Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 12:13:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
861  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 13, 2014, 12:31:12 PM
However, nothing lasted more than an hour at ambient temperatures of 17 degrees C.

1 hour is nowhere near enought to come to such a conclusion, unless ofcourse the rate is way off, in which case, evn 10 mins would do.

I assume the successful overclocking by others is either different chips or better cooling.  It was frustrating to see clear jumps above 500 GH/s, but then rates that dropped below stock of 453 GH/s.

They are all BM1382's, though the earlier S3's (apparently) have different voltage regulators (and who knows what else!). Cooling wise, you may have a point, though debatable, with the earlier S3's, but not relating to S3+'s. Again, I have to say you did not run them for long enough .... at the very least I'd run it for 4hrs. And the clear jumps you refer to, is that with the 5s or the avg hash-rate? For the 5s I've seen as high as 700Gh/s and as low as 12Gh/s, so it does not really matter, rather the avg rate.

EDIT: Finally, it is not a case of increasing / decreasing the voltage at which the chips run, it is about setting the appropriate voltage for the frequency you are running at. At the very least, you'll notice a decrease in the HW errors as the S3's (and S3+'s) seem to ship with an non-datasheet freq - voltage setting. For other units, you'll also see an improvement in hash-rate but more pertinently, if you are overclocking, then you'll be able to do it at its appropriate voltage and will be in a better position to decide when you've stretched your unit far enough. In my case, I have one unit (an S1 to S3 upgrade) that I am limited by the PSU and datasheet voltage settings as I feel it can be pushed further!
862  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 12, 2014, 10:21:30 PM
This thread is F******** EPIC.

Now i have two units that had trouble running at stock ... running at least at 250 with lower voltage.

One of them is at 262.5 running at 524gh at the moment. I couldn't even make it run at 441 at 218.75 back then.

Thanks you so much for this !
You are welcome, mind though that the pleasure, like custom dictates, is all mine!
PS. Would be nice if you explained how and why you had to update the firmware of your S3 for other users .....
863  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: December 12, 2014, 10:18:07 PM
While we are at it, everyone, stop whingeing! Block found at last .... fingers crossed it does not turn out to be stale.
864  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: December 12, 2014, 10:14:55 PM
seriously, wtf is going on?!?! 

It says on blockchain that the block was orphaned for possibly having double spend transactions.
That's that then.
865  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [DIY] - Reward $100 | Antminer S1/S3 Blade on Raspberry Pi on: December 11, 2014, 11:58:52 PM
Great thread!

I have 16 S1 boards in the UK if anyone is interested in buying them.
You got a PM.
866  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 11, 2014, 09:37:38 PM
If anyone still running the new firmware, would you please post here the line used to start cgminer? It "should" be in the System Log (under Status) immediately after starting up (I think that is where I saw it before, but may be wrong!) or even better, if you SSH into the rig open the file /etc/init.d/cgminer with vi editor and scroll down to the line that starts PARAMS= (not #PARAMS=). I think the issue of dropping hash-rate may be due to the setting of auto-voltage / frequency (and the startup line may reveal that!).
867  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 11, 2014, 09:26:00 PM

I would like the bring up the discussion about downvolting again..  it doesn't appear to make a difference measured by the a killawatt at the wall when lowering the voltage.

the watts go down some when you lower the freq., but you should be able to get a better Gh/j with the voltage change... right?

has anyone been able to lower the watts at the wall???
Have you got a killawatt and have you measured / monitored? I'd hazard to say thats your answer; but bitmain (or someone else) may have other empirical evidence / knowledge.

