Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 04:26:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
661  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin is becoming a black hole on: September 17, 2013, 10:32:38 AM
I'm no expert on the blockchain structure, but I was wondering if maybe some parts you've already downloaded haven't become corrupted. Have you tried running Bitcoin-Qt (or bitcoind) with the -reindex and/or the -checkblocks=0 parameters? (That will take a LONG time, be warned!)

No, I ran the shortcut in the Start menu and left it alone.

I usually restart the client periodically while it is grabbing the block chain.  Seems to speed it up a bit. 
662  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Stop saying Bitcoin is good for money transfer. It isn't. on: September 16, 2013, 04:00:05 PM
Bitcoin is good for transferring bitcoin.  How's that?  Not sure I got the capitalization syntax right Wink
663  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SHA-256 has no backdoors =/= Bitcoin has no backdoors on: September 16, 2013, 03:57:55 PM
Many of you seem to be lost in translation.


SHA-256 HAS BACKDOORS.

LIKE WINDOWS OS HAS BACKDOORS. That means NSA works with Windows to plant backdoors to access any system. NSA purposely weakens software and plants backdoors in it, SHA-256 is no exception.


It's worse than you think.  All they need is 8 BITS of a SHA-256 message digest and they can backdoor their way to reconstructing your arbitrary length message.  Incidentally this is the same tech they use to store a full year of global telecoms traffic on a thumb drive.     

664  Other / Off-topic / Another way to solve the distrubted consensus problem on: September 16, 2013, 03:47:09 PM

OK, so this might be a little tough to scale into a payment network..  thankfully we have proof of work,
but it's nice to see other solutions waiting out there Smiley 

http://io9.com/5947112/watch-32-discordant-metronomes-achieve-synchrony-in-a-matter-of-minutes

 
665  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SHA-256 is designed by the NSA - do they have a backdoor? on: September 14, 2013, 09:19:37 AM
Or, they were reading the email as you typed it using

1) Rootkit
2) Tempest
3) Robotic mosquito flying behind your head

1. Not likely. Email composed and encrypted offline. Also got tools for this, GMER, etc.
2. Not likely. Faraday cage and all that.
3. Not likely. All insects don't get past the door and air filters.

Of course, it's still possible. Just not likely.

@gmaxwell, nice post. I almost understood everything. hehehe.

You seem to have your systems quite in order sir Smiley  Do you mind while we stray somewhat off topic if I ask, how you authenticate your recipients public key?

666  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SHA-256 is designed by the NSA - do they have a backdoor? on: September 13, 2013, 01:49:05 PM
If you have to ask, you already know the answer.



More like, if you have to ask, you are trying to divert us from looking at secp256k1.
667  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SHA-256 is designed by the NSA - do they have a backdoor? on: September 11, 2013, 04:55:09 PM
I use gmail. But I also use GPG with 4096 bit RSA keys. They can store my encrypted message and keep it for all eternity, but they'll never read it.

Even with their quantum computer?

Even with their quantum computer. If you live long enough to read my email, you are effectively immortal. That, or someone stole my private key.

Or, they were reading the email as you typed it using

1) Rootkit
2) Tempest
3) Robotic mosquito flying behind your head
668  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Schneier in the Guardian: all your coinz is belong to them? on: September 08, 2013, 07:16:52 AM
The reason he mentions constants and EC is because of this:

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html

Thanks for the link.. but I'm not sure that's what he was talking about in the Guardian piece.  It seems he was referring to assymetric encryption or digital signature algos.. at least, I'm not aware of a standard random number generator that uses discrete logs.

I'm surprised there aren't any DSA altcoins yet.


That statement is not an allegation. He says "prefer," not "omg public key cryptography is hacked!"

 

In any case, my apologies for the overly provocative subject title.

669  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has the NSA already broken bitcoin? on: September 06, 2013, 04:26:14 PM
This would be pretty easy to test. Just get a bunch of friends to start exchanging encrypted messages about bombing an embassy or govt office. If these douche-bags can break it, they'd be on you like white on rice.

