 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
2
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: May 04, 2020, 09:43:55 PM
|
The monthly forecasting array on the Dow Jones was showing a panic cycle in March 2020 as far back as SEPTEMBER 2019. it called for February 2020 as a turning point which produced a high, March as the next which produced a low which was also a panic cycle, April was the next turning point which produced a high, now we have May which should produce a low on an intraday/closing basis. See link for monthly array in September 2019: https://ibb.co/YWqR9YpThat is what real PROOF looks like, there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work. Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions  how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves is that you must have some mental disability. Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith. Where did you go for the past month or so? Couldn't take the heat on all the wrong calls? Think people already forgot, so you are back again to pump some more before the dump? Oh wait of course nobody here knows how to read an array. There is no discussion happening here. This is the losers club, I am already gone.  No answers to the tough questions huh? Just insults? You are only insulting yourself bud by not answering. Showing your true colors. Everyone can see you for what you really are. Ask a question that does not gel with your agenda, start the insults and diversions. lol. Thanks for proving our point. |
|
|
|
|
3
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: May 04, 2020, 06:20:51 PM
|
The monthly forecasting array on the Dow Jones was showing a panic cycle in March 2020 as far back as SEPTEMBER 2019. it called for February 2020 as a turning point which produced a high, March as the next which produced a low which was also a panic cycle, April was the next turning point which produced a high, now we have May which should produce a low on an intraday/closing basis. See link for monthly array in September 2019: https://ibb.co/YWqR9YpThat is what real PROOF looks like, there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work. Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves is that you must have some mental disability. Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith. Where did you go for the past month or so? Couldn't take the heat on all the wrong calls? Think people already forgot, so you are back again to pump some more before the dump? |
|
|
|
|
5
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: April 20, 2020, 07:13:50 PM
|
That's May contract. Delivery now. Expires 21st april (tomorrow) June is at 20 bucks. They hype is strong with this one.  Watching meaningless contracts...........  |
|
|
|
|
6
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: April 01, 2020, 02:05:16 PM
|
|
Mods keep deleting my posts. Many of my posts are missing . If you don't realize what's really happening after 400 pages of this, you deserve to be ripped off.
Stop messaging me , message the mods instead cheers
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: March 29, 2020, 06:18:50 PM
|
Just like there's plenty of "demand" for phone, internet and email scams, right? Your posts don't make any sense. Lol. "You cannot expect someone to understand something that affects their livelihood." |
|
|
|
|
12
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: March 29, 2020, 02:51:58 PM
|
Crybabies reported my post to the moderator. All I did was ask why the umpteen minions were so concerned when people posted certain information about MA. |
|
|
|
|
14
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: March 13, 2020, 07:30:40 PM
|
|
Wow he cannot scam the common guy anymore. So he's looking for the deeper pockets, to de-fraud them instead.
One sale at 250k might be easier than scamming 1000s. He must be really hurting for cash.
What a guy!
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: January 26, 2020, 05:51:30 PM
|
|
MA is just another symptom of the corruption disease that's endemic throughout the markets.
Fed, politicians, real estate pros, stocks - fraud and enriching the oligarchy is everywhere.
MA is just warming his hands in the corruption fire 🔥 that is consuming us.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: January 26, 2020, 11:38:10 AM
|
|
Some of the MA sponsored trolls have tucked their tails between their legs and have disappeared.
No worries, new ones will arrive soon to proclaim how great the liar is.
MA competes with realtors when it comes to dishonesty.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: November 06, 2019, 02:48:54 PM
|
Oh come on! When a guy is worth a billion dollars, what does he care if he is wrong or right? Cut him some slack, he's been smoking it up with his buddy and co-fraudster Elon Musk. Its all good P. S. Please buy a sub, poor guy is losing his shirt in the market |
|
|
|
|
20
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
|
on: November 05, 2019, 01:15:33 PM
|
Hey MA, aka Alex aka blah blah, go spend your 100s of millions instead of trolling us. Unless you don't have the money, then please continue..... Go light one up with your buddy Elon, it'll all work out lol |
|
|
|
|
