Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 08:11:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 105 »
1  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 29, 2024, 03:32:44 PM
Hello!

I just received my Apollo 2 full node, and the basics are working great so far (I also have my Apollo BTC hooked up to it via USB, and they're both hashing away while the blockchain is still doing its initial sync).  I hope there are more features to control various things soon, like the power/fan/voltage settings for each miner individually and such!  

I'd also like to see an easy way to setup remote access to Ubuntu via the web GUI, thru standard RDP apps like Windows RDP... because I have had no issues getting in via SSH, but the Apollo 2 full node doesn't seem to work with ANY of my standard 4k monitors to access the Ubuntu GUI (no signal), and enabling xRDP or GnomeRDP through SSH terminal, using the usual methods, has not worked for me so far - I get a login screen when I RDP in, which loads and works properly and I can seemingly successfully login to, followed by a blank greenish background screen where I can only see my mouse pointer and not do anything else.  This blank/green screen is a common issue with Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04 and xRDP, but none of the usual methods of solving it work for me so far, and I've tried every solution I can find a thread about or that Bing Copilot can possibly suggest... editing the xRDP.ini file in various ways (adding an [xrdp1] section with various settings like -1 for the port), and modifying /home/$USER/.xsessionrc with some GNOME/Ubuntu related lines.  No luck with that stuff.  I can seemingly connect and authenticate just fine, but something about the Apollo 2's standard 22.04 image is causing rendering issues or something over RDP specifically that can't seem to be fixed in the usual ways.

Anyone have any suggestion on a good easy way to get RDP from Windows working into the Apollo 2, from SSH commands only because I can't access the GUI (Ubuntu or Gnome, the full desktop GUI) in any fashion yet?

Thanks!

What kind of monitors are you trying to connect?

Probably easiest solution is to run an VPN so you can easily access the Apollo webUI anywhere, unless you specifically need remote of the whole OS UI?
2  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Can't get my new Apollo II to connect to wifi on: April 29, 2024, 03:31:03 PM
I just got an Apollo II and it will connect over ethernet, but when I try to connect to my wifi it keeps giving me the same error  - 'secrets were required but not provided'.  I have never seen an error like that before and am not sure what to do. I know I've put in the right password for the wifi.  Any insight from anyone on how to navigate this error?


Sounds like some unsupported standard, wifi controller on Apollo devices is very basic to work best it needs a separate 2.4ghz SSID with plain wpa2 authentication.
3  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 29, 2024, 03:27:55 PM
Hello,

Is that possible to create an highdiff port on the solo pool ? ( i lurked on the ckpool github doesn't find it )

We will add options to solo UI for this in future updates, but for now you would need to edit the ckpool.conf file (opt/apolloapi/backend/ckpool/ckpool.conf) and add the following line to change the start diff

 "startdiff": 8000,




4  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 25, 2024, 12:09:48 AM
I just got my Apollo II USB today. I've been running an Apollo I via USB. I plugged in my Apollo II updated the port (linux sh script) and it keeps spitting out the following error:
MsPacket: version mismatch: act 0xd167 != exp 0xd166
WARNING: slave[0]: packet ignored
[6144]: cd ab 67 d1 21 00 a3 00 ... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

I don't get any shares on my pool

All Apollo BTC units need to upgrade to Apollo OS 2 for Apollo II support.

See details/instructions/links on our support page:

https://www.futurebit.io/apollo-btc-support
5  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Introducing Apollo II on: April 25, 2024, 12:06:44 AM
Just want to make sure I understand correctly, if I buy a "Apollo II - Standard Version", I'll be able to use it to mine Bitcoin at pools? I don't have to own a "APOLLO II FULL NODE" right?

Correct, you just won't be able to solo mine using the device. You can solo mine on a pool like ckpool though or just mine normally through any pool you wish

To also clarify since we get the question a lot, the solo mining capability of the Apollo II Full Node device is just a an optional feature. You can choose to mine to any pool you want like all our previous devices.

Also the USB Standard unit is not as 'plug and play' friendly...you need your own computer or raspberry pi type SBC and need to download our miner software thats command line based to run it (its pretty easy to setup, you just edit the supplied .bat or .sh script file but some people have allergic reactions when they see bash scripts or command line based software).