Yes I do, reference the post you quoted!
I'd hazard to say thats your answer!
868  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 11, 2014, 07:30:22 PM

I would like the bring up the discussion about downvolting again..  it doesn't appear to make a difference measured by the a killawatt at the wall when lowering the voltage.

the watts go down some when you lower the freq., but you should be able to get a better Gh/j with the voltage change... right?

has anyone been able to lower the watts at the wall???
Have you got a killawatt and have you measured / monitored? I'd hazard to say thats your answer; but bitmain (or someone else) may have other empirical evidence / knowledge.
869  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 11, 2014, 07:22:37 PM
That said, I would, however, still want Bitmain OEM parts on my Bitmain AntMiners... :/

Mind what you ask for, else you'll get it!
I'd say not worth it getting bitmain parts (more relevant though not worth for bitmain!). They'll charge you a packet for shipping, as they'd rightly have to, and their prices are ridiculous to say the least.
A replacement S3 controller board, for example, is nothing short of $ 110 plus shipping (or you'll have to make an order for an S3 and they'll ship both together at no extra shipping cost).
At the end of the day, the parts bitmain use, aside from their custom chip, are OEM parts which you can get on the open market.
870  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 10, 2014, 05:58:43 PM
Does the voltage reset to default after reboot?
It does not reset to default so long as you save it once you have set it. I simply do a Save & Apply after setting and do not need to reboot as that action restarts cgminer.
871  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.8.0 on: December 10, 2014, 01:16:20 AM
This has probably been asked before, but I can not seem to find it.
I have added a script (to an S3's scheduled tasks) that runs every 6 hours to restart cgminer depending on some condition, however I get the following response when the conditions are met and it tries to restart cgminer:

Code:
Reply was 'STATUS=E,When=1418173650,Code=45,Msg=Access denied to 'restart' command,Description=cgminer 4.6.1|'
[STATUS] =>
(
   [STATUS] => E
   [When] => 1418173650
   [Code] => 45
   [Msg] => Access denied to 'restart' command
   [Description] => cgminer 4.6.1
)

The critical line that call for the restart is

Code:
cgminer-api restart

Do I need to add any options to how I call the script or to the command to restart?

EDIT: OK got this figured out, I changed the PARAMS line in the file /etc/init.d/cgminer to included  --api-allow $_aa and restarted cgminer, and now I get:
Code:
Reply was 'RESTART'
[RESTART] =>
(
   [0] => RESTART
)
Though it seems the UI shows cgminer has stopped, it does not restart, I have to manually restart it. Is there a delay before cgminer restarts and / or can this be set / changed?
[/code]
872  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 10, 2014, 12:51:17 AM
Has anyone noticed an issue with a S3+ where it slows down to ~10% of normal speed (50GH instead of 500GH) after running for a few hours?

I have a S3+ that sporadically does this, and need to restart cgminer to fix it.

The issue is probably either with cgminer, my mining pool (solo.ckpool.org), or PSU. I'm running two S3s on a decent 1000W gold PSU, so I don't think the power supply is the issue.

I'm also using the latest Nov 26 firmware.
Is that a new S3+ and / or have you updated the firmware to the November release?
Ther have been several reports of rigs upgraded to the November firmware slowing down, and the symptoms look like the ones yours is displaying.
873  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 09, 2014, 11:58:08 PM
Pete, one day I will find you and give you the biggest high five ever. Thanks for the guide man!!!
Pete ...!? You talking to me? High fives all over then, and the pleasure is all mine.
I also noticed that the default voltage setting that bitmain ship with is 0725 but there is no mention of any 5 thousandth in the datasheet, so naturally, I tried it on one of my rigs that I had running at 0750 (aka tried 0755) ...... not bad!
874  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 09, 2014, 11:50:26 PM
this line in my web interface "scheduled tasks"  

0,30 * * * * /etc/init.d/cgminer restart

restarts my miner every 30 min. What do I need to replace the 0,30 with to have it restart every 2hrs ?
I'm guessing 120 but I wouldn't bet a finger on it !