That's an idea but not real sweet honey.  After all your bombing could also lead to increases in their budget so why bother stopping you?  If you are actually looking to make a test, include some real actionable high-stakes financial insider info and watch the futures market to see if anybody read your shit. 
670  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has the NSA already broken bitcoin? on: September 06, 2013, 03:47:07 PM
I'm reading this book right now. Pretty on topic. In this novel the NSA can decrypt any algorithm except one...



I'm sorry for your loss.  That book is total junk.  At least with the other formulaic dan brown novels, they touch on something he knows about (religious history).  This one does not. 
671  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Schneier in the Guardian: all your coinz is belong to them? on: September 06, 2013, 01:43:07 PM
Here's the relevant quote: 

"Prefer symmetric cryptography over public-key cryptography. Prefer conventional discrete-log-based systems over elliptic-curve systems; the latter have constants that the NSA influences when they can."

That seems like a pretty serious allegation to me..  anything to it folks? 

source:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-how-to-remain-secure-surveillance


672  Economy / Economics / Re: How does a country fully adopt Bitcoin? on: August 17, 2013, 07:54:18 PM
A government moving to Bitcoin would need its CB to buy an amount of BTC comparable to their monetary base and set a conversion date. The public would need Bitcoin wallets and tutorials in advance and would then receive BTC in exchange for giving up the old currency.  Tax breaks should be given to encourage people to buy ASICs for mining. Financial systems would need to be re-denominated. A big logistical exercise.


Not necessarily.

A government could grab some BTC and/or claim a certain amount.  They could for example claim that 1 ZMB would get you 0.00001 coin passed to an address you control at any branch.  Hey presto, you now have a currency backed by BTC!
673  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly: Terrorism money on: August 14, 2013, 12:53:25 PM
Terrorism is not really a thing, just an intangible concept used by governments to remove freedoms from the populace by justifying it in the name of protecting the state. Like 9/11, the Patriot Act could not be passed fast enough to remove rights and freedoms from American citizens in the name of securing America from "terror", which has been ongoing for 13 years and counting as more and more freedoms are eroded and destroyed, pushed along by false flag attacks (The Boston Bombing) that seem created to get us used to fully militarized police.

A "terrorist" activity essentially means any action against the state that they don't like, which gives them much flexibility in enacting unconstitutional laws and power to go after anyone they please, for any reason. In this the US is highly guilty of pushing their "War on Terror", which if you think about it, how does one have a war on an intangible concept. It is just a smokescreen and nothing more.

That said, US dollars and other fiat currencies have been funding war and terrorist activities long before Bitcoin came along. The only pundits who push that as a negative point about Bitcoin have nothing else bad to say, so this is them spitballing. Much like the "Bitcoin is used to buy drugs!" arguement...pretty sure the drug trade is Dollar based and still basically is, but no one calls for a ban on Dollars to stop the problem. If this is the only ammunition they have against digital currencies they are a desperate bunch indeed.


+1

Did you know: Terrorist terrorists terrorist terrorists terrorize terrorize terrorist terrorists. 


674  Other / Politics & Society / Garry Davis, Man of No Nation Who Saw One World of No War, Dies at 91 on: August 14, 2013, 12:50:23 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/us/garry-davis-man-of-no-nation-dies-at-91.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


 On May 25, 1948, a former United States Army flier entered the American Embassy in Paris, renounced his American citizenship and, as astonished officials looked on, declared himself a citizen of the world.

Garry Davis, dean of the One World movement, in 1956. He had his own flag and passport, and often his own jail cell.

In 1948, five years before starting an agency to issue passports, Garry Davis distributed handbills in Paris. A stateless man, he was a relentless force behind a movement to erase national borders.

Mr. Davis ran for the United States presidency in 1988.

In the decades that followed, until the end of his long life last week, he remained by choice a stateless man — entering, leaving, being regularly expelled from and frequently arrested in a spate of countries, carrying a passport of his own devising, as the international news media chronicled his every move.

His rationale was simple, his aim immense: if there were no nation-states, he believed, there would be no wars.

