 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
wtf someone is dumping 1355615213 zeitcoins on 5 litesatoshi...? worth of 67 litecoins? what is going on with ZEITCOIN?
anny way to see if this is yobit?
And ... they're gone.  |
|
|
|
I can assure you that I am not involved with either gang. I bought CWXT earlier this month because of the original promise of masternodes and think this new team is precisely what you said, the same as the original team. So they announce a 3:1 swap to Masternodes, sell to people on the pump, and then "change" their mind after they dump and exit because the main dev wallet has too much coins in it and instead announce their SCAMMY ICO. I am with you 100% that these guys are scammers. But you have no reason to associate me with them nor do I know why you would.
As for the free economics lesson, you can ignore it or not -- in fact it wasn't directed at you, despite what you may think (probably because I quoted your post in its entirety). It was for the new dev team mainly.
There is normally a good reason why coins have inflation -- and it almost always has to do with providing some type of VALUE to the underlying network. When there is no reason, that's just bad economic policy. If you want to talk about people not having value, look no further than the two gangs you refer to.
And who said I was wasting time? Maybe I'm trying to find enough people who want to fork the large wallet of its remaining coins and not participate in the new scammy dev ICO?
Don't you understand that you need to have enough coins that are staking in order to do that plus community support?
So are you saying you are going to fork this coin, get rid of the pre-mine and put in masternodes like the "new" team said they would? I'm looking for people who want to help with something like that.
which large wallet do you mean, the 6 or the 7mio large wallet? Is that all it is? If that's the case, no need to bother forking the address away ... Can't tell the truth anymore with this shit. Did someone manage to get a working BE? Seems like their old scammy one got taken down. |
|
|
|
|
I like CWXX. Anything to move forward and get rid of the scammers and to do masternodes as initially promised.
|
|
|
|
I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development? It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like. I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code? Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied? Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy? It is not so hard if you want the best. Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people. I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other. Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have. How this was initially pitched was that the devs were going to do a 3:1 swap of the CWXT chain to masternodes. Then, they linked to a (manipulated) block explorer and said they were not wanting to do a swap because the amount of coins in the original dev's address was too high. The new team has even gone so far as to state that they never planned on having actual masternodes, but that they would have masternode-like features on the Ethereum blockchain -- token ticker CWX. This is contrary to numerous statements made in the past and even this paid for press-release : https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/crypto-world-x-masternodes-taking/In order to save face, they want to collect your personal information in order to "give" everyone in the community 35000 CWX. This is in addition to running their scammy ICO. Anyway, it's clear that they lack the simple understanding of the economic incentive structure as to why someone would actually run masternodes and be rewarded in the underlying coin to do so, i.e. providing network security and being compensated in the network's base currency. What's not to understand? Inflation for doing nothing for the network makes no sense economically. On the other hand, inflation through rewards for providing services to increase the value of a network makes sense. There's your Economics 101 lesson for the day folks. I suggest you read Chapters 2, 4, and 5 and answer the first 10 questions in Chapters 3 and 7 for homework. These topics will be on the final.  I think most clear is you belong to gang number 1. You make many points but even if some are true you only say statements. When they have Block Explorer, it says on the other bitcointalk thread there is an identical number of tokenz with Yobit, but both gangs say it is 47 million. I think when it is higher as yobit reports, yobit is not lying. I find no wallet links, so why? I make one for myself should I? You are telling people your funny joke on Economics 101 well the funny joke is you have a token without a wallet, you have more tokenz than is said and you do not even make Block Explorer, so how can you be a reliable person to take instruction from? You talk my friend, but say just nothing that is about important things. This is political speak without any intent to be open. "Blame them, they are bad, this was bad, you are stupid, here is economics 101". You are not of value except to make it worse and you do it on purpose. I make jokes all the time and I said in other discussion I will make CWXX, new honest and no ICO but premine for victims if possible, then I make some more jokes but they are not so important. You can not make this token work and do not care and gang two is saying things but quiet suddenly, maybe you bully them to submit., I think so. I can make this token I have been to Github.com to see code and wallet but found only code there. It is very easy token to make. Maybe I make number 3 version and then start to say look you are bad. If nobody is responsible