"Legally". Cute.
Thanks for the lesson in law in whatever country you live in. Does that also apply to Canada? Algeria? I'd love to hear your take on all of the laws around the world. Please go on about them some more. I'm definitely reading it all.
It's not intended to be a lesson numbnuts.How can halfwits like you be taught anything? Does that also apply to Canada? Algeria? Ask Interpol ..you dumb fuck. |
|
|
|
I will expect the same amount sent from the address returned back to it and not a satoshi less.I will also now expect the matching shitcoin fork amounts attached to that address refunded.
You will receive neither one. That won't be for you to decide in the end. If you failed your own due diligence before investing, then that is your own fault.  Stop throwing stones while inside the glasshouse.Did you carry out the nescessary due diligence before releasing our funds to this farce? |
|
|
|
-nonsense snipped -
So I propose that the remaining funds that I am entitled to for the previous milestones be released to me so I can continue development of the DEX, and then investors should be refunded everything that is still in escrow as they are entitled to.
The holders (community) will vote (weighted) on where they want the project to go. Neither you nor Ton are currently in the position to make this call. the community or the investors? weighted according the amount of NVO tokens in the wallets right now or the amount of BTC invested during the ICO? Holders (which is what the community consists of), not investors. To prevent people from receiving double refunds in cases where, e.g., you invested, then sold everything and now want a refund, this would go based on current NVST holdings.
Note that this was a suggestion by some community member. All options considered, it seems to be the best one. Anyone who sold their NVST loses the amount calculated off the original base cost unless they can replace them to be sent back to the so called developers. Calculating refunds only based on NVST holdings is fraudulent and allows anyone to buy NVST and enter the refund pool.It also allows developers who have already misappropriated funds and bought NVST to enter the refund pool escalating the fraud. |
|
|
|
I "invested" 8BTC into this so called ICO crowsale so I want my 8BTC back.You can keep the Btrash for yourself as it is only a shitcoin along with all other forks but I would like my Bitcoin as in real bitcoin BTC refunded.
Lol. If you didn't read the OP a year ago then I don't feel sorry for you. Maybe now would be a good time to read into and get to understand what you invested in and how the escrows work in this situation. Keep your Lol to yourself asshole.Your opinion is as irrelevant as you are.I have read the farcical OP and even the statement about Maidsafe on it breaches the original agreement nullifying any contractual T&C's.Funds released from escrow will legally have to be returned by these clowns to anyone who requests a refund. |
|
|
|
I "invested" 8BTC into this so called ICO crowsale so I want my 8BTC back.
That's not how this works. Read the release milestones (you are entitled to 40%; though the refund will use all available funds - exact numbers TBD). Smells like major fraud.Who is to say developers hadn't all pre planned these milestones without any intention of having a working DEX so they simply had to use terms allowing milestones as a pretext to make money from invested funds without having any intention of finishing the job?There is also pattern here from past performance with regards other associated projects to support this conclusion. It is looking like a slightly more sophisticated level of scam however misappropriation of funds alone is unacceptable. I will expect the same amount sent from the address returned back to it and not a satoshi less.I will also now expect the matching shitcoin fork amounts attached to that address refunded. Don't insult my intelligence talking about terms,conditions or trivial nonsense such as milestones in the meantime.I know what I am legally entitled to under the above circumstances and I will be getting it. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Classic rolls out, and days later there is no word about it in the News Media. Mike Hearn declares Bitcoin dead and within hours it is in the New York Times..... http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/business/dealbook/the-bitcoin-believer-who-gave-up.htmlMark my words: Bitcoin is getting ready to be in a fight for it's life.On one side are the Blockstream/Core players. Liars, manipulators, shill, not afraid to destroy the fabric of Bitcoin with every bit of FUD they can dredge up - even if it kills bitcoin, but if they can't have total control, no one can. On the other side you have Mike Hearn w/R3CEV/Hyperledger/Banks (AND Mainstream Media & Govt backing - don't forget that!)We are at the start of a foot race to see who gets ready forst for the upcoming global financial meltdown. It's pretty clear that Bitcoin Classic will prevail in the upcoming March Fork given the huge amount of support / concensus for it. But Blockstream seems to wat to make this a do or die fight, and they appear to be willing to destroy the good name of bitcoin if they don't get their way. The looming battle may be the perfect backdrop of confusion and chaos for a Fiat Coin to rise from the shadows, and with the help of Gov't & Media nods - be introduced to the masses. Fasten your seatbelts kiddies.... this is going to be a wild ride. Right now I am betting 50% on Classic / 50% on Fiat Coin. Current 1mb Blockstream/Core Coin not even worth mentioning in my opinion. I see 0.001%. When you read this kind of post way back from 2016 telling that Bitcoin is dead and look at Coinmarketcap's list of top crypto currencies from today, you will surely just laugh out loud with those people believing that Bitcoin will die or its downfall is currently occurring.  I think this guy named Mike Hearn is just spreading FUD in the crypto currency realm way back at the year 2016. Take a look at what Roger Ver Tweeted also wayback at the year 2016.  +1000 I tried to merit this but have none left for today but this response should be merited by all who read it. |
|
|
|
If you give then give generously. One person gives freely, yet gains even more; another withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed. Vlad I could only give you 1 merit for this but do you remember the parable of the poor old woman who donated all of what little she had? |
|
|
|
But now Satoshi hardly has time to write on the forum, so it's pointless to charge anything on his account.