Garry Davis, a longtime peace advocate, former Broadway song-and-dance man and self-declared World Citizen No. 1, who is widely regarded as the dean of the One World movement, a quest to erase national boundaries that today has nearly a million adherents worldwide, died on Wednesday in Williston, Vt. He was 91, and though in recent years he had largely ceased his wanderings and settled in South Burlington, Vt., he continued to occupy the singular limbo between citizen and alien that he had cheerfully inhabited for 65 years.

“I am not a man without a country,” Mr. Davis told Newsweek in 1978, “merely a man without nationality.”

Mr. Davis was not the first person to declare himself a world citizen, but he was inarguably the most visible, most vocal and most indefatigable.

The One World model has had its share of prominent adherents, among them Albert Schweitzer, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Einstein and E. B. White.

But where most advocates have been content to write and lecture, Mr. Davis was no armchair theorist: 60 years ago, he established the World Government of World Citizens, a self-proclaimed international governmental body that has issued documents — passports, identity cards, birth and marriage certificates — and occasional postage stamps and currency.

He periodically ran for president of the world, always unopposed.

To date, more than 2.5 million World Government documents have been issued, according to the World Service Authority, the group’s administrative arm.

Whether Mr. Davis was a visionary utopian or a quixotic naïf was long debated by press and public. His supporters argued that the documents he issued had genuine value for refugees and other stateless people.

His detractors countered that by issuing them — and charging a fee — Mr. Davis was selling false hope to people who spent what little they had on papers that are legally recognized almost nowhere in the world.

What is beyond dispute is that Mr. Davis’s long insistence on the inalienable right of anyone to travel anywhere prefigures the present-day immigration debate by decades. It likewise anticipates the current stateless conditions of Julian Assange and Edward J. Snowden.

Mr. Davis, who spoke about the One World movement on college campuses and wrote books on the subject, seemed impervious to his critics. In a voice trained to be heard in the last balcony (he was once a Broadway understudy to Danny Kaye), he would segue with obvious relish into a series of minutely reasoned arguments concerning the need for a world without nationalism.

“The nation-state is a political fiction which perpetuates anarchy and is the breeding ground of war,” he told The Daily Yomiuri, an English-language newspaper in Japan, in 1990. “Allegiance to a nation is a collective suicide pact.”

The quest for a unified earth was an objective on which Mr. Davis had trained his sights very early. It was born of his discomfort with a childhood of great privilege, his grief at the loss of a brother in World War II and his horror at his own wartime experience as a bomber pilot.

Sol Gareth Davis was born in Bar Harbor, Me., on July 27, 1921, a son of Meyer Davis and the former Hilda Emery.

Meyer Davis was a renowned society orchestra leader known as the “millionaire maestro”: at his height, he presided over an empire of 80 ensembles — employing more than a thousand musicians — which played at debutante balls, national political conventions and White House inaugurations.

Garry was reared in Philadelphia in a glittering milieu in which the family car was a chauffeured Rolls-Royce and family friends included Bob Hope and Ethel Merman. As a young man he was considered unserious, he later said, known for roguish wit but lacking direction.

After studying theater at the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh, Mr. Davis made his Broadway debut in October 1941 in a small role in “Let’s Face It!,” the musical comedy. He was also the understudy for its star, Mr. Kaye.

Then the United States entered the war. Mr. Davis and his older brother, Meyer Jr., known as Bud, went overseas — Bud with the Navy and Garry with the Army Air Forces, flying B-17 bombers. Bud Davis did not return: he was killed in 1943, when his ship, the destroyer Buck, was sunk off the coast of Italy by a German submarine.

That, and a dark epiphany during a bombing run over Brandenburg, Germany, Garry Davis later wrote, would alter his life’s course.

“Ever since my first mission over Brandenburg, I had felt pangs of conscience,” Mr. Davis wrote in a 1961 memoir, “The World Is My Country.” (The volume was later reissued as “My Country Is the World.”) “How many bombs had I dropped? How many men, women and children had I murdered? Wasn’t there another way, I kept asking myself.”

