Her other work was not related to SCRYPT mining. Have you thought about that?
Have you asked? Do you know this? you should have been able to answer that with you background checks and cleared this all up. I called havelock a while about about listing a IPO, I know what it takes. You took my word for it and only asked if I had control of the website. Nothing about my personal background was ever asked, so you can try to act like you "vet" but you really do not. You are asking investor to invest in very very suspect IPO's. My guess is you know 0 about these people or actual history which makes your site a very large danger to investors. If anyone else can attest to what it takes to list on havelock that would be grand. I'm going to disagree with you there. We went part way through the process, for other reasons and it was fairly intense. Whatever methods they used brought back a list of the people who reside in my house. I can only imagine they had access to thinks like criminal charges. Also, the only charge shown was for irresponsible usage of a boat. Hardly concerning. (The one mentioned on page one, I myself have never been convicted/charged of anything) If security is increasing that is good and I applaud them. he had 3 criminal hits, But your right the boat thing is not that big. But continued criminal misbehavior, could be seen as a disregard for the law and security by some. This is not my belief but it is the belief of others, I just report the facts not interpret them for people. |
|
|
|
|
cowboy miner is not the one I thought he is but, he is a very nice and was extremely helpful. He has been around for a very long time and explained to me the situation.
Cowboy mining is just selling Hashes, they have not provided 0$ or any equipment in escrow. He does not know the OP or anything about him.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup and cowboy miner messaged me with his "real username" Investigating it now.
|
|
|
|
Lol, to what end? What is this collateral meant to insure? See red font above, you're not making any sense.
To make sure cowboyminer will host the needed hash-power. cowboyminer is suspect as of this point, so that does you 0 good. So you sell and host 1st round, then cowboy hosts 2nd round? But you have cowboys miners a collateral wtf sense does this make? |
|
|
|
|
where is cowboy miner located? is it Steven wilkinson?
Why the are you avoiding the answer?
|
|
|
|
No answer? I seen someone said they are in Thailand, hope this is not where you think he is. |
|
|
|
I have 9 posts and a brand new account.
BLAH BLAH BLAH
Send 10 BTC here: 1xxxx
Thanks
You got it bud! I got so many bitcoins, I throw paper wallets loaded with bitcoins at stripers! |
|
|
|
|
I know who cowboy is now, why are you hiding from public eye? raskul slow down buddy you do not have all the info chief.
Those miners are hosted in Texas, the OP is in 1000's of miles away.
They said they are going to buy those miners after round 2, the do not own them or anything of that nature.
I am going to contact the real cowboy miner I have his contact info and speak to him on a 1v1 basis he is a very well know bitcoiner and I am not sure why he is hiding from the public on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, really 2 rounds from now is not going to happen. Give up this pipe dream and come back with a real plan and answers.
Pirate40 handling was professional as well I could list about 50 people who were professional and scamed people that don't mean squat.
Why are you speaking for them Spondoolies no offense but let the OP answer the questions.
"CBCM certainly does a lot of work" Clarify it.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, but the fact we are having to get this information from you, the mining supplier does not sit well.
How hard would it have been for the OP to do some of this shit himself instead of forcing people to dig.
While I do not think you have anything to do with CBCM, I still do feel something is a miss with them, and the whole operation.
Its hard to get no clouded side stepping answers from the OP which is a bad sign. He made it sound like you guys had some super great backdoor deal that would make this IPO better then the others.
Even if it turns out not to be a scam it is a ass backwards investment, why does anyone need CBCM to do this? Why not just buy the miners direct from you and have you host them?
The fact of the matter is he is getting paid for a group buy, for the future with out 0 investment of his own or continued effort.
Bitcoiners pay
Someone else hosts
CBCM does.. exactly what? But they are getting paid.
|
|
|
|
The fact is booth spoolies and CBCM are side stepping what the actual agreement is.
Is it just to hold the 35 units for them? Or is their some secretive back door deal going on?
