-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Retina, DireWolfM14’s lending service, 21 APR 2019 Funding Address ETH: 0x49929FA95Fb7C0e24098E9A145D1c82968fdf0B1 BTC collateral Refund address: 3Cndc4UCK2rXBF41qyDeMd3peQFqGUejV9 Repayment date: 25-04-2019
This is Retina 24 APR 2019
Repayment Amount: 0.064
re-payment send address: 0x73fF544f3d5B6FE3A40cCD22fAad34fD3837560b
-Done-
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qajwxltf6gm3zryjh866qky9uu7drdjmeh94nnl
IOAz9V3zVBuEzwy7weFt/o8VcETqkq8lKkwWHJtlMbX0cOptr/5oVmb5BYJ5yN1OiMLgiHGHxFuONKvt1Gkud8E=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
i sent ETH: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x115022ca3ce9eaad4bda83eeb888d2ef55ba979a9d4df18dec0dff1f479b9c5dPlease BTC collateral Refund address: 3Cndc4UCK2rXBF41qyDeMd3peQFqGUejV9 Hi Retina, Your repayment has been received, and your collateral has been returned. Thanks for choosing me as your lender. TxId: e554112fb75afbcd9df15b03b91d7e4686eac6752c1c5c9fece77477baf76c94 |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Username: theyoungmillionaire
Loan Amount: 0.33 BTC
Collateral: None
Repayment date: 24 MAY 2019
Repayment Amount: 0.363 BTC, if less than 2 weeks 0.34122BTC to be paid as discuss via PM.
Funding Address: 35jR51b4MRoULgKwBD8sRXq8JnP4iG3vvz
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1young1tytJ9on6h3bSFTC9tAdBPg6P9i
HPhjSCHft4d5fQqaKESaO7dplC+nVciWAwxUrr9ZwseoZwWt2EavIc8Jk20tNUAjiUgYhwCm+dPYAkNnzJKiyjg=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Approved, and funded. Tx: 868b338261f097c6ad9782093e5261f107571dbb00cb7aa137e2017f85fa1a7a |
|
|
|
I guess you missed to add this guy, he only started April 19 unless you only place a lender who already gave a loan to a user here. This guy has none yet as of this moment. I didn't miss him, I just don't want to include newbies or Jr. members in the list. Even though I've clearly said that it's not an endorsement, I don't want to leave people vulnerable. If he's a legitimate lender, he'll likely rank up in no time and I'll add him then. |
|
|
|
Can you add a column that says when they started their lending service or giving out loans? This way it would help those who plans to borrow to determine knows who are in this business and if they plan to borrow they are confident that their collateral (if they will use one) will be safe. I wouldn't send any collateral to those who are new and without any trade history.
I'll work on that, but note the list is organized with the oldest services listed first. I'm using excel to create the table, and it wants to post dates as a numeric value. Frustrating, but I have a work around. I'll implement it when I have time. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk.org's List of Lenders:
Disclaimer:- This is not an endorsement, and the OP assumes no responsibility for any deal made with the lenders listed herein.
- Ensuring the safety of the borrower is the sole responsibility of the borrower.
- By using this list the borrower assumes all risk inherent in requesting a loan.
- Requesting a loan does not guaranty approval.
- The lowest advertised daily interest rate listed herein may not represent the rate for which you qualify.
- The list is organized by the age of the lender's thread, oldest first.
Inclusion:To be included in this list you must be Member rank or higher, and have neutral or positive trust. I will not include Newbies, Jr. Members, or any member who has a negative DT trust rating. If you would like to be included in this list please create a lending thread, include some terms and conditions of your services, and post a link to that thread here. If I missed your lending thread and you meet the above criteria, it was merely an oversight on my part, and I extend my apologies. If you wish to be excluded from this list please let me know by posting here or send a PM. If any of the above information is inaccurate please post here with any corrections you would like me to make, or send me a PM.
