Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 07:34:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 162 »
1481  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Transaction metadata (do we need an OP_DROP transaction type?) on: September 18, 2012, 12:54:46 AM
You could also use a P2SH-style transaction, moving the data into the scriptSig:

Using P2SH at least means the unspent txout is small, and does not carry the extra data.

1482  Economy / Speculation / Re: London 2012 on: September 18, 2012, 12:50:05 AM
This conference had essentially two strands: technical aspects and social aspects. This worked well, but it would be great to have business aspects as a third strand at future conferences.

+1 agreed...
1483  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Bounty] How-to Multi signature transactions on: September 18, 2012, 12:30:09 AM
Is there currently a GUI that supports multisig? Is it a part of bitcoin-qt 0.7?

It is only RPC at this point.

1484  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Bounty] How-to Multi signature transactions on: September 18, 2012, 12:27:50 AM
But even after that, there's a big hurdle for client developers, because signature collection is going to be a pain in the ass.  That's why I created BIP 10 (and already use it for offline transactions), but it might need to be expanded or supplemented with more user-friendliness.  Ugh...

For the audience (I'm sure etotheipi already knows this) "pain in the ass" might be more specifically translated as:  it is an Out Of Band problem.

You definitely need to collect together the keys somehow.

1485  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin Project will be making a major announcement in September on: September 17, 2012, 11:58:07 PM
Maybe the "major announcement" will end up being Jeff's work on speeding up the initial download of the block chain.

Appreciate the thought but (a) I.B.D. speed-up was the work of many people, not just me, and (b) it has already been stated in this thread (or linked to, I forget) that the announce is not some technical software feature found in the Satoshi reference client.

1486  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why no press/PR re: the London Conference? on: September 16, 2012, 07:40:32 PM
I'm sure uploading a video on youtube cost at least 100$

Probably far more than that, if you include obvious costs external to the youtube upload, like the videographer's time.

1487  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why no press/PR re: the London Conference? on: September 16, 2012, 07:19:49 PM
We need someone recording every talk and quickly uploading it on youtube as it end.

Sounds like a great idea for next year:  pay some bitcoins for this service, rather than complaining about not getting something for free.

1488  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BitInstant's Trip to Brazil - Global Payments Forum on: September 16, 2012, 07:16:20 PM
So... the fact that Gavin was invited to give a talk to the CIA over a year ago didn't mean Bitcoin was already on their radar?

CIA != Fed

I know a lot of people see "the government" and instantly assume that a presentation at government office A will instantly result in the entire federal workforce becoming aware of said presentation's contents, but that's not how real life works Smiley

In 2010, the federal government workforce numbered at 4.4 million people.  And most of those are hunkered down in their little slice of government, not talking to other branches.

1489  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [bitconf] State of the Coin 2012 on: September 16, 2012, 06:34:45 PM
Thanks Jeff!! Smiley Any change we see the actual recording of the talk?

The conference organizers recorded all the talks, and hopefully will have them up on youtube $Sometime.

1490  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why no press/PR re: the London Conference? on: September 16, 2012, 05:27:58 PM
All the talks were recorded, and should be posted $Somewhere, $Sometime.
1491  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Requested: graphs/statistics about spent+unspent transactions on: September 16, 2012, 12:39:17 PM
sipa's presentation at Bitcoin Conference 2012 including some information, because his "ultraprune" branch slated for 0.8 will specifically index unspent txout's.  Not quite the information you wanted, but it is worth a look for you.
1492  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / [bitconf] State of the Coin 2012 on: September 16, 2012, 10:59:00 AM
My conference talk "State of the Coin 2012", which covers bitcoin technical and non-technical changes over the past year, is posted at

     http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/2012/state-of-the-coin-2012.pdf

1493  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DDOS for ransom on: September 16, 2012, 08:52:18 AM
This is sadly already common in the poker world, HYIP forums, etc.  It was only a matter of time Sad

I think somebody has already tried DDoS+ransom on MtGox, a while ago, IIUC.

