The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Not at all! LocalCoinSwap is a democratic platform on which each participant has the right to vote, while each participant actually manages the policy of the platform! This is not true. The coining members of the project are whitelisted, get the right to vote and more opportunities to use the platform |
|
|
|
I like when project’s team is thinking about the community. It is so good when they create new interesting actions for users
What do you mean? You are talking about the bounty campaigns, or something else? No, I mean the photo contest that they launched on their facebook account. There you can win a big amount of LCS coins. The grand prize is 5000 LCS. OMG. It is so great. I need to participate in this contest. I hope I will have enough time to participate in it. What I need to do exactly? |
|
|
|
I like when project’s team is thinking about the community. It is so good when they create new interesting actions for users
What do you mean? You are talking about the bounty campaigns, or something else? |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. Of course, electricity is a productive resource that does not occur in living nature, in its pure form, but still, in modern life, electricity plays a huge role That's it, does not occur in its pure form in living nature. Then what kind of primaryity are you talking about? Do you think that before the appearance of electricity a person could not get fire for example? Of course they could, but we now live in the 21st century, I tell you this for information. Now the production of lighters and matches takes place on a conveyor, which is automated and electrified At the same time, the project will not be able to provide electricity for production facilities, which means that the concept of production for this project is not applicable Well, but the electricity stored for the day can be accumulated and given to third parties for a certain amount of money, right? That's right! Approximately so the system also works. Watch the video on the main page, the battery is given for use to recharge another battery, or to power one house I saw these videos and read the full support of the site on the information. I still think that without electricity it is impossible to develop further to all mankind I agree that electricity today is a great force with which humanity is moving forward. I very much hope that in the future the whole life will be electrified anyway But how to get so much electricity? its production is still limited resources, and if we take into account the electricity that is produced from unlimited resources, its production is not always faster |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. Of course, electricity is a productive resource that does not occur in living nature, in its pure form, but still, in modern life, electricity plays a huge role That's it, does not occur in its pure form in living nature. Then what kind of primaryity are you talking about? Do you think that before the appearance of electricity a person could not get fire for example? Of course they could, but we now live in the 21st century, I tell you this for information. Now the production of lighters and matches takes place on a conveyor, which is automated and electrified At the same time, the project will not be able to provide electricity for production facilities, which means that the concept of production for this project is not applicable Well, but the electricity stored for the day can be accumulated and given to third parties for a certain amount of money, right? That's right! Approximately so the system also works. Watch the video on the main page, the battery is given for use to recharge another battery, or to power one house |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. Of course, electricity is a productive resource that does not occur in living nature, in its pure form, but still, in modern life, electricity plays a huge role That's it, does not occur in its pure form in living nature. Then what kind of primaryity are you talking about? Do you think that before the appearance of electricity a person could not get fire for example? Of course they could, but we now live in the 21st century, I tell you this for information. Now the production of lighters and matches takes place on a conveyor, which is automated and electrified At the same time, the project will not be able to provide electricity for production facilities, which means that the concept of production for this project is not applicable |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. Of course, electricity is a productive resource that does not occur in living nature, in its pure form, but still, in modern life, electricity plays a huge role That's it, does not occur in its pure form in living nature. Then what kind of primaryity are you talking about? Do you think that before the appearance of electricity a person could not get fire for example? |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount |
|
|
|
Applications that write for the implementation of trading in the crypto currency market are generally poorly protected from hacker attacks and therefore are a vulnerable link in the transfer chain
This is not entirely true. Much depends on who writes this application. This can be either a good application with strong protection, or a bad one I agree! There are examples of applications that are "written on the knee," and now they are working poorly, although they are not trusted in terms of protection at all In fact of the matter is that if the project has collected 2.4 million dollars, then the developers I think have the opportunity to find outsource high-profile developers This is indeed so. You can find top developers if the team does not know how to make applications, and pay developer services out of the money that was collected |
|
|
|
Applications that write for the implementation of trading in the crypto currency market are generally poorly protected from hacker attacks and therefore are a vulnerable link in the transfer chain
This is not entirely true. Much depends on who writes this application. This can be either a good application with strong protection, or a bad one I agree! There are examples of applications that are "written on the knee," and now they are working poorly, although they are not trusted in terms of protection at all |
|
|
|
The developers did right when they updated the interface on the site, now it has become more convenient and beautiful, do you think?  I think that design is really not bad. But I think that for a project that raised $ 2.5 million - they do not have enough functionality What functional are you talking about? it seems to me that the organizers have included in the set of functions all the most necessary I think that it would not be bad to implement a mobile application, and it is desirable that it be cross-platform! This is too difficult for a project like locale coin svap, I think. In addition, why do you need a mobile application, if the platform works fine on the network? How, then, will the airdrop be realized? it would be much nicer if there was a mobile application that would facilitate this process |
|
|
|
The developers did right when they updated the interface on the site, now it has become more convenient and beautiful, do you think? I think that design is really not bad. But I think that for a project that raised $ 2.5 million - they do not have enough functionality |
|
|
|
It is another cryptocurrency on the market. Why developers think that it will be popular? What is it so special? I am just curious about it.
