...and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.  This is not correct but this is indeed the same traveler who also introduced Mr Macron to the temple and as all initiates receive the mysteries they predict your future because it is they who design it in accordance with Lu_ifer's will. Anyway bits of it have been lifted from the book L'avenir de la vie but the interview with Michel Salomon did not proceed as above. The full translation of the interview is as follows: Is this conceivable parasitic, a 1984 Orwellian based on a behavioral pharmacology?
I don't believe in Orwellism, because it is a form of technical totalitarianism with a visible and centralized Big Brother. I rather believe in decentralization. These machines to watch over our health, which we could have for our good, will enslave us for our good. In a way, we will undergo gentle and permanent conditioning.
How do you see the man of the twenty-first century?
I believe that we must very clearly distinguish two kinds of men of the twenty-first century, that is to say: the man of the twenty-first century from the rich countries and the man of the twenty-first century from the poor countries. The first will certainly be a man who is much more anguished than he is today, but who will find his answer to the pain of experiencing a sort of commercial form of conviviality.
But besides that, I am convinced that the immense majority who will have knowledge of these machines and the way of life of the rich, but who will not have access to them, will be extraordinarily aggressive and violent. It is from this distortion that the great chaos will be born which could be translated either by racial wars, conquests, or by immigration to our counterparts of millions of people who will want to share our way of life.
Do you believe that genetic engineering is one of the keys to our future?
I believe that genetic engineering will be in the next twenty years a technique as commonplace, as well known and present in everyday life as the internal combustion engine is today. It is moreover the same type of parallel that we can establish.
With the internal combustion engine, we could make two choices: either favor public transport and make life easier for people, or produce automobiles, tools for aggressiveness, consumption, individualization, loneliness, storage, desire, of rivalry. We chose the second solution. I believe that with genetic engineering we have the same type of choice and I believe that we will also choose, alas, the second solution. In other words, with genetic engineering we could little by little create the conditions for a humanity assuming itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made of copies of men sold to men, of chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work.
Is it possible and desirable to live 120 years?
Medically, I don't know. I've always been told it was possible. Is this desirable? I will answer in several times. First of all, I believe that in the very logic of the industrial system in which we find ourselves, the extension of the duration of the life is no longer an objective desired by the logic of power. Why? Because for a long time it was a question of extending life expectancy in order to reach the maximum threshold of profitability of the human machine, in terms of work, it was perfect.
But as soon as we pass 60/65 years, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
Hence I cry out that in the logic of industrial society itself, the objective will no longer be to extend life expectancy, but to ensure that even within a determined lifespan , the man lives as well as possible but in such a way that health expenses will be as low as possible in terms of costs for the collective. Then a new life expectancy criterion appears: that of the value of a health system, a function not of the extension of life expectancy but of the number of years without illness and particularly without hospitalization. Indeed from the point of view of society, it is much better for the human machine to come to a screeching halt rather than gradually deteriorating.
This is perfectly clear if we remember that two thirds of health expenses are concentrated in the last months of life. Likewise, cynicism aside, health spending would not reach one third of the current level (175 billion francs in 1979) if people all died suddenly in car accidents. So we have to recognize that the logic no longer lies in increasing life expectancy but in increasing the length of life without disease. However, I think that the increase of the duration of life remains a fantasy which corresponds to two objectives: the first is that of the men of power. The increasingly totalitarian and directive societies in which we find ourselves tend to be run by old men, to become gerontocracies. the second reason lies in the possibility for capitalist society to make old age economically profitable simply by making old people solvent. It is currently a market but it is not solvent.
This goes perfectly with the view that man today is no longer important as a worker but as a consumer (because he is replaced by machines in work). So, we could accept the idea of extending life expectancy on condition of making old people solvent and thus creating a market. We can see very well how the current large pharmaceutical companies behave, in relatively egalitarian countries where at least the method of financing retirement is correct: they favor geriatrics, to the detriment of other fields of research such as tropical diseases.
