Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 08:49:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ... 141 »
941  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 11, 2016, 05:25:03 AM
It would be hard for him to make that bet IF BitFury is not the manufacturer of the rig.  It's too hard for him to know when another manufacturer of rigs using their chips will actually ship.
942  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 11, 2016, 03:31:44 AM
Lulz they don't even list my pool.
Look at a real web site that can track pools properly Smiley
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pools?resolution=1w

2.2% of the blocks in the network for that "Week" is damn good, considering kano.is has 1.8% of the network hash rate at present.
943  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 11, 2016, 02:24:36 AM
Not sure what we are betting on but I will definitely take the bet-

So I will order 50Th-100Th the first day the miners are announced, if they arrive to me before April 1 I will pay you 1 BTC but if they do not then you send me 1 BTC.

How does that sound?

Don't forget to add, "In good working order and according to specifications."
944  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ** 5x AVALON6 GIVEAWAY ** Kano CKPool (kano.is) [0.9% PPLNS] US,DE,SG,JP on: February 09, 2016, 11:06:17 PM
All who are new to mining, new to the pool and new to the blockchain will find the following video quite educational.  Andreas got into explanations about SHA256, the blockchain, what goes on in a "race" when blocks are found by competing miners, the importance of low latency, etc...  I thought it was educational and others new to mining here on the pool will find it educational as well.  

If I'm out of line for posting the link in this forum, my feelings will not be hurt in any way if the moderator decides it needs to be deleted.

Consensus Algorithms, Blockchain Technology and Bitcoin UCL - by Andreas M. Antonopoulos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw3WkySh_Ho

In the 35th minute of the video - Andreas talks about that "race condition".... very useful information and I now better understand forks and orphans...
Heh, he's wrong about why the April-2015 fork happened.
The problem was the SPV pools weren't even checking the block header properly, let alone ignoring checking the transactions.
BTC-Nuggets generated (twice) a V2 block header that the SPV mining pools mined on top of, after the point when V2 headers were no longer valid.
Had they checked the transactions in the V2 BTC-Nuggets blocks, they would have found them all OK.

I was wondering if all that he was saying was actually accurate information.  Thanks for clarifying, Kano.
945  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ** 5x AVALON6 GIVEAWAY ** Kano CKPool (kano.is) [0.9% PPLNS] US,DE,SG,JP on: February 09, 2016, 01:53:55 PM
Thanks for this post extremely informative.

Sure... You're very welcome.
946  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ** 5x AVALON6 GIVEAWAY ** Kano CKPool (kano.is) [0.9% PPLNS] US,DE,SG,JP on: February 09, 2016, 11:15:34 AM
All who are new to mining, new to the pool and new to the blockchain will find the following video quite educational.  Andreas got into explanations about SHA256, the blockchain, what goes on in a "race" when blocks are found by competing miners, the importance of low latency, etc...  I thought it was educational and others new to mining here on the pool will find it educational as well.  

If I'm out of line for posting the link in this forum, my feelings will not be hurt in any way if the moderator decides it needs to be deleted.

Consensus Algorithms, Blockchain Technology and Bitcoin UCL - by Andreas M. Antonopoulos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw3WkySh_Ho
947  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 07:50:33 AM
Anyone have an online class they recommend for designing chips?
You need to learn prerequisites first:

1) digital logic design (combinatorial and sequential logic, synchronous and asynchronous circuits, automata theory, etc.)

2) elements of circuit theory (nodal analysis, mesh analysis, you'll need to understand what SPICE will do for you and what it won't do)

Only after some understanding of the above you will be able to comprehend the CMOS ASIC design textbooks.

For somebody who is a self-starter the best way is to get some low end FPGA kit from e.g. Digilent or Avnet or Terasic. Low-end because those are supported by the free editions of the respective design toolchains. This is the main objective: to actually understand the methodology and limitations. When FPGA's were competitive for Bitcoin mining several members of this forum learned everything from scratch in about 3 months.

The classroom environment becomes important only later. You want to choose a school that has access to the https://www.mosis.com/ prototype fabrication service.

Bitfury actually did his first chip in partnership with some Polish research institute when I pointed to him that he will then qualify for http://www.europractice-ic.com/ which is an European equivalent of USA's MOSIS.

Thanks for the info and recommendations.