Most of all, it is currency that offers very fast transactions. I think it is a very important advantage. Many currencies have problems with transaction speed. I agree with you, but many of don’t have such problems too. Is there anything else that is different about GCC coins? The transactions fees will be collected for redistribution on different needs. Most of them will be donated for green projects that could help to save nature of our planet. I am sure this is very significant for our planet and GCC users. Yes, I like this idea. Maybe it will be really useful somehow. Can you tell me about the other part of transaction fees? How are they supposed to be redistributed? They will be redistributed for rewards to those who will help in development of GCC. Also, some of them will be used for marketing events, improving the system and other actions that will help to improve the system as well. Well, it sounds nice. I hope they will achieve all of their goals. This project offers a good security for cypto assets. I think it is more important than even donating currency for charity. It is more important for me. |
|
|
|
It is another cryptocurrency on the market. Why developers think that it will be popular? What is it so special? I am just curious about it.
Most of all, it is currency that offers very fast transactions. I think it is a very important advantage. Many currencies have problems with transaction speed. I agree with you, but many of don’t have such problems too. Is there anything else that is different about GCC coins? The transactions fees will be collected for redistribution on different needs. Most of them will be donated for green projects that could help to save nature of our planet. I am sure this is very significant for our planet and GCC users. Yes, I like this idea. Maybe it will be really useful somehow. Can you tell me about the other part of transaction fees? How are they supposed to be redistributed? |
|
|
|
It is another cryptocurrency on the market. Why developers think that it will be popular? What is it so special? I am just curious about it.
Most of all, it is currency that offers very fast transactions. I think it is a very important advantage. Many currencies have problems with transaction speed. I agree with you, but many of don’t have such problems too. Is there anything else that is different about GCC coins? |
|
|
|
|
It is another cryptocurrency on the market. Why developers think that it will be popular? What is it so special? I am just curious about it.
|
|
|
|
If he has an iPhone, then he has no reason to be afraid of something. It will not have viruses, which means that attackers can not perform brute force
At me just android, thanks for the offer. In this case, I will not store large sums in this purse, and transfer only easy money to it on transactions Install yourself applications for Windows and a good antivirus, and I think that you will not have problems. Great solution, by the way. If you are confused by the mobile platform, then on the platform for the desktop you will be able to find reliability and security |
|
|
|
"This poses a significant obstacle to potential attacks as the attacker would need to acquire the coins in some way, either by spending a lot of hashing power or by buying them."
I am a little confused by this formulation. Why does it seem to me that the project is not very good protection?
Why do not you like this wording? This is the standard phrase for most similar projects The fact that this algorithm will create an obstacle on the way to hackers, which in theory can be bypassed. To buy a coin to crack a wallet? very difficult.. Developers can insert any description, but everyone knows these protection algorithms - PoS and PoW. Each crypto currency exchanger somehow works with these systems Okay, this project is made for minor transactions, we will assume that there is no need for space protection in order for the application to work There is enough protection even if even if your wallet is hacked, you can not get money from it, as this will lead to their loss If the project has haters from among competitors, for example, they can easily crack several wallets and reset them to take away part of the target audience... Yes, it will be excellent to get an empty wallet) I understand you, man! But the protection of the project is not really bad, despite the fact that this mobile application If he has an iPhone, then he has no reason to be afraid of something. It will not have viruses, which means that attackers can not perform brute force |
|
|
|
"This poses a significant obstacle to potential attacks as the attacker would need to acquire the coins in some way, either by spending a lot of hashing power or by buying them."
I am a little confused by this formulation. Why does it seem to me that the project is not very good protection?
Why do not you like this wording? This is the standard phrase for most similar projects The fact that this algorithm will create an obstacle on the way to hackers, which in theory can be bypassed. To buy a coin to crack a wallet? very difficult.. Developers can insert any description, but everyone knows these protection algorithms - PoS and PoW. Each crypto currency exchanger somehow works with these systems Okay, this project is made for minor transactions, we will assume that there is no need for space protection in order for the application to work There is enough protection even if even if your wallet is hacked, you can not get money from it, as this will lead to their loss |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
