Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 04:26:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
1281  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Newbie Question on: March 31, 2011, 08:52:08 PM
Again, nope, just pointing out the face that the terminology doesn't exist. And I have no problem thinking. In fact I was pointing out that no one had thought of what to call anything below .01. If someone said that the adopted standard was "point zero zero zero one" bitcoins I would have no problem with that. I think there could be a better and simpler way to represent it than that.
A thousandth of a currency unit is called a "mill" or "mille". Same as a tenth of a percent is a "per mille".

Yeah, banks love that stuff, especially with loan rates. I meant more along the lines of going down all 8 places. Not something that has to be addressed now but I'm intellectually curious since it exists. It would also have to be addressed for any type of standardization and/or mainstream adoption.

I can't speak for banks in general, but software developers within banks (etc) tend to just continue SI prefixes - cent, mille, micro, nano.
1282  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Newbie Question on: March 31, 2011, 08:21:06 PM
Again, nope, just pointing out the face that the terminology doesn't exist. And I have no problem thinking. In fact I was pointing out that no one had thought of what to call anything below .01. If someone said that the adopted standard was "point zero zero zero one" bitcoins I would have no problem with that. I think there could be a better and simpler way to represent it than that.
A thousandth of a currency unit is called a "mill" or "mille". Same as a tenth of a percent is a "per mille".
1283  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How to create a PULL request on: March 31, 2011, 02:31:23 PM
Code:
git commit -a -m "Check out my awesome bugfix"

This way you won't end up in Vim (and freak out). This is more usefull for shorter commit messages though.
...or you could just tell git what editor you'd prefer!
1284  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 6 things for new bitcoiners to do: on: March 30, 2011, 07:00:26 PM
instead of holiday you could use tor
Smiley That's a far better solution (though sadly lacking in beaches and sunshine...!)
1285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 6 things for new bitcoiners to do: on: March 30, 2011, 06:48:08 PM
put usb drive in the safe.
I wouldn't personaly trust a bank but thats what the encryption and backup redundancy is for. Which begs the question "Why pay for a Safe deposit box when there are so many free backups in this plan?"
You might already have a safe deposit box (if you don't I'd have to agree - don't bother). I also don't trust banks, but keeping just one copy in your own safe is more risky than keeping multiple copies in multiple locations.

Here's one thing I've thought about, and I'd be interested in hearing opinions on it: next time you're on holiday outside your own country, take your laptop with you, use SSL, and create a few new web-based email accounts (ideally using webmail providers outside either your own usual jurisdiction, or the "holiday jurisdiction". When you get back email your TrueCrypt-ed wallet to these new email accounts. You can easily get access to your wallet from one webmail account if you need to, but it's not obviously your account, and your own government is faced with dealing with a webmail host outside its legal control. (I'd also suggest an alternative, such as buried-in-a-bottle... just in case...)
1286  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: New demonstration CPU miner available on: March 30, 2011, 06:04:45 PM
I'd love to hear the reason as to why this wasn't simply
Quote
bool rc = false;
(some code) ...
if (rc4 != -1) {
  rc = true;
}
I'm not a C/C++ programmer, but wouldn't...
Code:
rc = (rc4 != -1);
...be even more readable?

It would be if it were correct but it's not, the program flow would change regardless of whether or not rc were initialized.
Sorry, I wasn't suggesting replace all your code, obviously the initialisation and the (some code) block would be retained. It's just the if {} block I meant.
1287  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: New demonstration CPU miner available on: March 30, 2011, 05:48:40 PM
I'd love to hear the reason as to why this wasn't simply
Quote
bool rc = false;
(some code) ...
if (rc4 != -1) {
  rc = true;
}
I'm not a C/C++ programmer, but wouldn't...
Code:
rc = (rc4 != -1);
...be even more readable?
1288  Other / Off-topic / Re: Anarcho-Capitalism and Anarcho-Socialism on: March 30, 2011, 05:43:26 PM
Anarchy has already been tried. Obviously it didn't last long. I don't know why we need any further examples unless there has really been a change.

The examples of anarcho-capitalism that have existed ended for reasons not related to anarchy, but external forces.