1494  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2012-09-12 dailybeast.com - The dangerous websites google keeps hidden on: September 15, 2012, 10:01:14 AM
But, as a percentage of total transactions using each currency, Bitcoin illicit goods trading takes the cake.

Evidence, to back up this hand-waving?

1495  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mtgox sux - chat logs pasted on: September 15, 2012, 12:03:11 AM
Bitcoin companies that are large enough to end up in the crosshairs of regulators need to comply with all the rules which make Bitcoin necessary in the first place or else risk being shut down.

Indeed.

Quote
It's a temporary problem that will go away when most people get their bitcoins via trade instead of buying them on an exchange and spend them instead of selling them for other currencies.

Yep, do something productive and get paid in bitcoins.

That is how the bitcoin economy is built.

1496  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: OPEN LETTER to Donald, Patrick & Amir RE: Bitcoinica on: September 14, 2012, 11:59:37 PM
Seriously? One name that's something in bitcoin, say it. Who's there?
Even if you disregard Nefario (GLBSE) and Intersango (libbitcoin), there's Tony Gallippi from BitPay, the guy from Butterfly Labs, Stefan Thomas (bitcoin-js), Pieter Wuille (core dev team), Jan Moller (BitcoinSpinner), Jim Burton (MultiBit), Vladimir (Bitcoin Magazine), Juraj Bednar (he's been promoting Bitcoin in Slovakia), the guys from Bitcoin Austria, and tons of people I didn't have time to meet or whose names I forgot.

Of the core dev team there's myself and Pieter (sipa), and I think Nils (tcatm) is coming too.

1497  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Version 0.7.0 release candidate 3 ready for testing on: September 14, 2012, 09:29:14 PM
When I query the daemon, I expected it to use an IPv6 connection however the system shows that an IPv4 connection is used to query the daemon. Using "bitcoind -onlynet=IPv6 getpeerinfo" makes no difference, the communication is still using IPv4. How can I use the client to query the daemon using IPv6?

hmmm, I think the HTTP client internal to bitcoin did not get updated to make IPv6 connections.  Worth filing an issue at github.

1498  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Stratum mining protocol - ASIC ready on: September 14, 2012, 04:38:06 PM
Custom binary protocol using Google Protocol Buffers would be much preferred.  You write

Quote
Protocol buffers by Google is interesting concept which may fit the needs, except that only C++, Python and Java are supported.

Your list of supported languages is woefully incomplete, and therefore, does not support the argument.  PB are supported for: C, C++, Python, Perl, Java, PHP, Ruby, and Haskell at a minimum.  Any language used by the bitcoin community is highly likely to be supported by PB.

Furthermore, PB encoding is strict and well debugged, unlike any newly created protocol (including my own binary protocol from years ago) and this new protocol.

Something for ASIC miners should be bandwidth and CPU efficient, and text/JSON is not that.  This has already been shown to be a problem in bitcoind, where pool server operators replaced the default JSON hex decoding routines with a faster routine, to decrease CPU usage associated with useless text encode/decode.

PB is used in thousands of apps, including most of the Google applications we all use (like search).

1499  Bitcoin / Meetups / Re: Unofficial attendance list - Bitcoin London 2012 on: September 13, 2012, 09:14:07 PM
Pretty much everybody on the speakers list will be there, at least, including me Smiley

About to board my BOS->London flight right now...
1500  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Version 0.7.0 release candidate 2 ready for testing on: September 10, 2012, 03:37:29 AM
well, the documentation seems to suggest that you must enable ipv6 by including USE_IPV6=1, but the build file has USE_IPV6:=1 as default.   i tried changing that to USE_IPV6=- and USE_IPV6=0, still results in same error

Try commenting out the entire line
Code:
#USE_IPV6:=1
Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 162 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!