6  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 20, 2024, 02:00:45 AM
FYI Main support page for Apollo II/BTC is up that has consolidated a lot of the info found here in an easy to read page with relevant links etc

https://www.futurebit.io/apollo-btc-support

We are also working on a revamped support site and knowledge base that is long overdue...these forums have served FutureBit well for nearly a decade but after 100+ pages and 2k+ posts I think its time to retire Cheesy
7  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 20, 2024, 01:16:02 AM
Will release the windows/linux Apollo 2 mining binaries tomorrow.

Where should we check for Apollo 2 mining binaries? I don't see anything new here: https://github.com/jstefanop/Apollo-Miner-Binaries


Getting to those next week, fixing some last UI bugs for now and still working overtime to get as many units as we can out to you guys next week
8  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 18, 2024, 04:33:59 PM
Want to get this tested here by a few of you since we dont have a lot of MCU1 devices left to test.

Below feedback would be appreciated:
OS detects internal board and starts up fine
OS detects and starts up external USB Standard units (both Apollo BTC or if any MCU1 owners have an Apollo II standard yet)
Was able to flash an Apollo BTC Full MCU1 and plug in via USB to Apollo 2 Full, it was detected and started contributing hashing.

It appears to be a little finnicky if you are manipulating the web dashboard for both units simultaneously. For example, it was initially showing both units and hashboards on the Apollo 2 miner page. After restarting the Apollo 1, it seems to be operating independently with no apparent communication with the the Apollo 2. Both are mining and contributing hashrate to the pool.

Also doesn't appear that the Apollo I node wants to start up, but this may be by design when connected via USB? I never updated the SSD on it, so ostensibly it couldn't fit the blockchain right now anyway.

Testing further, seems Apollo II device and 2.0.4 OS aren't connecting to Apollo I standard units even after several minutes, maybe just a USB issue?

Yea UI is only designed to register the internal SSD drive node.

When you restart the miner you should see the USB standard units start flashing their front LEDs, if they dont then that means the system is not seeing them. Try a different USB port/USB hub. USB hubs seem to fix most USB issues on this controller.
9  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Why are QRNG chips not used for nonce generation in mining hardware? on: April 16, 2024, 01:19:51 AM
Quantum Random Number Generators should be used in mining hardware for truly random nonce generation. QRNG Chips are being sold by ID Quantique (although I have no idea about the cost) - Why are these chips not widespread in all miner hardware by now? Perhaps the cost? Technological immaturity? I know there are some arguments of quantum resistant technologies which seemingly make QRNG less meaningful, but those technologies are not certain to work for future generations of quantum computers. Nonce's optimally should be generated by true sources of randomness.

ASICs iterate through nonce range to find a share, there is nothing random about it (other than the actual nonce that produces a share is a random output based on the block header).
10  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 15, 2024, 11:09:31 PM
anyone know what to do with the satscards? I'm in UK and haven't come across these before. 

Use it as a hardware wallet for your mining or solo mining address.

We included it for new users that dont have wallets so they can get started in one step by just importing the wallet address for either solo mining or mining straight to wallet address using ocean pool.

I didn't get a satscard...

Only Full Node units get one
11  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 15, 2024, 12:20:16 AM
FYI official images for all Apollo units are out.

This release is pretty stable and will probably knock of the beta tag on the next release after we fix a few last mostly visual bugs.

https://github.com/jstefanop/apolloapi-v2/releases/tag/v2.0.4-beta

Will release the windows/linux Apollo 2 mining binaries tomorrow.
12  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 15, 2024, 12:17:05 AM
anyone know what to do with the satscards? I'm in UK and haven't come across these before. 

Use it as a hardware wallet for your mining or solo mining address.

We included it for new users that dont have wallets so they can get started in one step by just importing the wallet address for either solo mining or mining straight to wallet address using ocean pool.
13  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Nicehash Pool on: April 14, 2024, 06:28:06 PM
MCU1 full node with Apollo 2 Standard attached to USB.
Using  v2.0.4-beta

Noticed that hash rate to NiceHash is only a fraction of actual mining.
When looking at the stats only shows one of the 2 miners (Apollo2) reporting data at no more than fraction (1.2 TH) of actual rate (5.8TH).
Apollo BTC is showing 1.9 TH and 0TH on NiceHash account.