I teach telephone technicians how to use their meter to identify and locate troubles on wire line telephone service; not wireless.  I also teach transmission trouble shooting and some outside plant engineering design.  ADSL is asynchronous but I'm very limited on my knowledge of it.  My training focuses more on maintaining the wire and/or fiber [In the middle] connecting networks together rather than each end of the network with its equipment.  

Telephony training in the telephone industry has taken a hit lately with the economy being so terrible.  When the stocks of CenturyLink and AT&T take a hit, one of the first things to go in their budget cuts is training.  I used to be on the road 42 to 45 weeks annually.  Now, I'm fortunate to get 6 to 10 weeks of training classes annually after more than 18 years in training.  So, i turned to mining to supplement income I had lost from less training.  

Now, it looks like I might have to open up some e-cig stores to supplement my income from training.  I've been thinking about opening up six to ten e-ciggerette stores in my area.  I may end up going that route to make the funds.  It's quite possible to clear $5K+ monthly from each store after taxes and expenses.  A buddy of mine does this on average from each of his 14 stores scattered over about a 40 mile radius.

I'll take your advice to heart, weigh my options and decide what to do with my time.  Obtaining the funds is the biggest obstacle in my opinion.  I don't see where it profits me much to learn the stuff if I don't have the funds to use it.  I may end up continuing the way I'm going with buying the best gear I can get my hands on when it's available.  The block halving approaching doesn't help at the moment either.

So, more than likely, I'll go the e-cig route to obtain more funds to have more options when it comes to mining.  If a 0.06 watts per GH/s rig comes on the market, I'm quite certain it would be able to mine with profits for quite a while.  Maybe for the lifetime of the rig.  I hope someone comes out with one soon that's available to us all.  I'm not giving up on mining.  That's for sure.  I'm now in wait and see mode regarding mining.

Thanks again for your recommendations.
948  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:55:13 AM
Perhaps it's time to start a new thread for this line of discussion.

I haven't said I won't learn how to do it. I'm just saying that's not in my skill set. Given a chip, I can build a miner around it. Literally every part of a miner except the silicon design (including power, controls, driver code, what have you) is something I already know I can do. But I'm not going to assume there isn't someone who already knows what he's doing and can do it better - and certainly in less time, which matters a heck of a lot in the bitcoin world. I intend someday on working on silicon design, and I already have some ideas what I'd try and make. But I'd prefer to start on something quite a bit less intense than something 16nm running 500MHz.

I totally agree with you, Sir.  I was simply trying to help with marketing and coordinating to try to get things moving with others who already have the know how.  Instead, I'm told by someone who appears to have the knowhow to do one of 3 things.   lol   Cheesy

At least I know NOW not to waste my time with them.  I would probably end up getting taken advantage of out of spite now.  I was simply trying to offer my time, energy and money to help them and others get something done.  Plain and simple...
949  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:50:34 AM
Anyone have an online class they recommend for designing chips?  If there are certain things I cannot learn unless I'm in a classroom environment, let me know and I won't waste my time trying to learn online but do my research of a college here locally in Birmingham to take specific classes needed for what I want to accomplish.  I don't need a degree; only the knowledge with some experience.

It sounds like an ASIC for bitcoin mining is relatively simple compared to other applications after reading this subject in other threads.  I just want to take the time to learn it myself.
950  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:38:59 AM
I still would like to know how much would be required to get a 16nm design to engineering samples.

same here.
All of it, I mean all that you can come up with. You have this big target painted over your faces: I want to buy Bitcoin turboencabulators, I'm ignorant of the technology, please rip me off.

Cypherdoc was exactly like you, he was ripped off on his Bitcoin turboencabulators by Hashfast, but actually made money by shilling and roping more naïfs.

There are three ways of getting something done:

1) learn how to do it and do it yourselves;
2) learn who can do it for you and for how much, then pay it;
3) prohibit your teenage children from doing it, and hope they will turn like all teenagers and do what's prohibited.

What I see in both of you is the strong desire to not learn anything about logic design and the semiconductor industry. Sidehack is one step ahead, because he is at least openly willing to admit that he won't do it.

You are like two guys who want to win competitive dance or acrobatic event, but don't want to get their asses off the lazy chair. Learn how to walk and tap your feet with the music before you sign up in a competitive event.

