the best approach is to play always a few events in the same pay slip. or play many single events. in case your pay slip is a winning one (also partially) just cash out. If you count in the long term... you get more and more respect trying to hit the big cashout/jackpot. My mistake is simple. I bet on events that I haven't researched well or that I'm not actually really informed about. Likewise "oh look what a nice odd "  To set a limit and avoid dangerous loss, I always try to play small amounts "for fun". |
|
|
|
|
un consiglio che viene dato è quello di non usare mai lo stesso address ma di crearlo univoco per ciascuna transazione...
però nel tuo caso potrebbe non bastare... ora qui le cose sono 3 (come già anticipato da mendace/altri utenti):
- wallet compromesso (hai una versione fallace di electrum, improbabile a meno che lo hai reinstallato....)
- malware / estensione su chrome / spyware etc...
- seed salvato da qualche parte ed è stato letto
nel momento in cui la transazione malevola avviene subito vuol dire che il tuo wallet era già "monitorato"...
dai un'occhiata a glacier protocol per avere idea sui vari passaggi per garantire "sicurezza" alla creazione del tuo wallet.
|
|
|
|
If you bet monthly 0,5% or 0,25% of your total earning... Is this amount that you cannot afford to lose or not? Of course assuming that you will lost everything... What about time spent and halving fun? And what about the potential win related to bet? Isnt worth ? Well Just stop betting of your answer Is no |
|
|
|
I guess it's ok for you a KYC procedure? Why you have been limited after 2 bets? Did you play big amounts? any previous experience? What you say about the limitations is of course correct. The bookie cannot accept unlimited bets, that is clear. The question is always how quickly something like this happens. For example, I was quickly limited by bet365, after two bets I was only able to bet 25 euros, although only one of the two bets had won. And thanks for your recommendations
I think that there are some betting sites that deserve attention here in crypto field. Duelbits, Stake,Megapari, SportsBet (a couple that allow also to bet without KYC if you need it...) But if you have trouble with "centralized" betting experience you have to use betfair and other exchanges since you can play against other users and generally speaking bookmaker doesn't limit account in most of cases... |
|
|
|
|
in general, centralized exchanges are used to make "an exchange".
deposits - exchanges - withdrawals . stop.
if we all did only these operations, there would be very little room for scams and similar issues...of course due greedy people try to put order with lower/higher limits, use staking opportunities, copy trading more and more and more...
obviously anyone must understands that certain APYs are unrealistic and can hide "scam".
regarding layoffs I am unsure if it's a real trouble. companies can layoff staff for many many reasons and this not means "we have an economic issue"...
|
|
|
|
these issues are not unique to the lgbtq+ community.... I believe that in many cases it is convenient for everyone to bet online. especially using crypto (faster withdrawal, cheap commission etc...) yesterday I went to withdraw a win in a betting center near my house and ... a guy was stabbed not even 50 meters away .... I never play in physical places for this very reason (safety) and above all after a certain amount of winnings I have to do AML etc etc ... a good gambler don't care about discrimination |
|
|
|
|
lot 1: 0.0765 BTC
lot 2: 0.0115 BTC
lot 3: 0.0085 BTC
|
|
|
|
yesterday's the final match was "something new" it's clear that it was a sort of passing of the "baton" between the two players ... Alcaraz is now solidly number 1 in the world and has demonstrated to be able to beat anyone. Djokovic remains a very strong player, who made history, unfortunately I think age has the effect  |
|
|
|
in some cases
...
Generally, CPFP isn't recommended for a few reasons. ... Hello ranochigo  Yes sure, thanks for pointing out... that's why I add the "disclaimer" ..and yes it should be used in a certain circumstances as a kind of "last resort". If the tx has been broadcasted without a RBF wallet, it's a quick/easy/working solution... maybe not the cheapest option but it doesn't requires any specific knowledge |
|
|
|
There's no update on that thread many have posted their telegram channel I wonder if OP did contact these members and hired them I hope one of those who worked on OP will give us feedback if what OP is offering is true
there's no additional information on the forum posting, the pay rate is tempting but the task is questionable.
