|
I'm talking about the fact that now there are payment systems, such as CryptoPay. What's the point of creating a whole bunch of same-type exchangers, if there is a service that integrates the project of any direction and works well with it?
|
|
|
|
A full-time dedicated security team has been enlisted to safeguard all vulnerable information at all
times. 95% of cryptocurrency deposits will be stored in offline wallets to minimise potential loss
due to hacking. Regular security audits by penetration specialists have been scheduled to ensure
the security system is fully up to date. In addition, third party monitoring systems have been
implemented for all servers with automatic shutdown mechanisms in cases of detected intrusion.
I always thought that this is the most effective defense, since in the era of modern technology and advanced computer fraud in the event of an unexpected hacking there will be nobody to stop the intruders What difference does it make if the majority of exchangers are closed now anyway? |
|
|
|
Most recently, I was looking for interesting threads on this forum, and I found a couple of interesting projects with exchangers, on which the protection of the client
I do not understand what it means to protect the client? Maybe it's better, or worse, than in this project? How can you understand your expression? Speech unequivocally goes about more perfect protection of the transaction, as well as the purse of the person who chose the exchanger as the main one on which it will produce trades And what's wrong with protecting this project? it is no worse than the protection of other similar platforms, I would even add that it is copied from the other exchangers On other exchangers, very different protocols and the level of protection. on some of them already introduced two-factor authentication, as well as verification of the identity Authentication is a smart enough step to improve the level of platform protection, but I think that verification is completely useless, since the main plus of any exchanger is anonymity I agree with you. Anonymity is a very important quality for any currency exchange, as in some countries crypto currency is banned at all |
|
|
|
Most recently, I was looking for interesting threads on this forum, and I found a couple of interesting projects with exchangers, on which the protection of the client
I do not understand what it means to protect the client? Maybe it's better, or worse, than in this project? How can you understand your expression? Speech unequivocally goes about more perfect protection of the transaction, as well as the purse of the person who chose the exchanger as the main one on which it will produce trades And what's wrong with protecting this project? it is no worse than the protection of other similar platforms, I would even add that it is copied from the other exchangers |
|
|
|
And what specifically in this project is undertaken to achieve maximum protection of the seller and the buyer? What is the innovation and competitive advantage of this platform relative to the rest?
Try reading the white paper, guys. The second part describes many ways to protect your wallet against various types of aggression, and each time the algorithms hit What example is there an algorithm? Suppose, if a transaction is made using the service COTI, the server is attacked by a ddos attack... |
|
|
|
|
to be honest, I completely did not understand why this system surpasses the usual crypto currency exchangers? It is absolutely the same exchanger with small features
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the main thing is for the development team to take care of the security of my data. It will be very insulting if their system does not survive the simplest attack and all the data that was passed on to the client will fall into the wrong hands
Inaccessibility of Private Data Traditional machine learning requires datasets to be uploaded to a dedicated server. Due to privacy concern, massive amount of private data stored in individual devices is untapped. In fact, I think that the developers made the mistake of sending algorithms of machine analysis to user devices. Yet mobile devices are not so perfect, and processing will take a long time It would be better to assign the solution of these algorithms to the miners, and also pay them a small commission, which would be enough to pay back the costs of the farm. In this case, the developers would not be able to create an environment where personal data does not go away from users' devices. This is also not a good solution Well, if network performance really increases in that case .. Then it will not be a bad decision. In that case, why does not anyone run the network of devices? Because it is not as productive as mining with the farm's GPU, for example, or with ASIC Actually, there is a project that seems to be called the world-wide Wi-Fi. In it for the provided Internet traffic, through a single router, all users of the network farm crypt for the owner of the network All because for the transfer of reports between user devices it is not necessary to spend a lot of traffic, but each modern phone has sufficient characteristics to solve the algorithm It's right! But it's all about the operating system of a mobile device, I believe. Write a program and firmware for the Android operating system - it's easy, and the rest will need to look for an approach .. |
|
|
|
Yeah, the main thing is for the development team to take care of the security of my data. It will be very insulting if their system does not survive the simplest attack and all the data that was passed on to the client will fall into the wrong hands
Inaccessibility of Private Data Traditional machine learning requires datasets to be uploaded to a dedicated server. Due to privacy concern, massive amount of private data stored in individual devices is untapped. In fact, I think that the developers made the mistake of sending algorithms of machine analysis to user devices. Yet mobile devices are not so perfect, and processing will take a long time It would be better to assign the solution of these algorithms to the miners, and also pay them a small commission, which would be enough to pay back the costs of the farm. In this case, the developers would not be able to create an environment where personal data does not go away from users' devices. This is also not a good solution Well, if network performance really increases in that case .. Then it will not be a bad decision. In that case, why does not anyone run the network of devices? Because it is not as productive as mining with the farm's GPU, for example, or with ASIC |
|
|
|
Yeah, the main thing is for the development team to take care of the security of my data. It will be very insulting if their system does not survive the simplest attack and all the data that was passed on to the client will fall into the wrong hands
Inaccessibility of Private Data Traditional machine learning requires datasets to be uploaded to a dedicated server. Due to privacy concern, massive amount of private data stored in individual devices is untapped. In fact, I think that the developers made the mistake of sending algorithms of machine analysis to user devices. Yet mobile devices are not so perfect, and processing will take a long time Special for u: Centralization of Processing Power Nowadays, machine learning is mainly conducted through a centralized computer, which its processing power is usually limited or confined to the processors of a single machine. Yes, he's right. Developers on the contrary thought about this issue thoroughly and came to the conclusion that it would be better if the algorithm was handled by each device separately |
|
|
|
Yeah, the main thing is for the development team to take care of the security of my data. It will be very insulting if their system does not survive the simplest attack and all the data that was passed on to the client will fall into the wrong hands
No, this will not happen, since you will not send photos in ordinary form to anyone. This has already been written many times on the forum and spoken in white paper |
|
|
|
|
There are few types of DML Protocol participants. How will each of the participant types use the test?
