Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 04:42:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 334 »
761  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 06:21:34 PM
The only way to "prove", "community support" is through proof of work. The moment of truth is approaching.

Power to the people! Grin

You are seriously deluded (or more likely your account was bought).

The miners are not supporting 2MB.

(did you forget that I live in China?)
762  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 06:17:37 PM
i have no master. but your assumption that someone can't survive and make a living without one, shows that you do have a master and that you get paid and your mind cannot cope with the thought you you being independant.
please think outside of the box you are living in

I am financially independent (which I am pretty sure you are not) so I am going to outlast you whatever happens.

Keep trying with the stupid stuff mate - everyone is seeing you're lack of intelligence.

And in case I'm wrong then why don't we organise a meetup in say Hong Kong (assuming you have funds that shouldn't be a problem for your should it)?
763  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 06:14:17 PM
so dont make it out to sound like the community who want 2mb real blocks, are following gavin.. its the other way round.. gavins giving into the community

Again - you have never provided proof of any such "community support" for 2MB (you just keep on repeating the word community like a fucking retard).

Hmm.. maybe that's because you are a fucking retard?

(now go and sulk because I called you a bad name)
764  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 06:10:14 PM
see how CIYAM presumes anyone not blockstream loyal as being a gavin fanboy..

You just make yourself look more and more ridiculous with every post.

Let's see how long your masters will pay you for your unsuccessful trolling attempts (their pockets are not really so deep).
765  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 06:08:09 PM
Fact: Satoshi reduced the blocksize to an arbitrary 1MB as a temporary security measure only. It was never intended to stay fixed at 1MB and certainly never intended as a consensus rule.

Fact: Satoshi's original software had 32MB as the limit.

So why isn't Gavin going for 32MB instead of the 2MB (after he has downsized a few times)?
766  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 05:51:23 PM
The community already does agree but core will never get approval from its corporate Blocksteam™/PWC wage masters.

Why do you post such blatant lies?

Prove that the community agrees or stop lying please.

(you are clearly a very dishonest person who wants to lie about what others think - in short you are a *****)
767  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 05:45:48 PM
^^ sunnankar: please delete your post. It adds nothing but faggotry to this thread.



I see - so Gavin fans are also anti-gay.

Any other minorities you'd like to attack while you're at it?
768  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 05:41:36 PM
over one million people in the community cannot all be greedy bankers or toomins.. (wake up lauda!! stop staring glazy eyed at your blockstream friends and see the rest of the world)

Stop making up stupid figures about "the community" - there are only "paid shills" such as yourself that we are talking about here.

(yes @franky1 - you are *done* and your are going to be stopped paid as soon as your masters can see that you are being "done like a dinner" everywhere that you post)
769  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 05:34:04 PM

Now provide proof of this or be considered to be the complete idiot liar that you are.


your blind loyalty to blockstream, that distracts you from logic.

So - you have no proof at all and just reply with rubbish.

Thanks @franky1 - you have been REKT by me (and I think by others already).

Cheesy
770  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 05:25:23 PM
but blockstream dont want buffer. they dont want room spare for open transactions, they want dominance, they want miners to have premium services and prices to allow transctions.

its not in their roadmap to have a buffer and room for growth.

Why do you spout such ignorant nonsense again and again and again?

You are probably being paid to do so but everyone now is aware of that (so don't expect you are going to continue to get paid for this nonsense for much longer).


i dont get paid.. but you do!

Now provide proof of this or be considered to be the complete idiot liar that you are.
771  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 05:18:27 PM
but blockstream dont want buffer. they dont want room spare for open transactions, they want dominance, they want miners to have premium services and prices to allow transctions.

its not in their roadmap to have a buffer and room for growth.

Why do you spout such ignorant nonsense again and again and again?

You are probably being paid to do so but everyone now is aware of that (so don't expect you are going to continue to get paid for this nonsense for much longer).
772  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! on: February 04, 2016, 05:11:44 PM
How exactly is increasing the blocksize to 2MB a 'retread' when it preserves Satoshi's original protocol in pristine virgin form? Cool

Well - the "pristine virgin form" had 32MB - so what exactly are you talking about?

