I am glad it helped.
You do not need to send anything,
but if you really want it ... 1HkxUjf7mDPLmDx63CDgM3QbpfdzY11R99
Thank you.

well that transaction does not exist in the global blockchain, which means the money is still in your pocket, you just can't see it ...

the easiest way to go here is to

1) install a new wallet, import the private key of the source address of that transaction

2) you will see all your money there

3) send it to another address of yours

I found a workaround:

In my multibit folde, I found this "<walletname>-data" directory, in which is "wallet-unenc-backup" directory, in which I can find .info file with list of all addresses.

I would like to vote for this feature.

Could you give us a workaround for this please?

Hi,

when Bitcoin is accepted from an untrusted source, the operation is considered as finished when the number of confirmation goes to 6 (not relevant here that some services use 3 or different number).

This number is used when someone sends money and we are about to receive them. How does the situation change when we want to be sure that the coins are no longer available in the source account? Do we still need 6 confirmations here?

The situation is as follows:

Wallet A contains 1 BTC. Bob sends 1 BTC from address A to address B. We want to be sure, that Bob can not use that 1 BTC for anything else. When exactly are we sure about that (with a similar level of security as with 6 confirmations on receipt)? Is this exactly at the very same moment that we are sure that address B received 1 BTC with 6 confirmations?

Is it technically possible to create orders to send BTC from address that is empty?

Thank you for explanations.

Its more about the disk operations to be done, rather than disk space.

Thanks for explanation of the protocol problem!

Hi,

Motivation: I run the original client since my first days, I have too many addresses in it and I want to keep using them. I have not found any quick and easy way to transfer my wallet to Multibit, so I need to stick with the original client. Every time I run it, it kill my old PC totally, disk is insane for about 5 minutes and I can do nothing. This is when the client starts, this is when it tries to sync with last two-three days of blockchain. It is very unpleasant. And I can't imagine what happens if a new user tries to get whole blockchain from the very first block. It must be insane.

Solution: For most uses of Bitcoin, you don't really need the full chain. Lightweight alternative clients are easy prove for the claim. They do not have the full information, however. The solution I can see, that would have much more information than lightweight clients and just little less than full-blockchain version would be to have blockchain snapshots. Let's say every 10000 blocks you can create a snapshot of all blocks except for e.g. last 1000. So if we are on block 200000 we create snapshot valid for the first 199000. The full blockchain contains every transaction that ever happened. The snapshout would contain only balances of all accounts. This could save enormous amount of data and most importantly it would extremely speed up working with the client. You would always have to work with a chain no longer than 10000. Everything else you would have in the snapshot. You still keep information about every account out there. You just don't have the history of how they get their funds.

My question: Why is it not possible? Or is it? I assume that if it would be possible, it would be done already, right? Or just why this is not implemented in the original Bitcoin client? It could be just a mode that you can turn on and thus save some disk space and most importantly thousands of disk operations and time.

Thanks for explanations

The communication from FC was just OK for me a couple of weeks ago. I used PM on this forum, not email, however.

0.00081605 BTC per share for today

Happy New Year

I am happy I can say that my recent missing dividends problem was solved by FC. Thanks FC.

Haven't heard from FC yet.

same problem here, dividend from 1 direct share from SebastianJu's last auction is missing, could you please inform me PM in case FC updates you?

I can see lots of deposits problems on Cryptsy. Please consider fixing this as the next thing to do. Waiting hours or even days for deposits is not really why people use cryptocurrencies, is it?

Litecoin withdrawal problem here too.

minersource.net just gives me this message whole day:

I have also the very same question as OP. I have been out since my purchase of Avalon B2, so I have no good info on these more or less new companies.

If someone could support experience with these companies with links so that I could read the full story, it would be great.

First question that comes to my mind - if there are more companies that are proven to deliver, how is that KNC comes with price that is 150-250% of competitors?

SebastianJu: Considering the very current forum hack, could you please send messages/emails confirming addresses for new shares and received funds?

The auction ended with no bidders. Never mind. If someone is interested to make me an offer, just PM me.

Have you make profit from this night?:



I had my orders installed from 1179.8900 (installed them when price was just above 1200 - blue arrow) and they executed down to 845.3000 (green line) and then I just woke up today to where the red arrow points - current price 1080. My avg. price 935 USD per BTC after deducting fees. That gives me 15 % if I sell now.

one hour to go

another dip this night, very similar to the last one ...

bump 24 hrs to go