for anything then why waste time here you produce nothing. If you still acting like a big crying baby in 1 week I will make number 3 on better code with better way to make it fair. You piss me off with your Economics 101, you are nothing. I can assure you that I am not involved with either gang. I bought CWXT earlier this month because of the original promise of masternodes and think this new team is precisely what you said, the same as the original team. So they announce a 3:1 swap to Masternodes, sell to people on the pump, and then "change" their mind after they dump and exit because the main dev wallet has too much coins in it and instead announce their SCAMMY ICO. I am with you 100% that these guys are scammers. But you have no reason to associate me with them nor do I know why you would. As for the free economics lesson, you can ignore it or not -- in fact it wasn't directed at you, despite what you may think (probably because I quoted your post in its entirety). It was for the new dev team mainly. There is normally a good reason why coins have inflation -- and it almost always has to do with providing some type of VALUE to the underlying network. When there is no reason, that's just bad economic policy. If you want to talk about people not having value, look no further than the two gangs you refer to. And who said I was wasting time? Maybe I'm trying to find enough people who want to fork the large wallet of its remaining coins and not participate in the new scammy dev ICO? Don't you understand that you need to have enough coins that are staking in order to do that plus community support? So are you saying you are going to fork this coin, get rid of the pre-mine and put in masternodes like the "new" team said they would? I'm looking for people who want to help with something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Have you considered accepting HUC for the ICO sale of CHI as well?
|
|
|
|
I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development? It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like. I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code? Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied? Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy? It is not so hard if you want the best. Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people. I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other. Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have. How this was initially pitched was that the devs were going to do a 3:1 swap of the CWXT chain to masternodes. Then, they linked to a (manipulated) block explorer and said they were not wanting to do a swap because the amount of coins in the original dev's address was too high. The new team has even gone so far as to state that they never planned on having actual masternodes, but that they would have masternode-like features on the Ethereum blockchain -- token ticker CWX. This is contrary to numerous statements made in the past and even this paid for press-release : https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/crypto-world-x-masternodes-taking/In order to save face, they want to collect your personal information in order to "give" everyone in the community 35000 CWX. This is in addition to running their scammy ICO. Anyway, it's clear that they lack the simple understanding of the economic incentive structure as to why someone would actually run masternodes and be rewarded in the underlying coin to do so, i.e. providing network security and being compensated in the network's base currency. What's not to understand? Inflation for doing nothing for the network makes no sense economically. On the other hand, inflation through rewards for providing services to increase the value of a network makes sense. There's your Economics 101 lesson for the day folks. I suggest you read Chapters 2, 4, and 5 and answer the first 10 questions in Chapters 3 and 7 for homework. These topics will be on the final. |
|
|
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzothe block explorer connie posted was manipulated.not believing it shows that you didn't have many coins.because if the original dev had 46 million coins,then there would only be left a little bit more than 11mil for the rest of us.all of us.and this is not possible because I know more than 3 guys that had and still have way more than 11 million coins in their desktop wallets. connie paid aalborg and some other dude to make a fake/manipulated block explorer as an excuse for connie to bail out and put the blame on the original dev.it was a smooth way out.well played if you ask me.end of story. Awesome. Well, then it remains for the "team" to provide a working block explorer that was not manipulated to prove their claims. |
|
|
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzo |
|
|
|
Anyway, I would like the so-called devs to address the statement they made saying that they were never going to do masternodes. So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ... 1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply. 2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!!  3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain. 4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens. 5) I say they promised masternodes at some point. 6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling. 7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to. . Here we are again. So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token? I sure do not. In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this. Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task?  