|
335 blocks ....wrong chain right?
|
|
|
|
|
wallet no connection
pools gone mad
lauch of the week!
|
|
|
|
|
I am here also, its not quiet due of missing interest but there is not much mor to say, DEVs working i am looking forward the reasults.
@wallet staking: I can confirm, my wallet is staking great,. check my adress in the blockexplorer
Technical specs:
Wallet on Kubuntu Trusty selfcompiled on qt4 (qmake-qt4 instead qmake)
using github sources
hope that helps
|
|
|
|
|
WAAALLLET SOURCECODE
DEEEEEEV
|
|
|
|
|
he makes a quite honest impression, why should he lie?
Normaly I would also concider a premine of this amount as to high, but with keeping his plans in mind, I am not shure.
If enough of the money goes into the Coin I may be O.K. with that,
It would make more sense than destroying it anyway.
|
|
|
|
great discussion, keep goin, I will return tomorrow good night  |
|
|
|
|
yeah something like a second layer, wich protects the core chain from direct access and works like a handle for request of websites, ATMs, Gameengines and so on perhaps with a permission system, wich lets the user control those features, like in social network apis, for example "do you whant to grand xxxx, to access information / functionality yyyy"
|
|
|
|
No problem thanks for your questions. Personally we just like the shorthand "DISTRO" when talking about the currency value. "DistroCoin" is a nice name for the coin we feel. I agree about the DistroCoin being the best and classiest official capitalisation for use in the formal context. Perhaps it could appear that way as a main heading in the OP, so it appears in it's formal context to everyone right from the start. I think regarding anon features, we would be best taking the path of BlackCoin, which leaves anon functions up to third-party development if they so wish to do so. But the coin itself does not need to include anon features as a fundamental. I think anon is a distraction for the core developers to avoid. That effort can be spent on other areas. Also, the principle of distribution upon which this coin bases certain fundamentals, is a bit contrary to the principle of "darknet" anon style features. I agree, privacy is a good goal, but not every coin has to jump on the train, just because DRK had some succes. We have enought coins that focus this feature, diversity power. Maybe an "API" like plugin specification would be great, e.g. "the Firefox of Cryptocoin"? This would lead to inovations, would make it "upgradable" and is also a great promotable feature. Currendly there has to be a new coin for each inovation, instead having a modular system. Writing this, Ideas like a second, parallel, patchable, sandbox like blockchain engine are flashing through my brain ... crazy brain |
|
|
|
  My two little sweet Powerstakers .... I can't get enough watching them! |
|
|
|
Wow...I dumped 300,000+ at 20. Went and grilled out on this beautiful Memorial Day. And come back to more arguing and a price of 13. Looks like I made the right decision.
 Ops clearly mixt the posts - Point for you Mr Sony |
|
|
|
I see you do not forget how to use the caps lock in such a noob way.
I told that ERC is not gonna delisted at all from Bittrex.
Are you like.... retarded or something? Who asked whether you think its going to stay or get kicked out of Bittrex? Here... let me google translate that for you in Italian just so we're on the same page. Ha Bill risponde a voi dicendo che non sarà delisting ERC?Why are you writing in what seems to be italian sorry? This is English thread! Have you lost your way? Btw i can repeat you that ERC is not gonna be delisted from Rex. And moreover i suggest you to stop offending and using such words, cause i'm reporting you to moderator like if there is no tomorrow. Just answer the question dude. Investors need to know if Bill responded to you saying he's giving you an exception. Why are you dancing around the simple question? hey sonywhatever if you would really know about market you would be out there and trade or develop or even do something useful for any coin of you choice. There is nothing more shameful, than trading like a hysteric chicken and then blame the dev for your failure. Of course a multipool is a strong awaited feature, but the Dev is active all the time and he invests more than you and he hires and pays developers. It will be ready when its ready. Look about the responsiveness of this man. Do you really think he is a scammer? Would be a stange tactic and yes, now you can tell us how incompetent he is and bla bla bla. YOU traded like a firstgrader and will be even more angry, when these hardworking guys have their stuff out. Have you ever had the feeling of entering a not-so-perfect community and just focus growing with them? (WOW...such growth) Maybe you would be able to afford loosing some Coins without behaving like a child then and what about having fun ... my last try to treat you like a man ... |
|
|
|
Exchanges are not unimportent, but they are the least natural market and the most unstable corevalue you can have.
For a crypto that can only be bought through an exchange, I'm curious to know why you think exchanges are unimportant. just read it again, Exchanges are not unimportent, ... People may believe me or not, but i know whats happening in the background of this Coin, and this one is a shure bet,
(no I am not one their team, if you doubt, maybe google helps about that)
Who cares what you know if you are not on the team. Do you have specific exclusive information that was not shared to the public that is going to bring value to the coin? Now would be a good time to share that with the investors don't you think? nope ... if you hold the bags (should not be THAT difficult given this low exchange value ...or?)
anyway ... have fun!
