Thanks, we found it helpful to inform educators and researchers about the architecture.

The only problem was KPMG's graphic erroneously makes it look like R3 and DisLedger both use Concurrence.

But DisLedger's approach is a much cleaner and more efficient design than R3's.

Publishing code provides no guarantee that we are running the same code on our servers.

No, the issue is that we contacted a few YouTubers, hoping to start a varied discussion. But the ones that accepted are all from one point of view. We don't want to link and publish them before we have other, opposing, viewpoints or it will seem that we support just one side of it.

We have patents-pending on the technology and we take our intellectual property protection very seriously. Organizations find it better to just use our tokens than to worry about patent infringement.

It works by Pink being an extrajurisdictional company. As long as our opsec is on-point, then we're "immune" from prosecution. In addition, we have contingency procedures so that if core team members are arrested (or even just have an accident), investors will be able to recover the system and find a new team to run it.

So does it recruit the blockchain's data decompression/compression processes in order to exchange and distribute data resiliently and quickly?

Our position regarding GAW and Paycoin. These unsupported "indisputable facts" versus the reality.

There has been a very vocal campaign against the previously highly regarded supplier, GAW Miners, and going even further targeting their CEO Josh Garza, and has also questioned our position on these matters. In response to this, I am issuing the following unambiguous statement.

We do not share the opinion that this operation,or Mr Garza are intending to defraud, or have defrauded any investor in Hashlets, Hashstakers, Paycoin XPY, or any other product or service supplied by GAW or it's companies. We are not associated with these companies beyond personal & private holdings of Hashstakers, Zen Hashlets and XPY Paycoin, and are not paid by these companies.
They are accused of reneging on contracts, there is no evidence of this. Reneging on promises. There were never price promises, beyond individual expectation of market value, and the anticipated $20 floor, a concept since reformed into the honours program, which whilst indefinitely delayed, pending the resolving of legal issues, is still very much active. Some proposed features have been shelved, delayed, or abandoned due to direct effects of the current hate campaign, and other features have since been proposed, some are better.
Leaked emails, widely circulated, have been obtained illegally and are legally confidential. They must be disregarded due to their origin being from a hacked external, and uncredited anonymous source. The hacking of privileged company resources also indicates that the hacker may easily have fabricated these emails using hijacked services, or had physical access to those resources.

Neither GAW, Zencloud or any other GAW operation, has at this time, directly or indirectly defrauded anybody regarding the conversion to hashstakers and XPY. This was always a choice, freely chosen by the individual.
The campaign against GAW is a phenomenon that is unprecedented, and has become almost a cult. The vehemence of these detractors - the majority of whom are non investors - has had a visible effect on trust and wider adoption of this XPY. This campaign was fuelled by a core few individuals, would be members of a kind of informal 'old guard' of Crypto. It is an indefensible action.
We cannot accept any of these third party, sometimes absurd allegations as hard evidence, neither can anybody else who does not have unrestricted access to confidential original company accounts, minutes of meetings and internal and external correspondence. Therefore, were we to conclude that there was a scam going on, it would be pure conjecture, and that is morally and professionally irresponsible, and would leave us fairly justly liable, to prosecution for libellous actions. The majority of the supposed evidence so far,  has no covenance and in some cases is even unknown of by the correspondents. Being unverifiable non original data, it is simply not worthy of consideration for any practical purpose.
GAW are also a registered company, with a strong track record. We have no desire to participate in any clearly orchestrated campaign against a hard working company.

Where we list other registered companies, it is always after confirming beyond doubt, that the company is using faked covenance, or is non-existent. We aren't here to investigate legal entities, already subject to outside audit.

I will finish by saying that personally, I am pretty adept at spotting a fraud. I do not believe that any deliberate attempt is being made to defraud anybody by Josh Garza. I do believe that the real damage being done to investors is due to this core group of 'haters' who resent this innovation and this rightly perceived threat to their own interests, and as such are prepared to originate and fuel this disinformation, not excluding illegally obtaining discreditable and confidential correspondence.

This is not intended as investment advice.

Ultimately, there will be a definitive outcome to this ongoing debacle. We'd like to come out of it with our integrity intact as well.

ViK. Editor & Project Lead. March 24th 2015

Bottom of the page:



They only added that disclaimer after being called out on it:
https://twitter.com/Badbitcoinorg/status/553634277007839233

its a real shame that we now rely on iliterate ponzi site owners to represent paycoin outside of ht

Products and prices seem to be pulled from Amazon.

Apple MB323LL/A iMac 20-inch 2.4GHz 2GB Intel Core 2 Duo, 1GB ram. $740

Let's try this: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=carsen+klock

The promise of $20 per XPY is not one we believe you can support from you (sic) own funds ...

Guaranteed returns should also be seen as a red flag on any "investment" site, ...

And everybody calls me a shill but not one person can answer my number 1 question:  Who is doing all this huge buying after all this MASSIVE bad news?  XPY should be dead, sub 1 penny and with dying volume.  Yet it is not.