Masternodes themselves, are not possible on ETH, so we are utilizing the exact same payout structuring and titling the smart contract concept as proof-of-hodl . Just like a masternode, if you hold the required amount - you are eligible for the extra staking(HODLing) rewards.This will proceed on the new eth chain. There will be no overall difference to the set up than it would have been on a seperate blockchain as originally planned with a swap out. We cannot engage our swap out as originally planned. We did not bother to develope a block explorer as we did not plan to proceed to utilize CWXT after the swap. A community member offered to assist to save us time and was having issues getting it to sync - due to the original dev remove portion of the source code. We had everything set up to engage a token swap up until the discovery of token centralization when a user was finally able to detect the problem with the explorer. We are proceed accordingly given the circumstances. I would like to point out that your previous post doesn't address the fact that you made claims about masternodes in the past. You completely gloss over what I asked for in my post and state what you are currently doing. I get what you are currently doing. And it's not what you originally said when you announced the r. I understand Masternodes are not possible on the Ethereum platform. When you initially announced a re-launch, you said masternodes with a 3:1 swap. You never said that this would be a token swap onto the Ethereum platform. You never said there would be an ICO. Obviously, this changed in the last few days. However, that doesn't excuse the fact that many people bought the CWXT token expecting a token swap. Now there is no token swap and those who bought CWXT are left bagholding. Let's take a step back and see how this looks for newcomers to the community, especially when it comes to the fake block explorer. There are very easy ways for you to accommodate those who bought coins and to do the swap to your new ERC-20 token (which is now to be ICO'ed when previously it was promised you wouldn't do that). It's quite simple. Actually create a block explorer. None of this 'some member of the community created a scammy block explorer and we are concerned about the amounts that are in this one address' BS. If the other block explorer doesn't work properly, how do you know that there are all those coins to be worried about in the original developer's address?Please answer my question regarding the block explorer. If it's fake, then how do you know those coins exist or are a problem? In short, you do not know, so don't use it as an excuse to do a scammy ICO. Again, to address your comments about masternodes, we originally planned to develope masternodes on our own blockchain with a new coin. but when the discovery was made regarding the original developer possesing a large amount a the supply - more than just what what in one known wallet, we had to pivot to ensure the protocol did not risk centralization and to ensure the security of our token investors on CWXT. There will still be a 3x reduction in supply. 60% of the supply is being given to cwxt community members, the other 40% ( which would have been swapped for the original devs stash if we engaged a swap) will be sold via an ICO to bring new community members to our protocol. We are giving 35,000 CWX to all community member that held CWXT. we have a registration form on our website to complete and have posted a blog regarding such aswell. We are allowing everyone to ALSO keep their CWXT ontop of gaining the free CWX. more details are on our website in the blog post. As far as the block exploer. The original dev has opened statied he owns a large stake on that network The original dev hasn't turned on his wallet since the first 2 weeks. How do you know he's coming back? He's long gone. We can still do a community take-over of this coin without doing an ICO on the Ethereum platform. Looks like the second guy in the rich list (address CViTkvEegwcNWFvu2zCSDX8qYzM38hkZpV) has been active since you announced masternodes. You're going to let him down? As the self-proclaimed new leaders of this coin's community, you're going to promise one thing and do another, even though it's completely possible to do what you said you would originally do? How do you expect anyone to listen to you and believe what you say? You've even admitted that you know what the problem is, but that it is too hard to do and that it's technically difficult, even though multiple people have told you that it's possible. You're then using it as an excuse to launch your scammy ICO. As mentioned above. The original dev has openly admitted he possesses more than just the one large wallet that was discovered. He owns a few more million cwxt. The second wallet is likely him aswell but no way to validate if he actually does control it, or which others he may control. Due to the high risk of centralization we have chosen to give each holder of cwxt that registers a limited amount of cwx at no charge. This way we are able to ensure one individual member( original dev) does not control a large portion of the market while still ensuring our current stake holders receive a stake of cwx, while also being able to retain their cwxt to do as they wish. We are not here to scam anyone. We are dealing with circumstances as effectively as possible. Yes we can block the one main wallet from a swap - but we are unable to block the other large sums he controls also which is why we have chosen the route we have. We hope you all can continue to support us. If you choose not to, we can respect that aswell I see that you mentioned that the original dev has stated that he controls the large address above. However, you provide no proof. In addition, there's no way for you to know how much he controls in the large wallet unless you create a block explorer. Let's just fork the original dev out of that ONE large address with 77% of the supply. There's no need to do an ICO. Also, I sincerely doubt the original dev is the second address ... In fact, I can provide proof if you really like. Please answer my points that I bring up: 1) How do you know the dev is still active and would cause issues with a hard fork? What do we know? He hasn't posted in ages and his wallet address (the real identifying information that you can use as to whether activity exists) hasn't staked since mid-January. 