Fine, I can take that medicine.  Sounds like it's time to do research and homework.  Then try to come up with the funds one way or another.
951  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:33:40 AM
Interesting idea, but logistically this would be really challenging to do - although one way you COULD do it would be if you developed a miner, and didn't release the driver as open source, and basically built a special version of the cgminer/bfgminer that was locked to a particular pool - and just make the pool fees that fund reinvestment.  Then there's no bother trying to enforce it, and even if you sold the gear, the new owner would still be contributing to the 'cause' so to speak.  This would also solve the issues of predictable cashflow for the parent company...  Hell, the pool could even be public, and people could mine into 'equity' positions even using other gear.  Use the infrastructure that already exists...

I like that idea too.  I would make a nomination for CK/Kano Pool to be that pool and they would probably be wiling to develop that special version of cgminer just for their pool at no cost.  They would be getting paid for their contribution by having more rigs on their pool finding more blocks, etc...  Hell, I would even send them a contribution for their time and effort.
952  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:22:43 AM
Now, I'm only throwing ideas out for people to brainstorm.

We could make it where ALL investors are owners of the crowd fund.  The percentage one owns depends on the amount they invest.  Rules need to be set up so that NO ONE ever has 51% or higher ownership.

Also, we would need to create something where those who invest MUST continue to put in a certain percentage of their earnings from mining back into the fund each month.  For example, maybe 3 to 5 percent should go back into the fund.  If they invested $100, they need to put back $3 to $5 every month into the fund every month for continued product development and to continue manufacturing.  It may be that 10% would need to go back into the fund every month.  I'm simply trying to throw out a number to for those who purchased ownership of a rig to continue their ownership in the company.  They can sell their ownership to someone else if they like.  If someone gets behind on their monthly dues for product development and manufacturing, they can no longer expect to have access to future gear that is created by the company of the crowd fund.

I'm throwing out ideas to try to keep something going if we are able to start it.  I don't want it to simply be a one time thing.  I want it to keep going and grow.

This would also mean people would have to be chosen to run "support" if issues should arise.  There needs to be a place to house the gear before shipment; for support; for repairs; etc...  Quite a bit to consider.  I would like to get something like this going if many with the contacts and the knowhow can work together to try to get this done.

EDIT:  The minimum investment might have to be like $500 or $800.  I'm not sure.  We would have to determine that number.  I simply used $100 for easy math.  If we could create a 16nm rig with 10 TH/s at 0.06 watts per GH/s at $800 cost per rig, it would ROI relatively quickly at current price of bitcoin and difficulty.

So, we would basically have to come up with a ball park figure of how much a 8 to 10 TH/s rig would be at cost for development, parts and manufacturing.  Each individual would be responsible for shipping to their location, any customs charges, VAT, etc...

I'm basically saying the minimum investment would be the cost for one rig.  The individual who made that investment also owns part of the crowd fund AS LONG AS they continue paying monthly dues for continued product development and manufacturing.  It may be we could make it 20% of their initial investment.  If they want to invest more as time goes along to get more rigs, that is fine too.  I'm just brain storming trying to figure out how to do this.
953  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:10:48 AM
I still would like to know how much would be required to get a 16nm design to engineering samples.

same here.
954  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 09, 2016, 04:02:49 AM
@dmwardjr


I don't know why you can't do that only problem i see it finding some one that will sell us some space and we need some one that is willing to design a chip etc .in a few month's i should have a few bitcoins saved up won't be much but some thing  and would be willing to invest them in some thing worth while, instead of buying a outdated miner the way it's benign to look.

 I'm sure a few others would, just to keep miners in the home etc .

I willing to invest up to about $40K for starters if I knew we could have a damn good product with excellent efficiency that would be in the mix for quite a while.  When I say efficient, I'm talking about 0.06 watts per GH/s or better.  If we had a rig with 16nm chips and that kind of efficiency, I'm game.  We just need a lot more investors it sounds like.  I don't even want to start a thread on this to begin anything like this and put all the effort into sending hundreds of PM's out to people to market it to them if it's not possible for that kind of efficiency and/or coordination.

It's also important to have this done in a way that protects everyone's investment.  I mentioned earlier that if the money needed to get it moving was not accomplished within a certain time frame, there needs to be a means of everyone being able to get their money back.

It would take more than just me getting the word out.  I know I sent out hundreds of emails to get people to point their rigs to CK/Kano Pool a couple of months ago.  I got quite a bit of people to come over.  They too talked to people to get them to come over.  People have to be willing to invest the time to send out PM's to get it going.  However, FIRST, I need to know it CAN be done and A PLAN has to be put together to explain [To would be investors] HOW things would be accomplished, WHO will accomplish WHAT and WHEN.  It will take some coordination, for sure.

