He made a new post that even with google translate I can't understand.
Seems like he is not using very kind words for the BCH guys
He says that the BCH attack is impressive. But it doesn't change anything, because changing constants is not the solution. He also says we are going to slowly trend towards weekly ma20. Weekly MA20 is around 4 500$. So that means he is bearish short term? Well if the price moves down, the moving average will still move a bit as it's a lagging indicator. So price and MA20 in the weekly chart could probably meet around the $4750 - $5000 area. As the $5000 level should be tested anyway I see this as a good sign to build a good support in that zone. So imo we could see 2-3 more weeks of downside. If we consolidate then or see a strong bounce like the other 4 times before this year needs to be seen. We are still parabolic, I don't understand the pessimism until we break below $5000. $5500 was a perfect bounce off the parabolic curve. We could still be at $10k by Jan 1 2018. I am not thinking downturn in the market for more than 5-9 days unless we go below $5k, then I am bearish for Bitcoin near term. It's still very possible to make it above $10k by new year "while" breaking $5k beforehand, don't you think? |
|
|
|
Update using the 2h (120m) TF - No Indicators except the one laid on top of the candles:  |
|
|
|
Please go away, retard.
You'll be alright. Time to respect the forum ... get a clue, you're not special. So, now we have someone who can see my fascial expressions [whether foe, kind, humble, angry, etc...]; "know" my heart [Seat of the emotions, passions, desires]; "know" my spirit [Seat of the mind, the intellect, thought processes] through a freaking computer screen on a forum? Geeeeeez You act as though this is "your" forum; when it's "not" your forum. It's a forum Luc created.  |
|
|
|
Please go away, retard.
You'll be alright. |
|
|
|
We arent going to start a new thread. Eventually this idiot will get tired of being stupid and the thread will live on.
Ooooooh Great.... Another "Useful Idiot." |
|
|
|
Well, all I have to say... Sounds like "Small Thinking" to me. How about thinking BIG? Why can't Luc be the one to create/begin a Technical Analysis/Fundamental Analysis/Mathematical Analysis/Manipulation (Wyckoff) Analysis, etc... thread of its kind and it flourish to become one of the best known sources for "productive" sharing? Yes, there can be "side chains" [Like the one you're speaking of with a Russian translator] to add to this original he created, called, "Analysis." Back then, several shared "productive" ideas all the time; the way it should have been. And No, I'm not going to get pissed at you, Sir, for your comment. "Since this thread seems like it will be squatted on indefinitely..." In fact, you're welcome to have the opinion you like. It's "your" opinion. Should want to fight for it. Hell, I do. ;-) Who knows, I just might ware off on you after a while. You know... Imbibe my spirit kind of thing... so to speak... ;-)  |
|
|
|
If your charts weren't messy as fuck perhaps they could be more widely accepted by this thread's participants and viewers. Right now, I look at your charts and see dog vomit. I fail to see the inspiration of masterluc in your charting capability since his charts are crystal clear and simple, unlike yours which I can hardly even see the damn price candles. While you may have a valid analysis, you need to make it dead simple for viewers to see it. You also don't need 4 fucking oscillators - one usually suffices.
Either way, it's pretty clear that participants in this thread do not want to be spammed by your charts. Not only are they impossible to decipher without understanding your "brand" of charting (which is more reason to have your own space for it), but they have absolutely nothing to do with Elliot Waves - which is what masterluc is known for. No one has commented on your stuff to understand further what you are attempting to convey, but very clearly we go and comment on bitcoin_vanga / masterluc charts to see what HE conveys. If you can't see that, then you've got bigger problems that are outside of the scope of this forum - perhaps you should check out a psychiatrist to get some shit addressed.
Hijacking the thread of your "inspiration" to gain followers is not much different than shitting on his legacy.
