My Bacon number is 4, and my Satoshi number is lower!
So I'm not Kevin Bacon, but I may be Satoshi.
|
|
|
You can much more easily publish data via the blockchain w/o OP_RETURN, and furthermore, you can easily put that data in to the UTXO set which all nodes *must* have if they are to maintain consensus.
Mike Hearn suggested we adopt blacklists to solve this problem back when someone put the child porn sections of the hidden wiki into the UTXO set; no-one's come up with a better solution since. You can make publishing that data more expensive by a small linear factor - about 10x to 100x - but that's the best you can do.
The best solution to this problem is legal and political: the idea that you have to prevent every last trace of "illegal data" from getting into a public ledger is absurd.
I absolutely agree that the problem is a legal/political one. Attempting to use technical solutions for legal/political problems is not always a recipe for success.
|
|
|
Do you think this is a real threat?
No. There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control. If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all. The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users. Limiting fraud is a benefit. Not for the fraudsters.
|
|
|
Nope. That's not how it works.
Now I am not quite understanding what you mean by that's not how it works? I asked: Is it becoming to difficult to get that amount of blocks in that amount of time? I am under the impression that the difficulty makes it harder to find a block, which would increase the time that it takes to discover 1 block, or say, 2016 blocks, are you telling me that is not how it works? It is set up such that a block will be found approximately every ten minutes. If there were only two miners with equal capability, they would each find a block about every twenty minutes. The higher the difficulty level, the harder it is for any one miner to find a block. The difficulty level is calculated by taking into account the entire network hashpower, such that the entire network will find a block about every ten minutes. I am under the impression that the difficulty makes it harder to find a block, which would increase the time that it takes to discover 1 block, or say, 2016 blocks, are you telling me that is not how it works?
It does make it harder for a miner to find a block, but the whole network finds a block about every ten minutes.... that's the "constant".
|
|
|
I am aware of that as I stated in my original post.
But for the last 1.5 years it has been almost like clockwork at 12 days. I don't think it has ever taken 13 days. My question was mostly, Is it finally becoming too hard to get that many blocks in this amount of time?
Nope. That's not how it works.
|
|
|
How is Bitcoin benefiting for large merchants like Overstock and whatnot if all they do is exchange for FIAT and pay with FIAT to everyone involved? Is this really helping the btc economy, hindering it or neutral? The only direct positive thing for bitcoin is the advertisement a big brand like Overstock creates.
Overstock actually keeps 10% or so in bitcoin.
|
|
|
Hahaha I remember when bitcoin first reached $1, and it made many people START believing.
|
|
|
I merged it because it works.. however, that plugin still needs to be polished and tested.
I just downloaded 2.0 from git on a Linux Mint 17, and there is no option for Trezor under "plugins", although there appears to be a trezor.py file in the plugins folder... it just isn't showing in the GUI. Is there something I have to do to "import" the Trezor plugin or something? you have to create a new wallet After tinkering around a bit, the Trezor plugin now shows under the plugin menu, but it is "greyed out". It says that github/python-trezor is required, but that is already downloaded and installed, as far as I know. I am not getting any option to use the Trezor when I create a new wallet, nor when I restore from a seed.
|
|
|
I merged it because it works.. however, that plugin still needs to be polished and tested.
I just downloaded 2.0 from git on a Linux Mint 17, and there is no option for Trezor under "plugins", although there appears to be a trezor.py file in the plugins folder... it just isn't showing in the GUI. Is there something I have to do to "import" the Trezor plugin or something?
|
|
|
Are there any plans to create a subforum for TREZOR?
There are plans for other clients to become compatible with TREZOR devices, and it would be handy to have one place where that information may be found.
|
|
|
For others who may be having this issue, I got it solved by adding
listen=1
to my bitcoin.conf file.
|
|
|
When I have Bitcoin Core running, Armory tells me to close it so it can do its thing, but when I close it, it says that Bitcoin Core doesn't appear to be installed.
What's going on here?
|
|
|
How about a QR tatoo?
That might get a little...ehm...distorted over time in jail. Actually, less than 3% of inmates are ever raped in jail. Prison rape is deliberately exaggerated to keep everyone terrified of prison. Do you mean "less than 3% of inmates are ever raped in jail"? Or "less than 3% of inmates admit to being raped in jail"?
|
|
|
Any chance that this is part of the stash confiscated by the US govt? Unlikely I suppose given the message  Doubtful that the entity that owns that private key also wrote that message.
|
|
|
well, Mercury is retrograde.
|
|
|
Next stop Uranus, prepare...  Yeah, except, thats Saturn. No, it's Uranus.
|
|
|
Keyword garble to trick automated sentiment trading bots?
Haha, that's a thought!
|
|
|
|