EDIT:  People have to be chosen who will maintain contact with people and institutions throughout every phase of the design, development and manufacturing.  Many things to consider and coordinate.
955  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ** 5x AVALON6 GIVEAWAY ** Kano CKPool (kano.is) [0.9% PPLNS] US,DE,SG,JP on: February 09, 2016, 03:24:35 AM
Yeah glad that ones over.

Welcome back David, you've been quiet.

Yes, I have been quiet.  I've been very busy lately.  I've had to analyze different things to make the right decision and it has taken up a lot of my time.
956  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [20 PH] ** 5x AVALON6 GIVEAWAY ** Kano CKPool (kano.is) [0.9% PPLNS] US,DE,SG,JP on: February 08, 2016, 10:19:58 PM
Captminer,

Good job, buddy!  It was comforting to have that one over with.  We can expect those at times.
957  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 08, 2016, 10:12:04 PM
I think Bitfury is talking about their next group of wafers.  They obviously have deployed the first groups of wafers as they are now 18% of the hashrate.

Unless they just frantically hooked up hundreds of Petahashes of their older technology that was just sitting around right before they get their new chips, which makes little sense to me.

I only hope they plan on selling a big chunk of the next batch of wafers to the public and not keeping all that hashrate for themselves.

Nothing would be worse for bitcoin than thousands of home miners "rage-quitting" and selling all their coins.

this would be okay if home miners have enough coin to drop price to under 200 usd.

A price crash to 150-200usd would cut big farmers badly especially if they are using  s-7's and avalon6's.

right now bitmaintech is holding more then 23,000 coins in 1 or 2 wallets.

a price tank to 150 would cost them 220 x 23,000

23,000 BTC is only a small drop in the bucket.  We have approximately 15 million bitcoins in existence now.  Most of the bitcoin held today is not by miners but by speculators.
958  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 08, 2016, 09:48:01 PM
You thought correctly. I don't do chip design, I'm purely a hardware guy. However, most of the companies my company supports *are* in the semi industry ergo my knowledge of where the chip mfg processes comes from. Our end of things is tightly integrated to what size nodes the Foundries can produce.

That said, I can tell you it is a fact that you are looking at several million $ to develop a chip from scratch. Even when using foundry or design house supplied pre-made IP blocks, TSMC will not even talk to you about 16nm chips unless the chip quantities are over 100k/month...  Push back to 20-22nm and higher and they are much more approachable but that is also outside our target. Sad

If a rig was designed and manufactured with [for example] 100 x 16nm chips, that would be 1,000 rigs each month for 100k quantities a month.

How much per chip do you think would be your estimate if we were able to get the 100k per month.

Also, I'm sure they would want us to purchase 100k/month for a certain length of time.  Would it be like 6 months minimum or 12 months?

I'm just trying to get an idea for the cost of the chips alone over a certain length of time (6 months to 12 months).
959  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 08, 2016, 09:30:21 PM
I know nothing about chip design. I'd lean on NotFuzzyWarm and 2112, guys like that, for proper silicon. As it is, all I can do is try and design boards around existing chips. Hopefully the Bitfury chip is still worth working with once it's actually available.

I sent you a PM but you, NotFuzzyWarm, and 2112 have basically answered my question.
960  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" on: February 08, 2016, 09:29:39 PM
ask sidehack or  NotFuzzyWarm  they both do design etc and can give some kind of ball park I think . yea we can't leave out the Home miner , i think even if i didn't mine my self at home, i would agree to.

I thought they may have only worked with chips other people engineered and designed.  I didn't know they too can engineer and design chips themselves.  I'll give them a shout to ask some questions.
You thought correctly. I don't do chip design, I'm purely a hardware guy. However, most of the companies my company supports *are* in the semi industry ergo my knowledge of where the chip mfg processes comes from. Our end of things is tightly integrated to what size nodes the Foundries can produce.

That said, I can tell you it is a fact that you are looking at several million $ to develop a chip from scratch. Even when using foundry or design house supplied pre-made IP blocks, TSMC will not even talk to you about 16nm chips unless the chip quantities are over 100k/month...  Push back to 20-22nm and higher and they are much more approachable but that is also outside our target. Sad

Bummer...   Damn damn damn damn...

Thanks for your input.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ... 141 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!