It is therefore on the one hand, as a socialist, objectively against the extension of life because it is an illusion, a false problem. I believe that asking this type of problem makes it possible to avoid more essential questions such as that of the release of the time actually lived in the present life. What good is it to live to 100 years, if we win 20 years of dictatorship?
The world to come, liberal or socialist, will need a biological morality, to create an ethic of cloning or euthanasia, for example.
Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in all cases. In a socialist logic, to begin with, the problem arises as follows: socialist logic is freedom and fundamental freedom is suicide; in consequence, the right to direct or indirect suicide is therefore an absolute value in this type of society. In a capitalist society, killing machines, prostheses which will make it possible to eliminate life when it will be too unbearable, or economically too expensive, will emerge and will be in common practice. It either a value of freedom or a commodity, will be one of the rules of future society.
Will not the men of tomorrow be conditioned by psychotropic drugs and subjected to manipulations of the psyche? How to protect yourself from it?
The only precautions one can take are related to knowledge and knowledge. It is essential today to ban a large number of drugs, to stop the proliferation of conditioning drugs; but perhaps the border has already been crossed.
On the other hand, isn't television an excessive drug?
Hasn't alcohol always been an excessive drug?
The worst drug is the absence of culture. People want drugs because they don't have the culture. Why do they seek drug alienation? Because they have become aware of their powerlessness to live and that this powerlessness translates concretely into the total refusal of life.
An optimistic bet on the man would be to say that if the man had the cutlure, in the sense of the tools of the thought, he could escape the solutions of impotence. So, to take the evil at the root, it is to give to the men a formidable instrument of subversion and creativity.
I do not believe that banning drugs would be sufficient because if you do not tackle a problem at its root, you inevitably fall into the gears of the police and it is worse.
How are we going to deal with mental illness in the future?
The problem of the development of the medicine of mental illnesses will come about in two stages. Initially there will be still more drugs, psychotropic drugs, which correspond to a real progress, for 30 years, in mental medicine.
It seems to me that, as a second step, and for economic reasons, a certain number of electoral means will be put in place, which will be either pain control methods (bio-feedback, etc.), or a computer system of psychoanalytic dialogues.
History teaches us that humanity evolves significantly only when it is truly afraid: then it first puts in place defense mechanisms; sometimes intolerable (scapegoats and totalitarianisms); sometimes futile (distraction); sometimes effective (therapeutic, if necessary setting aside all previous moral principles). Then, once the crisis is over, it transforms these mechanisms to make them compatible with individual freedom and to include them in a democratic health policy. „
„The pandemic that is beginning could trigger one of these structuring fears“ because it will raise, „better than any humanitarian or ecological discourse, the awareness of the need for altruism, at least interested. “
„And, even if, as we can obviously hope, this crisis is not very serious, we must not forget, as for the economic crisis, to learn the lessons, so that before the next – inevitable – prevention and control mechanisms are put in place, as well as logistical processes for the equitable distribution of drugs and vaccines. For that, we will have to put in place a global police force, global storage and therefore global taxation. We will then, much faster than economic reason alone would have allowed, to lay the foundations for a real world government. “ |
|
|
|
Deine Einwände sind berechtigt. Wir haben ein Problem. Nun brauchen wir Lösungen.
Mal ein Beispiel: Meine Augen sind lebenslang hinter Glas. Danke, Eschenbach, Rodenstock, Fielman!!
Könnte ohne Brille aber auch nicht Autofahren. Fahre mit Brille zwar auch schlecht, aber immerhin nochbesser als wie mit ohne. Das habe ich schriftlich bestätigt von Flensburg und der Ortspolizei.
Diese Masken sind nicht konstruiert worden um wiederverwendbar zu sein. Auch nicht wegen einer Pandemie. Das ist veraltete Technologie!
