we cannot ban scammers to prevent moderator abuse, you know. i know i hate scammers, but there are similar sites like www.badbitcoin.org |
|
|
|
Do I need to complete any surveys before downloading your file?
IIRC, you don't need for the survey. if he is legit, then your PC is safe from viruses. |
|
|
|
Virus total Link of your Files
You pay first or we have to download First
What types of files you will give to download .zip , .rar
Is these files Uploaded to some paid Sites?
and important question What is file Size - ?
the file size sometimes it will be 500 kb but mostly all files will be less than 1 mb. That is not a virus file again i am confirming you, and i already told that even through i am providing a safety. That is you will not download any files to your personal computer or laptop. You will download the files to virtual windows hard disk by using the software. So your personal computer or laptop always safe. Can we use mobile phone (android) to download those files ? You cannot use mobile phone the software only works on windows ok, granted.
can i delete the software easily once you finished your files?
i need to sure there would not be any hackers to hack/scam.
Yes the software easily removed and there is not cheap tricks like hack or scam. what are the download links for these files???
I will pm you the download link please check your pm and answer to my message. please send me a pm, by the way, if you have funds, show the evidence and/or place it into escrow. |
|
|
|
|
ok, granted.
can i delete the software easily once you finished your files?
i need to sure there would not be any hackers to hack/scam.
(if i request 1.000 downloads, you pay me $100 ? seriously, my PC has unlimited traffic volume/bandwidth.)
|
|
|
|
|
please provide any kind of valid evidence to prove that your files have no viruses.
you know, we have nothing to know unless someone proven your legitimacy.
i don't wanna see the negative, you know you might just be an alt.
i could grant you if virus proof is avaliable based on trusted security.
|
|
|
|
Yes, Just avoid Bitcoin XT. Stick with Bitcoin Core. it is safe and no fork issue.
wrong. XT is just as safe, or SAFER than Core. To quote Celean on reddit: Running XT at this time is equivalent with running Core. It's the same network, and the same Bitcoins. At some point in the future, if 75% mining majority is reached (but not before January 2016), the network will split whenever a miner creates a block larger than 1MB. This will not be accepted by Core unless they adopt a large blocks patch, but will be accepted by XT, and at this point there will effectively be two chains.
Running XT means that you will always be on the largest (75%+) chain, regardless of whether the fork actually happens or not. Running Core means that you will be left behind if a 75% majority is reached. Regardless of which version you run, coins will be safe (on both chains) as long as you acquired them prior to the fork, and for some time the chains will largely mirror each other, but eventually they will diverge due to different coinbases (mining rewards). i guess this would end up with major amount of storage waste due to the blockchain synchronization problem. even though it is safer, it is less sustainable and may not be newbie friendly in case of XT. |
|
|
|
|
in average, use HDD and RAID 1 would be the cheapest.
you will need a fast network speed as well to synchronise.
i could not afford the major storage costs.
|
|
|
|
|
neither bitcoin core, nor bitcoin XT is good.
for bitcoin core, the speed of transaction is too slow, and at most it could handle up to 2000 transactions per block, in fact, most of the ASIC hashes were wasted.
if more people came up to bitcoin, the transaction would be big problem.
however, if with the bitcoin XT, the block size would double every 2 years, leading to the full node users giving up with that matter, it would end up with centralisation.
XT would only encourage monopoly to take us out from bitcoin full nodes.
raise the blockchain size depends on the volume and the sustainability instead.
|
|
|
|
|
so, scam are not moderated, to prevent admin abuse?
ok i know. if admin and moderators decided to ban scammers, there would be lots of flame bait, banning wars (since admin/moderators randomly banned others just because of scamming, but it might not have any evidence at all), and could even lead to termination of admin/moderators accounts.
that would be annoying, i know.
give a chance to "scammers" to correct/resolve what they just did, based on the bible.
i guess this makes no sense, but lemme talk about.
|
|
|
|
|
never, as long as those newbies are proven that they do not have any kind of scam alts, with a good reason.
if we suddenly neggd the newbie in which none of the alt attached, that would just encourage alt creation; we should not negative them at first to prevent trust misuse, you know trust are not moderated to prevent admin abuse.
at most those newbies which attempt to scam could be banned for posting zero-value posts in lending session.
|
|
|
|
hopefully he would turn into a legit mining places, and refund my shit .023 btc (i lost my proof of transaction).  if that allowed us to choose our own pool, then we would conclude their legitimacy. |
|
|
|
 the home and TV is old, but the raspberry pi and components are new!  idk if you guys uses raspberry pi, it is much better than normal computers, since it is cheaper even if more stuff needed for a complete one. |
|
|
|
Price to less than $100 before Wednesday. Bet me.
No. It wont. Both party holds enough bitcoin to resist the price. Let me know how much you wanna bet and whether ready to escrow ? it is when pigs fly to be below $100 within 3 days, if it was true, it would destroy the world of bitcoin. other alt coins would risk with this. |
|
|
|
The above two loans are sponsored by only one guy ManyProofs - who do not have so much trust hence you may not get a loan from other people and you may again get it from ManyProofs. Sorry without collateral I can't give you loan. most likely altcoins, right? then you would be able to sell his collateral and lend if you did not have any money to lend. that's why collateral with altcoins only, makes no sense and risky. |
|
|
|
www.blockchain.infomy favourite wallet, since it has the full node features without synchronising with the network. wat about u
|
|
|
|
|
i am glad that i am using raspberry pi to type this post.
the nearby is my really old PC, but they are so much better than upgrading the windows 10.
|
|
|
|
"This new regulation would require anyone selling Bitcoins through our service to acquire the BitLicense if they sell Bitcoins to residents of New York.”
It's just insane!?!
It is. That is why Bitlicense is total bullshit and oppressive law. From my point of view Bitlicense was prepared by and for financial elites of Wall Street and old blood. In theory it prevents bitcoin to be used as it meant to be - efficiently making bitcoin bad choice over normal FIAT. explicitly! USD is gonna take over the currency! if i had money to appeal, i would battle with the law to overthrow this garbage law regarding the bitcoin. protocol of fiat is just bullshit and zero-value; since government could just do something, and the currency? dead. |
|
|
|
No. This is not going to help the Bitcoin community in any way. If the NYDFS gets some 200 or 300 companies to register for their BitLicense (each of them paying $5,000 to $7,000 per year in fee), then the other states will also be tempted to follow their example. In the end, the Bitcoin exchanges and other ventures will be forced to raise their fees, resulting in less number of people using their services.
exactly, this would encourage giving bitcoin up. USA used this way to get the trust of bucks back, if they didn't do this, bucks would decline. that's totally garbage, you know, liberty! |
|
|
|
|
what about if someone did a stress test?
what about if the bitcoin popularity wasn't gradually increasing?
what about the transaction flooding?
i knew exactly what bitcoin XT used to, if people gave up from using the full node wallet, less legitimacy of security, mining could only help verifying transactions, if someone controlled 51% of the full node wallet, bitcoin would be ended up with centralisation. i could support up to 16 mb blocks, it would be explicitly sufficient unless we had millions of users, plus storage wastes energy.
we need a sustainable and decentralised currency, unless you have evidence to support "how bitcoin XT could sustain bitcoin and its protocol", otherwise, please consider if you were kidnapped by the XT developers.
|
|
|
|
|
do not ever touch that service.
i got scammed from cloud mining ponzi for 2 times, none of the payout at the first time!
this is just ponzi, they decreased the price to attract people to buy until they gained enough.
that IPO is open-ended.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
