Each new coin maybe will added everyday or every month but most of the coins are not valuable and you cannot trade after get pay from bounty. But many of exchanger will be delete the useless coins for replace with a new coins better than before.
That sounds like a special policy by a social coin but usually you can trade the coin if reputable exchanges listed it. |
|
|
|
|
The entry point is relative, crypto currencies will go up in my opinion and being afraid of getting involved might be a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoin season might never come back the way we got to know it some time ago and we have to accept that.
|
|
|
|
|
Bear markets mean an opportunity to those who managed their portfolio well and took some profits before.
|
|
|
|
It is not just crypto thing. You can equally make money from non-crypto space with bad/Substandard products and convincing people they are the real thing.
We currently don't have a safe way to root out scams... more like a decentralized quality control system. The crypto communities also have to work together to make a safe solution to this problem a reality.
nowadays there is no solution to fraud. but I believe that sooner or later. the fraud will soon be destroyed. but also fraud cannot be immediately destroyed. because all need a process and strong cooperation. to overcome fraud. Fraud will never be destroyed because once you eliminated one form of fraud, another one will arise. |
|
|
|
Why is nobody using TradeOgre for this coin? Clearly it doesn't have any other reliable exchange. HitBTC is an outright scam and has already delisted it, TradeSatoshi delisted it, Nanex is having issues, Sistemkoin requires KYC or something like it. The only exchange working properly from day one for BTCP is TradeOgre. But looking at the volume on TradeOgre it seems very few people are using it.
I didn't even know that exchange before reading your post here. For how long has that exchange been around? |
|
|
|
It is a failed experiment for sure that made clear that forks are usually not going to work out. It really depends on the reasoning behind any fork whether it will be successful or not. Not all forks are experiments though it has to be accepted BCH was designed to take over BTC but it failed. True, I was particularly referring to forks where a single person or minority want to take over control for the sake of enriching themselves. That's what forks are about most of the time. |
|
|
|
Scamming people is just like looking for shortcut to success ,they never want to face any challenges in life but want to be rich quick ,I know crime pays but for every criminal there days are been counted
Get rich quick at the cost of others. They sometimes even go so far and accept to ruin the life of other people. It is disgusting, but something that will always exist. |
|
|
|
Will be good if this new coins will bring something revolutionary, but as i see none of this or all of coins i see until now that get on cmc this year don't bring nothing new like other coins do in past (0 fee when send, instant confirmation, create token on coin blockchain).
But they demonstrate an important fact and that is that it is not trivial to build communities that are distributed worldwide and willing to use one currency. Many different people have many different interests and many different tastes. Nobody knows with how many cryptos we will end up one day. But Bitcoin is more than enough to fit in to diverse interest or taste you talked about and I for one don’t really see any need to create more coins because most of these new coins end up affecting the market and defeating the objective of the blockchain technology. You will see an ICO come up with a project and after getting the attention of people that ought to have invested in already existing stable coins to invest in them, they end up collapsing and as a result of that poison the mind of people that would have embraced the currency and use if more often for it to get the value it aim to get. More coins with the same technology is not needed, but more coins with a diverse set of technologies for different purposes means progress and choice. Also it means that those dominating a network for example with mining power have to be afraid that users switch to another coin if they abuse their mining power. Having some competition is important. Exactly . we dont need copy cats , we just need unique coins with different approach but unfortunately this isnt easy to do thinking that the crypto market is alreadt bloated with good coins . currently we already have thousands of coins and when someone make a coin , it will be tough for them to stand out in the competition . better if the devs will only foccus ln improving the coin instead of creating another coin that doesnt have any purpose . I think we don't need different coins, we need strong collaboration between teams. That's what helps the industry. |
|
|
|
scammers are just a bunch of lazy people who annoy someone. they never think of the fate of others. nowadays there are a lot of scamers who make ICO and make ICO worse because of the unsettling scammer behavior. The scammer should be missing from the world of cryptocurrency and lost from this world.
Often times they are not lazy, they are super professional and that is why they hack the best of the best. |
|
|
|
I already understood that many people agree that the BCH project, which was created only to earn money from us, and as it turns out today, he is still alive and he is working and he is even pumped up with money. Do you think that there are reasons for this?
Because the first part of your post is blatantly wrong. Study crypto history. See the people who started Bitcoin and were here in 2010? How many of them support BTC? How many of them support BCH? If you do background research you won't need to ask the other questions. A lot of people support BTC and if you think otherwise, this is your opinion. BCH is a common fork. A small code change in the original BTC, which brought us everything that you now see around. What story are you talking about? I agree with the essence of your post. BCH was never going to take on or remove or dislodge Bitcoin. It was a failed experiment by disgruntled "whales" that thought they have a right to control the direction the development goes in. It is a failed experiment for sure that made clear that forks are usually not going to work out. |
|
|
|
But sometimes you could also blame the authors of the white papers in crypto. Sometimes they are massively long, like 70 pages or so. Who is going to read that?
