Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites  Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? Not really sure which one is THE most popular, but a google search for "best ICO" displays https://www.icohotlist.com as a first non-ad result You are right but maybe that would be an interesting statistic to see which of them really outperformed most of the others. Should actually not be too hard to gather the data. Since they charge a ridiculous amount of money to list new ICOs, they are able to pay for higher Alexa ranking etc.... To be honest I really don't care about those numbers, I care about the content on the website. My point is - no point in making that research, just take a look at their website - are they really experts in those ICO reviews.(ICO bench rated Binance 1.0)  Wow I didn't know that! A 1.0 rating for Binance is quite a huge fail huh? Curious how those "experts" came up with that. Yup lol take a look yourself. https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.png It was 1.05 / 5.0 until few days ago - this last review (March 3rd 2018) upped the score to 1.6 / 5.0. But that last is not really an ICO review because lol Binance is definitely not offering coins at 0.01$ anymore lol https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.pnghttps://icobench.com/ico/binanceAnd here's their "expert" review on Binance: "What is it (Binance)? Why is it listed?" https://icobench.com/u/anbord7It seems all these rating services suck. The best way is and will always be to just do your own research. There are no misleading incentives in your own judgment unless your brain tricks you into thinking the wrong things  Own research is great, yes, except for people who did their research and ended up investing their life savings in Bitconnect xD Most of the investors have a main job and Crypto is a side project so they like to see what people with full-time crypto jobs have in mind. Can't blame them much, but hey - crypto is real money - treat it like such. Don't invest just because some guy told you too Come on if they did thorough research and compared the payouts to what you can get in real life, you would right away be very careful about putting your money into Bitconnect. Whenever I see a project offering generally unrealistic payouts, I don't invest, period. And with this very simple rule I came to the conclusion that as of now all crypto-lending projects should be avoided and you won't lose money on them. It's not the solution to avoid it, just to be more careful about investing in those kind of projects and do a thorough research I know what you mean but for me personally avoiding those projects has paid off in the sense that most of them failed anyway and there are so many alternatives, why put your money into something you don't really believe in for now? |
|
|
|
Their Telegram has 20k members so it could probably make sense for them to focus on Telegram if they are short on manpower.
There is nothing like short on manpower. If they really have no time to post here they could find a community manager. This is something normal like all other ICOs are doing this. This could be big problem for them and i think this is the case, they lack manpower and looks like they will have to make some decisions and hire more people they trust in order to stay in touch with their potential investors. A lack in manpower is not a problem that you can't overcome. They have a clear concept and just need to sort out how to materialize it. Good employees are not so easy to find themselves in the team. They need to be trusted and this is not done quickly. if they need new people they're gonna hire them after the ICO , when full development will start. dimao is right though blockchain is a very hot topic these days and strong developers are a scarce resource. I hope they can convince some of the best to work for REPU. |
|
|
|
Their Telegram has 20k members so it could probably make sense for them to focus on Telegram if they are short on manpower.
There is nothing like short on manpower. If they really have no time to post here they could find a community manager. This is something normal like all other ICOs are doing this. This could be big problem for them and i think this is the case, they lack manpower and looks like they will have to make some decisions and hire more people they trust in order to stay in touch with their potential investors. A lack in manpower is not a problem that you can't overcome. They have a clear concept and just need to sort out how to materialize it. |
|
|
|
Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? Not really sure which one is THE most popular, but a google search for "best ICO" displays https://www.icohotlist.com as a first non-ad result You are right but maybe that would be an interesting statistic to see which of them really outperformed most of the others. Should actually not be too hard to gather the data. Since they charge a ridiculous amount of money to list new ICOs, they are able to pay for higher Alexa ranking etc.... To be honest I really don't care about those numbers, I care about the content on the website. My point is - no point in making that research, just take a look at their website - are they really experts in those ICO reviews.(ICO bench rated Binance 1.0) Wow I didn't know that! A 1.0 rating for Binance is quite a huge fail huh? Curious how those "experts" came up with that. Yup lol take a look yourself. https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.png It was 1.05 / 5.0 until few days ago - this last review (March 3rd 2018) upped the score to 1.6 / 5.0. But that last is not really an ICO review because lol Binance is definitely not offering coins at 0.01$ anymore lol https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.pnghttps://icobench.com/ico/binanceAnd here's their "expert" review on Binance: "What is it (Binance)? Why is it listed?" https://icobench.com/u/anbord7It seems all these rating services suck. The best way is and will always be to just do your own research. There are no misleading incentives in your own judgment unless your brain tricks you into thinking the wrong things Own research is great, yes, except for people who did their research and ended up investing their life savings in Bitconnect xD Most of the investors have a main job and Crypto is a side project so they like to see what people with full-time crypto jobs have in mind. Can't blame them much, but hey - crypto is real money - treat it like such. Don't invest just because some guy told you too Come on if they did thorough research and compared the payouts to what you can get in real life, you would right away be very careful about putting your money into Bitconnect. Whenever I see a project offering generally unrealistic payouts, I don't invest, period. And with this very simple rule I came to the conclusion that as of now all crypto-lending projects should be avoided and you won't lose money on them. |
|
|
|
|
Is this coin traded on even a single one of all those exchanges listed in the announcement and did anyone already claim the Bitcoin Dollar?
