This is funny case of multi-accounting, account Bila0 sent negative and account Bilugi positive feedback to BM:   Anyway, account Bilugi is banned so I have to guess that they re-applied with new account, technically it is not cheating because they use only 1 account, right? Instead of blacklisting them, I should probably suggest you to report them to moderator for ban evasion but I won't because your colleague Vispilio will attack me and say that this is which hunt then. As for other 2 accounts, they are both banned, so what's the point of this? 
Hey Vispilio, you might wanna blacklist these plagiarising sockpuppets that you got shilling for you:
Please don't rush him, it is too much for his bounty management to blacklist banned shills and 4 newbie accounts at the same time. |
|
|
|
You also tagged me without any proofs and you lied on my trust page, why are you complaining if someone tags you without providing any proofs in public, hypocrite?
you lie moron it never was Why don't you post controversial data which I shared?
You know what? I actually don't give a fuck about someone tagging you. I usually do, but in your case, I don't. I don't even want to look at anything on your trust page. |
|
|
|
But in any case, it is not yet possible to check online intervals.
You can check if user wasn't active for longer period of time and woke up, someone archived seclog for last 5 years ( http://archive.is/https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php), but, unfortunately, few months are missing. I apologize if the question is off-topic (but I think this is the most appropriate thread to ask about this).
Well, it has nothing to do with DT changes, you should have created new topic in meta for this. |
|
|
|
he tagged me without any proofs
You also tagged me without any proofs and you lied on my trust page, why are you complaining if someone tags you without providing any proofs in public, hypocrite?
Miscellaneous:Peloso sent positive feedback to scammer:  This account is "trust troll". |
|
|
|
A, da pocnemo spamati theymosa sa PM-ovima i mailovima pa neka nas sve skupa banuje? Hahaha!
Najgore što se može dogoditi je da skroz makne naš lokal i nazove nas hrpom spamera  Nije mi jasno koliko im komplikovano može biti da uključe trust rating. To vjerovatno samo zahtjeva ulazak u postavke, odabir Hrvatski>Trgovina i trust ratings enable/disable ili on/off. Siguran sam da nije potrebno više od toga.
Vjerujem da je ista stvar sa dodavanjem par novih sub-boarda, klikneš par puta i napišeš "off topic", "novosti" i eto, 2 nova boarda. Samo mi nije baš najjasnije zašto je sve to skupa toliki problem dodati, u krajnjoj liniji, ovo je forum i ako ima tema za nove board-ove zašto ih ne dodati? Osim ako administracija smatra da nema dovoljno tema... |
|
|
|
Sup folks? I need some crazy hat  (if possible, of course) Thanks |
|
|
|
You guys laugh, but OG is planning to blacklist you from DT . I'm not sure yet how he plans this, but he keeps repeating the threat. :/
Oh, damn, I will be blacklisted from DT 
Small update: shill account is kicked out of DT:  https://bpip.org/TrustLogHm, account Burningstar showed similar behavior, last time they posted was on April 2019: ...but I'll leave that as it is.
Locking this for now. |
|
|
|
Oh, yes. OG has long history of including users who "did his dirty work", "we" all know why he included bountydetective to his trust list, but, if "we" say it out loud, OG will defend himself and call "us" trolls and say it is not true, LOL.
Ekhem, ekhem. |
|
|
|
Ja mislim da sve ovo skupa nema smisla. Tražimo neke stvari već od prije par godina, ima bar 4-5(ako ne i više) tema za naš board u meti, moderatori su vjerovatno manje više svi upoznati (čisto sumnjam da od ovih što prate metu su propustili neku od tema što se uredno bumpa), adminima smo koliko sam shvatio slali poruke(više nas), opet dani prolaze i nema nikakvog odgovora niti se išta događa. Ko da je cijela sekcija na ignore Ne kužim koliko teško može biti malo proširiti naš lokal. I taj trust isto, pa ako se već nalazi po cijelom forumu(manje više) gdje god se rade nekakvi projekti i poslovi, jednostavno ne razumijem zašto kod nas nije vidljiv. |
|
|
|
Since 2012 huh? Care to share how well your "investments" have done?  Investments have gone pretty well all things considered. I didn't see Nasty shut things down without a refund after the exchange he was on before went under. I continue to receive donations. Had I kept everything in Bitcoin I'd be ahead more, but it's seen crazy growth unlike nearly any other asset. Overall though, I'm not bitter, had I put this in a savings account in USD, wouldn't have seen nearly the same rate of return either. Owlcatz asked you very simple question, shill. I am looking at bunch of meaningless words right now. Og is the only one including kroneko, making them DT2 and therefore giving himself +1 and his archenemy TMAN -1.