In the Icelandic Commonwealth, it was due to the church implementing their own policies which made it no longer an anarchy, and even then the anarchic system supported the country and kept it from falling into chaos for almost 300 years.

In the American Old West, the United States Government came in and shut everyone down (though to be fair, they had laid claim to the land first)
I'm not sure I'd categorise the Icelandic Commonwealth as an anarchy: it was, IIRC, a system of chiefs forming into a parliament. I'd agree with the Old West, however.

I find the "external forces" part interesting: in the (anarcho-capitalist) Old West the US Government arguably represented one form of capitalism. In (anarcho-communist) Ukraine in the 1920s and Catalonia in the 1930s the government of the Soviet Union represented one form of communism, and crushed anarchist forms of communism. I wonder... we should create an anarcho-pacifist state, and wait for the other pacifists to fight us :-)
1289  Other / Off-topic / Re: Anarcho-Capitalism and Anarcho-Socialism on: March 30, 2011, 05:29:06 PM
Anarchy has already been tried. Obviously it didn't last long. I don't know why we need any further examples unless there has really been a change.
OK, let me rephrase that. This forum is (of necessity) hierarchical. The project as a whole is not (and, as an added extra, I'm not sure it would matter even if it was).
1290  Other / Off-topic / Re: Anarcho-Capitalism and Anarcho-Socialism on: March 30, 2011, 05:20:31 PM
Satoshi, Gavin, Kiba, etc. guide the direction of the content of this forum and the Bitcoin forum.

They are leaders but what they implement is voluntarily accepted.
My thinking on this forum has little to do with kiba, Theymos, et al, but with "banning" etc. Of necessity (to protect forum members from arrest etc) certain activities are banned. There are rules that are enforced by rulers. I'm not saying that's undesirable (I can't see any way to avoid it while remaining hosted in the US or similar state), just that it precludes this forum from being an example of an anarchy.
1291  Other / Off-topic / Re: Anarcho-Capitalism and Anarcho-Socialism on: March 30, 2011, 05:12:01 PM
Quote
but it is essentially a system of hierarchy. It allows for the existence of employers, landlords, and usurers who rule over employees, tenants, and borrowers.
sounds like you're confusing capitalism with corporatism.

More like he hates the idea of leaders, employers, landlords, and tenants.

But even the bitcoin project is a hierarchy.

Satoshi is our benevolent dictator. Gavin is the lead developer. I am a global moderator. Theymos is an administrator.

FatherMcGruder have a really bad case of hating neutral things.
Well, it's not unreasonable for an anarchist to dislike rulers, the clue being in the name: Anarchy (from Greek: ἀναρχίᾱ anarchíā, "without ruler").

Whether Satoshi, Gavin, kiba or Theymos are "rulers" is an interesting question. The application itself is hosted on Github and is, I assume, open to anyone to commit to, and it's entirely possible for people to fork from it anyway (I believe genjix has done so, for example). I don't regard Gavin or Satoshi as "rulers", nor do I regard either of them as being able to "rule" me in any way (sorry, Gavin! Sorry, Satoshi!)

Is this forum anarchic? Probably not, and it probably couldn't be no matter how much we wanted it to be. It's hosted in the US, and the hosts are subject to US law: there are limits to what they can reasonably permit, to what we should reasonably expect them to permit. Does this matter? Probably not much. Sure, lots of decisions about the application and protocol are made here, but, again, the ability to fork mitigates this.
1292  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin account format spec? on: March 30, 2011, 03:35:46 PM
Sorry I couldn't find this anywhere...

Are there any specific rules about how you can name an account? eg. Does it have to be alphanumeric, can it contain spaces, etc... how long can it be?

This API Calls List doesn't mention anything about it:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_Calls_list

Also the 'Full list' on that page doesn't include the listaccounts() function... is that function new or is this just an oversight?


Probably the best way to find out would be to check the source code (search github for "listaccounts", and I'll do that once I get home, if you haven't beaten me to it!) However, in the meantime I can tell you that I've got account names with spaces, hyphens and periods as well as alphanumeric chars. None of my account names are that long - longest is 23 chars.
1293  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Does WeUseCoins Deserves the Full Bounty? RETAKE on: March 29, 2011, 05:21:05 PM
Yes.

