He has claimed he has source code which now he seemingly doesn't actually have.

If he were in any way an honest person then he would admit to the fact that he lied but of course he won't (but I guarantee we'll never see his Bitcoin equivalent source code because it doesn't exist).

It isn't easy to defeat the "shills" that are being paid to post here but I think I have fucked up this particular shill with his own bullshit.

You want to do the same thing?

It did not show any code at all - only class definitions.

If you are going to defend him then please show me the *code*.

I am quoting idiotic stuff from an idiot.

He claims to somehow know what I think?
(if you are really that smart I'll pay you 1M US)

So let's play a game smart arse - care to guess what my next post will be (if you can you can get 1M USD)?

Before he deletes it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1332557.msg13607751#msg13607751

This idiot is claiming that he has written his own Bitcoin client (without even saying what language it was supposedly even written in) and then refused to show any actual evidence of it (beyond the above bullshit post).

When someone is that dishonest I don't think you should pay much attention to anything else that they have to say.

I will not answer your question until you come clean about your claim to have written Bitcoin software in another language (which so far you have not proven).

Why don't you just admit that you made that up (too late to delete your posts as I already quoted them)?

(and this is the problem with all of the people that are supporting Gavin's vision - they are just dishonest - so the title and the point of this topic I think is very much relevant to what is going on)

That would be rather hard as this is my thread (I am trolling myself?).


Yes - because he lied and said he has created a Bitcoin equivalent in another computer language but cannot show it.


I read the article and it is of no relevance at all.

My guess is that you must be a socky of @franky1 - well try hard with your sockies @franky1 but it still won't help you if you can't show us the source code that you claimed to have created.

Well - maybe stop throwing stones then Cunt (oops - I meant Count of course).

Seems your forum name is aptly picked - doesn't it?

I am not attacking @franky1 over anything other than the source code he claimed to have but failed to show (because it doesn't exist).

I gave you an answer (read back a few posts).

Do I have to answer you multiple times?

I do not do remittance as a business so I am not commenting about whether or not it would be wise or profitable to do remittance with BTC as a business.

Again when I used BTC to transfer funds from Australia to China I profited from it.

That is not a lie but simply a statement of fact (it would not always be profitable to do so and I have never stated it would be).

So to be clear - @franky1 has attempted to deceive everyone here that he can program and that he has a working version of Bitcoin written in some other language and I have shown that he doesn't.

I think that pretty much destroys his credibility when it comes to anything now (oops - you fucked up - didn't you).

Please feel free to link to this discussion for anything further that @franky1 posts.

Why lie that you have implemented Bitcoin in another language and go as far as to try and deceive with images (that wouldn't convince anyone more than an idiot)?

How about you actually show us your source code or admit that you just "made that up"?

To be fair I won't ask you to reveal all of your source code - so just show me the source code that signs a raw tx.

Seriously?

If you want to actually talk about remittance then maybe start with some actual figures rather than just attacking me.

Such posts just show what the average people on this forum are about.

"Getting rich quick!"

They don't actually care about Bitcoin and they don't care about other people.

It is rather disappointing but not really surprising.

So - for those who are keen to "get rich quick" - don't listen to me - because I will make sure you never do!

I don't claim to have any magic thing to make a profit out of every trade (I only did such trades when the price was rising - when it was falling I didn't move any money).

Is it that hard to understand?

If I was interested in trying to convince people to send me money for some kind of business I think you'd expect me to have started some sort of stupid "ad sig" campaign wouldn't you?

Rage?

I am not angry - please enlighten me if you think I've got something fundamentally wrong.

Perhaps what you are referring to is the costs of doing things according to how they need to be done legally if you are running a business.

As I was never running a business those things don't apply to me but sure I do understand that Bitcoin is not succeeding as well as it should in the remittance business.

Seriously?

I have done remittance for several years (from Australia to China) and made a profit out of nearly every tx (due to rising BTC prices).

If you know what you are doing then it should cost very little (or even nothing).

The few times that I used TT to move money it cost me at least 30 AUD per tx (more expensive than every single Bitcoin transfer I have ever done).

Each implementation will build upon the longest chain that is valid according to them.

The problem is that if a specific implementation has something different then it will immediately "fork" (this is why no other software is actually doing Bitcoin mining).

With every post you add you just keep showing how stupid you actually are.

BTW - where is your actual source code?

(you can't fool me with basic class definitions)

I've decided that @franky1 *needs to be franked*.

Actually you never proved anything but keep on posting this crap.

You are actually are a rather annoying troll IMO.

Actually no never proved anything but keep on posting this crap.

You are actually are rather annoying troll IMO.