This is well known Og's tactic. I remember that he included iluvbitcoins to his trust list because iluvbitcoins placed negative feedback on someone(I can't remember was it lauda in question or The Pharmacist, or both), of course, he said something like "I included iluvbitcoins because we had several trades"... Yeah, like everyone here is stupid. |
|
|
|
~
No merits for me sir ognessty? But me like merits. Me like ponziarian merits very much sir.
It would be wise to (exclude) ~OGnasty together with nasty shill account kroneko from DT network. |
|
|
|
It’s more my time, the annoyance, and the fact that every post I make in the marketplace now has to be self moderated because the user constantly posts that I’m a scammer when I have done no such thing.
Look, I have my own opinion about OGnessty and you have your own, and, some people on this forum don't like ponziarian supporters/buddies/whatever so don't be surprised when something like that happen. I was trying to be polite as I could and to respond only to scam accusation and that flag, as far as I am concerned, account is flagged and I am out of this topic. |
|
|
|
not a shill for Nasty
Your post history looks like this: Nasty 2012 Nasty 2013 Nasty 2014 Nasty 2015 Nasty 2016 Nasty 2017 Nasty 2018 Nasty 2019 Nasty 2020 Anywayz, all I had to say I already said in topic. |
|
|
|
@OP, you need to include proofs in topic, that's how flagging system works. Anyway: This looks like some kind of agreement, and this: Looks like everything was arranged, I mean, OP said "all you need to do is to provide your addy" and according to screenshot, OG has his addy, so, it is like "ok, let's do this". This is what actually bugs me here: 3be5beb51c93436a80a96d744d6b65ae870bf70cf516d5fcb0bb1a05848a95a1
f246189927124169b6de30125a84fe388d62b8af8e04fc5013d99450d7a6975b
Txid’s for the $225 and a separate one for the fee.
I have to assume that OG returned you funds + escrow fee ( https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/e298d815d9f0fd531084eaa7504a5a1eb9d58e3b6861e97fb67dbe72b2e310d4), so we are basically talking about this person damaged you for....errr...0.00004394 BTC transaction fee. It is really tiny amount, but, as damage still happened, I will support that flag. Please update topic with TXID and screenshots. |
|
|
|
I was looking at wrongly created flag by account Rmcdermott927 and seems that account kroneko logged in just to support that flag:    I wouldn't care less but this account has been inactive since May, 2019, logged in a month ago to write 2 posts in "Nasty" topic, and, I checked whole post history of this account and account looks like one big Nasty shill account. Actually, account is Nasty shill since 2012.
Please (exclude) ~ kroneko the shill from your trust lists. |
|
|
|
Flag supported.
Based on what? I don't see any proof except few words written by OP, what you need to see before supporting that flag is: 1) proof that user backed out of deal 2) transaction ID and proof that OP payed fee to OG
I am opposing this flag for now until some evidence show up, unless flag system is supposed to work like "he said - she said" system? I don't think so... |
|
|
|
As I said before. I'm not interested in this topic. Who can add me wherever they want TrustList or Distrust. This doesn't really concern me.
You don't "sound" like someone who isn't interested. [...] PM theymos and ask to be blacklisted.
Aaah, but you see, if they do that then all those nice accounts won't get chance to become DT. |
|
|
|
should DT members tag accounts that evade the ban but participate in subscription campaigns?
[...]
Moderators do not always consider such applications.
Create topic in meta, report them to moderators, leave them neutral tag in case moderators don't take any action against those accounts and don't break your head too much over it. IIRC, I was giving negative feedback to ban evaders but lately I am giving them neutral feedback. Actually, it doesn't make much sense to me, forum administration ban someone, they create new account, you expose them and all of sudden they are allowed to post again. Why not unban banned account then? It's like account is banned, not the user. There are times when certain highly ranked accounts participate in subscription campaigns despite being accused of ban evasion.
Some campaign managers simple don't care who is advertising project, they only care that signature is visible and someone will see it and click on it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