Legit question by a legit user. Our only agreement with CBCM (Taras) is to hold 35 units for placement and hosting by us if the first round will be a success. I wish I had more SP10s to cover more rounds. All were sold out. Thanks for clarification spondoolies "We are a group of cryptomined enthusiasts who managed to start couple privately held mining projects located in different countries (personally I live in Czech Rep). All info about company's management will appear at our website soon. For the moment we are in business relations with Spondoolies-Tech (I am not authorized to disclose details of the agreement)." Tell me that is not misleading? All they had to say was we have units reserved and ready to be delivered. Why did I just get a email from a cowboyminer claiming he was hosting the units with pictures? |
|
|
|
All documents can be faked, so one requisite must be a webcam conference with the issuer.
A conference call with potential investors is the normal rule in any real IPO.
Not only that but some basic background questions to confirm identity would be great. Name some previous addresses at what times did you live there? What was the phone number when you lived there? Do you have a criminal record if so what, explain. Then they actually verify and check it. List of email addresses tied to your name then randomly message one. Just simple things to increase security. |
|
|
|
|
The fact is booth spoolies and CBCM are side stepping what the actual agreement is.
Is it just to hold the 35 units for them? Or is their some secretive back door deal going on?
|
|
|
|
There's also all the grossly devalued assets (HIF being one of them) and delisted offerings that must be replaced (NEOBEE[Q] and COG come to mind).
I have suspected that the HIF is a way to make IPO's look like they are trading at a good clip to start. I think HIF invests in the IPO in a couple of good chunks, gets people excited about them, then DUMPS them. It makes it appear as if people are actually buying them and they are a good security. Now they are going to argue that this is what the fund is for is to start up new business womp, womp, and more womp. But I really think it is a way to lure investors to new securities, then dump them for a profit. Pretty much making their own markets. I have not found the financials on HIF to prove any different. |
|
|
|
I'm not quite sure how this has been construed into a fight against Spondoolies and Havelock. Havelock vets new listings, and will continue to push through new IPOs because that's how they make money. How they go about that has always been questioned, but there's no point in bringing it up again since it's off topic. Spondoolies is an equipment manufacturer who sells to thousands of individuals and businesses. It seems that 35 miners is a drop in the bucket to what they normally sell, and that's certainly not a push for funding...heck, it's only enough to fill a single full-sized server rack. Their appearance in this thread is confirmation that CBCM has a reserve set aside...which is not a direct endorsement of the offering. @ Taras -- Given your background (supposed or otherwise), I would have thought dealing with these sorts of questions and comments would have been second nature at this point. 
Since you have a background in finance, let's change up my question a bit. What's the financial incentive for me to invest in your organization, as opposed to any number of other listings / mines?You think he did not hear you the first 3 times? or is just ignoring your legit questions? I mean you do run a mining fund and thats is exactly the kind of investors he wants right? |
|
|
|
|
Interesting, to me it looks like the most of the profit is from new IPO's and the initial trading. When no new IPO's are released trading comes to a slugish pace, for the fact the investors who wanted to invest in the company already have.
This is kinda validation for what was previously said, Havelock is letting in more IPO's to bump up profits. Who cares about the quality right as long as they get the profit from the trading.
|
|
|
|
|
So what I should just give you the info for free? Lol yea okay
|
|
|
|
I offer you all the exact same offer as everyone else, 15% of recovered assests + expenses incurred. For this one I will not require a retainer fee as I know exactly where he lives, works, and have a way to leverage him to give up the assets if he does not comply with a nice request I will turn some legal screws I know will work on him. P.S. They are not prosecuting Pirate40 SEC brings a civil suit http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_enforce/overviewenfor.pdf"Criminal enforcement of the federal securities laws is done through the U.S. Department of Justice and the individual U.S. Attorney's offices throughout the country. The Division provides assistance to United States Attorneys throughout the country by, among other things, providing access to Commission investigative files and assigning Commission staff to assist those offices as Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys. A defendant in a criminal securities fraud prosecution may be subject to both criminal fines and prison. A criminal prosecution does not preclude the Commission from taking civil action for the same conduct, and similarly, Commission action does not generally preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution" FBI old Bernie Madoff down they tend to do these types of prosecution, they have show little to no interest in pirate40 yet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
