You're right.  Pool operators should provide all of this information to miners, but certainly not on a real time basis as that would have the potential to negatively affect the profitability of the pool.  Should it ever become necessary to audit their claims, all one would need to do is compare their stated results to the the public block chains.  24-48 hour delayed data would likely be suitable to the purpose.

Show me a pool operator who utilizes an efficient profitability algorithm _AND_ makes this data available for all, and I will show you the pool operator who will attract most of the scrypt miners on the planet.

It's based on accepted shares. I know it's not perfect, but I think it doesn't make sense to base it on accepted+rejected as some malicious traffic flooding with invalid shares might easily skew the numbers. It can't do it when the stats are based on accepted hasrate.

Of course it's legit. There are ongoing payouts to users based on these numbers.

I agree that the only coin that has similar average long-term profitability is DOGE. But the whole point of coin-switching pool is to pick up a coin that only temporarily has good profitability and then switch to another coin that suddenly started being profitable. This is what this pool does.

Actually we're not even mining DOGE at all. We have too little hashpower for this. All these results come from other coins than DOGE. I really hope that we'll grow quickly to a point where we could start including DOGE as well.

No, we have to manually transfer money from our Cryptsy wallet to our own so that we can make payouts redeemable. As long as your estimated and confirmed balance are going up while you mine, then there is nothing wrong.

EDIT: You can read the whole process here: https://hashbros.co.in/blog/2014/estimated-balance-confirmed-balance-redeemable-balance

This is a very nice looking site.  I am impressed

I will be switching a miner over in a few to test it out 

And what if that block get orphaned? I was mining DOGE at https://dog.cryptoworld.eu/statsAuth we were counting on block for 106 Hours 10 Minutes and it get orphaned. Another took 49 Hours 3 Minutes oh shit.. Pool had about 200Mh/s in that time. The most of power of that pool is back to LTC now.

For me HashBros logic to mine easy coins until pool gets bigger works perfectly. I've earned here 0.170BTC just from 31.1. with around 2Mhs power. A miracle! compared to my previous experiences. Thanks

But please fix that lagging web interface.

I think you will notice that the link you posted is not even the one for my pool...

I really doubt there is any need for that kind of language!

I don't know loads about it, just what I've read on this forum and over at reddit etc, there's a bit of stuff here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/wafflepool/comments/1wc5si/realtime_profitability_and_hash_rates/cf21qwf?context=3
&
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg4880646#msg4880646
&
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg4880646#msg4880646

Yes I can see why it would scare people off because of the potential variance, but possibly make it scalable to compensate for the fear of increased variance - say that dogecoin because it is harder to find a block has to be 1.2x more profitable than the second most profitable coin, because then you are increasing your Emh/day by A LOT so long term it will attract more people to the pool.

Basically as phzi mentions, we only then mine the really profitable doge blocks not the ones 500k and below (since its known during mining) and we drop it when it decreases. Yes it will make some 15min mining blocks 0.00 payout, but you will have some bumper ones, and our Emh/day is WAY higher, maximising pool profitability, which in turn maximises attraction for others, and maximises the pool owners fees too, win win.
Making it say 1.2x higher than the others profitability sort of is middleground (you can make it 1.3x or 1.4x if you want to be more risk averse).

This is my point of view too, I go with overall profitability over variance avoidance. Yes we could be unlucky and not hit a doge or lotto block in which case the mh/day would be lower, but our expected mh/day would be higher, regardless of the variance. Hell it could go the other way and we could be lucky straight out the bat.
But i think what matters it the Emh/day (expected megahash per day) regardless of the variance involved (even with high diff coins).

I think the idea of multicoin mining is the maximise our expected payout. By joining a pool we also lower our variance comparatively to just multicoin mining by ourselves.
Dont think its just about more consistent payouts, but more consistent higher payouts which is what happens when you mine the highest profitability coin (be it doge lotto annon franko) regardless of difficulty (in the long run, or short run the variance evens out).

Funny how that question doesn't get asked then gets asked twice within 5 minutes, great minds think alike!
So currently we're not mining the higher difficulty coins because of fear of increased variance (even tho long term payout would be better), is there a way to display on the profitability page then, the coins that currently are unminable by our pool, so that when we go on we don't see say Dogecoin top, then Lotto second and wonder why instead we are mining the third choice coin at much lower profitability?
You could just put a line overlaying the whole of the coin to give the user an idea of what is and isn't currently possible.

Are you guys setup to predict the value of the next block for the various variable reward coins, yet?  (e.g. dogecoin, lottocoin)

Waiting for that before I give HashBros a try again, because calculating profitability based on average dogecoin reward make absolutely no sense at all.