Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 04:11:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
1221  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 08:02:02 AM
once the aftermath of nuking mecca will be felt, think LA bigger worldwide, it will be seen as a necessity. we are hedged now.
1222  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:55:17 AM


"You got to know when to hold'em--- Know when to fold'em! You've got to know when to walk away." ----Kenny Rodgers

we didn't came to play.
1223  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:48:13 AM
"The American Heritage Dictionary defines the term "Concentration camp" as: "A camp where persons are confined, usually without hearings and typically under harsh conditions, often as a result of their membership in a group the government has identified as suspect."

always be prepared to assume that in a poker table, if you didn't find the fools of the game, it "may" be you. Remember if you put your opponents, with it's back on the seas, that there is no escape but confrontation, you must expect that a great game will be served to you. Even if it implies your inability to cope with the level of attrition. We are speaking American Scale.

edit: I will always remember this Palestinians dad that said that he just wanted to watch mickey mouse with his daughters, however he did nothing to stop his neighbor rocket launchpads, or his suicide vest building shop, or his cars or his swords from being used against innocents that want to leave in peace and for those coming from Europe (we don't) have endured hardships. Remember that concentration camp are still flaged as peacefull by the Empire...

if you want read more about scaling : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination_camp
1224  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:42:37 AM
both down? it's called scaling.

edit: but it's a rupture of trade, since the buying power of one will overwhelmed the one of the others. As such the opposite side will be forced to liquidate. the question is how much. It's a sad fact of life in the pits. it's make it funnier Cheesy. fast surrendering is the best option in the situation, however the more your hopelessness the greatest your loss.
1225  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:37:07 AM
1 or 0
1226  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:32:48 AM
That will whereby it would prove thus known.

 Huh

and you didn't answer my simple question, which one is standing on the next sun raise? Al aqsa or mecca? You don't want to chose, you seems to not understand that it ain't a choice. Mercylessness is a too kind word to describe the pits of America...
1227  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 07:04:29 AM
TO GUARANTEE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BE CERTAIN THAT EVERYONE CAN SAY WHAT EVER HE WANTS EVEN IF IT S INSULTING TO YOU, THE USMC WAS CREATED. WE TAKE MUTUAL GREAT CARE OF EACH OTHER. IT S A BIG SYMBIOTIC RELATION.

UNITED STATE OF AMERICA MOTO : IN GOD WE TRUST

What is insulting to you in saying that the Palestinians are using al aqsa mosk, a simple point in the dunya, to try to persuade others idiots that their fights against the rightful owner of this place is just and should be supported. You really believed that after WW2 Europeans Jews wouldn't be allowed to return to the Temple Mount.. oh and btw We are American, always been, always will.

1228  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 06:51:28 AM
Masters of the Universe‽

In the vastness of space there is always a bigger fish, until you understand that God is the Greatest and that Death takes everything sooner or later with it.

For those that aren't aware, these are (real) public negotiations. Homo sapiens may freely chime in.



Isn't what Peaceful People do, discuss their problems without resorting to violence, but you need People and not sub-animals...
1229  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 06:24:27 AM
anyone that think that Beijing isn't a Chinese city, anyone that think that Moscow isn't a Russia City, or anyone that believe that America will fall. Is it clear enough?
1230  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 06:17:37 AM

It would not be a State that strikes of, bu the beasts termed "men" thereof--those very same beasts they strike.



of course, as always, safety first Cheesy. At least you agree that now we start to discuss the issue, clearly, fully staked, ready to raise or call. I think that you have no idea :


it's personal.
1231  Other / Politics & Society / Al-Aqsa Mosque or Mecca, which one do you want to see standing tomorrow? on: November 19, 2014, 06:12:48 AM
Placing the opponents in having to make a choice is always a very interesting thing, it permits to see what it values more... And let met tell you one thing, there are some very good value finder helpers in the Empire. So what would you chose if only one of the 2 picture here could stand the night?



or

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Born and Raise in the Empire :



How to tolerate markets were women are traded against camels (or anything)... I cluster fuck those places.



edit: this flash will be seen in Jeddah, and my friends, don't dare to believe it only happens to others, in old times...

