 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »
|
|
What's your offer? $10 for how many BTC?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, just looked at your diagram and see you're not using the USB miners. I've used a network switch to a wireless ethernet bridge to hook multiple S4s into the LAN. I don't see the problem you're presenting I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
Just curious why you don't just use a USB hub on the laptop. This design seems like the hard way.
|
|
|
|
Billy Bones,
watching US foreign policy closely for years now. I can tell you, that both republicans and democrats are "playing for a single team", that team is not american citizen, though.
Where's the Like button on this this thing? ^ - true |
|
|
|
American History X is great. |
|
|
|
|
I leave my two remaining U3s at default clock frequency and voltage now. I melted two going higher...not the bricks but the chips.
At default, in Windows 7, they hash ~ 113 GH/s average. No excessive heat.
|
|
|
|
|
What's the latest on KNC and their legal issues?
|
|
|
|
|
Equilibrium is one of my favorites too.
|
|
|
|
|
Just finished Ex Machina, not bad at all.
|
|
|
|
|
For $15, I'm your huckleberry.
|
|
|
|
|
God Bless America.
It's not what you'd expect from the title.
|
|
|
|
The real question is are they going to be a game changer or just eeking out a tiny bit of efficiency.
they cannot be, we are not in the good old time, were the next miners generation, were madly and vastly better than the previous one, here it is only a game ofa slightly better efficiency this in reinforced by the fact that the last generation was launched many months ago and still we have nothing Always the chance of the proverbial "quantum leap", but not S7. |
|
|
|
|
Is intolerance of intolerance to be tolerated?
|
|
|
|
I don't really care either way, but Christians probably should have just stuck with the New part, which are the teachings of Christ according to select apostles.
Then that shows the invalidity of the bible. Such Christians do not truly believe in their own holy book. Just curious, what's your take on Islam? |
|
|
|
|
I don't really care either way, but Christians probably should have just stuck with the New part, which are the teachings of Christ according to select apostles.
|
|
|
|
|
Old Testament and New Testament are starkly different in the rules department.
|
|
|
|
If two people of consenting age decide to have their union sanctified, because they share the same sex, it does not diminish their right to do so any less than a hetrosexual couple.
It does not diminish homosexuals right, since they can get married. The priest is there to do so, in the same way as a architect, doctor, lawyer ....... should provide professional support, irrespective of their clients sexual orientation. Next it will be claimed as shocking that a white priest should marry a black couple. Both attitudes are grounded in bigotry
That diminishes the priest's right to religion. The priest has no right to be intolerant. Religious views that imposes intolerance should never be adhered to, absolutely disgusting, especially since over 50% of the worlds population is not heterosexual(Blame religion and denial for this not being common knowledge). Religions make their own rules as long as they don't hurt others, whether you think they're a "cancer" or not. I find it interesting though that Christianity is the religion Americans "pick on" the most often. That's a joke, correct...? Many religious views and "rules" hurt others. I advise you go look into the various discrimintory and hateful laws found throughout the bible, koran, and torah. Also, it's because Christianity is the biggest reliigon out there so far, largely because most of it's followers had it forced on them. EX: Spain and other Christian countries had Inquisitions, where their residents were forced to turn into Christians, leave the country, or die. Reading comprehension my friend. I didn't say they do or don't; I only said they have the right if they don't. Ya know, like knocking down tall buildings, molesting children, etc. If those "rules" are a part of the relion's dogma, then no, they need to be removed. Maybe English isn't your first language, but here you clearly said they don't: "Religions make their own rules as long as they don't hurt others"As an aside, it is my first language. I wasn't advocating any of the acts of any religion. I was just saying that if there happened to be a religion that has a dogma that hurts no one - leave them alone. If they do, then it's not cool when practitioners act on it. I'm no theologian, but you can find text that advocates harm to others out of intolerance in most religious texts. Not all, but most I'd venture. I just like how the media goes the route of "Catholic priests molest children - Catholicism is bad". On the other hand, don't judge Muslims based on the behavior of "a few extremists". |
|
|
|
If two people of consenting age decide to have their union sanctified, because they share the same sex, it does not diminish their right to do so any less than a hetrosexual couple.
It does not diminish homosexuals right, since they can get married. The priest is there to do so, in the same way as a architect, doctor, lawyer ....... should provide professional support, irrespective of their clients sexual orientation. Next it will be claimed as shocking that a white priest should marry a black couple. Both attitudes are grounded in bigotry
That diminishes the priest's right to religion. The priest has no right to be intolerant. Religious views that imposes intolerance should never be adhered to, absolutely disgusting, especially since over 50% of the worlds population is not heterosexual(Blame religion and denial for this not being common knowledge). Religions make their own rules as long as they don't hurt others, whether you think they're a "cancer" or not. I find it interesting though that Christianity is the religion Americans "pick on" the most often. That's a joke, correct...? Many religious views and "rules" hurt others. I advise you go look into the various discrimintory and hateful laws found throughout the bible, koran, and torah. Also, it's because Christianity is the biggest reliigon out there so far, largely because most of it's followers had it forced on them. EX: Spain and other Christian countries had Inquisitions, where their residents were forced to turn into Christians, leave the country, or die. Reading comprehension my friend. I didn't say they do or don't; I only said they have the right if they don't. Ya know, like knocking down tall buildings, molesting children, etc. If those "rules" are a part of the relion's dogma, then no, they need to be removed. |
|
|
|
If two people of consenting age decide to have their union sanctified, because they share the same sex, it does not diminish their right to do so any less than a hetrosexual couple.
It does not diminish homosexuals right, since they can get married. The priest is there to do so, in the same way as a architect, doctor, lawyer ....... should provide professional support, irrespective of their clients sexual orientation. Next it will be claimed as shocking that a white priest should marry a black couple. Both attitudes are grounded in bigotry
That diminishes the priest's right to religion. The priest has no right to be intolerant. Religious views that imposes intolerance should never be adhered to, absolutely disgusting, especially since over 50% of the worlds population is not heterosexual(Blame religion and denial for this not being common knowledge). Religions make their own rules as long as they don't hurt others, whether you think they're a "cancer" or not. I find it interesting though that Christianity is the religion Americans "pick on" the most often. |
|
|
|
|