Ashamed to say it's the first time I've watched the (excellent) video.

Also ashamed to say I've contributed nothing to the bounty. What address can I send my contribution to?

Done. (Thanks, Kiba!)
1294  Other / Off-topic / Re: My doubts about anarchy on: March 28, 2011, 09:45:29 PM
It is interesting to note that in an anarcho-capitalist society you could construct an anarcho-socialist community, but not the other way around.
I keep reading that here, but without any explanation why it's the case.

During the Social Revolution in Spain (an Anarcho-Syndicalist revolution that was ultimately crushed by the Spanish Communist Party and the Soviet Union) small-scale capitalism existed. Small farms weren't collectivized, and although the larger land-owners had their lands seized it was by state dictat (the Spanish state being largely non-anarchist, as most anarchists refused to join the government). Even amongst the anarcho-syndicalist collectives there was an element of capitalism, with trade between collectives occurring.

I can't see anything inherent in the rejection of rulers that would lead to capitalism becoming "forbidden". It may become increasingly difficult for capitalists to compete with collectives, but construction of a capitalist society within a wider anarchist society shouldn't be impossible.
1295  Economy / Economics / Re: Deflationary currency? Really? on: March 28, 2011, 06:13:06 PM
Bitcoin is a great step forward in the direction of having a stable currency, but it does not seem that its creation algorithm is directed towards obtaining stability. We will have gradually increasing difficulty of mining, until a few years from now, mining will practically come to a halt.
But as mining decreases, so does difficulty. The most recent re-targeting saw a decrease in difficulty, because mining had decreased following the previous re-targeting.
1296  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin Failure is likely on: March 28, 2011, 05:51:52 PM
Though, technically, the courts are supposed to be independent of the government.

I hate to pile on, but no. The judiciary is the third branch of the US government, alongside the executive and legislative branches.
1297  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Hiding the command window on: March 28, 2011, 05:49:25 PM
What about running bitcoind (bitcoind.exe?) as a Windows service? You'd be able to start/stop/restart it through the "Services" management console GUI, and there would (I presume) be no unpleasant terminal window.

Disclaimer: reason I mention this is because someone asked how to do this fairly recently, here on the forum, and my "contribution" was less than stellar, as I recall (it's been some time since I last regularly used Windows...)
1298  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: RPC Miners (CPU/4way/CUDA/OpenCL) on: March 28, 2011, 05:36:25 PM
downloaded boost from here: http://www.boost.org/users/download/ and im lost again
If it helps (and it may not, I'm not a regular OSX person) Boost is in MacPorts. May make life easier, you should just be able to...
Code:
sudo port install boost

Obviously this relies on you having MacPorts installed, but I assume that that's a regular OSX install, no compilation required.
1299  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Nagios plugin for monitoring GPU temperature and fan speed? on: March 28, 2011, 05:13:39 PM
I will give munin a try, however I would prefer nagios since I use it to monitor my whole network (which is pretty big).
I've only just this minute looked at Naigos (used Munin before, however) but it looks to me as if you could fairly easily hack comboy's script. If I read the documentation correctly, Naigos wants a plugin that simply spits out something like "GPU Temperature: 75.4". You could do that with comboy's script by removing everything except the else-block. (And maybe a bit of ruby-hackery to pretty-print the output for Nagios/human-consumption).

...but I know nothing about Nagios, YMMV, IANAL, consult a qualified physician before commencing exercise, do not taunt Happy Fun Ball, etc.
1300  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: GPUminer now with added files for less technical users. on: March 26, 2011, 11:52:45 PM
I will most likely change that.  By default though, if the file paths are correct, the batch files will work without any changes after they drag and drop the .conf file.  As for an autoscript, I'll look into it, I have a few programming buddies that might be willing to help.
I assumed things would work, but I also think it's essential that default passwords get changed - otherwise it's too easy to harvest IP addresses and then try connecting with YOURUSERNAME and YOURPASSWORD. Easy to use is good, but easy to crack isn't :-)
that would require the RPC port to be forwarded, which is rare.
Assuming that the client was behind a properly configured router, yes. This isn't going to be an issue for all users, but ideally it wouldn't be an issue for any users.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!