|
|
|
|
Isn't this story from the oldest archives you can find in crypto history? Or am I totally wrong here? That's like months ago, which is an eternity given the dynamics in the area. |
|
|
|
guys i bought mine at cobinhood but still holding bars not tbars yet.
Same here. I didn`t received TBARS at Cobinhood, yet. Did you buy BARS on Cobinhood AFTER Feb. 21? If so you won't be getting TBAR for your BAR tokens as you purchased after the theft and hardfork of the token. there was a time Frame until when you get tbars and i did it in time . the Information said until 7 pm i think. i bought at 1 pm 21 february I believe your case will be looked at on a "case by case basis" by the company. They are looking at Feb. 21buys carefully. Let us know how you eventually make out and if you receive TBAR. I hope your case is OK. Are there any precise numbers or at least estimates as to how many worthless BARS have been purchased on the exchanges? |
|
|
|
Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? Not really sure which one is THE most popular, but a google search for "best ICO" displays https://www.icohotlist.com as a first non-ad result You are right but maybe that would be an interesting statistic to see which of them really outperformed most of the others. Should actually not be too hard to gather the data. Since they charge a ridiculous amount of money to list new ICOs, they are able to pay for higher Alexa ranking etc.... To be honest I really don't care about those numbers, I care about the content on the website. My point is - no point in making that research, just take a look at their website - are they really experts in those ICO reviews.(ICO bench rated Binance 1.0) Wow I didn't know that! A 1.0 rating for Binance is quite a huge fail huh? Curious how those "experts" came up with that. Yup lol take a look yourself. https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.png It was 1.05 / 5.0 until few days ago - this last review (March 3rd 2018) upped the score to 1.6 / 5.0. But that last is not really an ICO review because lol Binance is definitely not offering coins at 0.01$ anymore lol https://i.imgur.com/wT6RRFk.pnghttps://icobench.com/ico/binanceAnd here's their "expert" review on Binance: "What is it (Binance)? Why is it listed?" https://icobench.com/u/anbord7It seems all these rating services suck. The best way is and will always be to just do your own research. There are no misleading incentives in your own judgment unless your brain tricks you into thinking the wrong things |
|
|
|
No update no news no communications...
It is not good news for an ico. I hope it is just a busy phase they don't have time to do such things.
have patience man, sometimes no news is good news. Just checked the project's twitter page and its telegram group and observed minimal activity. But lets give them the benefit of the doubt and I hoped they will present some good news in the coming days. Their telegram group has over 20,000 members so I doubt that it's really very quiet in there. They have a big following just waiting for something to get released. I believe this is going to be an interesting 2018 for REPU. |
|
|
|
i hope after the ico many attracting businesses will join the Repu Smart reputation management . I am sure that this will happen in the near future. We have to believe and wait for success. There is a lot of potential in the project and its functions, and this is sure to be seen by the external public to Crypto, it will be even better if they expand the marketing outside the channels and establish a reputed partnership with influence over other brands Correct but there is no point in going beyond crypto because most of the things that are non-crypto today will become crypto in the future. It will be better actually. If common people use repu, then there will be a chance that they will know / learn crypto. For sure this is a project that could really help the whole space to see increased adoption once its operational. |
|
|
|
Probably such an application may be needed for each user. Is the price already known for using the software?
~ $9.99 per camera / month Woah! 10 dollars a month is totally worth it if it guarantees my families security, its a great investment for every homes. I agree, quite a small price to pay for a month. Approximately 10 dollars a month, almost everyone can pay for the camera, or rather for their safety. in my opinion this is a very democratic price for any person who worries about his safety and the safety of his family. Price is one of the advantages of this platform. Is that price already confirmed? I thought Faceter will be a system that can be used as a third party program to any digital camera so I think that will be more practical to buy for a security system in a company or a public place like a mall. Don't know but I can also imagine that they will have different versions of software and offer various tiers with several pricing options. |
|
|
|
Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? Not really sure which one is THE most popular, but a google search for "best ICO" displays https://www.icohotlist.com as a first non-ad result You are right but maybe that would be an interesting statistic to see which of them really outperformed most of the others. Should actually not be too hard to gather the data. Since they charge a ridiculous amount of money to list new ICOs, they are able to pay for higher Alexa ranking etc.... To be honest I really don't care about those numbers, I care about the content on the website. My point is - no point in making that research, just take a look at their website - are they really experts in those ICO reviews.(ICO bench rated Binance 1.0) Wow I didn't know that! A 1.0 rating for Binance is quite a huge fail huh? Curious how those "experts" came up with that. |
|
|
|
Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? Not really sure which one is THE most popular, but a google search for "best ICO" displays https://www.icohotlist.com as a first non-ad result You are right but maybe that would be an interesting statistic to see which of them really outperformed most of the others. Should actually not be too hard to gather the data. |
|
|
|
It looks like small community for Realisto and also this thread is not too much active but I want to know that when is the launch date of platform. Price is almost half than ico price.
