that explorer's main/recent block page is a bit deceptive. the hash it displays is for the last (possibly only) transaction in the block and not the block itself.
if you enter the block number into the search box you will then be shown the block's actual hash along with all the transaction hashes contained within the block.

dumb question, anyone know what is the point of all this newbie comment spam? are they trying to build up activity points to be able to do something more nefarioius in the forums?
if forum creators/moderators made a point of deleting these spam, would it prevent whatever gains the nefarious ones are trying to make?

automatic backups to the same hard-drive are almost no value, automatic backups to any drive on the same system is not much more value. think house-theft or fire or children or lightning surge through your network cable.

automatic backups create massive complacency. people need to put active thought into their backup and restore procedures if they expect them to be there and working when needed.

then there is the *security* of your backups if sent elsewere. for example automate sending of all the wallet non-zero value privkeys via email somewhere may seem useful at first blush. but so totally prone to interception it's not funny.

wow. these posting spams are getting more and more contrived.

it does seem dangerous that my (correct time) linux daemon/wallet was immediately accepting blocks generated 1 hour into the future. they should have been ignored (at least until the correct time catches up to the block's time.)

ideally in the future we're on several exchanges so we dont get screwed over when one exchange decides to have 'issues.'

one possible reason is you are trying to send a large amount from a wallet with lots of small entries. it gets too big/complex for the maximum blocksize.
try sending a half-sized amount (to yourself if you dont want to involve other people's wallets for this test, this will 'consolidate' a lot of those tiny amounts.)

i'm noticing new blocks arriving timestamped 1 hour into the future the last couple days.
i turned off my daemon and going to wait a few days.

nlexch.com may be a good place to list. its free.
sure, its low volume, but volumes on that exchange should naturally grow as it gets
a greater variety of coins.

https://www.nlexch.com/coinlisting

the exchange has already saved my butt with franko, new-casino and dnotes2

nlexch.com may be a good place to list. its free.
sure, its low volume, but volumes on that exchange should naturally grow as it gets
a greater variety of coins.

https://www.nlexch.com/coinlisting

the exchange has already saved my butt with franko, new-casino and dnotes2

nlexch.com may be a good place to list. its free.
sure, its low volume, but volumes on that exchange should naturally grow as it gets
a greater variety of coins.

https://www.nlexch.com/coinlisting

the exchange has already saved my butt with franko, new-casino and dnotes2

last week i was noticing a distinct bug where my connected miners were not showing up at all.
i disconnect the miners, and a while later they would show up on h2c and stay ghost-connected for the
same duration i really had them connected earlier. it was some serious lag in web page reporting on the order
of 20 minutes or so.

a young coin has appeared on tradesatoshi called Capitalcoin using the ticker CAP

eeesh.

thanks!
are there 2 connectors per board? so i either do controller+2 or controller+4 and not +3 ?

it's been 14 days (10 working days) and bitmain hasnt shipped my power supply i ordered at the
same time as an L3+ (power supply "shipping within 7 working days after full payment".)

yet they have shipped my L3+ yesterday (march batch, yayyyy)

so, will it cause any damage to the L3+ to only power up the controller and 3 other connectors
(4 out of 9 connectors) using a lower power supply i already have?

how about using two different supplies to power up more connectors?

the problem with crowd-sourcing a fund collection to pay for exchange listing(s) is who do you trust?
i'd be willing to host a dedicated firewalled wallet for such a purpose, but why would anyone have trust/faith in me?
i'd also suggest funds be collected in low-fee established currencies and regulary converted to BTC (eg: LTC, BCH, Doge options offered as well as BTC.) regular rather than last-minute conversion allows for averaging the market cost of BTC and hopefully avoiding any nasty peak pricing just when we wish to pay the exchange.
and how would excess funds be handled?

hmmm, perhaps instead of hosting a private firewalled wallet, a dedicated new account on an exchange (cryptopia?) to host the wallets and allow conversions to BTC without extra transfer-to-exchange fee costs?

has anyone got https: working for accessing and configuring the L3+ ?

i have to traverse an insecure network (a network i dont have control over) and would prefer
not to have my L3 logon credentials in plain view of the network.

the original post still refers to Cryptsy of all places.
perhaps removing dead links would lead to less of an amateur show appearance.

i too have had a bad issues with a couple wallets on yobit and zero response to tickets.

you do realize this is NOT 'CAP' coin, right?
it's a new coin, inspired when the original CAP had some issues.
this coin will be changing its name and ticker soon.

and so what if its a scam, pretty much most altcoins are scams or failures just waiting to happen. welcome to crypto!

would you like to PAY for an exchange listing?