Resources:Education:[EDU] EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN LENDING TO USERS![EDU] The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" - IGNORE AT YOUR OWN RISK!What is considered collateral?Escrow Providers:Escrow ProvidersOther Resources:How to sign a message?!Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
|
|
|
|
Why all the fuss about "willingly locking my account"? Why not just stop posting from the account(s) you want to "lock"? What does theymos have to do with it if you decide to stop posting from those accounts? What's with the deadline of one to two weeks? Why does any of this matter to anybody reading the meta board?
Or, how about this: Don't go away and just play the hand you're dealt. Deal with your red-tags, accept the fact that some people are going to accuse you of doing things you may not have done, accept the fact that you Hilarious don't get along.
Grow a pair, and stop being such an attention whore.
|
|
|
|
This time last year someone hacked my account and changed my password. This is to say I have now got my account back. My temp account ThirdPrize2 will now become redundant.
Have I got any trust issues outstanding on this account? I can't see any.
Can you sign a message with this address: 1Di4b12bXWUTyyvHG8DXHs2hXJxe5jwyaNot that we're a bunch of skeptical cynics or anything, but you know... We're a bunch of skeptical cynics. Trust but verify. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This id my Bitcointalk accaunt! My! 24/04/2019
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1MikadoVmK6BtotcwM7SP1trcWeWPkMhAa
HPSStSRZhQwFDm0S8lT1SWDt4HLKzA9xSHKSM4n6QIIELO6T8uoChWEIt+4HcgrIpfsW+j7oUCHhF7M6F8nf2e4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Verified. |
|
|
|
Doesn't really matter now does it? Yobit signatures have been banned on the forum for the next 60 days And if they actually come back 60 days from now, I hope they hire a reputable manger who'll keep the spam to a minimum. Whoever that manager is, he'll have his hands full. I don't know if they intended to pump the forum with a bunch of spam just to get their name out, and get people talking about them, but think about the way this worked out for them: They had a tone of members spam the forum for a couple of days; the whole forum was in an uproar; 8 threads with Yobit in the subject were started just in the meta board. It'll be interesting to see if they actually come back 60 days from now. Hell, we'll be talking about them for another week at least. They're getting a shittone of free publicity just from all the chatter. The just scammed us for an advertising pump and dump. |
|
|
|
So we're gonna get 129 appeal threads now? The deluge ought to provide a few distractions from the incessant DT bashing and merit mafia malignment. I thought nobody in their right mind would attempt to impersonate a Yobit shitposter  Every AI has a set-back or two. Remember HAL9000? I thought it was harsh personally as I certainly wouldn't lump you in with the mass of yobit shitposters, but you were pushing your luck with the repeated off topic posts in my opinion.
I agree, in this particular case. Mday, and a few others should not to be lumped in with the mass of zombies that flocked to that shitshow, but unfortunately they'll likely have to swallow the pill with all the rest. If you're talking about Cryptohunter I would agree also. Not sure why he's currently feigning a ban though and trolling on other accounts but an admin should look into it. Is she banned, or just faking it? Obviously there's at least one new user with her style of ranting running around trying desperately to match Thule's red tags. |
|
|
|
Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.
I know I've mentioned this, but I'll refrain from tagging anyone for spamming, and follow your instructions. I'm glad that Yobit is in a time-out. Maybe next time they'll hire a manager rather than just encouraging a bunch of spammers to dust off their Sr. Member alts and plague to forum with shitposts. |
|
|
|
|
You found one user in one of Yahoo's campaigns who's posts you don't like, so Yahoo isn't a good manager? That's quite a stretch.
Yahoo has proven himself to be one of the better mangers here. Besides, the posts of that user you referenced aren't even that bad. I've seen much worse shitposts in paid campaigns.
|
|
|
|
What security risk exactly in involved by storing multiple chains of coins on one wallet? (Assuming they have replay protection that is.)
None that I know of, but I have never owned any BCH and don't plan to. My recommendation stems from the assumption that the OP is new to crypto, and keeping different chains on different wallets may be easier for neophytes to manage. |
|
|
|
|
Either coin can be sent to the address you've created, but only use the address for one type of coin. If you send BTC to that address, use it only for BTC. Do not send BCH to the same address.
|
|
|
|
The thread is about when signature campaigns will accept negative trusted members the meaning of negative feedback will lose its power and at the same time the DT abusers will lose their power.