Is this on nice hash only? Would wait at least an hour for hashrate to settle.

Might be NiceHash only. One of the 2 (Apollo 2 S) is sending data at severely reduced rate even after a few hours. MCU1 unit does not send data at all as shown in the "Hashboards and Pools" page.
NiceHash may require separate Id's for each mining unit?


I believe what you are seeing is the Apollo BTC is hashing and the Apollo 2 is not.
That's why you see "reduced' hashrate but actually it's the Apollo BTC's hashrate that you are seeing. They are mislabeled in the software.


I have the same problem with miningrigrentals, I can only get the Apollo BTC to hash there, the Apollo 2 doesn't send data. It works fine on Braiins though, but I would like to have it work on MRR.
I believe you would need separate id's for each unit but it doesn't look like you can do that right now.

OK, I see and agree, they must be cross labeled or not reading assigned values. Also agree that some pools need separate Id's depending on how data is sent/received. I have a few GPU rigs on NiceHash and all cards on each rig have their own ID's

Hopefully Monday's update will address some of these issues as we are still in a Beta version.


Currently when more Standard units are connected it looks like a single miner as far as the pool is concerned. We only test on standard pools, but will check nice hash and mining rentals to see what the issue is, but these are notoriously buggy pools since they just send the connection to a downstream pool anyway.
14  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 13, 2024, 07:46:56 PM
Hello all, any suggestions as to what the best way is to connect Gen I full Node with the New Apollo II?
Thanks for your help!

Hi we are about to release updated images for Gen 1 units with Apollo II support officially on our support and GitHub pages on monday so look for an announcement/email. You can find the links for beta images if you go back a few pages.
15  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 12, 2024, 09:10:10 PM
So the Apollo BTC (MCU1) recognized the Hashboard  (hashboard #0 Standard unit).

It started to hash and I started seeing activity on Braiins, although lower than 6+ TH/s
After 5-10 min, I got this error in the dashboard saying the Hashboard #0 is not Active

What is weird is it shows the standard unit is hashing but the Apollo BTC is not, what I see on the pool it looks like the Apollo BTC is actually mining at 2TH/s and the Standard unit is not.

https://gyazo.com/dfe922d3b8b19ac8d7cdd60d85f8ae30

https://gyazo.com/fb9a2fa0ee93a929906bc6cdf5d63167



EDIT: After restarting the miner and the hashboard being active again, I noticed in the "show all data>pools" tab that the hashboard was showing 0 (By the way there is an issue with the labelling, it inverts the 2 boards Apollo BTC should be #0) so I thought maybe it's an issue with miningrigrentals.com so I switched to Braiins pool directly.
Restarted and now the standard unit showed some activity in the pools tab. Although after a few minutes, it dropped again and saying inactive.

https://gyazo.com/e4791f6cf7605178d248f979a9bdc87e

Again, the reporting is wrong, the Apollo BTC is actually mining at 2TH/s and the standard unit is inactive, it doesn't show 0 on the screenshot but the current overall hashrate in the background only shows 2Th/s

Apollo II ramps up hashrate slower than Apollo I, there is a much better auto tuner built in that takes about 15 min to reach optimal hashrate.

Looks like both connect but Apollo II drops after a while, the Apollo II is the USB unit correct?

If you can ssh into your Apollo I please send the dmesg output after it drops so we can see if it's a USB or software issue (can email us the output).

16  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 12, 2024, 06:26:24 PM
Hello so I flashed the new os 2 on my Apollo mcu1 seems to work. No hashrate from my dashboard like I said on support by email.

I have a question is that possible to point other miners on my own solo node for the solo mining or it’s exclusive for the Apollo ?

Hi your dashboard is showing 0 hashrate?

Yes you can point any Bitcoin miner to the solo pool. The LAN address is shown in the solo pool page, and you can also port forward 3333 to your LAN address so you can access the solo pool from your WAN address.
17  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Nicehash Pool on: April 12, 2024, 06:17:27 PM
MCU1 full node with Apollo 2 Standard attached to USB.
Using  v2.0.4-beta

Noticed that hash rate to NiceHash is only a fraction of actual mining.
When looking at the stats only shows one of the 2 miners (Apollo2) reporting data at no more than fraction (1.2 TH) of actual rate (5.8TH).
Apollo BTC is showing 1.9 TH and 0TH on NiceHash account.


