6770... Man I'm going to start touching myself here.....
Are there any shorts left alive at this point?
calibrate your datum of record to bitstamp please Hm. I have been using Coinbase, it's pretty reasonable and not Finex (which for some reason is back in line this morning). Everyone loves stamp? Concurrent with my recent public whinge over Coinbase's new fee structure, I undertook a survey of exchanges for me to deal upon. After concluding such survey, Coinbase remains my exchange of choice. Ergo, stahmp is irrelevant to me. I can do the simple translation from stahmp to base prices. All y'all - to the extent you are interested enough to do so -- can perform the reflection. |
|
|
|
I was told "biggest resistance in btc history" around $6k.  Well, it was. Until it wasn't. |
|
|
|
Despite your protestations, you have utterly failed -- in any manner whatsoever -- to describe any core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks.
You are not the boss of me. True. You're gonna do what you're gonna do. And you're not gonna do what you're not gonna do. One of those items on the latter list would appear to be to provide a description of the core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks. For you have yet to do so, despite your repeated false statements that you already have. . For low security transactions: https://blockstream.com/2019/05/08/en-liquid-new-members-and-integrations/Ah yes. The Core plan is to pay Blockstream for the privilege of using Blockstream's proprietary, permissioned so-called 'sidechain' (and falsely labeled as such, I might add) - a consequence mandated by Blockstream's crippling of the underlying public permissionless blockchain. If Blockstream doesn't kick you off Blockstream's said proprietary permissioned so-called 'sidechain'. That's what you're going with? |
|
|
|
During the last 5 months, I increased my BTC stash by... wait for it...
% fucking 50.
I would call it a win.
Fitty percent is unsneezeattable. Good on ya'. One More Thing: FUCK TONE VAYS SIDEWAYS
Tone Vays is -- and has always been -- a non-entity. Why he has a ... 'following' is incomprehensible. |
|
|
|
What is going on, this is crazy gentlemen.
|
|
|
|
Forking hell...!
Are we Choo-Choo'ing now?
 Thank you Toxic For me this remains the quintessential WO meme, and the highest form of the art to date. Needs top hat, mustache, and monocle (this is gentlemen). Riding bull (Lambo) Paint train orange and put it on a roller coaster. Rocket ... Bawb might have been onto something with the banjo as well. While violin in classical music probably outnumbers fiddle in country, where else do you hear a banjo? (Bela Fleck excluded, of course). |
|
|
|
You should link to my Steemit explanation and also include a copy of the chart image directly in the post. Here a direct link to the chart image: https://i.imgur.com/dx9G5k8.png |
|
|
|
is the guy on ignore by the majority?
yes He talks about real facts that I do not want to hear because they turn my dreams into nightmaresNo, I just want to understand. False attribution is frowned upon in these parts. |
|
|
|
... I'm inclined to think anybody in bitcoin for longer terms would want to be in a buy to strong buy accumulation phase now or in the near future ...
... and they would want to have that accumulation phase wrapped up by April-May '19 time frame (12 months prior to halvening) to maximise the bottom scraping accumulation.
difficulty estimates crossing above difficulty from below ... the bottom is in. Price has once again gone down and found the true floor to cost of production. Some expensive miners went out of business, some weak hands miners dumped their stashes, some probably hedged forward and are fulfilling contracts at much higher prices. Bottom line is all excess production has now come on the market and been absorbed. Bitcoin's next trick, if it repeats, is the rising prices revives latent demand ... into a tightening supply situation.
I'm not saying i told you so ... but ... the April-May date was called for end of accumulation and beginning of rise, bottom was called in mid Dec. Good call. |
|
|
|
is [rebal] on ignore by the majority? was not aware of it.