Es muss ein Atemfilter her der folgende Kriterien erfüllt:
1) Verdeckt das Gesicht nicht (hier springe ich über meinen eigenen Schatten ich möchte eigentlich Face Recognischenficken)
2) Erlaubt Sprache. Da bin ich Sprachlos wie das gehen sollte
3) Ist keine "Wegwerfbrille" also kann wiederholt getragen werden. "Einwegbrillen" hatten sich nie so recht durchgesetzt, nur mal so als Vergleich
Schlauch im Mund, reinstecken bei Nahkontakt, Filterpaket in der Hemdstasche. Andere Ideen habe ich grade nicht.
Diese Masken sind halt eine Sackgasse.
[2 posts merged]
Die verräterischen Politiker und Akademiker, die in privaten Clubs über Ihre Zukunft entscheiden, und die Tugend signalisierenden Extremisten kümmern sich NICHT um den Planeten.Sie benutzen nützliche Idioten, die wirtschaftlich ungebildet sind, um eine extremistische Agenda voranzutreiben, von der sie profitieren werden.Sie kümmern sich NICHT darum, wie viele Eier zerbrochen werden, um "ihren verrückten Kuchen zu backen" Alle Teile von #2030 https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article223275012/Kampf-gegen-Klimawandel-Lauterbach-wegen-Coronazeit-pessimistisch.html[Zitat]Um den Klimawandel anzugehen, sind Schritte notwendig, die "analog" zu Einschränkungen der persönlichen Freiheit wegen der Pandemie sind. [Unquote] |
|
|
|
Es wurde in Großbritannien aufgenommen und der Standort ist von einer städtischen Müllverwertungsanlage, die aussieht, als hätte sie ein Verbrennungsgebäude mit einem Schornstein
Okay, dann ist ja alles gut. Wo sind die Biogefahrentonnen für diesen "tödlichen" biologischen Müll?
Wofür sollte man dort "Biogefahrentonnen" aufstellen? Sollen die auch verbrannt werden? Die Arbeiter dort werden schon wissen, dass man nicht mit dem Müll spielen sollte. Die COVID-19-Maßnahmen (nicht die Pandemie) töten und werden Millionen töten
Bitte mit Quellen belegen. Die Ozeane werden im Jahr 2020 mit schätzungsweise 1,56 Milliarden Gesichtsmasken überflutet werden, so ein heute veröffentlichter Bericht der in Hongkong ansässigen Meeresschutzorganisation OceansAsia. Dies wird zu einer zusätzlichen Verschmutzung der Meere durch 4.680 bis 6.240 Tonnen Plastik führen, heißt es in dem Bericht mit dem Titel "Masks on the Beach: The Impact of COVID-19 on Marine Plastic Pollution". Diese Masken werden bis zu 450 Jahre brauchen, um sich zu zersetzen, wobei sie sich langsam in Mikroplastik verwandeln und sich negativ auf die Meeresfauna und -ökosysteme auswirken.
Wenn man das mit den 4,8 bis 12,7 Millionen Tonnen Plastik, die jährlich im Meer landen, in Relation setzt, macht das "nicht so viel" aus. Trotzdem wäre es natürlich wünschenswert, wenn der Müll nicht im Meer landet. Wofür sollte man dort "Biogefahrentonnen" aufstellen? Sollen die auch verbrannt werden? Die Arbeiter dort werden schon wissen, dass man nicht mit dem Müll spielen sollte. Ja, aber viele werden achtlos an öffentlichen Plätzen entsorgt. Warum gibt es bei einem so "tödlichen" Virus keine Kampagne zur sorgfältigen Entsorgung dieser potenziellen "Super-Spreader"-Masken? Bitte mit Quellen belegen. In diesem Zeitraum sind mehr Menschen an der unzureichenden medizinischen Versorgung anderer Krankheiten gestorben, z. B. durch aufgeschobene Krebsvorsorgeuntersuchungen und -behandlungen oder die mangelnde Bereitschaft, eine medizinische Diagnose zu stellen. Wenn man das mit den 4,8 bis 12,7 Millionen Tonnen Plastik, die jährlich im Meer landen, in Relation setzt, macht das "nicht so viel" aus. Trotzdem wäre es natürlich wünschenswert, wenn der Müll nicht im Meer landet. Dies sind NUR Masken, die wenig wiegen, aber aufgrund von Problemen mit elastischen Verwicklungen usw. für Meereslebewesen sehr schädlich sind. Dies umfasst NICHT Plexiglasschirme, Spritzen usw., die nicht berechnet wurden. |
|
|
|
|
Psalm 19:10 , Proverbs 31:10 , Sirach 26
Selah
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy=yes=dignity Anonymity=no=unaccountability
|
|
|
|
Oh man, I just blew my own burned out CPU.
