I haven't checked marlboroza's trust page recently, but I will after writing this. If he got a neg from someone on DT, I suppose that's something DarkStar_ would have to make a call on--but it's really none of your concern, OP. You're coming across as a disgruntled applicant who couldn't get into the Chipmixer campaign rather than someone pursuing some sort of justice.
I'll spare your time:  Reference link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220060.msg53687151#msg53687151He left me that feedback because I exposed some ban evaders and self-DT-voterswhat to say... It is funny, actually, one of those accounts is allegedly jihadist https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219960.msg53689508#msg53689508 but I am pure evil because I pointed that he is evading ban... Make exactly 0 sense, but OK, "lets just decentralize DT more". |
|
|
|
no concrete evidence to support his claims
There is more than enough evidence around, you just have to find them. Posting them in every single topic you trolls deflect is waste of time. * no concrete evidence to support his claims
* concrete evidence that marlboroza does support documented and proven scammers and self confessed trust abusers.
Hm, my word is no concrete evidence to support my claim, but your word is concrete evidence to support your claim. Funny troll. /ignored (this includes your next new account). |
|
|
|
This sounds an awful lot like what you and your red nosed friends are doing to silence any criticism of your trust system abuse.
I wonder how you posted this. Marlboroza is even using the fact that I disagree with him in his "investigations" (read retaliatory peanut hunting expeditions) as justification for negative ratings.
Can you quote me post where I said I tagged you because I disagreed with you? Stop lying moron. I didn't bother to place all topics where you interfered and deflected other peoples investigations in feedback. This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure.
Who forced me exactly  I decided it is best to not follow your double standardz guild and remove this feedback. It was suggested to me that best thing I can do is to stay away from lunatics like you. |
|
|
|
Možda je opcija i otvoriti drugi flag s pravim razlogom? Ali također nisam baš previše upoznat s flag sistemom.
Mora biti nešto vezano za financije, recimo za taj žuti flag je dovoljna logička pretpostavka da je netko prevarant ili da je "osoba visokog rizika za trejdanje" (recimo newbie account hoće nekakav kredit bez kolaterala), za one crvene mora biti kršenje ugovora ili nekakvog pisanog dogovora (to može samo oštećena osoba napraviti). Sad ovo, nisam pametan iskreno, možda je "osoba visokog rizika" jer ne smatra da bitcoin ima vrijednost pa možda ako napravite nekakav deal s njim i pošaljete mu btc dobijete broj iz excel tablice nazad  U moru shitcoina i tokena pojavio se još jedan novi koji ima veze sa trnutnom situacijom i napumpanom Corona pričom.
Nekidan je bio nekakav MLM corona virus u gambling section, uplatiš lovicu, onda nađeš referale i oni uplate lovicu i tako piramida to neba, a kao nešto tražite lijek svi skupa u biti samo dobiješ njihov novac. Moraš priznati da su neki prevaranti maštoviti i prate "scenu". |
|
|
|
Yes, this thread is about your trust system abuse. Just because you don't like what I have to say doesn't make it a lie or a valid use of the trust system.
I followed what you presented in objective standardz guild, why are you complaining now? You don't want users to follow your standards now? WTH? What any of this has to do with your removed posts which you presented to look like I reported them in order to silence you? Why are you defaming me? I did not report those posts you accused me of, and when I report post, it is because they are breaking forum rules. This https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53938220#msg53938220 is off topic reply btw, and it is reported as one. It has nothing to do with you as person but it has everything with post which is off topic. Threatening even more tags in order to attempt to silence me? No trust system abuse here! Everyone move along, nothing to see here.
I am not threatening you, I was saying that I am reporting off topic post which is lie btw and I don't want to tag you for defamation, further, I am giving you suggestion to stop posting off topic replies and defamatory lies. I am sorry if it sounded like threat but it really wasn't. Going off-topic and writing walls of tripe is something synonymous with a few members that tends to post together in batches, mostly done just for misdirection and attention-seeking purposes.
Well, you are not the only one who noticed this  If they have been at it for years will they really change their ways now? Even the newbies sock-puppets and alt-accounts being used to post on-behalf of the few Turkish board members that cheated their way to DT1 have been attacking those that exposed their plans.
It is getting rather silly now to see the conduct of these imbeciles on a near day to say basis.
I don't know whether it is silly, but it is very sad. |
|
|
|
guys like goraset, whom you hate so much for mysterious reasons, are 10x the intellectual you are
There is nothing intellectual in stealing other peoples work for their own benefit and tagging person from whom they stole work with negative trust. Also, there must be something about such user becoming default trust member but I will have to read this and few other topics as well again. I see brilliant posters all over this forum
Me too, but there must be a reason why these ban evaders are banned, maybe they are not so brilliant like brilliant posters. Hm, did you know that some of them self voted for themselves to become DT and they are exposed? Why are you so pissed? You popped out of nowhere to defend thief, users who are evading ban and sockpuppeting their way to DT, some merit abuse, obvious scam advertising... That is net negative. Shame on you. Can you make a short final list of user names that are being considered here?
