|
For what to lose a possibility of profit earning - a tax even on a part of actions with bitcoin, it is already income. And if to forbid, then transactions with bitcoin will leave on the black market.
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investment is subject to risk too. Gold and silver will make for 25% of profit? Most likely almost all this percent will be absorbed by inflation. The bitcoin gives the chance to earn much bigger % for a short time.
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of things depend on the chosen campaign. In certain cases quite long expectation is required.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer to use exchangers from the list: Bittrex, Livecoin, HitBTC, Bitstamp, Binance, Kucoin.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps process of search of new opportunities of earnings is not interesting to Bill Gates any more and he are content with what is?
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin was supposed to be used as a currency, not only a form of investment. However, it's been more successful as a form of investment, a "speculative asset".
Do you guys think that this can change in the long term ?
To become full-fledged currency bitcoin it has to be stabilized. The moment will become perfect condition when other currencies estimate not in dollar, and in bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
The states do not love bitcoin because for them it is actually lost profit. If though any percent can be received for cashing in, then at the transfers made through cryptocurrency, money passes a tax.
|
|
|
|
|
Strong growth is more attractive to promoting of bitcoin and as world currency including. Strong volatility gives the chance of big profit at the correct rates.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiat - inherently, the same goods. Than its is more the closer line behind which he begins to lose the cost because of decrease in purchasing power. Inflation.
|
|
|
|
|
The simplest option, it to use advertizing. Quite good method to create a basis for passive earnings. Plus in parallel it is possible to start additional services, but they depend on content of the website.
|
|
|
|
|
Faces commission of such purchase it will be convinced that the legislation of the country in which is made purchase provides such type of mutual settlements. Otherwise such transaction can be recognized as invalid and cancel it. As a result you will be left both without car and without altcoins\bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
If to consider the general situation, then nobody can be insured for 100% of actions of hackers (the exception makes full offline the mode). Can be cracked any device in network though the cryptocurrency exchange though bank.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that such option will be possible: with sufficient technical base, the state can release the cryptocurrency and replace usual cash.
|
|
|
|
the year 2023 is too fast for the crypto currency to replace the fiat currency, perhaps at that time the crypto currency and fiat currencies go side by side and have nearly as many users
If such replacement happens, then most likely not earlier 2033, or even 2043. When there is rather advanced technical base and an opportunity to be in online from any point of the world. |
|
|
|
|
It is too much influencing factors to answer unambiguously. The situation can change within a month with one on opposite.
|
|
|
|
Pretty good idea to close the ICO's as they are actually becoming the viruses of crypto world.
In addition to this they shovel just keep the other tokens which are already present in the CMC now so that we can focus on these tokens and people can actually put real value to them. I mean everything will get focused on them and not the junk that is coming every other day in the market.
Then that would be the best way to run crypto currency market. ICO's are really really worst these days.
And who is going to implement this closing of the ICOs? The idea is good but ICOs are not centralized as well, each country has its own regulations and some does not even care. ICOs has become the new and the easiest way of raising money But also became a scam field for scammers. I agree, In this situation there can be useful more strict requirements to organizers and managers of ICO programs. |
|
|
|
I'm just reading an article in the newspaper. Klaus W. Wellershoff (a last chief in UBS Bank) says that's impossible to use a currency with volatility as money. If the value of the money decrease, that means the value of the merchandise decrease. For example : if you buy a flat with bitcoin and few years later the bitcoin value decrease... Your flat lose his value as well.
What do you think about this argument?
And you are capable to call currency with zero volatility? Actually volatility depends on from what party to look. For example - It not the bitcoin becomes cheaper, but the dollar rises in price and vice versa. |
|
|
|
|
Because the bitcoin can't be controlled by standard methods. The bureaucracy never wants to introduce modern and simpler rules, посколько it kills an essence of bureaucracy.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