They should really be focussing on development and getting some results done to encourage people to believe in the vision of Realisto. |
|
|
|
To make a video recording in many countries requires a permit, or rather a warning for those who will be on this videorecording. How do the developers plan to solve this problem? Do they have instructions that are responsible for the legal performance of this project?
yeah this is another point of view. The legal performance of this project is also important. In some countries the video recordings are not a proof in front of the court. And this means before u invest your money you should have to check the legallity of this product in your country. It's not only important, it is essentially critical. Legal aspects might be part of their most critical issues to resolve when it comes to the growth of their project. |
|
|
|
CEO lied about the success of the parent EHI, scamming investors to believe he had more contacts than he actually had when he was just working out of his office, a 1 man show and he claimed he had millions in revenue
price is crashing so hard, in a few hours it will be 0.50 get out while you can.
so many lies and untruths by the team about this project.
half the developers are just hired to fluff up the whitepaper.
Am I looking at a different chart than you? When you wrote this the price was already close to zero, wasn't it? What a crazy dump. Did investors now lose all their money? Anyone who bought BAR tokens on an exchange after Feb. 21st thinking they were going to scalp or swing trade tokens for quick profit are holding near worthless coins now. A lot of sour grapes I think. Original investors holding BAR before Feb. 21st are fine. Their purchased BAR will be replaced with an equal amount of TBAR with the same valuation ($1 per TBAR). Ok but was it made absolutely clear right away that those who kept trading will end up losing money in the end? Even if that was the case, how would you make a fair announcement that ensures that everybody has the same info available? It's impossible. |
|
|
|
CEO lied about the success of the parent EHI, scamming investors to believe he had more contacts than he actually had when he was just working out of his office, a 1 man show and he claimed he had millions in revenue
price is crashing so hard, in a few hours it will be 0.50 get out while you can.
so many lies and untruths by the team about this project.
half the developers are just hired to fluff up the whitepaper.
Am I looking at a different chart than you? When you wrote this the price was already close to zero, wasn't it? What a crazy dump. Did investors now lose all their money? |
|
|
|
The idea of the project is useful, but what will the developers of the project earn from? What will they profit from? This priority issue needs to be clarified first of all for investors
Hello! This is one of the easiest questions for the team, our earning prospective is very transparent: we are going to charge for the use of our service with surveillance cameras. Prices for corporate segment are calculated individually and depend on the number of cameras used and the workload (the number of recognized faces per unit of time). Faceter solution for mass consumers, small businesses and ordinary people in particular, is going to be available at the 4th quater of 2018. The price will be affordable, so that everyone can use Faceter and payment will be the same as for any subscription (person selects tariff and the number of cameras and pays for it). But you aren't allowed to install those cameras wherever you want right? You are going to sell those cameras equipped with your technology to whoever wants them, is that the business model? Faceter does not produce cameras, the company will provide solutions for face detection for existing CCTV ip cameras using blockchain and miners for calculations. Ok this answers a lot of my questions I was wondering all the time because I thought you are also producing cameras and are planning to put them everywhere  Will it later be possible to integrate your solutions with all kinds of cameras? |
|
|
|
It is really great news that REA token is now listed at Yobit exchange! However, volumes are still low. Anyway let's way the launch of the Realisto Platform. At least till this moment Realisto team is following the roadmap quit well!
Yobit isn't very good. Many people refrain from depositing money and trading there because they are anonymous and could stop operating any moment. Would be good to see REA traded elsewhere very soon. |
|
|
|
Is the ICO listed on top ICO ratings websites?
They are listed at Track ICO, Bit Expert, ICO Watch List, CoinSchedule, ICOHolder, ICO Marks, ICO Alert, ICOMarketCap.io, ICO Showroom, CoinMarketPlus, etc... you can check all on Bitto.tech site. Also on their site, you can check with whom are they in partnership. Nice overview about those rating websites Do you know them all by heart or is there a list with all those ICO ranking services available? Which one is the most popular (sorry for being off-topic)? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