2) You say you can block the large wallet, good. Then do it. Who cares if the original dev still has a few coins. I highly doubt he has anything beyond that main wallet. In fact, we'd be able to do some basic blockchain analysis to find out any addresses that are still associated to him. Totally doable as long as he never sent to an exchange, and then sold and rebought his own coin -- but really, who cares, throw up a rich list and allow people to sign addresses if they want to prove it's them and not the original dev ... I'm sure that we'll see that the large stake holders are not the dev's sybil and that we have a vibrant and diverse community. 3) Why would anyone from the community believe that you will do as you promise when your initial promise is doable, as you've so readily admitted? Why should the community follow you? All you've done is made broken promises, back-pedal and offer different plans than the original one promised. You then continue down this whole charade and expect people to buy into your BS, using excuses. |
|
|
|
Anyway, I would like the so-called devs to address the statement they made saying that they were never going to do masternodes. So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ... 1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply. 2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!! 3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain. 4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens. 5) I say they promised masternodes at some point. 6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling. 7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to. . Here we are again. So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token? I sure do not. In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this. Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task? Masternodes themselves, are not possible on ETH, so we are utilizing the exact same payout structuring and titling the smart contract concept as proof-of-hodl . Just like a masternode, if you hold the required amount - you are eligible for the extra staking(HODLing) rewards.This will proceed on the new eth chain. There will be no overall difference to the set up than it would have been on a seperate blockchain as originally planned with a swap out. We cannot engage our swap out as originally planned. We did not bother to develope a block explorer as we did not plan to proceed to utilize CWXT after the swap. A community member offered to assist to save us time and was having issues getting it to sync - due to the original dev remove portion of the source code. We had everything set up to engage a token swap up until the discovery of token centralization when a user was finally able to detect the problem with the explorer. We are proceed accordingly given the circumstances. I would like to point out that your previous post doesn't address the fact that you made claims about masternodes in the past. You completely gloss over what I asked for in my post and state what you are currently doing. I get what you are currently doing. And it's not what you originally said when you announced a relaunch. Own up to it. I understand Masternodes are not possible on the Ethereum platform. When you initially announced a re-launch, you said masternodes with a 3:1 swap. You never said that this would be a token swap onto the Ethereum platform. You never said there would be an ICO. Obviously, this changed in the last few days. However, that doesn't excuse the fact that many people bought the CWXT token expecting a token swap. Now there is no token swap and those who bought CWXT are left bagholding. Let's take a step back and see how this looks for newcomers to the community, especially when it comes to the fake block explorer. There are very easy ways for you to accommodate those who bought coins and to do the swap to your new ERC-20 token (which is now to be ICO'ed when previously it was promised you wouldn't do that). It's quite simple. Actually create a block explorer. None of this 'some member of the community created a scammy block explorer and we are concerned about the amounts that are in this one address' BS. If the other block explorer doesn't work properly, how do you know that there are all those coins to be worried about in the original developer's address?Please answer my question regarding the block explorer. If it's fake, then how do you know those coins exist or are a problem? In short, you do not know, so don't use it as an excuse to do a scammy ICO. Again, to address your comments about masternodes, we originally planned to develope masternodes on our own blockchain with a new coin. but when the discovery was made regarding the original developer possesing a large amount a the supply - more than just what what in one known wallet, we had to pivot to ensure the protocol did not risk centralization and to ensure the security of our token investors on CWXT. There will still be a 3x reduction in supply. 