|
This looks pretty interesting. I will follow it and probably invest into the TEC. If you guys will be as good as the Ark team then this will be another great project!
Good luck guys!
|
|
|
|
What reddit censorship issue? cap has gone from $55 million to $34 million in two weeks. why?
Basically the market did not buy that a buyback is more beneficial than divs. Also the reddit censorship issue shook peoples confidence. |
|
|
|
I think that he means that Game is a part of ICNX... It can't be a part of ICNP because of the reasons you posted... I hope for ICONOMI's sake they are planning to invest in MobileGo. I know they have a portfolio of GAME which is performing great. I assume they have researched MobileGo and plan to take a stake. Especially since MobileGo is leveraging the Ethereum blockchain. Its a perfect fit.
How can they have a portfolio of GAME? Game ICO was late 2015 early 2016 if I recall correctly. ICONOMI wasn't even announced nor funded at that time and ICNP funds only go into new ICOs. So If you can`t proof it otherwise, nice shill mate. And that is not a proof: I know they have a portfolio of GAME which is performing great. |
|
|
|
|
Whats up with them not accepting SWIFT transfers from third party accounts? Any updates in regards to this and when the issue will be resolved?
|
|
|
|
Checked out the one pager and it looks good. When they get all this working this is could be very good. External fast-growing companies (scale-ups) are selected to join the Econic Launchpad program. In this program, ABN AMRO develops collaborations with the external companies, usually in the form of products or services that ABN AMRO can offer to its clients. The bank serves as a base, or platform, that provides structured access to the industry, expertise, and network, in order to “launch” the scale-ups’ business development. It’s a win-win for both ABN AMRO and the scale-ups. Complete list of the GITR challenge finalists can be viewed here: http://celebrate.econichub.com/launchpad |
|
|
|
|
Both sites are down so I am out of this project. Good luck to everyone who plans to stick around!
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, so they are doing another ICO? Why? |
|
|
|
|
Did any ICO investors that didn't apply for beta get access to the platform?
|
|
|
|
Anyone made any calculations if it is better to vote for multiple pools all vote for just one?  |
|
|
|
Yes, Chris posted that in one of the replies to my questions. Also, I see no new activity on Trello for like 16 days. Time for an update much? I have no problem with them taking the time to build an awesome game. What I have a problem with is the fact that they haven't added jewels to Apex which was one of the original promises on the roadmap. If a small server like Heroes has made 300k in jewels already, imagine what a server where there are always 100+ active gamers online could do...
Was the 300k posted somewhere? I was out for a bit but haven't seen anything related to the actual earnings reports. |
|
|
|
lol, Stewie is probably on everyones ignore list. I know he is on mine @EliphazFimk Now that we can communicate better , could you point which accounts made those assets ? Are those funds withdrawn or are they still in the exchange ? I guess that you have to give at least the identity of the person/s who made those assets and give us the opportunity to give neg trust . HEAT must protect it's investors in any possible way .
We have no more information than you have available, nor do we have access to the asset concerned. Issuer can be seen by clicking on the asset pair and landing here: https://heatwallet.com/#/trader/0/4249904286321844153You can use the API to track payments / trades to and from that account https://heatwallet.com/api/There seem to be a couple of BTC redemptions from that account https://heatwallet.com:7734/api/v1/account/payments/14601113921039187075/all/timestamp/false/0/100Our BTC gateway handles BTC deposits and redemptions, we don't currently have the resources nor the inclination to operate as an escrow for other assets or general investigator of asset issuers' business. opportunity to give neg trust Feedback mechanism on assets is planned but not yet available. However I don't necessarily see what would the neg trust be about? Has the asset issuer promised something? Has the mistaken buyer contacted the issuer for resolving the issue of him not finding out enough data or even the issuer account number of the asset before buying it? Things like that in a decentralized environment are to be handled by the parties affected and not the infrastructure supplier (us). Crypto platforms are all about giving full power of tokens to the counterparties in transaction. It's unfortunately a known fact many people don't understand that and aren't willing to take full responsibility of their actions regarding their funds, thus try to still resort to some authority figures they perceive would have power to settle their errors, whereas in reality this isn't possible in a decentralized system. The asset issuer responded to our questions about the purpose of his assets, so I'd suppose there's good chance contacting him would be fruitful. HEAT mainnet supports private messages to account number. @EliphazFimk So the account is 14601113921039187075 . Is this an ICO account or it is an account created after launch . In case it is an ICO account can you share who was the buyer ( bitcointalk account ) ? I don't remember what was the process for claiming HEAT and if the above is possible , but if that's the case this will be a way of pressure to the asset creator to return funds to the buyer . @StewieG Probably you are in his ignore list , i agree that he owe you at least an apology . |
|
|
|
|
I have no problem with them taking the time to build an awesome game. What I have a problem with is the fact that they haven't added jewels to Apex which was one of the original promises on the roadmap. If a small server like Heroes has made 300k in jewels already, imagine what a server where there are always 100+ active gamers online could do...
