"Trading fee is only 1%"  1% or 0.1% ? sharexcoin 1% mintpal only 0.15% Sharex has 0.1% fee It was a typo on their website it's corrected now Awesome, Thank you  |
|
|
|
There is already 2.5GH/s - What's the point..  Appropriate username.  Thanks  |
|
|
|
There is already 2.5GH/s - What's the point.. |
|
|
|
I see you also launched Pinkcoin..
Don't you want to be an active dev on a Single coin? ... One dev, multiple coins... sounds like shit to me.
^ This  |
|
|
|
I see you also launched Pinkcoin..
Don't you want to be an active dev on a Single coin? ... One dev, multiple coins... sounds like shit to me.
^ This |
|
|
|
"Trading fee is only 1%" 1% or 0.1% ? |
|
|
|
X11 is doomed anyway, stay away from these coins...
Rank Donor User Name KH/s DRM/Day 1 burninj 169,954 24,218.664 Tehe  Its now impossible for anyone to get blocks unless they are running a large mining network.
even with my 3 miner rig pulling over 5MH/s it would take me 5 hours to get a single block, assuming the network hashrate didn't grow any more (which aint likely).
I solo mined 4 blocks between 01:24 & 03:20 GMT with ~2.3Mh/s (R290) |
|
|
|
"Advanced features will be created on top of the core as 3rd party services." Like what?  |
|
|
|
I wish that dude would stop using bold and red text or that when on ignore their posts completely disappeared  |
|
|
|
Ummm  { "blocks" : 150, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 10.61138470, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414, "search-interval" : 1 }, "blockvalue" : 50000000000, "netmhashps" : 990.77283169, "netstakeweight" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "minimum" : 0, "maximum" : 0, "combined" : 0 }, "stakeinterest" : 1000000, "testnet" : false } |
|
|
|
if we didnt put singature and did the facebook option... we will receive coins or not
?
Should do.. |
|
|
|
Funky background on the website 2 more days, I might go back to Scrypt mining for this, dammit  |
|
|
|
FeeShare module will be up soon.
Excellent. But, can the order books update in real-time rather than on a refresh only? (or am I doing something wrong?) |
|
|
|
|
MP reset the votes? PMC is at #36
|
|
|
|
Buying ShareCoin! PM Me, Online nowI'll be happy to buy 65,000 SHARE for 65,000 satoshi. 0.00065000 BTC.
For $0.28 cents? Don't reckon anyone is going to sell for that. To Everyone else: PM me if you want to sell, I can promise decent offers.
|
|
|
|
Yeh, guess so.. Some lucky player will eat that 7k sell wall at 0.00014995 for 1BTC |
|
|
|
Fun while it lasted |
|
|
|
Ok. How do you access your servers? Console access? That's not locked down via ip then either? So I can login from anwhere in the world?
Yes, you can't stop bad system admins from making mistakes but you CAN also limit damage in other ways. In this case maybe not, but without locking things down to known good IPs, you are missing a very basic security feature that can give a huge increase over not doing it.
So please, "Stop spreading garbage" as this was a basic query for information on how it could happen if network level firewall rules are in place, which they should be.
I VPN with both certificates & passwords, in some cases also with RSA. Never locked down to IP, so yes from anywhere in the world. The culprit was able to fool an incompetent sys admin into allowing him access. Probably via console, yes, or by tearing down the firewall, changing the passphrase, etc. At this point we don't know if it was a dedicated or VPS. Garbage might have been the wrong word. Please, stop fear mongering. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
