Who is the manipulator? The person selling, or the person not buying?

BTC is going back to < 200 IMHO because that is where miner profit is and the Chinese Ponzi ended. Perhaps we will see mid 100's Q1 2016 again.

Thank you for your support.

 

This just made my day 

Regards

Goldmaxx

No one asked you about your coins, you did it on your own behalf. If you want to be taken seriosly in the future, you MUST prove it on the blockchain so we could move forward, otherwise you will be branded as a BS spreader and liar. I highly doubt you own that much VNL, but you act like a spoiled child anyway, such behavior is unworthy. Where is your cheerleading attitude?


For a person with a big bag you strangely feel sad on the price increase.

If you still have any it will be a disaster, if you continue to hold and spit poison in the future, Dave. Dump it now and buy YOVI.

I'm a bigger VNL whale, so you better do what I said.

        PS this is BS too, couldn't resist

Justin Frankel and Tom Pepper invented Gnutella while working @ AOL (they bought winamp + shoutcast). AOL shutdown the project when they found out so they told AOL to go fsck themselves and abandoned Gnutella. The Gnutella protocol was reverse engineered within weeks and within a year there was upwards of 25 independent code bases. People did not copy/paste back then(like in crypto-currency), there was no such thing as clones in file sharing except those that disabled adware, etc. I personally know Bram Cohen and so no I did not invent BitTorrent either. I personally know Jed MccaLeb but no I did not invent Edonkey2000. Mr. King invented Peercoin. Sean invented Napster and I personally know the Macster team that later became part of core Napster in California. Limewire(NYC near ED2K) is JAVA so I did not invent it or have relations with their staff. I think I covered your list. The only ones I have not contributed to are Limewire and I've never submitted a pull request to Peercoin or Bitcoin.

Thank you for your support.

This is inconsistent with reality. Bitcoin is a miners market, meaning it is worth what it cost to mine. Periodically we have these pumps and always have. The miners are waiting to dump and when they do it's back to ~200 where electricity cost to bitcoin output ratio is normalised. I highly doubt BTC will be over 400 even in 365 days from now unless the mining hardware situation changes.

Thank you for your support.

Bitshares has/aims for 100000 TPS

https://bitshares.org/blog/2015/06/08/measuring-performance/

Hi dygus.  Welcome to the DGB discussion and community.

You could also look at the recent videos posted by Jared.  

Start here:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6SxmDmUvIk

And, then, an update:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4JFALjythE

For a general overview of DigiByte's core services you could look at the overview on the DigiByte Group's website here:

https://digibytegroup.com/learn-about-digibyte/

However, I know that that page needs a bit of updating to include some new information related to DigiByteGaming, the (soon-to-be-released) DigiByte Marketplace, and also some general updates about DigiSpeed.  I'll probably hold off fully updating the website until the release of DigiSpeed.  I've been working on a complete website update for the DGB Group.  I'm hoping to have it completed within the coming month.

any update regarding the fork any planned date set?

Yes, the example here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin is flawed and like most implementations you can match inputs and outputs because the denominations differ.

Dark++ is a framework, so it will come in stages.

Thank you for your support.

Ok mate. Your single and only argument in the sentence is Digibyte which was just pumped 2 weeks ago after being down for months and it is already retracing.

Meanwhile my arguments were:


All of the above mentioned projects do marketing and all of them had higher volumes Daily/weekly/monthly than what DGB had. Your argument is invalid. DGB could only pump because there were months of heavy accumulation, people like you are blind thinking a project pumps because of some random spam on twitter.

The way I see it, PR and development should go hand in hand...
Unless your product is still in the development phase and isn't sold in stores yet, PR is a crucial factor for the future succes of your product.

IF VNL wasn't trading already on Poloniex and Trex, I could agree with the fact that PR should come later.
BUT, VNL is a product sold in stores, thus needs PR, even though it is still in the development phase.

VNL can be an awesome succes, but I think, as with all succesfull companies, VNL needs a PR department.
John is the most awesome developer out there, but the worst PR person I could think of.

The only way I can find a logic in that behaviour is to artificially keep the price down during develoment phase.
This could be a dangerous strategy though and it will be hard to change peoples perspective towards VNl in the future.

I'm not saying we should hype VNL to death, but some healthy, honest PR wouldn't do us wrong for sure...

Just my two cents...

Regards

Goldmaxx

Did you read my last comment? Just asking because you actually suggest again that promotion in itself will help in this market.

It's easy to skip facts and spam the same comment again, right?

This is inconsistent with reality. Bitcoin is a miners market, meaning it is worth what it cost to mine. Periodically we have these pumps and always have. The miners are waiting to dump and when they do it's back to ~200 where electricity cost to bitcoin output ratio is normalised. I highly doubt BTC will be over 400 even in 365 days from now unless the mining hardware situation changes.

Thank you for your support.

VNL is the first coin that I advocate buying it as the price falls...

Normally price drops like this happen after huge news that has no follow up.

VNL, on the other hand only has low buyer support.

There does not seem to be any risk in project abandonment.
And the tech is better than any other coin.

I have never been this optomistic while watching prices drop.

You are just pissed that you lost money. Welcome in the crypto world, son. If there is someone who gained some profit, then there is also someone who lost his money. And if you are a daytrader, you also did a bad job.

if you still have VNL, then have faith. if you sold them, then yes, you lost your money. Get over it.

My problem is the short sight of the people, everyone should understand that we are not going to pump in another few months and John is capable of releasing another few innovative features meanwhile. No point in demanding or being negative prior to that, no one told these people that they will get rich instantly. I'm not asking for faith, I'm asking people to open their eyes. If this doesn't work out sooner or later you can just leave altcoins alltogether because it will be pointless to invest into anything.

This is a long term investment and John isn't going anywhere from the looks of it.