And if you ask me why such violence? if they could they would, because we are Kefirs right?

 Cool

And final edit: we only need one keystroke. and we can't come back once we pressed it. Chose wisely, be advise by the wisest, understand it's very serious.
1232  Other / Politics & Society / Hide and Seek - What do you think of sheeps that harbor wolves? on: November 19, 2014, 04:47:04 AM
Hi,

It's a rhetorical question that could be applied to many situation, I don't think it's right to say that anyone is for peace while at the same time harboring criminals. The problem is that sometimes harboring, or not resisting to a criminal - terror group from within could be from the Empire perspective called an act of assistance, which may automatically flag you as an enemy of the Empire. All the enemies of the Empire have died.

So some people have to start to think a little bit. you can't be against theft and let thieves live among you, you can't be against murderers and harbor murderers among you... or to rephrase it closer to the truth, yes you can welcome who ever you want among you, but welcoming the enemies of the Empire, may lead to the meeting with the Empire's Forces.

To illustrate my point of view. A mother support her son that is a rapist. Every day the mother do everything that no one in the neighbor could have an idea that her son is a rapist. Once upon a time the force learn about it, the mother refuse to open the door... the next day she lies with her dead son in the graveyard.

So why do you think that those that say they want to live in peace never move a little finger to stop those among them that are doing the work of evil? Are they afraid? Do they believe that the criminals will go away or win? What does it tell about them as parents, as they can't even provide a criminal free playing field for their Children?
1233  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is full spectrum dominance? Do you plan to make the People of China servant on: November 17, 2014, 09:58:21 PM
any updates from the nsc? peace is an active p2p shared choice...
1234  Other / Politics & Society / Is trying to change a p2p hash a crime? on: November 17, 2014, 09:08:30 PM
simple  Cheesy. It would make 51% attack illegal Cheesy.
1235  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How can the U.S. fix Detroit? on: November 17, 2014, 09:04:30 PM


Cuz everyone knows we're a few republicans away from Utopia?  Roll Eyes

Wonderful, it works with both parties, depending of the situation Cheesy
1236  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What makes a currency meaningful? on: November 17, 2014, 08:46:27 PM
What makes a currency meaningful? Honesty. Privacy. Freedom to use it to grow and accumulate by everyone.

In other words, a currency is a commodity that makes life easier for those who use it. Life gets easier for the honest, naive people. Life gets easier for the crooks.

Making currency meaningful isn't about currency. It's about freedom and honesty... lifestyle among the people.


For example, you hear the preaching of the politicians. So, you vote them into office. Then, they do whatever they want, lie through their teeth, etc. But you keep on believing them. Suckers!

The reason Bitcoin might have success is that it is honest in a way that is difficult to corrupt. The reason Bitcoin might fail is the same one that the whole country fails by. People would rather believe the corrupt government and media, to their own demise, than use something private and honest like Bitcoin.

Somebody might say, But Bitcoin can be used for all kinds of corruption. Fiat currency is corruption incarnate the way it is being used around the world by the big banks and the governments.

Smiley

It's a real pleasure to read you. Thank you. I permitted myself to highlight a certain passage that I liked particularly. Do you think that I could rephrase it by shafting the wheat from the weed? Was Christians persecution about people trying to be righteous (who said they succeed;)), who only wanted to do business among themselves, the crooks would be pissed off, as any medium of exchange that they may used may get voided in a sec, even more with the backing of the imperial guard... sad than even the prospect of a full success in any transformation of currency - society may already be to late for any real change... toxicity. But I think it's still cool to try what ever the results, the potential rewards outweight so much the potential risk, that frankly there isn't many others options... what's cooler is that those options are evolving very fast...
1237  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What makes a currency meaningful? on: November 17, 2014, 07:56:42 PM
hashing = "mining"  Huh "sharing" = mining  Huh "loving" = mining  Huh wasting = mining  Huh living = mining  Huh as long as it's not: work makes you free  Cry, I think I can adapt. Undecided

A currency is a medium of exchange, not an income redistribution tool. Cryptos need electricity to send and receive. Many parts of the 3rd world do not have electricity easily available. So, cryptos will not solve poverty or inequality.

