your compression rate is excellent.  in fear of throttling  ? or for speedier encryption  .

I agree that it's a tool better kept unused. However you forget those 2 doctrines of engagement. I predictive & II preemptive. I don't have to wait for you to exercise violence to stop you from harming me, otherwise it would be too late. It's called alternatively: better safe than sorry or shoot first discuss later.


Of course because truth only get closer to reality, when lies always move to unreality or fiction.


The truth always sell since it's the closest match to reality available. Those wanting to be in denial will bear the consequences of their choices, since reality is inescapable.


you are in absolute denial. Truth = best useful narrative of reality. If I tell you there is the shade of a tree behind this rock... How could untruth be told? Reality is a surface, like a mirror, only an inspiration can match all of its asperities, living it rather than seeing it. Once that is achieved sides become like un ending reflections of the same lies with no emprise on reality since it can't be conquered but lived in a singular harmony whose sole complexity can match reality. And there you breath.


Are mathematics in line with reality? there is one apple and a pineapple. How many fruits there are? The answer is when? Now? 2.


Violence is self backed. However truth is the closest thing available to reality and lies are the farthest. There is no way to "excuse" reality. it is.


I didn't said used, I said backed.



That's why it's better to use dead wood, and all trees die, you just have to be patient.

How would you differentiate between "violence" and "aggression", I prefer to think in the term of anything that may risk to cause a damage.


Why not extended it to all living beings? Against trees being among the livings?


I like the words of jet lee, rephrased in bring ty enemy closer to thy, so that thou may win over him, and ultimately from your worst enemy to your best friend, if he can overcome his lies... I agree it may seems to an untrained eye as a temporary weak position, but it's wanted, a trained eye will say that the edge is just being deployed. Slow motion battle. One leaf a time, the grass conquered the Earth. It's impossible to win against reality. it is or it isn't. it's dual. y or n. 1 or 0.


you can't control reality. but you can leave in truth.

yoohhoo full answer   

I'm lovin public ledger for public spending...

all is clear, thx.  .

very nice post RodeoX. However I have to disagree on a specific point, something wanting my money is already oppressive to me .

Leviathan being the gov ? and what is Pluto? What does it mean "responsible"? And what is a subject of Leviathan?

I am so lost 

You seem so passionate, I don't understand why? Could you please explain me more? A lose attempts to fight deflation in the tech industry by the cartels? I mean scam us ISP, so others methods will be found, and then you will die off, like Kodak. For me it's just an attempt by the ISP to extort more money by colluding and not wanting to invest in the infrastructure to compete in the marketplace by for example guaranteeing low latency or full continuous capacity. I don't want to block an ISP to provide a cheap absolutely QoSed (multitiers), high latency, 0 guaranteed capacity or what ever service... but I find it soo stupid to use such an ISP. I hate QoS (who the f are you to tell me that what I transmit is of low priority), then again I hate non stable band weight (what the fuck I paid for X up and down, I don't care if you can't make it continuous, what ever your excuse, bye), furthermore I think Deep packet inspection always leads to packet sniffers and stupidly increase latency, and finally I find that latency sucks, but physics is, and that only the speed of light (or what ever quantic method) shall limit my latency, and not a stupid isp or backbone provider or what ever that didn't upgrade his lines or machines and uses queuing during spikes to cheat everyone he contracted with. But more than that I prefer this vision :
"Open Internet
The idea of an open Internet is the idea that the full resources of the Internet and means to operate on it are easily accessible to all individuals and companies. This often includes ideas such as net neutrality, open standards, transparency, lack of Internet censorship, and low barriers to entry. The concept of the open Internet is sometimes expressed as an expectation of decentralized technological power, and is seen by some as closely related to open-source software."
than this:
"A "closed Internet" refers to the opposite situation, in which established corporations or governments favor certain uses. A closed Internet may have restricted access to necessary web standards, artificially degrade some services, or explicitly filter out content."

And I think that net-neutrality simply mean that each packet is born equal to all others packets, and that only FIFO shall rules in all gateway and that the wideness of the gateway is continuously provided. I understand the financial gain that could be made in killing net neutrality, but they seems in my view very short sighted. As such I don't understand those that want to kill the idea that each packet is born equal, or those that want to change the status quo on this complex subject. I like the idea of peers on the internet each equal to have depending on the bw the same right as I do, and I think Net neutrality is necessary for peer to peer. And I don't like to have to read for each thing I do or contract 300 pages or more just to know that I need to read 3000 more to have a chance to understand anything... Open Law next goal?

I believe that truth backed by violence, lead naturally to the moral high ground, which may not mean earthly victory over the liars. Anyone cares? 

up  Do you think I can hope or it's just a wastefull hoping?

a problem with gambling, betting? yes I know it's very hard to accept that their will always be a loser in every bet, gamble... I bet you will not like my answer? Did I lose?

No he would have taken the risk earlier, but his puppets maybe.

Excuse me, but I kindly disagree on most of your points, if not all.

1st If you bought an analog tape and want it digital, you didn't buy the digital version. I know it's hard, but it's a fact. you are the owner of a license to an analog tape (it's more technical, but in short), you don't have access with your contract to the digital version. It's like if you bough a car, then a new model arrives and you go to the dealership and steal the new model... only there you do it digitally.

2nd I had the same situation with a dvd, I went to a shop, pay $ to the shopkeeper who put my dvd in a small scratch removal machine it did wonder. Again if your car is scratch do you go steal a new one?

3nd I am deeply sorry for this one, but I can't say it other way, if you are that stupid to something with unbelievable drm and what not on it. you deserve what you got. to take the analogy you needed a very urban cars because you have a small garage, and buy a pick up truck so big that it didn't fit your garage. Who's fault is it? Again yours, because you were unable to read or understand what you were buying.

4nd NO quite the contrary. I want nothing from you. I was just expressing my contrarian opinions. I didn't want to hurt you or shock your feeling. But if you want my opinion you could stick to open sourced music (or drm free - dmca free), and support your local artist why not with bitcoin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronage or be a thief. your life your choice, just face the consequences. However I really like to read your opinions, even if I disagree. thx for sharing.

peer-pressure.

I agree, it will be hard to explain to them that there are only 21M btc max... maybe try to sell them an alt as a complement . But more seriously, the fact that btc mining rely on electricity and not directly on carbon may be a problem for their empires...

me too 

simple question, hard to know answer...

the law is sinuous... what's fun is that it could happen to any girls in America... who knows who could be her daddy... .

anyway, if any entity that has to be watched&control the recording... I smell the catshit already...

Imagine, a cell, the camera is only pointing on the left side... what will happen on the right corner will still be matter of discussion... but once the wall themselves will speak, no place un turn will be left for the criminals... Mercy isn't my +.

short answer: nothing.
best solution: buy low, sell high, take the profits and run 

 I read global then plan... my answer is a 4 letters word + you... I mean it. Why? because if your wonderful plan fail it will be at a global scale. answer it s a no. sorry.

best