60% of the supply is being given to cwxt community members, the other 40% ( which would have been swapped for the original devs stash if we engaged a swap) will be sold via an ICO to bring new community members to our protocol. We are giving 35,000 CWX to all community member that held CWXT. we have a registration form on our website to complete and have posted a blog regarding such aswell. We are allowing everyone to ALSO keep their CWXT ontop of gaining the free CWX. more details are on our website in the blog post. As far as the block exploer. The original dev has opened statied he owns a large stake on that network The original dev hasn't turned on his wallet since the first 2 weeks. How do you know he's coming back? He's long gone. We can still do a community take-over of this coin without doing an ICO on the Ethereum platform. Looks like the second guy in the rich list (address CViTkvEegwcNWFvu2zCSDX8qYzM38hkZpV) has been active since you announced masternodes. You're going to let him down? As the self-proclaimed new leaders of this coin's community, you're going to promise one thing and do another, even though it's completely possible to do what you said you would originally do? How do you expect anyone to listen to you and believe what you say? You've even admitted that you know what the problem is, but that it is too hard to do and that it's technically difficult, even though multiple people have told you that it's possible. You're then using it as an excuse to launch your scammy ICO. |
|
|
|
Anyway, I would like the so-called devs to address the statement they made saying that they were never going to do masternodes. So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ... 1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply. 2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!! 3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain. 4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens. 5) I say they promised masternodes at some point. 6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling. 7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to. . Here we are again. So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token? I sure do not. In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this. Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task? Masternodes themselves, are not possible on ETH, so we are utilizing the exact same payout structuring and titling the smart contract concept as proof-of-hodl . Just like a masternode, if you hold the required amount - you are eligible for the extra staking(HODLing) rewards.This will proceed on the new eth chain. There will be no overall difference to the set up than it would have been on a seperate blockchain as originally planned with a swap out. We cannot engage our swap out as originally planned. We did not bother to develope a block explorer as we did not plan to proceed to utilize CWXT after the swap. A community member offered to assist to save us time and was having issues getting it to sync - due to the original dev remove portion of the source code. We had everything set up to engage a token swap up until the discovery of token centralization when a user was finally able to detect the problem with the explorer. We are proceed accordingly given the circumstances. I would like to point out that your previous post doesn't address the fact that you made claims about masternodes in the past. You completely gloss over what I asked for in my post and state what you are currently doing. I get what you are currently doing. And it's not what you originally said when you announced a relaunch. Own up to it. I understand Masternodes are not possible on the Ethereum platform. When you initially announced a re-launch, you said masternodes with a 3:1 swap. You never said that this would be a token swap onto the Ethereum platform. You never said there would be an ICO. Obviously, this changed in the last few days. However, that doesn't excuse the fact that many people bought the CWXT token expecting a token swap. Now there is no token swap and those who bought CWXT are left bagholding. Let's take a step back and see how this looks for newcomers to the community, especially when it comes to the fake block explorer. There are very easy ways for you to accommodate those who bought coins and to do the swap to your new ERC-20 token (which is now to be ICO'ed when previously it was promised you wouldn't do that). It's quite simple. Actually create a block explorer. None of this 'some member of the community created a scammy block explorer and we are concerned about the amounts that are in this one address' BS. If the other block explorer doesn't work properly, how do you know that there are all those coins to be worried about in the original developer's address?Please answer my question regarding the block explorer. If it's fake, then how do you know those coins exist or are a problem? In short, you do not know, so don't use it as an excuse to do a scammy ICO. |
|
|
|
Anyway, I would like the so-called devs to address the statement they made saying that they were never going to do masternodes. So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ... 1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply. 2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!! 3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain. 4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens. 5) I say they promised masternodes at some point. 6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling. 7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to. . Here we are again. So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token? I sure do not. In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this. Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task? |
|
|
|
