RCN goes live April, Hopefully the beta exchange by Ripio will follow closely. great time coming
I added some Ripio tokens to my position as I researched project well and expect it will bring true value after launch this year. I like that it is in communication with other projects building their products on Ethereum network, like Request. Future looks bright and this bear market is good opportunity to get some tokens with great discount (could drop even more). It will produce important synergies among the projects that collaborate and can bring additional value for the users of all combined networks together. Thank you guys. It seems there will be many huge developments in the near future. Maybe we will see pumps very soon. Not sure if pumps are the desired outcome of every bit of progress. Organic growth over time with strong hands in the game are awesome as that creates real price support. I don't like pumps.. It gives a short-term effect. I like it better when the price grows slowly but steadily. This is the best option! Problem with pumps is that it creates disappointed losers who then start to bash the project instead of supporting it. |
|
|
|
Really it is a great job. I like it very much. I am a little bit crypto trader. I wish it is helpful for me. I also refer it my friends. So, it is so much exciting.
I hope you don't pee your pants because you are so excited. Also, nothing has been done so far. What are you excited about? |
|
|
|
guys, what are your thoughts about the market now?
Well the market as for me now is stable, the cue-ball course keeps, but the impermanent crypt The market is still recovering. I hope the fall will not happen again. The market is already quite green, at the moment we can predict further growth. Before summer and so, the currency should still grow, some make such forecasts Growth to summer, and then the market stabilizes? The digital money market is only evolving, stabilizing, sometimes shocking and surprising with unexpected events ... It is difficult to predict It is exciting, but it can also take longer than we all hope. I wouldn't call the market stable in any way now but I know what you mean. It's more likely that it won't go away today than it was 5 years ago. But we can say with confidence that the huge growth as before will not be With confidence? Lol where do you get the confidence from that crypto will not explode to a 10 trillion dollars market cap in 3 years? |
|
|
|
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis  They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't. The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about. Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers. I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn. But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done. The final mark comes from the market anyway ) They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out. We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world  Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing. I always say- trust none other than yourself. Why not invest some time in doing the research yourself? Personally I don't trust anyone else with my money. The minority of investors in crypto does the due diligence thoroughly. The large majority only listens to some crazy Youtube video producer. Even YouTube has become less reasonable. Each blogger now has a number or dissappointed who trusted, but it did't work out. And of course, an incredible number or scammers/spammers who ping us on Telegram every minute. It's all about your own research guys, the market today has a lot of cases to be compared. Less reasonable is a negative exaggeration. It is a joke what most Youtubers do and they simply get paid to talk positively about scams. Well some of them are taking your promo video and use it as about the half of their "review" ) Lol man that's even worse. But you know it's the audience that decides about their rise and fall. If they want to watch copied content, then there is a right for those youtubers to exist. |
|
|
|
It means that in ICO there are only 1496 participants. However in their telegram group there are 20k so... so what?) do you expect that they all will become an investors?) may be they are bots, or bounty participants or airdrop'ers... I was speaking exactly about it That there is no hype anymore around their ICO, so I'm pretty sure that the ICO extension won't change anything... yes, it will not change anything, agree. I saw them at the very beginning and they were looked pretty interesting for invest, but after that I being in their telegram groups I've changed my opinion, and as far I see a lot of people did the same. Many ICOs went for an extension because most of them were supposed to end at a time where everybody had to pay taxes and stuff. Could help a little to move the end date but they also need to promote it. As far I see their promo campaign is not a small, but it will not help if people don't like them in general, I saw the same already a couple of times with other projects. No doubt about that. You need to have a good representation of your project and then a campaign can catalyze your efforts. |
|
|
|
The projects are excellent, but I wonder how long it will last? And what is the experience of developers in this area?
This kind of question is I like to be answered by the team. Seems the team is only visible on their social media accounts and also they are not very active. Do the team have photos together working together in the company? Fotos are absolutely worth nothing. Even they could be faked. I think video material is much safer than anything else. |
|
|
|
LitecoinZ is having problem with Yobit listing.
Which may be even good for them, as Yobit listings harm your reputation as a project in my opinion. |
|
|
|
guys, what are your thoughts about the market now?