3 card monte. 2 cards you always see. The one you never see, it’s out of sight cause slight of hand is the “X card”.
Wow, 99% can’t see it. Such an amazing play. I got it anyway but I didn’t see the game being played in full.
* There is a mystery clue in this message if you can find it and figure it out. Not too difficult either unless you think doge was a meme coin and it’s a great buy at $.40 cause “it’s cheap - it’s not even $1 dude”.
I’m tired of saying the obvious. It’s so tiresome.
You people don’t...
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee #NFT zzz  I suggest we turn this whole thread into an NFT and split the proceeds ....after our great and fearless leader Vlad takes his cut  |
|
|
|
#YOUAREANIDIOT
Good retort. Touché  |
|
|
|
Klimawandel extremisten,die zu sehr damit beschäftigt sind, masken und impfstoffe auf twitter zu pushen, um sich über diesen kleinen fauxpas gedanken zu machen ... alles teil der größeren agenda, leute. #2021 #2030  Es sollte eigentlich jedem bekannt sein, dass die Masken irgendwann (hoffentlich) auf einer Mülldeponie bzw. wohl eher im Müllbunker einer Müllverbrennungsanlage landen. (Wo wurde das Bild aufgenommen bzw. gibt es eine URL zur Quelle?) Es wurde in Großbritannien aufgenommen und der Standort ist von einer städtischen Müllverwertungsanlage, die aussieht, als hätte sie ein Verbrennungsgebäude mit einem Schornstein, aber vergessen Sie nicht die 100 Millionen Stück biologischen Mülls, die dank zweimal wöchentlicher Tests alle verbrannt werden müssen.Wo sind die Biogefahrentonnen für diesen "tödlichen" biologischen Müll? Ebenfalls von der Regierung: Sie müssen Elektroautos fahren.Die Tugendbold-Extremisten sind mehr um sich selbst besorgt als um Plastik. Die COVID-19-Maßnahmen (nicht die Pandemie) töten und werden Millionen töten, aber es gibt noch einen anderen großen Kollateralschaden davon - zusätzliche Verschmutzung und das Töten von Wildtieren.Die Ozeane werden im Jahr 2020 mit schätzungsweise 1,56 Milliarden Gesichtsmasken überflutet werden, so ein heute veröffentlichter Bericht der in Hongkong ansässigen Meeresschutzorganisation OceansAsia. Dies wird zu einer zusätzlichen Verschmutzung der Meere durch 4.680 bis 6.240 Tonnen Plastik führen, heißt es in dem Bericht mit dem Titel "Masks on the Beach: The Impact of COVID-19 on Marine Plastic Pollution". Diese Masken werden bis zu 450 Jahre brauchen, um sich zu zersetzen, wobei sie sich langsam in Mikroplastik verwandeln und sich negativ auf die Meeresfauna und -ökosysteme auswirken. |
|
|
|
Klimawandel extremisten,die zu sehr damit beschäftigt sind, masken und impfstoffe auf twitter zu pushen, um sich über diesen kleinen fauxpas gedanken zu machen ... alles teil der größeren agenda, leute. #2021 #2030 |
|
|
|
Why isn’t this coin moving. So many whales and early adopters own a ton plus it’s a good coin.
I find lost hopeless coins with potential, like dvc, and I make this happen. It’s what I do. A good recent example is DGC, hanging at $.005 for years. Pretty much dead. I step in and in under a month it’s up 12x and rising.
I do have a hefty upfront fee but think about it and let me know. This is the last and biggest run for alts and you don’t wanna miss it cause you didn’t have the highest caliber doing it all.