Perhaps you should ask Luc if he agrees with your views? How bout that? I'll take the constructive criticism to heart on "clear" and "simple" for the next update.  Update on the 1440m (1-Day) TF:  |
|
|
|
WHEN Luc Kindly asks me to leave You still depend on mom telling you when you're making a fool of yourself? You still depend on mom to tell you to do the right thing of not following the bully or bully crowd even when someone is being a "productive member" to a group? As far as I'm concerned, you and others like you can shove it. I will continue to be "productive" until Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or he changes the title to indicate this is only for "his" analysis and no one else is allowed to post a chart [Which several of you have done I might add]. Why is it not okay for me to post? Never mind that question. You've already made clear your bully intentions. I'm staying and doing absolutely nothing wrong by staying. I've broken no rules in this thread. Hell, no "rules" have been published on the first post of this thread stating any such rule for only Luc to post charts and ideas but no one else. Your hypocrisy [And those of your bully friends] serve none of you well and I will continue my updates out of spite until and/or otherwise Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or changes the title of this thread to indicate only he can post a freaking chart and share thoughts or ideas. Thanks for sharing And thank you for your support. I honestly believe Luc wouldn't have it any other way than for all of us to share. I can see if what was shared was not "productive." At least I'm willing to lay it on the line and say what I believe is about to play out based off "patterns" I saw in FIB RT 0.618 Price Points when the coordinates of those FIB's are placed at pre-determined locations as described with a couple of rules from "Loaded Gun Theory," which have shown a "consistency;" a "pattern." I personally, believe the time and effort invested to see these consistencies and patterns was "productive." That's what I brought to the discussion and "thought" it was worth having a look. This is "somewhat" consistent with Wyckoff's Schematics but brought to a more modern (crypto) evolution. Many have thought [When looking at his schematics] that we "must" have a Phase E in Distribution Schematics while ignoring important rules he laid out before getting involved with the schematics. Anyhow, thanks for your support! And again, I'm sure Luc would agree. I'm sure he would want us all to share thoughts and ideas. Come on guys and girls? As for somewhere else to share and where people can appreciate my work (time & effort invested) to put together some publications; I already have that place with over 780 followers. https://www.tradingview.com/u/ProwdClown/I like coming to this thread because I got inspiration from Luc to invest time to become a better trader and "hopefully" have enough knowledge to "contribute" positively to the group some day. Now that "some day" has arrived and I invested time for that "some day" [Since June 2014], I'm told, "Go away, this is only for such and such." Well, I'm not having it!!! If Luc {One of my inspirations; although he doesn't know it} were to kindly ask me to leave; not post charts or something to that affect OR change the title to "Luc's Analysis," then fine, I'll chill and take my analysis elsewhere. Otherwise, I will remain and "contribute." |
|
|
|
WHEN Luc Kindly asks me to leave You still depend on mom telling you when you're making a fool of yourself? You still depend on mom to tell you to do the right thing of not following the bully or bully crowd even when someone is being a "productive member" to a group? As far as I'm concerned, you and others like you can shove it. I will continue to be "productive" until Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or he changes the title to indicate this is only for "his" analysis and no one else is allowed to post a chart [Which several of you have done I might add]. Why is it not okay for me to post? Never mind that question. You've already made clear your bully intentions. I'm staying and doing absolutely nothing wrong by staying. I've broken no rules in this thread. Hell, no "rules" have been published on the first post of this thread stating any such rule for only Luc to post charts and ideas but no one else. Your hypocrisy [And those of your bully friends] serve none of you well and I will continue my updates out of spite until and/or otherwise Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or changes the title of this thread to indicate only he can post a freaking chart and share thoughts or ideas. |
|
|
|
as long as no one quotes it, "ignore" should work fine. we all fall for allures. he will regret this later, I am sure.
LOL, You guys crack me up. Really? I sure as hell won't regret a thing. Certainly won't. Even if Luc asks me Kindly to leave and/or changes this title in this thread I won't feel regrets. Until then, I'm staying and offering up what I think is going to occur just as he AND OTHERS have offered up what they think will occur. A new Daily candle has begun less than an hour ago. We're half way there to the $4,854.86 price point for the 2 Guns Down 0.618% FIB RT.  |
|
|
|
|
I'm NOT moving at the behest of so called "followers" opinions. As I've already said previously; WHEN Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or the title has changed to "Luc's Analysis" I'll remain here, you morons.