Well the market as for me now is stable, the cue-ball course keeps, but the impermanent crypt The market is still recovering. I hope the fall will not happen again. The market is already quite green, at the moment we can predict further growth. Before summer and so, the currency should still grow, some make such forecasts Growth to summer, and then the market stabilizes? The digital money market is only evolving, stabilizing, sometimes shocking and surprising with unexpected events ... It is difficult to predict It is exciting, but it can also take longer than we all hope. I wouldn't call the market stable in any way now but I know what you mean. It's more likely that it won't go away today than it was 5 years ago. |
|
|
|
I saw this project, I thought for once, artificial intelligence? and then i knew I could trust the project and if Ethereum AI with the recent improvement on artificial intelligence worth it, then I believe this must be a great project and I'm ready to give them a yes!
This is a good project. I hope this project it will go further. I can faithfully say that this project is fully legal. so anyone can participate this project.
You shouldn't expect too much from AI as of now though as there needs a lot of research to be done and a lot of development. It is the future I think, but have reasonable expectations. |
|
|
|
A good idea. I think that excess monitoring, of our data, will not hurt anyone. And if we have the opportunity to make money for it, it's cool. Implemented, this service can become very popular. This idea should go into
There are a few though that now want to get the data back in the hands of the users and provide them with a platform to monetize their own data if they wish to do so. The race is on now. |
|
|
|
Many factors tell me that people are interested in this platform. For example, most experts consider the idea of the project not very original, but quite timely. Sharp criticism indicates the undisguised interest of experts in the project, so in the future it should be observed. May be you're right, but the idea with refferal program affraided all investors. Personally, I think that OMNITUDE has missed its chance  Why do you think that the idea with referral programs made investors stay away from this? Investors are also interested in expanding the community and creating some interest. |
|
|
|
RCN goes live April, Hopefully the beta exchange by Ripio will follow closely. great time coming
I added some Ripio tokens to my position as I researched project well and expect it will bring true value after launch this year. I like that it is in communication with other projects building their products on Ethereum network, like Request. Future looks bright and this bear market is good opportunity to get some tokens with great discount (could drop even more). It will produce important synergies among the projects that collaborate and can bring additional value for the users of all combined networks together. Thank you guys. It seems there will be many huge developments in the near future. Maybe we will see pumps very soon. Not sure if pumps are the desired outcome of every bit of progress. Organic growth over time with strong hands in the game are awesome as that creates real price support. |
|
|
|
There are many reasons why they might do it. Some just lose confidence in the project and some need the money for unknown reasons of course.
Live on what it means to exist and do what it is necessary for people. It is for this reason, perhaps some and sell coins. Now the price is still falling and you need to think to look for opportunities to buy the coins until the price is cheap. By the way, when gbx will already be traded at the exchange.globitex.com ? It's always good to have some cash left over to then buy coins at better prices. If you commit everything you have at once you can't really react to the market. |
|
|
|
I have read the medium of this project that they have developed this so called "prototype" which I didn't understand well. Can someone explain me more about the project development so I can understand well what is "prototype" means. I hope this will be address.
Prototype simply means first sample model. It's basically the early stage of the ICO where the team will release the prototype of the project in order for them to gain audience, popularity, and also investors that are willing to invest on the project. Even with a prototype you can make mistakes. It's important that the quality is already good so people are convinced of the team. You may have a good point, but what is good by having an available prototype is that people can actually experience the usage of the platform and in this way, I think they can surely make some suggestions abut some improvement of the platform. As long as it is not totally disappointing or just extremely limitedly working, showing a prototype can be the right step for sure. But there are more participants involved in a global prospective it is highly recommended to proceed as per the promised white papers that will build the trust and reap a success without bringing new changes in between. Not sure if such a strict approach is always the best. If you feel that some changes could put the project into a better position, you should make them regardless of the white paper. The community should agree however. |
|
|
|
It means that in ICO there are only 1496 participants. However in their telegram group there are 20k so... so what?) do you expect that they all will become an investors?) may be they are bots, or bounty participants or airdrop'ers... I was speaking exactly about it That there is no hype anymore around their ICO, so I'm pretty sure that the ICO extension won't change anything... yes, it will not change anything, agree. I saw them at the very beginning and they were looked pretty interesting for invest, but after that I being in their telegram groups I've changed my opinion, and as far I see a lot of people did the same. Many ICOs went for an extension because most of them were supposed to end at a time where everybody had to pay taxes and stuff. Could help a little to move the end date but they also need to promote it. |
|
|
|
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't. The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about. Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers. I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn. But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done. The final mark comes from the market anyway ) They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out. We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing. I always say- trust none other than yourself. Why not invest some time in doing the research yourself? Personally I don't trust anyone else with my money. The minority of investors in crypto does the due diligence thoroughly. The large majority only listens to some crazy Youtube video producer. Even YouTube has become less reasonable. Each blogger now has a number or dissappointed who trusted, but it did't work out. And of course, an incredible number or scammers/spammers who ping us on Telegram every minute. It's all about your own research guys, the market today has a lot of cases to be compared. Less reasonable is a negative exaggeration. It is a joke what most Youtubers do and they simply get paid to talk positively about scams. |
|
|
|
Both projects Ethereum and Binance cannot be compared to BitcoinZ. I think it is a far-fetched dream to believe that this can reach those levels.