Yes, please save us by not quoting him. Thank you. What? Did I say something wrong? I'm gonna try to help you here. Why, I do not know. Yes - you have made some number of posts here, most or all of which I seem to recall reflect an ignorance of how Bitcoin actually operates. I quite frankly don't recall the bulk of them, but such is the impression I have. As just the latest example, there is a huge difference between an exchange rolling back internal txs in order to rescue customers, and the blockchain being rolled back in order to rescue the exchange itself. The recent Binance statement from CZ postulated the latter - which upon later reflection CZ realized was intractable (duh). You seem to be conflating this with the former. This is a pedestrian misunderstanding that could be rectified by even the most cursory familiarization with the situation. I would suggest some study of Bitcoin operation before making further blanket assertions. |
|
|
|
I received this today from Shelby via PM. Submitted here without commment for your consideration: I written detailed analysis in my protonmail to several of you. But some of you are not in my trusted discussion group. Bitcoin beginning a parabolic moonshot! Altcoins may crash now until later this year! Here are the various projections I have for the new ATH price around March 2020: 1. $1154 ÷ $260 × $19666 = $87287 ($260 #3 on April 10, 2013) 2. $1154 ÷ $63 × $3122 = $57187 ($63 long-winded bottom after #3 in 2013) 3. $31 ÷ $1.10 × $19666 = $554223 ($1.10 #3 on Feb 10, 2011) 4. $32 ÷ $0.70 × $3122 = $142720 ($0.70 long-winded bottom after #3 in 20131) ($1154 for #5 and #1 on Nov 30, 2013, Bitstamp, projected to early March 2020) ($32 for #5 and #1 on Jun 8, 2011, Bitstamp, projected to early March 2020) 5. Drawing a line through the #3 in 2011 through the #3 in 2013, also runs through the #5 and #1 on Nov 30, 2013. Drawing a line through the #3 in 2013 through the #3 in 2017, project to approximately $133,000 for the #5 and #1 posited to occur March 2020. 6. A Markov model predicted the volatility range for Bitcoin in 1 year between $3k (our bottom) and $82k: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-bitcoin-price-prediction-for-2019/answer/John-Young-390Here is some more on that: https://medium.com/@VidrihMarko/bitcoin-2020-at-one-million-is-this-really-realistic-ca8992a23fbf7. Let’s consider John Mcafee’s unspecified model: https://micky.com.au/russian-economist-insists-us-sanctions-will-push-bitcoin-to-2m/https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/john-mcafee-says-point-set-technology-puts-bitcoins-price-at-least-1-million-by-end-of-2020/https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/887039604846714881https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1124436476962516994Also realize his $1 million prediction is by the end of 2020, but he not considering the volatility in the price: https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/938938539282190337So crash in the price before the end of 2020 could derail his bet, even though in terms of fundamental valuation he might be correct. But how could Mcafee be correct? Now look again at @infofront’s chart: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4919568.msg44351466#msg44351466And read my reply to John Mcafee: Quote from: https://twitter.com/iamnotback/status/1126843991637409792If that #3 – #5 (2018–2020) is extension of #1 (≤ 2010) – #3 (2017), not #1 (2014)? (c.f. linked chart) Quote from: https://twitter.com/iamnotback/status/1126845026716094464Notice that #1 – #2 has a less steep slope than #3 – #5, thus returning to the rate of ascent of < 2011 for the coming #5, topologically connects patterns within patterns. Nature is fractal. |
|
|
|
... the news wrote about Jon trying to pay his creditors and needs more time to do so, which is why he should not go to jail instantly or so.
It is _so_ cute how you still cling to the fantasy that Montroll gives a shit about trying to pay back those whom he has defrauded. |
|
|
|
cringe/vomit  Reaction unsurprising. Fluff, but moderately entertaining. Fringe benefits for some. |
|
|
|
Is there a Dutch word for 'fuckery'?
Afgang ore rotzooi.  tyvm^ edit: wait what  Fuckery synonym; Afgang ---> failure. Rotzooi ---> garbage. sounds more like 'fucked-ness' or uselessness fuckery is ~=shenanigans or devilry but ruder obviously edit: i see the internet dictionaries have both meanings active/passive. meh, fuck 'em fuckery = manipulation to me I understand you've not read the 50 Shades trilogy. |
|
|
|
Is there a Dutch word for 'fuckery'?
V8 = closest to it rude thought we were mates  Fuckery is the sincerest form of flattery. |
|
|
|
I’ve identified three credible estimates of Bitcoin electricity use that agree with each otherwell—Bevand, Vranken, and Krause and Tolaymat—and three others that have seriousissues—O’Dwyer and Malone, Digiconomist, and Mora et al. The latest estimate from one ofthese credible sources is about 5 GW of power use globally on June 30, 2018, with someindications that electricity use started falling around that time, due to the collapse of Bitcoinprices in early 2018. If converted to annual electricity consumption, 5 GW represents 44 billionkWh (44 TWh), or about 0.2% of global electricity use. https://coincenter.org/files/estimating-bitcoin-electricity-use.pdf ^ -just another 50.8% needed to be safe |
|
|
|
inertial dampers offline
hull breach on level 59
Simply an opportunity for volatility harvesting. |
|
|
|
Howdy? $5962 observed. Waiting for crossing $6k. Capitulation bros will join again At 6125, I get to exhale. Been holding my breath since November. |
|
|
|
A horse has less moving parts than a Ferrari...
False statement is false. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
