I spoke with the owner regarding new content and he said he really has no "new" news. He also said you can retweet others tweets about them. There should be some fairly new tweets posted by cryptkeeper and vindyn8 about us

[5:04] 
also bitcoingarden

[5:04] 
bitcoin rush

Hes just asking for you rto do the best you can with whats there. Your main thing is your original tweets.

I understand your humor, but humor in this thread was not at all funny. See if any one read it, it can be easily interpreted that you are promoting op post and you are in hand in glove with him. Good you took it down, op is trying to scam and your post was not at all funny, what if some one actually did it and then gets virus or ask you to pay would you really pay. Then you would be like mate it was a joke, so with all due respect you should have been more careful.

Dear member no hard feelings but you are asking a senior and other members to allow themselves to be scammed first, then loose their data download virus for 26$.i do need cash but even then I would pass this offer again and again, I am surprised this thread is yet not locked. Don't give such offers, everything that needs to be proved is already proven

this is not a place for Jokes, this board is for speculation. maybe you and OP need to read the sticky topic about the rules of the forum.

1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.
2. No off-topic posts.
3. No trolling.

this is breaking all 3

But for me, it seems like throwing out some blind balls it may hit one day or other. When bitcoin prices will be hitting $1000 and when it is coming down from there toward some $900 or $850 price levels, they will come again and say "see what happens we have already warned you".

There is no tomorrow in a practical world. We must predict based on what is we are having today.

we should be thinking about moving the minimum fees down to 100sat/kb. when the fiat valuation rises.

but nah. core wants to push the fee war by introducing 0.0002 fall backs and then average fees etc
rather than letting transactions through and letting pools be instantly reactive to demand and open to decide,

so lets show a scenario where nodes AND pools used the "averaging" instead of reactive

in the future it wont matter what you set in your node. if someone else in the network had their relay fee set to "average" or say 0.00024. this will cause transactions to hop around the network of ethical nodes but then get dropped by the expensive node BEFORE even getting to a pool.

imagine there were 7 hops to reach a Pool from yoUr node, and each node in the relay set a different rate

U->0.00010->0.00012->0.00016->0.00018->0.00020->0.00022->0.00024->P

now imagine you have 1000tx of 0.00011 they get dropped here. and pool never sees it
now imagine you have 1000tx of 0.00019 they get dropped here. and pool never sees it
now imagine you have 1000tx of 0.00023 they get dropped here. and pool never sees it
now imagine you have 1000tx of 0.00024 they get through and pool sees it

whatever node has the highest rate between you and a pool becomes a gatekeeper, keeping cheap transactions from reaching the pool. forcing people to pay more just to be let past the gatekeeper to even be seen by the pool.
enforcing a fee war of a price rise just to be seen even during low demand.

also pools themselves wont just add any tx if demand was low not just because they are not even receiving tx's but also the "average fee" doesnt instantly react. but slowly reacts over a number of blocks. as they are no longer reactive to just add what they please, but now what gets added is based on an "averaging".

now continue imagining the pool only sees transactions over 0.00024(due to average previous demand). and an "average fee" of 3 hours (like 21.co uses) takes upto 18 blocks to bring the average down. meaning pools then makes empty blocks. until the average drops enough to see cheaper transactions

meaning if there were only 4000 sent in one 3 hours segment. where blocks allow 2500tx in per block
where the "average" network fee starts at 0.00024 due to previous demand

now imagine the 4000tx's vary in fee like this:
1000tx of 0.00011
1000tx of 0.00019
1000tx of 0.00023
1000tx of 0.00024

3000 would not even reach the pool straight away due to expensive relayers dropping the tx, treating it as third class citizens

it would look something like this:
block 450,000 - 1000tx (average already at 0.00024) <-the relay network only lets the 1000tx at 0.00024 to reach a pool
block 450,001 - 1000tx (average decreases to 0.00022667) <-the relay network only lets the 1000tx at 0.00023to reach a pool
block 450,002 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00020148) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,003 - 1000tx (average decreases to 0.00018889) <-the relay network only lets the 1000tx at 0.00019 to reach a pool
block 450,004 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00016371) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,005 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00015111) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,006 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00013852) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,007 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00012593) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,008 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00013333) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,009 - 0tx (average decreases to 0.00011334) <-the relay network hasnt let any tx to reach a pool
block 450,010 - 1000tx (average increases to 0.00010074) <-the relay network only lets the 1000tx at 0.00011 to reach a pool

but sticking with the "average" scenario.
ofcourse human emotion would see the 450,002 was empty so the 2000tx that got rejected for the 3rd time. would up their price to get into 450,003
block 450,003 - 2000tx (average decreases to 0.00018889) <-the relay network lets the 2000, >0.00019 tx to reach a pool
and bring the average over 0.00019000

however if pools were instantly reactive to demand. and the relay network was instantly reactive. instead of the stupid concept of averages.
in this low demand scenario all transactions would have been included in 2 blocks..
eg
block 450,000 - 2500tx - includes 1000 at 0.00024, includes 1000 at 0.00023, includes 500 at 0.00019,
block 450,001 - 1500tx - includes 500 at 0.00019, includes 1000 at 0.00011,

not 11 blocks with 7 blocks being empty if just left to wait for averages to drop, or 4 blocks if getting peed off to pay more due to emotional rejection and seeing an empty block

Transaction fees are voluntary on the part of the person making the bitcoin transaction, as the person attempting to make a transaction can include any fee or none at all in the transaction.

A transaction was safe to send without fees if these conditions were met:

- It is smaller than 1,000 bytes.
- All outputs are 0.01 BTC or larger.
- Its priority is large enough

The transaction fee is processed by and received by the bitcoin miner. When a new bitcoin block is generated with a successful hash, the information for all of the transactions is included with the block and all transaction fees are collected by that user creating the block.

The transaction fee is therefore an incentive on the part of the bitcoin user to make sure that a particular transaction will get included into the next block which is generated.

How much fees we pay for a transaction?
Sometimes, it is not possible to give good estimates, or an estimate at all. Therefore, a fallback value can be set (default: `0.0002` BTC/kB).
Furthermore, Bitcoin Core will never create transactions smaller than the current minimum relay fee. Finally, a user can set the minimum fee rate for all transactions, which defaults to 1000 satoshis per kB.

The top transaction fees will rise a lot. That will be for top speed processing. Even 10$ or more is clearly possible.

But the ones not in a hurry will still be able to get their transgers for tiny fees, like today.

It's possible.
But it wouldn't be because the tx fee rises to say .001/transaction.(could also be possible coz of the miners,although unlikely)
It would rise as Bitcoin value in USD rises.
Like this:

 if 1 BTC = $740 then  .0002 tx = $0.15 then if
    1 BTC = $7,400 then .0002 tx = $1.5 so if
    1 BTC = $74,000 then .0002 tx = $15 .

But that is only if the tx fee stays on that rate despite the dollar equivalent($74,000)
Although, who's to say how fiat value would be by then.
(Now: $10 = buy 3 bread Future: $10 = buy 1 bread)

I don't think the tx fee would ever increase to as high as $10, but I'm not quite aware of the workings of why it has been going up in the first place besides the increase in transaction load. I'm worried more about the size of the blockchain growing faster than Moore's Law.

maybe a scam but my friends already invested £20 in it.

Please post in this thread marijuana bitcoin related business opportunities

Don't say I didn't warn ya. 

What script, I'm not making any scripts yet.

Yes, a one time registration.

You wont even have to login in order to use/check address. This just secures your address from malicious users so they can't claim it as their own.