(oh - yes - now that everyone has worked out that it can't work Gavin just keeps on reducing the amount in order to take over the project)
773  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 04:20:10 PM
As usual @franky1 you use your "wall of text" approach to try and attack me (as you do with everyone else).

Perhaps you hadn't noticed that we've all noticed this and are not going to respond to your silly posts.

You are an idiot and everyone knows it.

So keep on making an idiot of yourself (it doesn't bother me).
774  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 04:03:09 PM
you can circle jerk your link to all your friends on /r/bitcoin/ to garner votes in your favour all you want..

As I don't even use Reddit it is rather odd that you would state that (perhaps you are just overwhelmed with having to deal with facts that you're not very used to having to).

Let's face it @franky1 - your sponsors are not going to be paying you for much longer (as you have failed them - you make them look foolish which is not really what they want for their money).
775  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 03:59:02 PM
the community want 2mb.. not the corporate shit

They don't - http://bitcoinocracy.com/arguments/in-the-event-of-a-fork-i-will-sell-rbf-blockstream-core-coins-and-buy-classic-bitcoins.

You can carry on about "the community" but apparently they don't have any funds invested in BTC (so you think people that own zero BTC should make the decisions?).

Unless you are a supporter of "communism" (and this is very funny for me to be saying to you as I live in China) then you can't possibly support the idea of "the community" being some financially irrelevant minority making the decisions about Bitcoin.
776  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? on: February 04, 2016, 03:33:07 PM
First this idiot says:

its not free!!

Then he follows it up with:

miners get multiple thousands of dollars worth of value every ~10 minutes.
transaction fee's do not need to be a revenue stream for atleast 2 decades

So then - why is not free if according to your own logic there is no need to charge for it for at least 2 decades?

I'm guessing you are going to say the only reason is that we don't have Gavin in charge and 2MB blocks?

Cheesy
777  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: ACCT using CLTV - More Effective than a sleeping pill! on: February 04, 2016, 09:49:10 AM
If you allow for third party liquidity providers (one or many, eg crowd funded trades), you can pair trades faster.

Without many offers presumably the application could never even take off (that would require some marketing effort) but the speed is limited by the method (ACCT using CLTV) rather than by the number of offers that are available.

(and it would become a bit tricky for users to keep track of a whole lot of trades that will require them to create txs at the right point in time)
778  Other / Meta / Re: What's above Legendary? on: February 03, 2016, 05:25:31 PM
What if it goes like "Super Member" or "Super Legendary"Huh
Sounds nice, right???

How about "Addict"?

(that seems more suitable to me - and no I'm not hoping to qualify)
779  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is there really demand for a decentralised BTC to LTC exchange? on: February 03, 2016, 04:53:59 PM
I am posting that this looks interesting. But I'm not signing a bitcoin message just yet. You have my word I do own or control at least 1 BTC. (errr, just look at my gaming website, that one has at least 5 in cold storage.)

Thanks - and no worries (I have followed some of your topics before and trust that you are for real).

It is simply hard to work out whether or not what I've developed is worth promoting (and I don't have much help in the marketing department currently).

(agreed that I was a bit impatient complaining about two hours - I think I got a bit tired in trying to do political stuff which I've now stopped doing)
780  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The need for decentralised exchanges — has never been more important on: February 03, 2016, 01:48:17 PM
Hi CIYAM, please add any available links to your de-projects here. We need increase the awareness and purpose of de-exchanges because sooner or later they could be the only backbone bridging digital currencies to ensure their survival. I'm sure we could also collectively share resources and knowledge to make this dream a reality.

Other than the topic I referenced the CIYAM project itself is on github (https://github.com/ciyam/ciyam).

Currently work on a "memory-hard" proof algo is underway before being able to offer CIYAM as a decentralised application platform (which is what the project has been heading towards for the last year).

Also I have already created an ACCT Bitcoin script (based upon TierNolan's idea) using CLTV which others are free to use (currently the raw txs need to be created using CIYAM but it wouldn't be so hard to write a stand-alone tool for doing that).
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 334 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!