A currency shouldn't at least not be a mean of extraction. I don't think that electricity per se is the problem, who doesn't want an iphoneclone... a mini solar panel and you are good to go... machine build...

People willingly give up their power. It doesn't matter how many advancements are made, this will continue to happen. They seem to want to avoid the responsibility that comes with having any power at all. Most will happily trade their power for a false sense of security.

The best we can do is find ways to render the consolidation of power irrelevant to the responsible individual.

As long as it has value, a currency will be gathered into the hands of a few. A currency without value is pointless.

Do you think it can be trained? Or structurally engineered? How they will try to consolidated, aggressive to the point that BTC and clones had to come. Their is only value in trust in the men next to you, carrying the arms needed to defeat your opponents, in case such ones, doesn't want to discuss and solve in a consensual way your problems (and his as of you standing in arms before him, otherwise he would laugh...). It's called plantation transition, once the salve rise, necessarily certain formers masters will have to readjust to the new paradigm. The real question is what can they keep. Some argue that their life is already too much due to the damage inflicted. I couldn't agree more.

I liked your post. But I don't think cryptocoins are going to address human greed. The only way to discourage hoarding of anything is to devalue it. Doing that destroys it's utility and will keep anyone from using it.

The big difference with something like bitcoin is not that it will keep the greedy away, but they must compete equally with you. Take for example the "qualified investor" in the U.S. To be qualified you must have a million dollars and expect to make 500k this year. How insulting is that!?! It implies that the poor are to stupid to invest their own money and that just having money shows how smart you are. The system is rigged to keep normal people from investing and living off of capitol gains, exactly how the rich make their money. The poor are expected to work and create the real value that the rich are cashing in on.


woooh, I like this spirit of realism. I could just add that serving as cannon folders and prostitutes is the cherry-icing on the cake (depending on the taste). Greed ain't a sin, wanting more cake because you are hungry while the others are on diet ( Kiss) could be even describe as helping.

It sounds like you're asking for things that aren't possible: for a currency that has widely acknowledged value but also one in which the accumulation of it isn't possible by the wealthy. If your premise is that currencies typically allow for oppression of the poor, and you want bitcoin to become a currency, it too will allow for oppression of the poor. Bitcoin doesn't solve the fundamental problem of the human race: scarcity of resources. Scarcity of resources is what drives greed, not currency. Currencies are just a representation of it and a way to facilitate trade, and it doesn't matter if it's denominated in USD, Euros, Pounds, or Bitcoins. Bitcoin will not end scarcity, so there will always be rich and poor, even with bitcoin. But solving that problem wasn't the intent of bitcoin either. I don't know where the concept came from, but the problem bitcoin was supposed to solve was not inequitable distributions of wealth; it was the necessity of a central authority (which may abuse its power) in the currency creation process. Any ideals you're assigning to bitcoin outside of that single one aren't innate to bitcoin, and they aren't necessarily warranted.

scarcity of resources = stress; life = how do you cope with this stress, becoming a sub-animal or a human. don't wait, time is ticking for both as certain. Greed is allowed to grow like poverty. It's a political choices, that has many advantages for sub-animals in terms of reproduction and others earthly advantages. Very common among the human specie. Does it have DNA markers, I don't believe so, it's more from the spirit than the flesh, sadly?