* */2 * * * /etc/init.d/cgminer restart
875  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Undervolting an S3+ on: December 09, 2014, 01:40:29 AM
Will I have much of a performance hit if I undervolt my S3+. It is currently running at stock 0725. What setting will it still run stable and have a relatively similar hash rate. Is this recommended for the rig to run coole? I am in a high ambient temp environment. What are recommended settings for a high ambient temp environment?
That is the lowest voltage mentioned in the BM1382 datasheet (the chips inside S3's), so I'd say you are undervolted to the hilt according to bitmain. I am not sure how low the voltage regulators used will go, but I'd guess you'll need to modify some hardware (caps? / resistors?).
As far as I am aware, there are no recomended ambients as the rig will try its best to cool the chips, thus running the fans faster (and louder!). You could try reducing the frequency, but I doubt you'll maintain the hashrate, more like it will drop, and I am not at all sure that will reduce the temperature either.

0725 is the factory setting. So are you saying Bitmain ships it undervolted at the max undervolt setting already?
I can not say definitively that 0725 is the max undervolt setting, but the BM1380 BM1382 datasheet lists 0.7v as the lowest voltage setting; it is possible that you can set it lower (and there is nothing to stop you from trying!).
876  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 08, 2014, 07:34:46 PM
Sorry for the silly question but I just put the voltage setting in the voltage box under the drop down for the Frequency, correct?  
No such thing as a silly question, simply a question.
Yes, type the voltage setting inside that box and click Save & Apply (cgminer will restart after that and no need to reboot), else if you click Save, the setting will be applied next time you reboot the rig.
877  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Undervolting an S3+ on: December 08, 2014, 07:31:35 PM
Will I have much of a performance hit if I undervolt my S3+. It is currently running at stock 0725. What setting will it still run stable and have a relatively similar hash rate. Is this recommended for the rig to run coole? I am in a high ambient temp environment. What are recommended settings for a high ambient temp environment?
That is the lowest voltage mentioned in the BM1382 datasheet (the chips inside S3's), so I'd say you are undervolted to the hilt according to bitmain. I am not sure how low the voltage regulators used will go, but I'd guess you'll need to modify some hardware (caps? / resistors?).
As far as I am aware, there are no recomended ambients as the rig will try its best to cool the chips, thus running the fans faster (and louder!). You could try reducing the frequency, but I doubt you'll maintain the hashrate, more like it will drop, and I am not at all sure that will reduce the temperature either.
878  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: December 07, 2014, 08:42:02 PM
Wehey! I like the update to the dashboard .... we can now see the details about the current round.
Any chance of reloading my developer points then?
879  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [DIY] - Reward $100 | Antminer S1/S3 Blade on Raspberry Pi on: December 07, 2014, 01:56:28 PM
so i finally got around to soldering 2 boards into one. i took off the 1st and 31st chip. so in total there is 61 chips. when i go to set freq all chips seems to report back. it hashes 80ghs-90ghs for a little and then slowly drops, it shoots alot of hw errors. im thinking its a timing/clock issue.
You are the man!
Yes you are right, it is a timing issue as the timings are for a chain of 32 chips. I'd hazard a guess that if you set it to a fraction of the timing you have for the frequency you are running at, then you'll have less HW errors and a hash-rate improvement.
Once again, YOU are the man and well done for taking one for the rest of us mere mortals!

EDIT: Any chance of photo's of the mod on both boards? That will be super.
Also, (and I am sure you can handle this), but if you want some input on the timings that you can try, could you advise what freq you are running the boards at?
880  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: S3+ (BM1382) Overclocking with voltage setting on: December 07, 2014, 12:21:31 AM
Hmm....I have mine set to 0850 right now...maybe I will me the adjustment per your recommendation tonight.  Is there a notable hash increase?
Running at a freq of 262.5 with a voltage setting of 0850 will not be as efficient as running with a voltage setting of 0750, as you'll get more HW errors. At the very worst though (assuming you have an an adequate PSU), you'll be wasting power as the combined wattage is 544W whereas at 0750 it is ~294W. (note the wattage I mention here is theoretical and will actually be more!)

Classically, that is what we have been doing wrong all along, i.e running / overclocking the rigs with different frequencies at the same voltage setting! It should have been setting a voltage for a range of frequencies, but now we are wiser.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!