Maybe members who applied in the other thread can help us shade more light on what kind of games OP is up to. PaulBf1, rat03gopoh, malcovi2, inthelongrun, bitbollo, gunhell16, Docnaster what kind of tasks did OP give you last time around or is he up to some naught games? I don't remember what task proposed OP but considering that I didn't participate, I wasn't interested in participating, else I didn't remember... I think it wasn't one of those "once in a lifetime" opportunities 
I join the suggestion: OP @It_Is_2022_AD clearly explains what you are looking for, what service you want to receive and what you offer. talk about it publicly, it is an attitude that gives seriousness to what you do and helps users understand whether or not they can participate ... personally, I have not skype account so it's kind hard get in touch .... |
|
|
|
|
in some cases (transaction that have a change) it is also possible to use another solution to "accelerate" a transaction...without having to modify this first transaction already broadcasted.
this solution requires to spend "the change" (output coming back of the first transaction) in a new transaction by setting a higher fee.
in this way, by processing this second transaction, the first is also included in a block... and it is a solution that also works with wallets that have not implemented RBF (but of course as mentioned above you need some "change" from first transaction...)
|
|
|
|
|
statistically these sequences of huge consecutive streaks are possible, these are part of the gambling experience.
the problem arises from the fact that by "losing" you try to recover and therefore you bet more.
meanwhile during "winning" streak, you try to bet as little as possible because you expect a defeat at any moment!
solution? the first is correct, stop the game.
the second, trying to play a figure that you use only for fun... at this point you don't care if you win or lose...but you play just for fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction 1: $30,005.61
bech32 address: bc1qm9wnwsgy52jdefvm5g4w72lxqep5d9ks4gq62p
|
|
|
|
qui sul forum sono stati beccati un po di contenuti scritti con AI...
i signature spammer devono tenere alta la loro produzione e questo sistema ha semplificato il loro lavoro di molto, anche se ovviamente vengono facilmente colti sul fatto. Non so quanto possa essere una buona idea, a logica non dovrebbe scattare il ban immediato, come succede nei casi di plagio? Oppure dato che tecnicamente non si sta rubando un contenuto di altri i post fatti con software AI sono accettabili? è noioso leggere commenti copiati da altre parti, post che non hanno nulla a che fare con il topic iniziale, etc etc...è davvero una perdita di tempo enorme e non è un qualcosa di produttivo... Questa è la ragione principale per la quale preferisco bazzicare la sezione italiana, siamo in pochi, è vero, ma i contenuti sono di qualità più alta. Le sezioni internazionali sono un putt@nai0. credo che vengono bannati solo i casi degli "irriducibili" o quelli beccati a postare più volte contenuti del genere. molto spesso un "signature ban"/trust negativo è molto più efficace e smettono da soli di postare contenuti. è vero, decisamente la sezione italiana è "di qualità" però è una goccia nel mare e molte sezioni non sono completamente trattate (esempio collectibles/gambling) Mi sorge una domanda... è l'essere umano a scrivere come un'AI o l'AI che scrive come un essere umano? Direi la seconda, no? Alla fine il punto delle AI è fare qualcosa come farebbe un umano, al tempo stesso però lo dovrebbe fare in meno tempo e con migliore qualità (almeno in teoria). Era riferito al post di bastisisca... |
|
|
|
unfortunately when there is money involved, even family members have issues, of course...two people who weren't even so close friends it's a serious issue.... in general, in these situations it is always better to clarify everything regarding the bet/money in the past I made "funny" bets with some friends who turned out to be successful... but no discussions, it's not good wasting time on certain things, in many cases a friend is worth much more than the amount won. |
|
|
|
|
lot 1: 0.0105
lot 2: 0.002
lot 3: 0.001
|
|
|
|
|
excluding a couple of trusted sites (the exceptions) that do not require KYC all sites must have this option because they are somehow compliant with the regulators and allow you to have the opportunity to discuss in case of disputes....
I personally had a good approach with Megapari (they have many markets).
I play most of the time with STAKE because they are offering cashback bonus etc etc.
My favorite site extra crypto is betfair.
Live bets with the exchange allow excellent results if you know how to use them profitably!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