Which wallet is working? There is not a single connection, wallet in v 1.0.2.0 Noda took from the forum.  I have about 58 peers ... Here's a list for you of ones with close to the best height and some that I used to sync. addnode=198.204.245.66 addnode=104.251.218.157:16205 addnode=128.69.180.109:16205 addnode=149.56.154.75:16205 addnode=173.212.64.117:16205 addnode=178.187.121.227:16205 addnode=178.187.27.120:16205 addnode=178.187.60.199:16205 addnode=178.187.9.198:16205 addnode=185.117.101.202:16205 addnode=203.20.114.252:16205 addnode=72.176.251.66:16205 addnode=77.121.108.134:16205 addnode=79.137.71.98:16205 addnode=90.225.61.229:16205 addnode=91.185.91.21:16205 addnode=92.232.94.171:16205 addnode=94.114.48.67:16205 addnode=95.104.230.203:16205 addnode=95.104.251.29:16205 addnode=87.116.182.134:21403 addnode=70.189.171.217:16205 addnode=84.28.37.230:60471 addnode=178.85.243.65:52130 addnode=94.143.28.27:16205 addnode=46.70.102.237:12628 addnode=79.114.130.235:54537 addnode=185.223.30.253:64134 addnode=133.155.196.41:57838 addnode=83.247.52.7:60164 addnode=93.45.83.171:64822 addnode=210.55.81.48:11789 addnode=172.113.115.183:49413 addnode=203.219.240.201:50157 addnode=174.50.118.218:62738 addnode=45.48.11.107:51141 addnode=134.255.216.252:55894 addnode=52.170.100.22:57967 addnode=52.14.4.19:62898 addnode=173.178.26.186:54552 addnode=146.148.47.117:58894 |
|
|
|
We were never hosting masternodes. We were hosting masternode-like features, our new coin will host Proof0of-HODL concept that will reward token holders the exact same:D
Community Devs will be WORKING HARD to implement MASTERNODES for stake holders , aswell as a DAO VOTING MECHANISM to further excel developments
Masternode Requirements-
1 Masternode will require 100,000 CWXT to operate
Masternode Stake rewards will be set at 30% of daily staking pay-out ,distributed to masternode holders on daily basis.
Current Stake rewards - 28,800 tokens amoungst stakers per day.
30% of 28,800 = 8,640 new tokens per day to Master Nodes
Regular staking = 20,160 Tokens per day
CryptoWorldX Token Supply
Total Supply: 100,000,000 CryptoWorldX Tokens
Coin Specifications
Ticker: CWXT
Block Time: 30 seconds
Min Stake Age: 1 hour
Max Stake Age: 30 days
Block Reward: 10 CWXT
Transaction Confirmations: 3
Minting Confirmations: 10 We have confirmation to be posted on masternodes.pro . Stay tuned for more regarding that!
hi,
when was/is the swap ?? and what will the ratio be ??
Swap will be in November. We have confirmed that it will be hosted on Nova Exchange at a 3:1 Ratio. A masternode on the new block-chain will require 50,000 tokens, so 150,000 CWXT before swap out.. The ticker symbol will change from CWXT to CWX with the swap out aswell. We have a press release being announced later this week. Feel free to jump to our telegram for instant communications http://t.me/cwxtcryptoworld . Stay tuned!  It's like I said it myself ... thanks |
|
|
|
Lol at the obvious liars and scammers.
This has been hilarious to watch.
The fucking clowns "in charge" of this coin have no fucking clue what they're doing and they still took so many people for a ride.
Well done.
I don’t think they are scamming anymore. Just poor execution... Scammers would vanish. It seems like they are young and have a poor understanding of the industry. Right. I'm not pointing fingers quite yet. Maybe it's a language barrier, too. But, let's summarize the events : 1) Devs announce a reboot / relaunch with a 3:1 token swap with masternodes. 2) People don't do their own research and miss the massive pre-mine and buy anyway, causing a price runup. 3) Some community members / devs notice the large 'address' of the original dev causing some concern for the swap. (someone even points to the source code on github to show the massive premine) 4) Devs make an announcement to change to ERC-20 and will now hold an ICO. 5) Community members complain this isn't fair to those who bought on the promise of masternodes and lower coin supply. 6) I point out that you can easily take a snapshot of the current CWXT database, use various cryptographic schemes a la digital signatures to prove address balances that could be used for a swap to the new CWT ERC-20 token. I also point out that the amount needed to fork the chain is probably much smaller and that we could probabilistically fork the original pre-mine away since it's clear that this amount is not being staked. 7) Devs like my idea but then dismiss it claiming that I say CWXT is ERC-20 and that the mechanism I proposed is not doable (to which I call BS and others are being polite and saying devs are new and don't understand). . Now we're here. I'm sure the community can convince the new team to do the right thing. That’s not really fair stating that people bought anyway. If a coin is on an exchange, it should be traded. If you’re going to mess with it, then it needs to have a warning or be delisted from the exchange. I'd include myself in the group of people who bought without looking at the source code. I wasn't trying to be putting people down who bought and believed the devs promise of doing the swap. I believed too and bought accordingly. Also, YoBit (where the vast liquidity for this coin is) is notorious for never updating a coin if there has been a community take over or a hard fork. You can try all you want to contact them, but they will leave the old chain up, or not have a working wallet and run the backend for the trading with a database. Anyway, the point of that stement is that people bought based on the devs statements that they would be doing a coin swap at a 3:1 rate with masternodes. Now the devs say they want to do ERC-20 (or that it was originally planned), but anyone who has been around the block all know that you can't have masternodes with ERC-20. That's lunacy. My conclusion is the devs must be either 1) incompetent 2) new to crypto or 3) outright scammers. |
|
|
|
Lol at the obvious liars and scammers.