- I do it all
Mate that's bullshit.Digitalcoin just looks like somebody has been trying to pump it with a few satoshis.All shitcoins on dead or low volume exchanges are going to just die off because nobody gives a fuck about coins that don't have a good market or large community.All these coins you are yammering on about have about a snowballs chance in hell of doing anything apart from getting jerked off by some wannabe whale with some lunch money on a dead exchange where you can jack the price up easily. Let's see you get your "connections" pump that IXC you are always talking about with a few million dollars first or just admit its all hot air. Bring back develguy because at least he does actual work around here without all the bluster. Shut up fool.Vlad knows everything #iamprofane #topcover #supertroll |
|
|
|
Not sure how much longer you’ll live after that cause mad max will be everywhere
 |
|
|
|
I sold all my BTC for IXC.I should have kept my BTC instead of listening to Vlad.I am broke now  ~Noob Grrrrrrrr. Treason. Treason..moi? NEVER!! With your latest forecast for ixcoin and cashing out bags I will be like that beggar you buy a horse for  Thank GOD I finished the Digital Twin.
~Satoshi |
|
|
|
When are we going back up to $40 ?
Gettin it hard to stay up around 40 cents right now bro  |
|
|
|
Der Moderator hat zu viel Zeit, um seinen Tag damit zu verbringen, meine Beiträge zu löschen. Besorgen Sie sich einen richtigen Job...weniger Zeit im Leerlauf bedeutet weniger Zeit, die hier mit den Pennern verschwendet wird |
|
|
|
Privacy is the first line of defense. No one who tries to take it away has your safety in mind.
"Personal information is unnecessary in the systems I create.
I see it as flaws, points of failure; information to be exploited; provided freely it is for Others to exploit.
Willing participation & Choice is All I provide."
I make Trustless Systems because I don't trust you. Personal information is unnecessary? By next year no coin without KYC on every wallet will be criminalized. How anybody gonna stop that? Dunno Vlad, Satoshi's words not mine. |
|
|
|
Fud is good..keeps the price down |
|
|
|
Spielverderberin |
|
|
|
AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998
AstraZeneca plc is a British-Swedish multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company. The company was founded in 1999 through the merger of the Swedish Astra AB and the British Zeneca Group <snip - interesting historical corporate info> Merging Feces and Urin is still Manure, and not suitable "shootup" material. It's probably very good 'junk' for the ' useless eater' classes. Oxford University has hundreds of years of 'enlightened' study and countless late-night rap sessions concerning how to deal with such problems this problem in particular. There is also a fair bit of 'cross-pollination' in academia so 'good ideas' about how to resolve problems such as overpopulation and de-evolution can spread and metastasize. Happily enough, these academic institutions tend to be hungry for money making it easy for TPTB to influence the trajectory of 'discovery.' 60 mill sheople inhabit that little island and the gents running the farm all went to school together.Arrogant virtue signalling dummies then think it's all just a big coincidence and they live in a democracy while lecturing others on such matters The Bullingdon Club is a private all-male dining club for Oxford University students. It is known for its wealthy members, grand banquets, and occasionally bad behaviour, including vandalism of restaurants and students' rooms. The club is known to select its members not only on the grounds of wealth and willingness to partake but also by means of education. Former pupils of public schools such as Eton, Harrow, Radley, Shrewsbury, Sedbergh, Rugby, Westminster, Charterhouse, St. Paul's, and Winchester form the bulk of its membership.
The Bullingdon was originally a sporting club, dedicated to cricket and horse-racing, although club dinners gradually became its principal activity. Membership is expensive, with tailor-made uniforms, regular gourmet hospitality, and a tradition of on-the-spot payment for damage. The club has attracted controversy, as some members have gone on to become leading figures within Britain's political establishment. These include former Prime Minister David Cameron, former Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, former Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, and current Prime Minister Boris Johnson. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
..^^^New York Post claiming people that sadly passed away 11 months ago, have now sadly passed away due to Covid.