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr don't miscontrue what people are saying. Your analysis is much appreciated, but it would be better appreciated in a separate thread. As has been alluded to previously, this is and has been a thread dedicated to the analysis of Masterluc. So despite the ambiguous thread title, when people come here they are looking for analysis specifically from Luc. You'd better serve yourself and the community by starting a separating thread or contributing to a more general thread (Afrikoin's thread, for example, was mentioned; he welcomes analysis from all).
I could care less what you're saying. I've ALREADY given my thoughts. WHEN the title changes and/or Luc asks me to stop, I'll stop; Until then, ignore me. I actually personally don't have a problem with it. Just trying to convey the sentiment of others. Too bad others aren't equally accommodating. |
|
|
|
dmwardjr don't miscontrue what people are saying. Your analysis is much appreciated, but it would be better appreciated in a separate thread. As has been alluded to previously, this is and has been a thread dedicated to the analysis of Masterluc. So despite the ambiguous thread title, when people come here they are looking for analysis specifically from Luc. You'd better serve yourself and the community by starting a separating thread or contributing to a more general thread (Afrikoin's thread, for example, was mentioned; he welcomes analysis from all).
I could care less what you're saying. I've ALREADY given my thoughts. WHEN the title changes and/or Luc asks me to stop, I'll stop; Until then, ignore me. |
|
|
|
Okay, I'm going to try this again [One more time] to try to get involved and be a productive member of this discussion.
At what point will you consider yourself an unproductive member of this discussion? I guess the moment you decide to stop being "provoked." |
|
|
|
No problem gents.
Ignore button.
There's your sign: "ignore Button" |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, enough already. Go away!
+1 And you'll be just fine too. +1 to myself. Don't do the community a disservice by discouraging freedom of speech; freedom of expression; freedom to exchange ideas! I will "always" fight against those who would attempt to stifle any of the bitcoin ecosphere freedoms just mentioned! Remember, we're speculating on "The Internet of Money." It's the first ever ecosphere with no boundaries [Except those mathematically written in the code. One nation to itself. One FREE Nation to itself. The way it should be. Please go read the entirety of this thread. Dozens of people have misunderstood the title of this thread 'Analysis' thinking that it is a general Analysis thread. It is not. It is a dead thread devoted to postings from Luc whereever readers find it. The audience in this thread only cares about Lucs anaylsis. So you are wasting your time and annoying people by posting your analysis in this thread. So if you want to be a DICK and keep doing that, no one can stop you. But it doesn't help anyone you or anyone else. You, sir, are entitled to your opinion. If and/or when "Luc" comes on here and tells me this thread is devoted to "Luc's Analysis," so be it. Until then, I'll keep posting on "Analysis." All he has to do is change the "title." I'll take that as a kind message to stay away and create my own thread. I've seen others post here and there's no problem. I post on here and there's a problem? Seriously, I'm the one to keep the peace; while at the same time not being one's doormat. So, until I see that title changed and/or "Luc" comes on here and kindly asks me to chill. Then I'll keep the peace and "chill." Until then, "you're" the one not keeping the peace and I Kindly ask you to "chill." |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, enough already. Go away!
+1 And you'll be just fine too. +1 to myself. Don't do the community a disservice by discouraging freedom of speech; freedom of expression; freedom to exchange ideas! I will "always" fight against those who would attempt to stifle any of the bitcoin ecosphere freedoms just mentioned! Remember, we're speculating on "The Internet of Money." It's the first ever ecosphere with no boundaries [Except those mathematically written in the code. One nation to itself. One FREE Nation to itself. The way it should be. |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, enough already. Go away!
You'll be alright!  |
|
|
|
Update with more perspective from previous events:  |
|
|
|
I'll be just fine posting right here. Did you notice the title? It says, "Analysis." Does it say, "Masterluc Analysis?" No. If Masterluc comes into the thread and asks me to kindly leave, I'll leave. Otherwise, I'm staying. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