The cryptocoin world has a serious philosophical question it needs to address and that is the subject above. We have seen throughout history that inequitable distributions of wealth or power always results in oppression of some form or another. This is a natural consequence of the territorial nature in the human species so if we plan to fix anything with cryptocoin, we should not leave out the opportunity to discourage the aspect of human nature which is at the root of all the harm in the first place. If we don't, we just exchange one evil for another. How so? Let's assume bitcoin begins to be accepted as a store of value but its distribution and access is poor. Without it being in the hands of the vast majority, that value will either become irrelevant over time or another source of domination. It will fail to achieve its main purpose of a fluid currency with either scenario. Sadly, this argument applies to just about all the cryptocurrencies so what is a better solution? I don't have an answer but because I've pondered this issue longer than most, I know the direction we need to take and that is why I am introducing this thread with the hope that the more thoughtful and altruistic among you will participate. We need a coin that has disincentives for dominant mass accumulation and we need a coin that is accessible to all. These both can be achieved in many ways and this thread is designed to put these suggestions forward for discussion.

Always? never have been the men whose pockets have been the fullest the kindest? there must be something going on here... Maybe only thieves and liars can prosper in the world of sauron? Happily pockets of the dead are always emptied, sooner or later. But it doesn't help in your fast electronic societies.

I think that we don't need one coin, but as many until maximal "efficiency" is reached in the size of each group. Certain groups converging towards certain conflicting interest will have to resort to violence to attempt to go trough the "iron wall" or die trying.

Thank you for your post it's quite rare to read such beautiful phrase as evil swapping, I thank you very much to have dared to express your opinions, that reflect a sure and certain comprehension of "money" as it's called in the real estate game called monopoly.

A currency is meaningful once it's used further - help - foster the type of future you want your children to live in. Otherwise it's just a scam attempt by your opponents to conquer your land, or worst.


1238  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How can the U.S. fix Detroit? on: November 17, 2014, 04:10:22 PM
I am sorry, I am not constructive at all as of now. So simply, burn it to the ground, it seems to be fun to fight the fire and burning it. It may regenerate or not, who cares anyway... I can't see it from Manhattan, it doesn't exists. More seriously what do you understand by "fix", free crack?

xoxo
1239  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is there a reliable charity organization ? on: November 17, 2014, 03:55:31 PM
LOL It shouldn't realistically, but the problem is we won't know, it's one of the problems of an overreaching surveillance state, you can get on a watchlist for literally anything, hell, I wouldn't be surprised if America already has files on the long term members here in all seriousness but that's just my paranoia talking, but that's how paranoid THEY are.

there is a difference between paranoia and fears (one is groundless the other real) as for intend and act (I want, I do), for a SVM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning#Support_vector_machines... I ask myself who are the closest members to my actual categorization... it just get exponential... They still seems to be able to use the tools, but it flag them as users. I don't know the consequences of such flag.

Edit: it start to get fun with those : no logs mode usage flagging and post action deletion of logs... overarching.

And you want to know when it starts to spin crazy, trying to SVM GOD.

I know we can trust, and there is no serious other hope from the servants of sauron.

edit 2: I personally love the "potential traitor of the agency"... bad category apparently.
1240  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Child kidnapping by the Norwegian State on: November 17, 2014, 03:51:22 PM
As you will not read, I just can't stop from commenting, for those that will none the less follow the evolving situation very diligently that I strongly support Orphans adoption by the gay lobby (as it's called here), but I am more skeptical on the case he (as he will not read) presented. It revealed a classical lack of faith of most die hard statist supporters, they can't seem (unless "the take care by" was voluntary, and "parenting" seems more appropriate) to admit that the situation of this "toxic" child (they will be very common sooner as you may imagine, thx to the narratives holders, as a question I don't think that woman you describe ever had access to raw heroin, only trashed), can improve with time. His Mother can start to act as a Mother, and who knows he could heal. So in this sense I wouldn't support an adoption, because long term there is still hope for the kid. However in the case of Orphans it's very rare (Cheesy) that the dead come back to life, a caring couple seems very natural to me.
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!