I think the idea of having an exchange run on BTCz as the main currency to trade against, is not far fetched. Afterall BNB and USDT are 100% premined coins like ICOs and they made a single individual or one private corporation an enormous amount of money. BTCz market cap is hovering around $6M which compared to BTCP which is mired with controversy and has a marketcap of $500M with significantly less development is indication of at least a 50x to 100x return on this project if the devs continue working on it as they have been. But again unlike ZCL where devs controlled and DUMPED it in a controlled P&D scheme, BTCz is community driven so just like Bitcoin that cannot happen to it. In fact the BitcoinZ twitter handle is owned by a scammer just like bitcoin.com is owned by a scammer and @bitcoin twitter handle was suspended. These are indications of a truly community driven project which does not rely on a super king that runs everything that will collapse when that king leaves or found to be shady like Cryptojack, Rhett and Tai Zen of BTCP are killing that project, and making a killing personally, or RogerVer and JihanWu are killing BCash and making a killing along the way. You gave strong points here but still, the way to get to market caps or revenues like Ethereum or Binance is just insane. Maybe I should soften my comment a little bit and say that it will take a very long time if it ever happens. Though I am more than happy to find myself proven wrong. I'm not comparing BTCz to Ethereum that one has Putin and his government behind it with all Telegram channels dedicated to promoting ICOs which their sole purpose is to sell more Eth. But I am comparing BTCz to ZCL and I think its a better project. Its significantly better than the controversial BTCP. And certainly better than all of the other Equihash coins and I have written an in depth article on the subject. The temporary price drop is because of ANN switch. Google searches still go to the old ANN. No one tells me what happened but I am more than happy to negotiate and get the original account back or rename the project altogether to something the community owns the .com and @Twitter accounts. The thesis about Ethereum is pretty interesting, but would you mind providing some proof for that? |
|
|
|
Both projects Ethereum and Binance cannot be compared to BitcoinZ. I think it is a far-fetched dream to believe that this can reach those levels.
I think the idea of having an exchange run on BTCz as the main currency to trade against, is not far fetched. Afterall BNB and USDT are 100% premined coins like ICOs and they made a single individual or one private corporation an enormous amount of money. BTCz market cap is hovering around $6M which compared to BTCP which is mired with controversy and has a marketcap of $500M with significantly less development is indication of at least a 50x to 100x return on this project if the devs continue working on it as they have been. But again unlike ZCL where devs controlled and DUMPED it in a controlled P&D scheme, BTCz is community driven so just like Bitcoin that cannot happen to it. In fact the BitcoinZ twitter handle is owned by a scammer just like bitcoin.com is owned by a scammer and @bitcoin twitter handle was suspended. These are indications of a truly community driven project which does not rely on a super king that runs everything that will collapse when that king leaves or found to be shady like Cryptojack, Rhett and Tai Zen of BTCP are killing that project, and making a killing personally, or RogerVer and JihanWu are killing BCash and making a killing along the way. You gave strong points here but still, the way to get to market caps or revenues like Ethereum or Binance is just insane. Maybe I should soften my comment a little bit and say that it will take a very long time if it ever happens. Though I am more than happy to find myself proven wrong. |
|
|
|
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't. The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about. Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers. I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn. But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done. The final mark comes from the market anyway ) They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out. We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing. I always say- trust none other than yourself. Why not invest some time in doing the research yourself? Personally I don't trust anyone else with my money. The minority of investors in crypto does the due diligence thoroughly. The large majority only listens to some crazy Youtube video producer. |
|
|
|
The authors of the project Omnitude ICO promise to make the field of Internet trading transparent, profitable and safe. This system will play the role of a bridge for integration between existing systems and the technology of blockrooms without the need to replace them. Your summary applies to 1000 other projects as well. What is it that makes this one unique? I think that Omnitude ICO offers an innovative concept to address major inefficiencies in enterprise system management which are ripe for blockchain implementation. For now blockchain only makes sense in enterprise system management where you don't need a lot of speed I think. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