The other way, he came to believe, was to eradicate conflict by eradicating borders.

In November 1948, six months after renouncing his citizenship in Paris, Mr. Davis stormed a session of the United Nations General Assembly there.

“We, the people, want the peace which only a world government can give,” he proclaimed. “The sovereign states you represent divide us and lead us to the abyss of total war.”

His act, reported worldwide, earned the support of the intelligentsia, including Albert Camus, and of the French public, so recently racked by war. Less than two weeks later, speaking at a Paris auditorium, Mr. Davis drew a crowd of 20,000.

In 1949, Mr. Davis founded the International Registry of World Citizens and was soon inundated with requests to join from around the globe. “We’re bigger than Andorra,” he told The Boston Globe in 1981, when the registry was a quarter-million strong.

Today, more than 950,000 people are registered world citizens, according to the World Service Authority, based in Washington.

Mr. Davis, who lived for long periods in France, appeared on Broadway a few more times in the early 1950s, including in a revue called “Bless You All” and “Stalag 17,” the prisoner-of-war drama. But the One World imperative occupied him increasingly.

In 1953, he founded the World Government of World Citizens. The demand for its documents proved so brisk that he established the service authority the next year.

More than half a million world passports have been issued, though there are no statistics on the number of people who have successfully crossed borders with them. A half-dozen countries — Burkina Faso, Ecuador, Mauritania, Tanzania, Togo, Zambia — have formally recognized the passport. More than 150 others have honored it on occasion, according to the service authority.

Fees for the passport range from $45 (valid for three years) to $400 (for 15 years). The passport has text in seven languages, including Esperanto, the artificial international language.

Carrying world passport No. 1, Mr. Davis spent decades spreading his message, slipping across borders, stowing away on ships, sweet-talking officials, or wearing them down, until they let him in. The newspapers charted his comings and goings:

1949: “Garry Davis Arrested in Paris”; 1953: “Garry Davis Held Again: Arrested When He Camps Out Near Buckingham Palace”; 1957: “France Expels Garry Davis”; 1979: U.S. Court Rules ‘World Citizen’ Davis Is an Alien and Rejects His Passport; 1984: “Japan Expels American ‘World Citizen’ ”; 1987: “ ‘World Citizen’ Announces Presidential Bid.” (It was the United States presidency this time.)

In 1986, Mr. Davis ran for mayor of Washington, receiving 585 votes.

Mr. Davis was arrested dozens of times, usually for attempting to enter a country without official papers. He had canny ways of circumventing authority.

In the 1950s, when France was trying to deport him, he conspicuously shoplifted items from a Paris department store. (His haul, United Press reported, was “$47 worth of peach-colored lace panties, black-silk brassieres, black garter belts, lace petticoats and pink slips.”) He made certain he was arrested.

As a result of his arrest, Mr. Davis was legally enjoined from leaving the country.

Mr. Davis was married two or three times, depending on how one counts. His first marriage, to Audrey Peters, an American whom he courted by mail while detained in France and whom he met for the first time two weeks before their wedding in 1950, ended in divorce. In 1954, the newspapers reported his “marriage” at sea to Gloria Sandler in a ceremony he performed himself; that union, too, was dissolved. His marriage to Esther Peter in 1963 also ended in divorce.

Survivors include a daughter, Kristina Starr Davis, from his marriage to Ms. Peters; two sons, Troy and Kim, and a daughter, Athena Davis, who confirmed her father’s death, from his marriage to Ms. Peter; a sister, Ginia Davis Wexler; a brother, Emery; and a granddaughter.

His other books include “World Government, Ready or Not!” (1984) and “Dear World: A Global Odyssey” (2000). He was the subject of a short documentary, “One! The Garry Davis Story,” released in 2007.

In old age, Mr. Davis was far from idle. Last year, he had a world passport delivered to Mr. Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, who has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

Just weeks before he died, Mr. Davis had a world passport sent, via Russian authorities, to Mr. Snowden, the fugitive former national security contractor accused of violating espionage laws, whose United States passport was revoked in June.

