Hello AC
Have a sincere question for you. You say that you have purchased all or many of the MA reports and I assume were/are subscribing to
the his private blog etc. I also assume you took the time to study and test out the validity of his trading advice, as any
intelligent investor would before risking their hard earned money.
My question to you is at what point and on what evidence did you gain enough confidence in MA's trading advice where you
decided to go ahead and risk and then lose enough money so that it has left you so pissed off?
Fred
First of all, your question cannot be answered because you are mixing four assumptions up.
1) That I was pissed off when I lost money
2) That I am posting here because I lost money
3) That I am posting so much because I lost so much money
4) That I am acting alone
Every speculator loses money at some point.
As to why I was getting pissed of, this is well documented
here (click) and it has nothing to do with losses.
As far as my losses are concerned, I did not even blame Armstrong for them. I thought it was my mistake because I thought did not know how to
interpret his model. I am not joking. That is because
Martin Armstrong makes claims that
his models never fail. At the time, it looked ok because the market basically moved in a straight line. I made a spreadsheet with all reversals and election details that I could get hold of, in old reports, from his web sites and so on. This seemed to confirm his assertions. So I did what one should do to build some confidence. The thing is one does not need a model for a market that moves in a straight line. The model failed to predict the turn and Martin Armstrong
lied about it. That
lie initially delayed my discovery of the scam, so that episode resulting in a loss wasn't even my staring point.
Today we know that
he manipulates historical records and cherry-picks results.
I should have considered that from the start. My due diligence was flawed.
The big mistake a few people are making in my case is that they think everybody must act in their own interest, and therefore, their activity would need to be funded in some way to be sustainable.
That is the flaw / feature in human nature that
Martin Armstrong exploits. It does not apply to me. And it probably does not apply to many people, either. I don't have this flaw / feature.
He says (literally):
"There is no such thing as bad publicity" and he calculates quite correctly, that the majority, the silent losers will keep quiet because they are afraid to be seen as losers, and
they do not see any gain in what I am doing so they move on.
So all he has to do is to replenish the pool of clients at least as fast or faster than the attrition rate (of the losers).
I am here to break that cycle. That is why I am posting here. The fact is that WE are winning and HE is losing. Again, in good tradition, I provide proof as usual:
To stay within the scope of the current events, we stick with the coronavirus petition
Bring in the expert Martin Armstrong to stop the destruction of the world economy (target 100,000 signatures).
Signing this does not cost a thing, so everybody with only half a brain who knows how to fill a form can do it. I can afford to even advertise it here which is the ultimate irony
Apart from the self-documenting incompetence and recklessness of our
Charlatan-in-chief as he
becomes a Coronavirus Expert overnight.
At this time, the signature count is topping out below the 1% mark somewhere at 850. That is all the support
Martin Armstrong has. This bitcoin Armstrong forum gets more viewers in four days. He basically shot himself in the foot by showing everyone that
nobody believes him.
The other example is his book he sells at amazon in 200 lots and then claims it is sold out the fastest ever. He limits it to get the effect. He simply does not have more supporters than that roughly. Not the
millions of Socrates users he is claiming to have.You see, why should I stop NOW?
Martin Armstrong needs more idiots to exploit.
We can call them idiots now, because now the evidence is here for everyone to see, and even an idiot - all he needs to do is to click around here and he can see what he can expect from him. So I am cutting off the stream of idiots - the last resource that was available to him.
What a difference a few well-researched, well-hyperlinked blog articles make, eh?
As to who the others are who support my activity, just go through the 300+ pages of this blog
Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.
Read this blog
starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
