But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long
This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all! Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github? He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it? Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment |
|
|
|
But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long
This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all! Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github? |
|
|
|
But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long
This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all! |
|
|
|
I went to the github and read about what the latest modifications of the project were made by the authors of the project. I do not understand, the project will run, or not?
How did you decide that the project will not be launched? To be honest, I do not follow the updates on the githaba, but I'm wondering why you decided that the project will not develop? |
|
|
|
Design is certainly good, but what do you say on the technical side of the project? Do you think that the project is really needed today?
I believe not. This project is the next exchanger, and as for me, the best exchanger that is at the stage of ICO is this LocalCoinSwap. I would argue, because in fact - these are the same projects, just this project has not yet collected the right amount of funds, and it does not have such a profound history I think that the history of the project is not so important, since any project always has such parameters as its security and the problems it solves And what problems does this project solve? again all the same problems in the issues of the cryptonopoly of individual electronic exchangers that do not give a chance to smaller exchangers? |
|
|
|
guys, the fact is that this script has no restriction on creating polygons, and therefore, in order for the site to stop functioning - it's enough to click on the cap a hundred times, and further work is possible only after the page is reloaded
I clicked already 100 times and nothing. After a certain time, I stopped creating polygons, and I just clicked aimlessly Try changing the location of the cursor (you can play by accelerating the polygons with the cursor) - and by moving the cursor you should click the mouse This is how I got my browser to crash. At the same time, reloading the page was not possible, I had to kill the browser in the task manager Wow, this is very strange. Why do you think this can happen? Really so lags the server on which there is a site? or the problem in the comp of each of us? |
|
|
|
guys, the fact is that this script has no restriction on creating polygons, and therefore, in order for the site to stop functioning - it's enough to click on the cap a hundred times, and further work is possible only after the page is reloaded
I clicked already 100 times and nothing. After a certain time, I stopped creating polygons, and I just clicked aimlessly Try changing the location of the cursor (you can play by accelerating the polygons with the cursor) - and by moving the cursor you should click the mouse |
|
|
|
Great project, a strong team. I wish the project luck and further development. They solve very important questions. I really appreciate this approach
I agree! And I also liked the site of the project, and the animation in the header of the site. Very interesting performance. Although this is not an innovative design solution) Are you talking about this animated site header on scripts? have you tried clicking on this cap several times? The script is written in such a way that when the mouse is clicked, new polygons are formed that adhere to the already existing ones Yes, I tried to click now. It's pretty funny, but what did you want to say? You did not mean just beautiful site design, right? |
|
|
|
|
Great project, a strong team. I wish the project luck and further development. They solve very important questions. I really appreciate this approach
|
|
|
|
When COTI is going to start there bounty program??
It's already on, is not it? see the link in the answers section on the project website. She was exactly there, if you need, then I'll write you her right away |
|
|
|
It really sounds great! No project now can not boast of such information publicity, very strong information coverage
I'm not so sure. With the exception of mentioning in Forbes (and in fact I'm not sure that this is the only project that was mentioned there) - other projects also keep up with information noise Yes? and which project was still described in the INC.COM? This is a serious media, and the rest of the resources are simply insignificant compared to even a sensational forbes! I'm not agree with you! Any information will reach its recipient if it is launched into the masses at least somewhere! Otherwise, the information will be lost among other info-guides This is very interesting, why now when I see other media, except for FORBS - I notice them only reading, but forbs - as if screaming at me from the screen of the monitor! |
|
|
|
|
It really sounds great! No project now can not boast of such information publicity, very strong information coverage
|
|
|
|
|
About this project and the truth was written in Forbes? It's very cool, if it's true. Is there a link to the article, or issue number of the magazine?
|
|
|
|
Do you think it's worth investing your money in the development of the project? Is it possible to earn money on this and how much?
I have invested and do not regret! The project is very good about after launch, tokens will cost more, so at this stage it's worth doing It is still possible to return your money. Since the service can not always be of high quality, even though the project is only just starting How will you return your money if you have already received the service? If you have already paid for something and got the result, then the service worked as it was prescribed There is such a thing as the reviews and feedback. What will other users of the system say if they see that the service produces incorrect reports? Will they remain users of this product? You're right, negative feedback is a great mechanism that stimulates the work of any manufacturer, whether it's an auto giant, or a small grocery store I think that you exaggerate the strength of the reviews. The auto giant can easily remove your reviews from any resource, since it has huge connections, and a small store has a number of regular customers who do not care what you write on your forum Nevertheless, there are leaders of opinions to which the majority will listen. Often, they use services from anonymous accounts to avoid the subjectivity of the project team. Opinion leaders are a powerful tool, but even their reviews can often be bought, although they are expensive |
|
|
|
Do you think it's worth investing your money in the development of the project? Is it possible to earn money on this and how much?
I have invested and do not regret! The project is very good about after launch, tokens will cost more, so at this stage it's worth doing It is still possible to return your money. Since the service can not always be of high quality, even though the project is only just starting How will you return your money if you have already received the service? If you have already paid for something and got the result, then the service worked as it was prescribed There is such a thing as the reviews and feedback. What will other users of the system say if they see that the service produces incorrect reports? Will they remain users of this product? You're right, negative feedback is a great mechanism that stimulates the work of any manufacturer, whether it's an auto giant, or a small grocery store |
|
|
|
Do you think it's worth investing your money in the development of the project? Is it possible to earn money on this and how much?
I have invested and do not regret! The project is very good about after launch, tokens will cost more, so at this stage it's worth doing It is still possible to return your money. Since the service can not always be of high quality, even though the project is only just starting How will you return your money if you have already received the service? If you have already paid for something and got the result, then the service worked as it was prescribed |
|
|
|
|
Are you seriously? can I get into the black list of the project?
And if I'm an investor, but at the same time I ruined my reputation, will I get my money back?
|
|
|
|
Okay, I get it. And how to get on the white list of the project? What do I need to do? Participate in the bounty program and help the project?
Look at the form to fill out. On the site you will see the link "white list" in the menu, there will be a form, in it your name and surname, links to your accounts in social networks and your contribution to the project Is it just necessary to become an investor in order to get on the white list? I thought there was a right guy who wrote that to get on the white list of the project you need to help in his development But in any case, the contribution at the ISO stage is a huge help to the project. There are already no two opinions, money now is the best help to the project. I disagree. The project always has 2 resources: it's money and the media. If there is at least one, then the second will necessarily appear. A very true statement. If there is a media - they pull up the clientele, which invests money. If there is money, then you can pull the media through them It sounds of course real, but more for a normal project, connected with the purchase of a sale or other business. In the crypto currency market, it has long been the view that schemes for conventional projects run at 10 percent Nothing like this. The project is a project, and nothing new in fact people came up with, creating a block chain. It's just a way to store and transfer data, and otherwise everything is the same |
|
|
|
Okay, I get it. And how to get on the white list of the project? What do I need to do? Participate in the bounty program and help the project?
Look at the form to fill out. On the site you will see the link "white list" in the menu, there will be a form, in it your name and surname, links to your accounts in social networks and your contribution to the project Is it just necessary to become an investor in order to get on the white list? I thought there was a right guy who wrote that to get on the white list of the project you need to help in his development But in any case, the contribution at the ISO stage is a huge help to the project. There are already no two opinions, money now is the best help to the project. I disagree. The project always has 2 resources: it's money and the media. If there is at least one, then the second will necessarily appear. |
|
|
|
|
Okay, I get it. And how to get on the white list of the project? What do I need to do? Participate in the bounty program and help the project?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