First: Only the shady sponsors of sig campaigns will accept users with negative trust. DT didn't make those companies shady, their own reputation did. Sponsoring the spamming of the forum by red-tagged accounts isn't going to help that reputation. Birds of a feather, as they say. Second: What power? The power of persuasion? That's all that DT status amounts to. It's a review, and nothing more. People can heed the warnings, or ignore them. There's no "DT power" other than how prominently DT users' reviews is displayed. That's all. Go ahead and make it mean more than that if it pleases you, but it's still just a review. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Retina, DireWolfM14’s lending service, 21 APR 2019
Funding Address ETH: 0x49929FA95Fb7C0e24098E9A145D1c82968fdf0B1
BTC collateral Refund address: 3Cndc4UCK2rXBF41qyDeMd3peQFqGUejV9
Repayment date: 25-04-2019
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qajwxltf6gm3zryjh866qky9uu7drdjmeh94nnl
IOuSD/M+l6YfWTdmbk7jDGd/wViXPKILoukn4Kqdmt4vYftM0eyvQ2Uxc3bmx9C1VGOjahSagw/wtnxt/Qhomb8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I send BTC: https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/address/3BQxzqqLpvuFko5njVkNbz6MLfhEWVsaDE/I received your collateral and funded your loan. Thanks again. 0x0b5f430678e8389568ba21982914f991b6657f0ef3c79f8e82aff3d9ee09c116Please send re-payment to this address: 0x73fF544f3d5B6FE3A40cCD22fAad34fD3837560b |
|
|
|
Username: Retina
Loan Amount ETH: 0.06
Collateral: 0.0023
Repayment date: 25-04-2019
Repayment Amount: 0.064
Funding Address ETH: 0x49929FA95Fb7C0e24098E9A145D1c82968fdf0B1
Hi Retina, thank you for the request. Please send the collateral to here: 3BQxzqqLpvuFko5njVkNbz6MLfhEWVsaDE -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
DireWolfM14’s lending service, 21 APR 2019
This is the BTC collateral address for Retina:
3BQxzqqLpvuFko5njVkNbz6MLfhEWVsaDE
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1q2nwf4njwkpeuyycx5a95nj6mf8m45djdk863xs
H63SoUxs2jiZzTIwEI6QzbojDFqutrRhlFJp90LIrsqlNRQ9uA/NSNNXOAQPhbzHBU7DdIcRfhpPvMVfyqGtY+M=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- And if you can, please sign your request with this BTC address: bc1qajwxltf6gm3zryjh866qky9uu7drdjmeh94nnl ETA: I just noticed, for this duration, and since it's a secured loan your repayment amount will be 0.0606 ETH. Thanks. |
|
|
|
to avoid derailing that thread...
Lol, that thread was off the rails from the OP. Thanks for the list, I had asked LoyceV if he could provide an average earned merit of the participants of the campaign, your list makes it easy to calculate. The 351 participants so far average 12.1 earned merit each. That's actually more than I would have guessed, but there are 169 participants, almost half with 0 earned merit. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think you have to worry about getting red-tagged by any DT members just for wearing the signature. I don't plan on tagging anyone for that, and I think most DT members are planning on holding back. Like The Pharmacist alluded to; the OPs of many of those scam accusations just stop responding to the threads they created. That could mean their issue was resolved, but since most just peter out we don't know for sure. Furthermore, nobody has provided concrete evidence of a scam. So, in my opinion tagging some for promoting a scam would be inappropriate given what we know today.
I might tag someone for plastering shitposts across the forum but if I do, that person will get ample warning and be given every opportunity revise his strategy. And I'm talking extreme cases, I don't have time to police everyone who's wearing the sig.
As far as whether you should quit the campaign, that's really up to you. I personally would not want to promote an outfit with Yobit's reputation. Even if all the scam accusations are really just customer support and software issues, there are way too many for my liking. And you know what they say about smoke an fire.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