This has been hilarious to watch.
The fucking clowns "in charge" of this coin have no fucking clue what they're doing and they still took so many people for a ride.
Well done.
I don’t think they are scamming anymore. Just poor execution... Scammers would vanish. It seems like they are young and have a poor understanding of the industry. Right. I'm not pointing fingers quite yet. Maybe it's a language barrier, too. But, let's summarize the events : 1) Devs announce a reboot / relaunch with a 3:1 token swap with masternodes. 2) People don't do their own research and miss the massive pre-mine and buy anyway, causing a price runup. 3) Some community members / devs notice the large 'address' of the original dev causing some concern for the swap. (someone even points to the source code on github to show the massive premine) 4) Devs make an announcement to change to ERC-20 and will now hold an ICO. 5) Community members complain this isn't fair to those who bought on the promise of masternodes and lower coin supply. 6) I point out that you can easily take a snapshot of the current CWXT database, use various cryptographic schemes a la digital signatures to prove address balances that could be used for a swap to the new CWT ERC-20 token. I also point out that the amount needed to fork the chain is probably much smaller and that we could probabilistically fork the original pre-mine away since it's clear that this amount is not being staked. 7) Devs like my idea but then dismiss it claiming that I say CWXT is ERC-20 and that the mechanism I proposed is not doable (to which I call BS and others are being polite and saying devs are new and don't understand). . Now we're here. I'm sure the community can convince the new team to do the right thing. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
.... Due to the fact we are unable to verify the exact amount of CWXT held by each member of the community at the time of the occurrence, or how much CWXT users may have sold or bought at the time of discovery ...
Are you completely incompetent ? It's easy to know exactly someone's CWXT amount at the time of a snapshot. And there's a way for you to credit everybody with the new tokens you are going to create on the Ethereum platform without even conducting an ICO -- and without collecting personal information. Don't believe me? Follow along in these 4 simple steps. 1) Announce ahead of time the block number in which a snapshot will occur. 2) In order to claim an address and the amount in the address, a user can sign a message that gives the Ethereum account that they would like the ERC-20 token to be deposited using the associated private key that corresponds to the CWXT address. 3) You can then use public key cryptography schemes to manually verify the signature. 4) You then send users the ERC-20 token to the account that is indicated in the message. ------ Someone mentioned a community takeover? I say we perform a coup d'etat! That's great except CWXT is NOT an ERC20 token, it hosts its own private blockchain, it's hard to deal with. This is the best course to go forward to accredit current stake holders of CWXT. What are you talking about? Not once did I say CWXT is an ERC-20 token ... Let me quote you again so everyone can understand the trickery that you are trying to pull. Hello everyone!
Everything is going great with the new development team, we are on track and schedule so no alarm with us.We are structuring the code for our Ethereum based token that we will be utilizing going forward and will be posting our White paper in the coming days.
Originally we had planned to engage a token swap from CWXT token holders to the new ERC20 token CWX.