|
|
|
|
|
Great job ARK team! And the price reflects it. I am sure that it will continue to rise in the future! Keep up the great work
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Remove all non certified assets and trolls will have one less bullet to fud heat... the HEAT team created 100 million komodo(KMD) as an "asset".
That of course is not true. Random HEAT user created an asset called "KMD" (which, when I questioned him, he told he would be selling to supposedly "operators of the blockchain"). Anyone has been able to create any asset, called anything not claimed previously, on the Decentralized HEAT Asset Exchange since it was opened. After the early phases we've added certification features to clearly indicate which assets are house backed or otherwise certified, and those that are not maybe would be wise to use more stringent due diligence before getting involved with. In decentralized asset exchanges, such DD is mandatory. HEAT's certification feature adds an useful layer on top of that. I'm not aware NXT's extensively used Decentralized Asset Exchange for instance has anything like that. We've been personally in touch about further co-operation with jl777 since the large Supernet ICO investment and will have to see where this goes when HEAT is stable. The Komodo promotion in this thread seems to be somewhat overlapping with our existing arrangements, but we'll be looking whether that notarization possibility is relevant to HEAT. Better to delete all assets other than heat certified at present - they are a waste of space and confusing. Better for heat to issue the main alt coins such as poloniex offers. and fiat assets.. |
|
|
|
 lol, jewels should have been integrated into Apex on August 2016 and jewels still aren't integrated into Apex... |
|
|
|
|
I just checked the Conquer Heroes FB fan page and the last post was in December... So what is going on with Conquer Heroes?
|
|
|
|
You guys do realize that Melonport have an estimate of final deployment in 2019 right? Even if they hit that target they will be very late to the ICN party |
|
|
|
Entered my bracket, nice contest |
|
|
|
|
Can you explain this a bit more in detail?
Paypal fiat purchases: 50% burned, 50% used to buy coins at cheapest price off exchanges
In-game purchases made with jewels: 50% burned, 50% added to paypal fund
|
|
|
|
Well Chris said that almost 200,000 jewels have already been bought via Paypal, so that isn't so bad, especially if you aren't focusing on that yet and since Jewels were never integrated into Apex... As for the burning mechanism, I think you don't need to complicate things, just assign an address that is visible to everyone, code it so that no JWL can be moved away from that address ever again and start dumping jewels into it. The sooner you guys start, the better because that will give a nice boost to the price and lower the market availability.
Transparency is important so I will try to conduct a bi-weekly talk to Chris and deliver a summary to the community. For such cases I volunteered doing this temporary role of PR. We will collect as many as interesting data and publish it. Currently the focus is on game improvements in order to bring more players to play the game and to integrate the blockchain to the game so at the moment the PayPal is not commonly used. That will be used once we get our games available and using Jewels token and that is part of the focus now.
The burning mechanism is being revised. Actually any professional advice or comments by the community can assist for such a decision.
The were several announcements mainly for game events in the past 3 weeks (as Chris answered on that in previous posts) but the Tweeter account hasn't been active.
I will revive it soon to make sure there are updates there as well but I expect BCT and Slack to be the common update forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