Is this on nice hash only? Would wait at least an hour for hashrate to settle.
18  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 12, 2024, 06:16:21 PM
Link to download MCU1 Apollo OS 2 below.

Want to get this tested here by a few of you since we dont have a lot of MCU1 devices left to test.

Below feedback would be appreciated:
OS detects internal board and starts up fine
OS detects and starts up external USB Standard units (both Apollo BTC or if any MCU1 owners have an Apollo II standard yet)

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/j4o3rcwe88emzsuwe4wm7/apollo-2-mcu1_110424.img.xz?rlkey=cu3i66xtl5n4ln8ji7mct3zth&dl=0

This includes latest v2.0.4-beta release

Reminder MCU1 controllers are Batch 1/2 Apollos with the longer GPIO pins on the board (check link below if you are not sure which you have).

https://mega.nz/file/dghWnKJC#J2kkpfH5RVKynf0OvuE5mKojXdUqAFCczHMyv6mDrM4

My miner is crashing, and restarting every 10-20 minutes. To my feeling it's happening the moment new blocks are mined.

The node falls back a couple of hundred blocks after the restart, i.e. the current block was 838879 and the node would start syncing at 838663 again.

MCU1 board. This behaviour was also happening before, and I was hoping the upgrade would fix this.

This sounds like a corrupted SSD drive. You might need to reformat the drive and start syncing again. Can also try a re-indexing the node before you reformat the drive.
19  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 12, 2024, 04:52:32 PM
received my Apollo 2 founders edition.  Excitedly flashed the sd and powered it all up.  of all the technical faults or issues I expected to face, what I didn't bank on was not being able to connect it to wifi - just goes round in a perpetual loop of putting in the wifi password, thinks about it and then says not connected and brings up the password pop up again.  It recognises my wifi networks fine (and the password I am entering is correct - I double checked!).  It just won't connect to wifi.  Very frustrating.  Any suggestions?

ok, so I just powered up my other unit without flashing it and it works fine, so something happened in reflashing to muck up the wifi connectivity. Question is now how do I fix that? 

and now after an hour's use, the other unit has dropped off the wifi and won't reconnect.  Brilliant.  Never had any issues like this with the Apollo 1 units.  Right now I have 2 expensive bricks taking up space in my office Sad

Wifi on our controllers are finicky, needs to be close range to the router and mixed 2.4/5GHz networks dont work well. Best is to seperate SSID for 2.4 and connect to just the 2.4 SSID.

Apollo 1 wifi has been bullet proof so does the Apollo 2 use an inferior interface? I'm using the 2 at the same distance as I've always used the 1.  Nothing seems to be working to resolve the wifi conenction issue.  Hard wiring seems the only solution which kind of makes the whole concept a bit pointless. 

If you have an early Apollo I with MCU1 that tended to be a more reliable wifi controller than MCU2 units that ship on later Apollo 1/2s.

Wifi is also effected by many things, just the cases differences between the two units can cause much difference.

Have you tried it on a 2.4ghz only SSID?
20  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official FutureBit Apollo BTC Software/Image and Support thread on: April 12, 2024, 01:29:59 PM
received my Apollo 2 founders edition.  Excitedly flashed the sd and powered it all up.  of all the technical faults or issues I expected to face, what I didn't bank on was not being able to connect it to wifi - just goes round in a perpetual loop of putting in the wifi password, thinks about it and then says not connected and brings up the password pop up again.  It recognises my wifi networks fine (and the password I am entering is correct - I double checked!).  It just won't connect to wifi.  Very frustrating.  Any suggestions?

ok, so I just powered up my other unit without flashing it and it works fine, so something happened in reflashing to muck up the wifi connectivity. Question is now how do I fix that? 

and now after an hour's use, the other unit has dropped off the wifi and won't reconnect.  Brilliant.  Never had any issues like this with the Apollo 1 units.  Right now I have 2 expensive bricks taking up space in my office Sad

Wifi on our controllers are finicky, needs to be close range to the router and mixed 2.4/5GHz networks dont work well. Best is to seperate SSID for 2.4 and connect to just the 2.4 SSID.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 105 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!