What does this even mean?  What does this even mean? Exactly as I expected. No answers... just media style rhetoric. Keep it going... this will help some intelligent people make some decisions in case they happen to see this  oh yes of course , they will im done, said so, will enjoy the sunny weather with my dog wow such sunny day  . |
|
|
|
Exchanges are not unimportent, but they are the least natural market and the most unstable corevalue you can have.
For a crypto that can only be bought through an exchange, I'm curious to know why you think exchanges are unimportant. just read it again, Exchanges are not unimportent, ... People may believe me or not, but i know whats happening in the background of this Coin, and this one is a shure bet,
(no I am not one their team, if you doubt, maybe google helps about that)
Who cares what you know if you are not on the team. Do you have specific exclusive information that was not shared to the public that is going to bring value to the coin? Now would be a good time to share that with the investors don't you think? nope ... if you hold the bags (should not be THAT difficult given this low exchange value ...or?)
anyway ... have fun!
What does this even mean? What does this even mean? |
|
|
|
So even if they WOULD delist ERC -> WHO CARES? They would list it again when the market is demanding it.
Ummm...if a coin gets de-listed, that means there is no market (demand) for that coin. Where are you going to generate market demand if there are no exchanges that list ERC? The store? The store will no longer accept ERC because they have no way to exchange it for BTC (and then to USD or EU). So, if there are no exchanges that list ERC, its value is zero. I guess you can try selling your ERC person to person. See how much they're worth then. First of all: There will be always one Exchange (I cant tell you which one for now) and because of that a real market grows by offering products and services. Guesswhat: thats what money is invented for. Second i dont see ERC delisted on all exchanges (Bittrex may be, but they do fast listing and delisting, policies are different and there are much more importent exchanges) Exchanges are not unimportent, but they are the least natural market and the most unstable corevalue you can have. People may believe me or not, but i know whats happening in the background of this Coin, and this one is a shure bet, (no I am not one their team, if you doubt, maybe google helps about that) if you hold the bags (should not be THAT difficult given this low exchange value ...or?) anyway ... have fun! |
|
|
|
Bittrex volume is now .5 BTC. Bittrex is delisting coins that are dead.... all coins that are not getting minimum .1 BTC. This is bullshit, but it is the truth. Sell your coins before it it is announced next week or after that. Once announcement is made, all people will remove buy orders. Once it is delisted, because after that you have ShareX coins and other stupid places selling for 1 and 2 sats and only if you are lucky, someone will buy for that rate. Even the dev will not buy
No I am not trolling... I don't want to buy dumping coins for "cheap". I would be a fool if I did. I am already at a loss because I bought 150k somewhere at around average 120 sats and had to sell at 30. Polo has rejected them and its not getting anywhere. Don't be foolish people. The dev is not a scam. but he is unprofessional and don't know anything about coin marketing! He is lying with fake promises of success in long term blah blah!! WOW.. there ist a problem with your CAPSLOCKif you are (or have been) in this Coin for fast trading (fast trading can be fun yeah) I am shure, you should have chosen a different Coin. There so many good Coins with specs for this purpose, that it is really a kind of artform having been that wrong, as you have been. T HATS what I would call incompetent. THIS Coin specs are for the long run ... for your info: long run means month, weeks .... not hours, days AND exchangerates will follow the Coin and not Vice Versa. Tell me ONE staple high value COIN which did that faster! So even if they WOULD delist ERC -> WHO CARES? They would list it again when the market is demanding it. Just check back in three month and learn ! |
|
|
|
why in poloneix no ERC?
Ever-so-smart answer would be that "ERC hasn't been accepted - yet". Only Poloniex knows why. There has been numerous requests to add ERC, though. Maybe you should do the same..? Maybe we still doesn't offer such speculative option to poloniex. Btw we would prefer entering on Mintpal, cause until now has been more secured compared to poloniex. Keep sending your req! Thanks guys (& girls obviously, no sexism on ERC) Probably poloniex knows something that alot of people dont know. Have look at the price. It might tell a lot. I don't whant to be inpolite, but that answer is totaly nonsense An exchange does not have any interest on the price of the coin, but on the trading volume, to earn money. The actual tradevolume of more than 33BTC is more than good in this stage of the coin and it also proofs not only sellers but also buyers. @soccosocco If you trust the features: BUY many of us are strong supporters of that coin I assume thats what makes some certain people that mad I buy as much as i can have fun! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