Mr. Snowden could not be reached for comment.
675  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 6 Bitcoin Societal Issues on: August 14, 2013, 12:41:01 PM
Nice list!

1) Bribery -- authorities can be bribed to grant favors.  Can police/politicians be trusted?

This will always be an issue.  Sound money will only level the field a bit by somewhat lessening the controllers of the money supply role as briber of last resort. 

2) Unfair elections -- untraceable alien and excessive donations controlling election advertising.

Today, "unfair elections" is a tautology, even before we consider donations.  Coins could improve this tremendously if they are used as part of a fair voting protocol..  if anybody cared or fair votes were ever needed. 

3) Tax only the honest? -- under-the-table commerce and pay is not taxed.  Only fair tax left is a flat "head" tax.

Tax only the honest (or rather, tax only what people declare) is already the system.  Coins will only enable more open operations and more fair taxation.  With coins there is a way that a company could actually prove what their revenues were. 

4) Financial aid cheating -- wealth can be hidden so poverty can't be determined as easily.  Who should get government aid?

This is the same problem we have today.  Where do you think all the welfare money is going?   

5) Terrorism and Crime -- no stopping funding of enemies foreign and domestic.

Once again, already true.  The oranizations that fund "enemies" foreign and domestic now can draw from "credit creation", total impunity, etc.  A sound system of money will eliminate some of the need for funding enemies, but people will always be able to play that game if they remain ignorant.

6) Porn and Drugs -- buying this stuff is made easier and undetectable.

If you are somebody that needs to pay for porn, you don't have the technology available to use bitcoin.  If you think people should not be able to choose their own foods/drinks/medicines, then why should we be allowed to use money at all?   

676  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: List of UK organisations who take Bitcoin on: July 25, 2013, 04:14:14 PM
OK so to recap our situation.
 ~5 years later and millions of quid invested, and now:

 there are about a dozen people who genuinely would use this system and have their name associated with it in the UK. 

Can anyone compare for me with the number of UK vendors in TOR marketplaces?
677  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Lets have some fun!! Brainwallet with 1btc. You crack it, its yours. FREE BTC on: July 16, 2013, 09:38:51 AM
Nice idea Smiley

A very hard puzzle with a get-it-yourself cash reward; I hope to see them in newspapers soon. 
678  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ► ► ► LTC IPO: Litecoin's Pre-Gox Project, fontas ► ► ► on: July 15, 2013, 11:23:40 AM
Fontas's famous for PUMP N DUMP. Now that PUMP has been announced public, I am afraid DUMP is the real intention.  Wink

I'm gambling on DUMP N PUMP myself. 
679  Other / Politics & Society / Re: "I don't vote"... "it's beneath me"?? on: July 13, 2013, 08:09:27 AM
"I don't vote" -- could somebody please explain this attitude which seems very pervasive among An-Caps and Libertarians & Co.?

Seriously, is it a:
"I don't negotiate with terrorists" hunger-strike kind of thing, where you drink poison and hope the other person will die?

Not that I'm trying to get anyone to participate in the democratic process (please, just NO! Wink ), I'm just trying to fully understand how this non-participation mindset is supposed to personally benefit the non-voter.


Don't confuse voting for a representative (giving up your political power) with voting for a law, a system, a product, or a verdict (i.e. jury duty) (exercising political power). 

Every time we spend 1 USD we are voting, and each of these votes are more powerful politically than any vote for a representative.  We all vote, and we should all put some thought into our votes otherwise we are most definitely fucked.  Also, unlike the professional elections reality TV show, votes made with dollars and coins are actually counted. 




680  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin as currency? on: July 13, 2013, 07:50:57 AM
I always say Bitcoin isn't a currency because of this. You measure Bitcoins by dirty fiat money to know how much they will buy you at any given moment. That seems a token/proxy to me, not a currency.

Is your dollar token still worth more than 10 millies?  It's been extremely variable lately. 

Seriously though, the only real answer to this issue is to wait a few hundred thousand blocks and see how you feel then.   
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!