Because you, literally, refuse to acknowledge the fact that

is a purely legitimate statement.

And not one time have you offered to make it right for those whose currency was stolen.

The largest issue, here, is that no matter how many times the words are put on the screen, there seems to be a defense mechanism that kicks in whereby members of the centralized 5% and their fanboys fail to acknowledge that in order to "punish" 1 person that they feel was a "bad actor", currency was stolen from people that made legitimate transactions and currency was stolen from people that was mined through what these same people feel are is the only way to "legitimately mine"!

Those facts continue to go unrecognized.

If you "voted" for, or support(ed), the rollback, then you "voted" for, or support(ed), the theft of currency from those who weren't "bad actors" and had a legitimate ownership of that currency.

Again, more talking out of your ass.
I didn't "find" or "exploit" any-feken-thing.
I run a pool who's miners had their currency paid to them and that was literally stolen from later with the rollback.
These are people with overhead and bills and no currency to show for their efforts, because it was literally stolen from them by a backroom, social media "vote" from 5% of the community.

I've gotta say... These SAFE guys don't know what they're talking about.

I'm all for forking, go ahead fork KMD.

BUT... you better know what you're doing.

Have a competent developer who knows how to code, and maybe how to read code.

Anyone that is familiar with Komodo knows that there are 64 elected Notary Nodes, all of which get EASY DIFF MINING.

Now if you're going to fork Komodo, and not remove the pubkey's of the Elected KMD Notary Nodes, then guess what???

EASY DIFF MINING STILL EXISTS for KMD Notary Nodes.


No attack by KMD community or jl777.

All we have here are some smart people (elected kmd notaries with key's for the specified pub keys), and some dumb people (safe devs who left in pub keys in the code).


If the devs were competent enough to understand the coin they were forking, and to read the actual code, and know that the Elected Notaries have EASY DIFF MINING, then they could have either removed the KMD Notary Node pubkey's, or they could expect to have these individuals mine very easily.


Nothing here was an attack as Jl777 clearly pointed out.

If the SAFE community wants to learn anything at all.... its not to trust the SAFE DEVS with shit. 

And don't trust any crypto coin doing a ROLLBACK!


Thanks, xrobesx.

http://vote.xrobesx.co  to vote for me as a KMD Notary Node.

As opposed to the currency that was literally stolen from everyone with the roll back!
It should be disheartening for anyone in the space with any sense of decency that the people in this forum would liken mining at a low diff to "rape", but be completely fine with literally stealing valid currency out of people's wallets with a roll back

What happened the other day was an inadvertent triggering of a long forgotten bug. I stopped the mining at about 0.0001% of the full diff it would have gone to. Went into discord and explained all this and how to fix all the issues.

Within 24 hours I got the diff back down to what it was before I started mining and I estimate the total mining losses to be less than $1000.

All that had to be done at that point was resume mining and keep the chain intact with my having gotten a whopping 60,000 SAFE. Certainly the most inept attack every conducted. Get a small amount of coins, go in and publicly announce you did it, help the attack vector get fixed, and undo the high diff.

For thanks I am accused of attacking SAFE. If it were an attack I would have mined millions of coins and put the diff in the trillions. not just from 1 million to 10 million, but to trillions. Now that would be an attack. Even after the diff was to 10 million, the chain was still being mined, it wasnt forked. It was just temporary high diff like if a larger miner mined it for an hour. Really, no big deal in the big picture.

But your reaction to this has made it into a bigger deal. You made it clear that SAFE chain will be rolled back for arbitrary reasons and is not an immutable chain. You attack me incessantly believing that I am motivated by the money from getting SAFE.

Anyway, you now convinced me that I am like to attack SAFE. So I will.

To my mind you stole the notary mined coins, so I will get them back at some time in the future. This is my announcement of that. Feel free to keep rolling back the chain after each attack.

It was your choice to make me into an enemy.

Good luck.

You are convinced I attacked the SAFE chain, if so I would have just set the diff to a trillion and not said anything. my recollection is that diff was about a million when this all started

I am reducing the diff now, pretty rapidly. That is what I am doing. You are just making me upset and emotional. I am making a point that as it is now (un)SAFE allows anybody to set its difficulty at any arbitary level.

If you cant understand the point I am making, then not sure what more there is to be gained. Or you can continue to take my time and make me upset. Now the choices are 2 million diff or 2 billion. you choose.

do you need help in converting "komodo" to "safecoin"?
what exactly are you developing codewise
stop acting as a thief and trying to take credit for others work

also what diff do you want the SAFE chain to be left at? 1 million or 1 billion? your call

It is what it is. I saw notaries could mine. Started. realized (un)SAFE didnt have any of the fixes activated and stopped and asked others to stop.

this has nothing to do with ICOs

stop claiming you make improvements when it is just a cut and paste and I wont bother with (un)SAFE at all.

Who doesnt like coins? Is it wrong to mine SAFE?

Anyway, your constant badgering just makes me upset. As it is now all the notary mining is stopped and my fix to the diff issue that actually works without any forking or rollback is rapidly reducing the diff.

Just dont forget to add all the GPL notices that are required and dont make false claims about making improvements when you are just copy pasting and changing "komodo" to "safecoin". That alone might cause some problems in some areas but I have no mood to review the code for you

Also try to not deploy halfway forks with 1.5 year old fixes unactivated and if you are claiming dPoW then maybe having some notaries notarizing is a good idea? As it is you have no notarizations and the longest chain rule is in effect.

good luck, stop pestering me with complaints about some lost hours of mining. I saved your coin by finding this when it is just being mined. If I didnt, someone else would have after it was trading and the results would have been far worse

I just started notary mining as the coin said I could. I did not remember all the fixes made along the way and what would happen. looking at the code I thought maybe the notary mining might not even work, there was only one way to find out. What harm to mine some blocks?

Anyway, I explain in detail in my wall of text post, which apparently you did not read.

and $2 million was raised not $200 million, you are confusing marketcap with funds raised

For the hundredth time, no hashrate was purchased. The SAFE code is a cut and paste, including the KMD notary pubkeys. Anybody can mine without restrictions to those addresses and without the height activated fixes being activated, the prevention of this is inactive.

I did not realize this when I started notary mining as it was fixed over 1.5 years ago in KMD, but still alive in SAFE.

SAFE is no competition, SAFE is like a vulnerable little child that doesnt know not to stick his fingers into electric sockets. I try to help by my actions. If you actually thought beyond a few days mining rewards you will understand that.

My "stomp" was inadvertent, but it ends up exposing that none of the critical bugfixes over the history are activated in SAFE and there is no notarization and no dPoW active at all. Making false claims of improvements over my baseline, does make me emotional. Sorry, I seem to be human.

However, I did not fork the chain, no coins were lost. Critical vulnerabilities were found and I spent hours trying to help, but ignored and criticized.

So safecoin developers cannot fix this issue? what does that say about safecoin team?

If he really used an Attack to get that Coins, that is so bad from so many Angles.
Actually he drestroyed his own credibility + Komodo Credibility.
The Legal implication could be also very very harmful for him.

Looks like someone is in Trouble.

i used to like komodo, but after j1777's attack on safecoin, made on purpose, i think it's a shame for a coin with good tech to have such a shitty character leading it