Customers
Companies, research institutions, governments or non-governmental organizations
request machine learning algorithms for prediction reports.
Algorithm Developers
Create algorithms and request for fine-tuning of algorithms. Algorithm creations
are decentralized and crowdsourced in developer community.
Layers of Decentralized Nodes
Distributing Nodes deliver algorithms, Federated Nodes aggregate results,
Report Nodes produce reports and Algo Refining Nodes improve algorithms.
4 Data Owners
Contribute idle processing power and allow access of private datasets of their
devices for local prediction results, participate in fine-tuning of algorithms.
|
|
|
|
Hello! I have a topic for discussion. Who do you think will benefit from this platform?
Very good question! I believe that now there is no one who would be interested in this platform, since despite the movement in the project, the team was never able to catch up on its road map Why do you think the project team does not manage to fulfill the tasks of its road map? They also created a closed beta version of their platform, as promised APR 2018 Token Generation Event and Launch of DML Protocol Gen 0 (DML Algo Marketplace) Beta Where is that? But now it's only the beginning of April, what are you talking about? After all, in fact, if you consider that the prototype is already somewhere out there, because it has already been shot review videos, then soon there really will be a beta test of the marketplace |
|
|
|
Hello! I have a topic for discussion. Who do you think will benefit from this platform?
Very good question! I believe that now there is no one who would be interested in this platform, since despite the movement in the project, the team was never able to catch up on its road map |
|
|
|
I like the concept, but I still don’t get one thing. Why would people share their private info with someone else? Will they do it only because it is a good idea?
It isn’t right. Have you read the white paper or something? All advantages are described on the web site and in technical documentation. Yes, I understand. You want to say about the bonuses and other stuff. What about the security? You’ve named only one big plus of the system for data owners. Also they will get a possibility to use those algorithms that will be provided thanks to that shared info. Security is guaranteed. Are you sure? Nobody wants to share history of his browser, for example. You are funny. That’s why they are using blockchain. In addition, developers will use only summary information without any personalization. These features will provide security of private data. |
|
|
|
I like the concept, but I still don’t get one thing. Why would people share their private info with someone else? Will they do it only because it is a good idea?
It isn’t right. Have you read the white paper or something? All advantages are described on the web site and in technical documentation. Yes, I understand. You want to say about the bonuses and other stuff. What about the security? You’ve named only one big plus of the system for data owners. Also they will get a possibility to use those algorithms that will be provided thanks to that shared info. Security is guaranteed. |
|
|
|
I like the concept, but I still don’t get one thing. Why would people share their private info with someone else? Will they do it only because it is a good idea?
It isn’t right. Have you read the white paper or something? All advantages are described on the web site and in technical documentation. |
|
|
|
Omg. They give 30% of the bounty pool for signature. I think it is too much. Maybe they should change their mind about it.
Why? I think it is a logic decision. What allocation supposed to be better in your opinion? I think blogs and media are more interesting for popularization of the project. Some videobloggers could make short and informative videos. People like to watch them Maybe you are right. They give for this a big part of the pool too. Do you think they need to raise it? I think it would be wonderful. The project is very promising. It shares the idea of new type of energy distribution, so I think, it deserves to be well-known. |
|
|
|
Omg. They give 30% of the bounty pool for signature. I think it is too much. Maybe they should change their mind about it.
Why? I think it is a logic decision. What allocation supposed to be better in your opinion? I think blogs and media are more interesting for popularization of the project. Some videobloggers could make short and informative videos. People like to watch them |
|
|
|
|
Omg. They give 30% of the bounty pool for signature. I think it is too much. Maybe they should change their mind about it.
|
|
|
|
But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long
This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all! Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github? He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it? Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment And for what we pay money? we invest in some obscure platform that abstractly should help businessmen with market analysis through machine learning The project description is available in the white paper of the project. Read it, please, and you will not have questions about what exactly this project does. Visualization here does not hurt, I agree .. That's it! Visualization is something that no modern project can do without. The video is of course also good, but it would be better if everyone had the opportunity to use the product |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
