Just like to say that after reading your post I withdrew the coins I had remaining on hitbit, it all went smoothly for me, about one hour before coins in my wallet. I withdrew BTG, don't know if that matters. |
|
|
|
2011: 1 btc = 1 skateboard
2013: 1 btc = 1 bicycle
2014: 1 btc = 1 moped
2017: 1 btc = 1 fiat
2023: 1 btc = 1 lambo
well that would be nice |
|
|
|
Fact is, Bitcoin was never designed to cope with wide adoption.
Bitcoin is software, software evolves, windows 3.1 was not designed for the modern workload. But, here we are, with windows 3.1 now evolved into windows 10, and windows 10 performs well. |
|
|
|
Breaking 24777$ prediction game
27/12/2017 bikerleszno
07/01/2018 ghandi
08/01/2018 savetherainforrest
09/01/2018 explorer
10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho
12/01/2018 speedwheel
13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner
14/01/2018 northypole
15/01/2018 ivomm
16/01/2018 maca068
17/01/2018 bitcoinvest
18/01/2018 last of the v8s
21/01/2018 flamast2
24/01/2018 kartala
25/01/2018 orpington
26/01/2018 rolling
27/01/2018 LFC_bitcoin
28/01/2018 jojo69
31/01/2018 realsteelboy
12/02/2018 yonton
13/02/2018 Wekkel
15/02/2018 starmman
17/02/2018 leveldkrypto
18/02/2018 olesh
19/02/2018 BitCoinBurger
22/02/2018 icygreen
23/02/2018 erisdiscordia
24/02/2018 phil_s
06/03/2018 sa_94
07/03/2018 NUFCrichard
13/03/2018 erre
18/03/2018 fabiorem
21/03/2018 dakustaking76
05/04/2018 bitcoinbunny
11/04/2018 hairymaclairy
02/06/2018 oblox
05/11/2018 mikenz
31/12/2018 melman2002
Maybe because its This time of the year we make a small game Just to call 24777$ (CET) the one with the day of breaking This price wins .25 BTC
The list Will be Made after This post So When a date is taking iT cannot been taken again
When the winning date is exactly in the middle of 2 each Will get .25
Oterwhise closest to the winning date wins
LIST MAKING ENDS 25-12-2012 @ 22.00 cet
AFTER THIS POST NO MORE NEWBIES MINIMUM 50 Posts
01/04/2018 for me please |
|
|
|
i agree. we needed the block size increase with SegWit2x (New York) agreement. everyone was on board, miners, businesses, wallets,... but developers weren't so the community didn't get on board either. and that was the thing that activated SegWit in first place!
The services and wallet providers didn't even try SegWit (which has zero downsides If implemented) to judge If it's good or bad. SegWit2x looks like an attempt to take over bitcoin If you ask me and the same supporters are the ones who are delaying activation of SegWit. Very true, no way would I want an increase in the blocksize unless it is done by core. and your right about the supporters not implementing segwit, very arseholeish and bad for business |
|
|
|
I hope Lightning Network will be implemented in bitcoin. Then the price will skyrocket  . What do you guys think? I think it will help a lot |
|
|
|
I honestly don't know what core can realistically do. Increase block size? While that looks good on paper, I think it legitimizes Bitcoin Cash in a sense.
From what you are saying and I seem to incline that way too, bitcoin is flawed from the beginning. The expectation that you could store every transaction in the world in many copies (each node holds everything) is simply unrealistic not flawed, because of things like the lightning network. Problem is we need it sooner not later. |
|
|
|
well that was completely fucked.
is it over?
probably not, but, lets hope so |
|
|
|
It's pretty common for the entire crypto market to fall in unison during "Real Bitcoin Crashes."
That said, I'm still not sure if this will become one. We're not even at 1/2 the peak price. Serious crashes fall to 1/4 to 1/10th of the peak (so $2,000 to $5,000 in our case).
It could just be a bit slower to get down there this time. Though I hope that the market is more mature now and it doesn't get there at all. |
|
|
|
Go to analysis thread
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
There are obviously issues either way, but, the amount of congestion we are seeing on the network will turn people off. Also there may be no alts at the moment, but, that will eventually change,Bitcoin needs to get ahead of them.
|
|
|
|
The master did claim 10k would be tested again.
The problem is he warned us that the bubble was over if we tested 10k from 20k rather than 17k, which is what is looking like is going to happen here.
‘But the price can simply stupidly drown the bubble further. And in that case, I strongly doubt that we will see something more than 20-30k any more. Because 10k is not tested, it means that we will fall on it no matter where. And if with 30 we fall to 10, then the bubble caput. And if from 17 to 10, it seems like no. ‘
where do you guys find out about his predictions? does he have a twitter account or something? |
|
|
|
On a bright note, BCH is also crashing hard
everything is crashing. About time too, previously (last year or so) this has meant BTC is near a bottom. bottom could still be a few thousand off though. |
|
|
|
|
coinmarketcap is looking crashtastic
|
|
|
|
will we hit 13k?  we are currently on support level. |
|
|
|
Someone yesterday on LedgerX bought $1 million dollar worth of $50,000 Dec 2018 Call options.
About 275 contracts. Hence someone thinks it will go at least >$53,600.
masterluc |
|
|
|
|
BTC Dominance: 42.9%
for fuck sake, gonna be an all time low soon
|
|
|
|
|
So fees are getting stupid (some as high as $160), Segwit adoption is slow and the lightning network is still a ways off. The price is being affected and BTC market dominance is almost at all time lows.
I think it is about time that we raise the block size, to give segwit adoption and LN more time. Being that the blocksize increase would be done by core we can trust they'll do it right, so why shouldn't it be done?
If we delay too long BTC will lose its dominance and when that happens it is all over.
Let's drop the tribalism, the bickering, and just do what is in the interest of BTC. An increase in blocksize will not be the end to decentralization, it's been almost 10 years since BTC began hard drive sizes have increased substantially in that time and the cost has come down substantially.
|
|
|
|
|
Lets face it, at this point in the life of BTC the high fees are an issue, these fees may not matter in 10 years time, but, they do at the moment because BTC is still a young technology and smallish market. $70 for a transaction is just stupid any way you cut it. Segwit adoption is slow, so maybe something should be done in the meantime until segwit adoption increases and until the lightning network arrives.
remember the fight over segwit? The price was having troubles and then once it happened the price boomed. I think the reason for this boom was that it was now possible for bitcoin to scale, however, we are now finding out this scaling is slow going and price is being affected. If we fixed this now, and yes through a increase in blocksize, people would be a lot happier, because it would buy time for the lightning network and segwit adoption. You would also find that price may boom again.
BTC dominance is nearing an all time low, if this doesn't concern you, you're an idiot. Once we lose this this dominance getting it back will be tricky.
|
|
|
|
It could easily go to $10k-12k and still be bullish.
10k is masterlucs prediction before onward and upward, if it does go down that far lets hope he is right. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