And, lest we all forget that you initially said there would be a coin swap to masternodes. I have no idea how you can say that you had originally planned on an new ERC-20 token when your original post states masternodes. And I quote ... COIN REBOOT/RELAUNCH CWXT - CRYPTO-WORLD X TOKEN http://www.cryptoworldxtoken.infoCryptoWorldX Token is a digital currency that uses cryptography on a decentralised peer-to-peer network. CryptoWorldX Token is exclusively designed towards communication to all bitcoin and alt-coin enthusiasts. This is the latest incarnation of a community forum to enable discussions in a powerful and secure way. We will also launch the first e-mail service provider for the crypto enthusiast with the added security of 2fa This project was left by prior developers and is being REBOOTED/RELAUNCHED by community members. The people of CWXT community believe this project has potential as the SPECs are great and stake rewards high. Community Devs will be WORKING HARD to implement MASTERNODES for stake holders , aswell as a DAO VOTING MECHANISM to further excel developments Masternode Requirements- 1 Masternode will require 100,000 CWXT to operate Masternode Stake rewards will be set at 30% of daily staking pay-out ,distributed to masternode holders on daily basis. Current Stake rewards - 28,800 tokens amoungst stakers per day. 30% of 28,800 = 8,640 new tokens per day to Master Nodes Regular staking = 20,160 Tokens per day CryptoWorldX Token Supply Total Supply: 100,000,000 CryptoWorldX Tokens Coin Specifications Ticker: CWXT Block Time: 30 seconds Min Stake Age: 1 hour Max Stake Age: 30 days Block Reward: 10 CWXT Transaction Confirmations: 3 Minting Confirmations: 10 THIS TOKEN IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ON YOBIT AS A TRADE-ABLE ASSET!! Current price - 1CWXT/0.00000012 BTC Wallets: WINDOWS GITHUB MAC O/S LINUX O/S https://github.com/CryptoWorldX/CWXTEXCHANGES - YOBIT https://yobit.net/en/trade/CWXT/BTCWhat's the story? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
.... Due to the fact we are unable to verify the exact amount of CWXT held by each member of the community at the time of the occurrence, or how much CWXT users may have sold or bought at the time of discovery ...
Are you completely incompetent ? It's easy to know exactly someone's CWXT amount at the time of a snapshot. And there's a way for you to credit everybody with the new tokens you are going to create on the Ethereum platform without even conducting an ICO -- and without collecting personal information. Don't believe me? Follow along in these 4 simple steps. 1) Announce ahead of time the block number in which a snapshot will occur. 2) In order to claim an address and the amount in the address, a user can sign a message that gives the Ethereum account that they would like the ERC-20 token to be deposited using the associated private key that corresponds to the CWXT address. 3) You can then use public key cryptography schemes to manually verify the signature. 4) You then send users the ERC-20 token to the account that is indicated in the message. ------ Someone mentioned a community takeover? I say we perform a coup d'etat! |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
.... Due to the fact we are unable to verify the exact amount of CWXT held by each member of the community at the time of the occurrence, or how much CWXT users may have sold or bought at the time of discovery ...
Say what??!! Don't you know how these databases work? Or digital signatures? You can very easily know exactly someone's corresponding CWXT amount -- and at the same time credit everybody with the corresponding ERC-20 tokens that will be on the Ethereum platform. Here's how you do it ... 1) Announce ahead of time the block number in which a snapshot will occur. 2) In order to claim an address and the amount in the address, a user can sign a message that gives the Ethereum account that they would like the ERC-20 token to be deposited using the associated private key that corresponds to the CWXT address. 3) You can then use public key cryptography schemes to manually verify the signature. 4) You then send users the ERC-20 token to the account that is indicated in the message. Notice how there is no need to give you anyone's email address or name or telegram address or any identifying information ... ---- Alternatively, we can conduct a coup on this community take over. |
|
|
|
|
Any competent dev could fork this coin by taking a snapshot of the database and remove all the UTXO that correspond to the large original developer address.
You can see that the coins in that address haven't moved since January.
Just fork the repo, take a snapshot, remove UTXOs that correspond to that address, announce to community that you need to download the new wallet at the new github repo, and go from there.
Pretty sure the original dev is long gone ... so why not do something like this? There's 48M in that address and about 59M total, so a 3:1 split would be less than 4M coins. Nice low supply.
At the very least, if the ERC-20 token goes through, let me swap my worthless CWXT for the even more worthless CWT on the ETH platform.
|
|
|
|
|