Investa white paper is not so long and complicated. This is only a couple of pages which I read fully before I have invested in this ICO. INV token should be integrated into all products and listed on Ibitt exchange. Additional products like e-wallet should be created and liquidity should be a lot better because Investa team should have a liquidity fund and I don't see anything about this. I really encourage everyone to read Investa white paper. Is easy to understand and I made copies in waybackmachine.com to have a proof for my statements. Liquidity will only increase when supply and demand increases at the same time. DO you see this happening? |
|
|
|
I got out when BTCP was about $18, I had already lost a great deal at that time. I was lucky to get out when I did. A very sad tale this was coin ended up being.
Wasn't it one promoted by John McAfee? He should have known better then, but if it was the case he probably did it for a nice chunk of money. |
|
|
|
|
Holding multiple alt coins doesn't necessarily mean that you are sufficiently diversified. It depends on the technologies they offer.
|
|
|
|
When we start to ask questions then errors and bans start to occur. I only hope we will get our answers.
What is with dashboard, launchpads, app, e-wallet? where are these products? When INV will be fully implemented or listed to IBitt?
will INV be implemented to Investa products or not? Is this true that iNV will be listed on Bitfinex or only they work on some project together with Ibitt exchange?...
I asked again your questions in the Telegram group and guess what ... I am banned again!!! This time there is no doubt that this is not a mistake. Additionally, the manager lied about the reason for the ban. He wrote that he banned me because I was threatening him in my PM. Which is totally not true and I sent PM after the ban to ask for the reason not before as he says. Banned me because I asked these questions, end of the story. Lucky the CEO steps in and answered a few of your questions @Crypto mania. App is being testes as we speak for Quickex which is the product we have more demand for. It will be integrated to the e-wallet of Ibitt and later on work as a one stop shop for all services. I had a similar situation. but it was with another project. I also posed a lot of questions. but everything was much easier. the answers to all my questions were in white paper. It is with this document, that you should first get acquainted But sometimes you could also blame the authors of the white papers in crypto. Sometimes they are massively long, like 70 pages or so. Who is going to read that? |
|
|
|
I already understood that many people agree that the BCH project, which was created only to earn money from us, and as it turns out today, he is still alive and he is working and he is even pumped up with money. Do you think that there are reasons for this?
Because the first part of your post is blatantly wrong. Study crypto history. See the people who started Bitcoin and were here in 2010? How many of them support BTC? How many of them support BCH? If you do background research you won't need to ask the other questions. A lot of people support BTC and if you think otherwise, this is your opinion. BCH is a common fork. A small code change in the original BTC, which brought us everything that you now see around. What story are you talking about? Nothing more than a common fork. You can't also win over the whole developer team and other important things of the real Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Here all true messages are deleted, this project is dead. The site does not update the roadmap. Nobody needs a bot, except for such projects as LRM, BLACER and so on (shit coin). The price is constantly falling, in the discord some multicolored beggars. I do not recommend investing in this project (I watched it for 6 months) one negative. The ransom, as promised, did not even come, coins fly from the wallet of the virgins to the stock exchanges and they pour it, making rare stuffing
Sad but true. Nothing has changed since I invested (Well nothing that I've noticed anyway besides the price nearing 0) I HOPE someone from the team will speak up. If I'm wrong(a[pologies), because I truly hope I am. Lastly: It would show some class and be courteous to the masses imo, if the team Made a Statement hopefully on twitter. Stating how the team hasn't been able to make any movement and essentially dead at this time.
(if that is the case) [/color][/size][/size][/size][/size] [/b] dear evos investors - they are scammers this link tells the story and data of these people With Respect to the defrauded investor SKAM https://docs.google.com/document/d/13ZkpE72Zk7JaT_CeyHBGH8L3cDrfcZY8_HOF30RHSDY/edit  Is the data real about those guys or can it not be said with certainty? Because then sharing it shouldn't be done. Just make sure you know what you are sharing. |
|
|
|
Lazy? Not really. They are also exerting efforts just to scam people. It's just that, they are like termites who also do some works like determined the background of their targets before taking advantage of them. They just do not have conscience, do some illegal works just to scam people. Laziness is not the reason here. They are working also in illegal way.
Some of them are lazy, but they shouldn't be able to make a lot of money these days. The sophisticated ones will still earn big. |
|
|
|
Will be good if this new coins will bring something revolutionary, but as i see none of this or all of coins i see until now that get on cmc this year don't bring nothing new like other coins do in past (0 fee when send, instant confirmation, create token on coin blockchain).
But they demonstrate an important fact and that is that it is not trivial to build communities that are distributed worldwide and willing to use one currency. Many different people have many different interests and many different tastes. Nobody knows with how many cryptos we will end up one day. But Bitcoin is more than enough to fit in to diverse interest or taste you talked about and I for one don’t really see any need to create more coins because most of these new coins end up affecting the market and defeating the objective of the blockchain technology. You will see an ICO come up with a project and after getting the attention of people that ought to have invested in already existing stable coins to invest in them, they end up collapsing and as a result of that poison the mind of people that would have embraced the currency and use if more often for it to get the value it aim to get. More coins with the same technology is not needed, but more coins with a diverse set of technologies for different purposes means progress and choice. Also it means that those dominating a network for example with mining power have to be afraid that users switch to another coin if they abuse their mining power. Having some competition is important. |
|
|
|
You should see the reputation of ICOEthics. He doesn't have that reputation because he is sloppy. He has it because he is right and if he is wrong he is also willing to correct it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