Vlad has many thousands of posts on this forum.He is rumoured to be satoshi you know |
|
|
|
i0coin was created on a whim and released just days after it was thought up meaning it was not well planned.It only had one developer who was south american and spoke spanish.Yes it does have a genesis block dated/timestamped 5th august 2011 and it is NOT bitcoin. i0 coin genesis block is timestamped with the words "5/Ago/2011 - Diario El Dia - Obama cae al 39% en la aprobacin ciudadana"Bitcoins genesis block is also dated 2009 with the comments about bank of england etc. |
|
|
|
Is there a spv wallet for namecoin?
Something like bitcoinj?
BitcoinJ has been ported: ConsensusJ-Namecoin. It is in the beta stage. The last release is from April. Look at the last page - there we talked a bit about Electrum-NMC, which would be another option. However, it is even at an earlier development stage and if you don't know exactly what you do you probably shouldn't use it for "real coins". Link: https://github.com/namecoin/electrum-nmc@domob: Thanks! If there is help needed, we'll communicate. Namecoin electrum works fine.You simply need to ensure you do not use segwit transactions.The only thing it doesn't support is domain name registrations. |
|
|
|
The price is not going to rise to lambo levels (>$40-50) again without bitcoin going full moon. (>20k) Check the charts, all the altcoins including bitcore and bitsend are in hibernation mode. They'll stay in deep freeze for the next 5-10 months if not years at least. Just slowly accumulate more but also don't be too greedy, remember this shit can blow up at any time.
That’s a very possible scenario. Cryptos pump when you least expect it. Nobody knows what the next "moon" coin is going to be. It is usually a big surprise to everyone. But it makes the holders happy. Oh, I’ve got a really good idea. Cool, any ideas on what this coin is. erm ..just another altcoin? |
|
|
|
@realdantreccia on your latest medium article it quotes " My guess is that the metadata required for broadcasting this transaction is kept secret. That is why you no longer find block 1’s for Namecoin, I0Coin, IXCoin, and Devcoin on their public block explorers." Can you elaborate on this because it is very easy to find block 1's for these coins on their explorers?For example here is i0coin's block 1 or am I missing something here? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/i0c/block.dws?1.htmDetails for Block #1
Hash 000000003bd07007793dfc435377b7b01d5072233e186fc214b78cd4d1960901
Date/Time 2011-08-16 20:02:57
Transactions 1 0.2 kB
Value Out 48.0 I0C
Difficulty 1.0
Outstanding 48.0 I0C
Created 48.0 I0C |
|
|
|
Could I0coin also change the frequency of block generation? If blocks are generated every 5 minutes instead of 10 transactions can be completed sooner and the network will appear to move faster. If as we've seen a 10 minute turn into a 30 minute block or even a 60minute block, the network slows to a crawl and it's nearly impossible to trade on it (look at name coins and it's current 1 hour block generation). 5 minute blocks in these cases can't blow out quite as much and it will ensure a smoother network at a little cost to throughput.
Like 48 coins per block (instead of 96), but one block each 5 min (instead of 10)? Sounds nice. Guys, i'll be pushing the launch time a day, i want to release executables to most platforms, integrate this feature into the client and maybe implement the NTP protocol. This is not a get-rich-quick-release-asap fork, I want to do the things right  Preliminar source code is available on github: https://github.com/kr105rlz/i0coinI've dropped the source forked from ixcoin and started from scratch using the main bitcoin coide (Yes, wallet encryption included  ) I'll keep you updated! i0c is a scam too. If you guys want to actually make a successful fork, you need to actually improve things and probably retain at least one-way compatibility with Bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
None of what they "say" is factual without code. None of it. Not even the great Charlie Lee. But I know this is all part of the plan. This is where it started.I don't have a copy of the old original chain.Current explorer won't show this because it was hardforked at some stage since. Hash: 00000000de13b7f748fb214e3f9c284fe6a57e1559fee545bfe473f72599c0d1 Height: 0 Version: 1 Tx Merkle Root: 764fc5f8e5c2ef66fd00f815348d965b80a852800379e20e9336ecaa68864034 Time: 2011-08-16 01:20:20 Difficulty: 1.000 Nonce: 2831549010 Transactions: 1 Value Out: 48.00000000 |
|
|
|
|
Ethereum is an ICO premine.No further discussion is needed
|
|
|
|
|
All altcoins are for the cemetery.Bitcoin BTC Ticker: BTC is the only coin that matters.All alts including shitcoins like Litecoin are essentially worthless.Ethereum is also a pile of shit that will die at some stage.
The only purpose of altcoins is to take bitcoins from noobs.
|
|
|
|
Bitcore team has a great product on its hand. The fork is great news, no ICO and asic resistant. Nice website, great logo. Well done Bitcore It's just another altcoin similiar to Litecoin,Bcash etc.What need is there for all these altcoins? I will admit it is a better altcoin than Bitcoin cash and that shitcoin called Litecoin. |
|
|
|
|
Lets remind noobs looking in here who may be thinking of buying into this.
1)Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin.It's just another altcoin.
2)Wright is not the real Satoshi.
3)Roger Ver is not the real Jesus.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
