301
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A WIF generator ... but is it possible to generate faster ??
|
on: October 17, 2023, 08:48:21 PM
|
Ps, care to share what you are trying to achieve using WIFs?
If you read all his code he is only scanning for some address, exactly the same thing that we do in puzzles. OP is using scalar multiplication in each cycle that is slow I already told him that searching for publickeys is up to 32 times faster, but he doesn't care. OP a very good optimized code in CPU can scan some 20 million keys per second. Try to reduce redundant steps in each cycle you are still some steps behind.
|
|
|
302
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A WIF generator ... but is it possible to generate faster ??
|
on: October 17, 2023, 05:24:23 PM
|
TBH with you if you want speed, you should start changing of language...
There are a lot of changes and short cuts than can be implemented to generate that amount of keys and even more in less than a second.
- Avoid to conver Integers to WIF that step isn't necessary at all. this mean (avoid bytes_to_wif ) - Avoid to use Integer to address each time (in your case avoid to do key (wif) to address each time) - As i can see you are calculating Keys in sequential order, this can be faster if do only Point Addition in each step of the cycle (This is at least 32 times faster than your "key.address" ) - Avoid search for addres directly insteat of search by address you need to do search by RMD160 hash, this avoid to conver each of those hash160 to address in each step of the cycle. - Add endomorphism, this can search keys over all the curve and increment your speed by 2 o 4 times depending of your implementation.
Basicaly you need to stop using those API and slow languages. And starting to do almost all from scrash to avoid repetitive steps in each cycle
Doing this a laptop can search some 20 Million keys per second with only CPU. A high end Computer can seach 100 Million keys/s with only CPU.
|
|
|
304
|
Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
|
on: October 17, 2023, 01:32:04 AM
|
Si que da gusto ver comisiones de 1sat/vB siendo confirmadas. Momento perfecto para consolidad. El unico detalle que sigo viendo es que segun la pagina de mempool quedan 81 bloques pendientes (Sin contar transacciones entrates). De estos 81 bloques pendientes hay en fila 22 mil transacciones lo que da un promedio de 271 TX por bloque. Yo de momento ya relize consolidaciones. Tambien estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la red lightning. A ver como se mueve en la semana, vi las variaciones del precio el dia de hoy y si que dan sorpresas esas noticias.
|
|
|
305
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: How important is cryptography?
|
on: October 17, 2023, 12:56:51 AM
|
During the process of undergoing research partaining bitcoin. I came across the word cryptography. Though have checked what the word entails and it talk about public and private key. I am soliciting for the forum members to enlighten me more and broaden my knowledge about cryptography. If you are still in the research process why you don't continue to search about cryptograpy on internet, directly? Wikipedia, Google, even chatGPT are good starting points. What stop you to continue by your self? If i can recomend you some place to start is https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mastering-bitcoin/9781491902639/ch04.htmlalso search the full book.
|
|
|
306
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / What monetary cone do you like?
|
on: October 16, 2023, 04:47:39 PM
|
I know that this is not a specific of bitcoin topic but let me change the question a little
If you want to organize your UTXOS in some way with some specific denominations/balance, which one do you want to choose?
For example some mixers use utxos of
0.001BTC 0.01BTC 0.1 BTC ...
And maybe others denominations
I remember to see some time ago the chips from chipmixer in some base of two denominations:
0.001 BTC 0.002 BTC 0.004 BTC 0.008 BTC …. 1.024 BTC 2.048 BTC 4.092 BTC 8.196 BTC
In the Fiat money that we use almost daily there are denominations of 1,2,5 for coins and banknotes, example for some bank notes: €5, €10, €20, €50 $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100
Just to mention some of them…
This is only for the first organization for some mixing.. After this it will be as usual some 1 or 2 inputs to 1 to more outputs and the change address with any random amount - fees
So here is the question again. If you want to organize your UTXOS in some way with some specific denominations/balance, which one do you want to choose and why?
I would like to read your answers.
My favorite option is ther first option: 0.001BTC 0.01BTC and 0.1 BTC
Regards!
|
|
|
310
|
Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Ferrari acepta bitcoin en EEUU y la aceptará en Europa
|
on: October 14, 2023, 02:16:02 PM
|
En mi opinion y como mencionas sigue siendo una buena noticia, el punto es que bitcoin se siga promocionando de una u otra forma (Recordar que no hay mala publicidad) pese a que algunas otras shitcoin y tokens esten de colados. El unico detalle que le veo es que le veo es que estas compañias inermediaras no dejan de ser CEX o similares que aplican siempre KYC y AML https://bitpay.com/blog/is-it-safe-to-accept-bitcoin/What is KYC and why is it important? The reason we identify and verify businesses before signing them up is because we want to make sure we keep criminals off our platform.
KYC stands for Know Your Customer and it is one of the most important pillars of our Compliance Program. Prior to signing up up a new business to our platform, we want to make sure that we have identified and verified their business. The reason for this is not because the regulators tell us to do so, but because we want to make sure we keep criminals off our platform.
Por lo que si quieres ser totalmente anonimo entonces no sera la mejor opcion. Saludos!
|
|
|
314
|
Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [H] $100 BTC [W] US PP 1:1
|
on: October 13, 2023, 03:29:19 PM
|
I undertand you perfectly, one question how one person can develop trade history if nobody trade with him?I am about to trade with some other user this next monday and that is weekly trade agreement, check next topic that i create. I want to buy bitcoin periodically. I am not going to burn my account for 100$ USD, i am actually in a campaign signature and my reputation worth more than 100USD. But anyway if you desition is final, then there is nothign to do. Good luck with your trade
|
|
|
315
|
Other / Archival / Re: My brothers in Satoshi, have you heard the trumpets of the halving?
|
on: October 13, 2023, 02:07:05 PM
|
1) OP Sucks 2) This is far away of bitcoin discussion, this shoul be moved to offtopic. 3) Who cares about some obscure IA Chat I think you have a problem and should seek medical help, if you are turned on by this nonsense.
Agree with you, OP forgot to take his pills. Would it be better to make Bitcoin more religious, or should we kick out anyone trying to spread the word of Satoshi though it?
WTF?? OP you are OK ?
|
|
|
317
|
Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [H] $100 BTC [W] US PP 1:1
|
on: October 13, 2023, 01:12:47 PM
|
Signature verified and quoted: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi. Cxin back on BitcoinTalk. Signed 10/12/23. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1BAMEeZJwM4Rnew6GuSLif9vN2FEHQ2RAc Hxeti8iHhtUSnGi5ljroykWptTTVGaMIQ3cGJLd3aD9uAOMbN7lorGvdcSOP+uYF8VcOCRbR+sa+wffgMtF9wYA= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi. I am interested in this exchange, let me know if you want to trade with me. I am going to send back the PP payment after one confirmation Regards!
|
|
|
318
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: October 13, 2023, 12:58:42 PM
|
It's better not to sign a message without a date. The same signed message can be used again in the future, and it will still get verified.
I see, that is a problem, also people is some lazy to search for previous signatures . I know that is not common, i just search for his address and it is not indexed on google. Should we add some rule to not quote signed messges without date?
|
|
|
320
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Lightning Network Growth 1.212% in the last 2 years
|
on: October 13, 2023, 03:43:28 AM
|
Readers see 1% and what comes after the decimal place, but the real figure is 1,212% as can be seen on the image you shared.
I am one of those, but when i see the graph i undertand that the OP is using dot for thousand seperator instead of comma. Anyway Very impresive the growth of the Lightning Network, i would like to participate on it, but in my city there is no bussines that accept bitcoin, even less LN.
|
|
|
|