Errr...those are separated cases so that list won't make much sense, all I could do is to link similar topics to this topic.
Locking this until next bump, I don't want this to turn into another nonsensical rant from Vispilio and his buddies. |
|
|
|
Please let me know the good reason for your account suspension at this time  You need to prove something here and LOL it's suspended: D It is suspended probably because of ICO spam, that picture I posted is his twitter status. I doubt someone went to his twitter to copy/paste this, so if this happened it was taken somewhere from that thread and I just don't see it. Another question is - why would anyone who has his twitter and is reporting his own statuses use status of someone else? Makes no sense. I have no idea why cryptoaddictchie is responding to this thread and Little Mouse is nowhere to be seen and RapTarX posted only 1 post while connection includes RapTarX and Little Mouse as well and topic is about them. Edit for conclusion:The purpose of this topic is to reach a conclusion and the relationship between Little Mouse and RapTarX, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that they are owned by one person even though they still try to lie to deny it But there are still allegations of connectivity now (make by marlboroza), so the question is whether I should let this topic continue or lock it Well, I didn't tag any account yet because I am not sure. Evidence is pointing into direction that they are alt accounts and some circumstantial evidence could connect some other accounts, but really, there is always "what if someone do this to me, am I going to be tagged then"? And, If we rule out circumstantial evidence RapTarX == CoinMenX, then all I see here is they tried to roll the same account into campaign, regardless which account they used to do this. They didn't really cheated anyone and other connection is for different topic then. I usually send neutral in case of alt accounts who didn't violate rules of campaign, so this is very likely what I will do here (and drop other connections for now). |
|
|
|
Again, what do you think he can come up for this year, let us preempt him
I have heard that he will disable signatures for few days and he will tell everyone that this will remain permanently. Or was it that he will disable signatures permanently and tell everyone it will be for few days? Not sure 
Is it just me or time flies so fast? |
|
|
|
This is the first I heard of anything related to buying accounts but is the buying or selling of accounts formally barred by forum rules?
Nah, account sales are allowed, pretty much as scamming other people. Lauda mentioned somewhere that theymos said "it is ok to flag account trades", I will probably update post when I find it. Hacker, did you buy this account?
Asking this third time already but I don't think you have answer it or at least I missed it. I need this info to update topic and I just don't want to update it with wrong information.
You said something like "you don't control other accounts" in January so logically, you control other account for a month or two. I saw no such direct reply to the question you asked at least 3 times either. However unlikely there is a small chance he maybe he missed the posts. I am pretty sure he didn't missed it. Well, if he doesn't want to answer it then I have no other option than to go trough seclogs for last 2 months and to see when account changed password and email. More work for me, but it is ok, he doesn't need to say shit here anyway. Account is registered in 2014. so I didn't ruled out possibility that account was previously hacked. |
|
|
|
Suchmoon refuses to answer a direct question, so "some one" reports it to make sure they don't have to.
Can someone from TECSHARE's trust network please tell him that suchmoon answered his question?
Can you explain why my rating for Vod is not valid? Theymos himself said a trust rating for him over this issue was a valid use of the trust system. Why are we both wrong, and what exactly is invalid about my rating for him?
Your rating might or might not be valid, it depends on how you read and understand Theymos's message. To determine what Theymos said or wanted to say, one should not cherrypick theymos' words: Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant. But I tend to think that since he edited his post and seems to genuinely regret at least the public doxxing part, it'd be best to forgive. Second part (yep, that part you don't want to see) is more important than first part, theymos said that tagging Vod is appropriate usage of red trust but as Vod regret doing it you should forgive him and not tag him/remove tag. But, if you cherrypick words, you might conclude that theymos said meriters should also be tagged: For the meriters, I can understand the argument for red-trust[...] Why cherrypicking red-trust? |
|
|
|
~
Vispilio is trying to say that he is pissed because someone exposed some of his friends (and very likely some friends in the past) as bunch of ban evaders, scam promoters, plagiarists, merit abusers... He just like to exaggerate things and post bunch of false nonsense and defamatory lies, everything is documented in his trust page, I suggest everyone to read references before taking any words of this account for serious. the days of you and your puppet masters are numbered
Doesn't surprise me at all, as long as you morons are including scammers and very shady users to your trust lists, days of users who are trying to clean this community from scam are numbered. Some good old users already left this place because new system allows scammers to "get in", which is opposite of few reasons why this system was created in first place. I would suggest everyone to ~Vispilio from your trust network.
Someone excluding you means they don't think your judgement is good or you are excluded for some other reasons. I wonder what those "other reasons" could be. It could literally be anything. Well yes, it can be anything. For example, you can say to someone that you like their work and what they do for community and then exclude them even thought you like what they do. For the sake of this topic, what you did and what by ralier did is not the same. You have tried to manipulate trust system to get into DT and you got tag for it. By ralier was excluded from lauda's trust network - and they tagged lauda because of it. Some of users are trying to put everything in the same basked, it is not how it works. In this case, I don't see how -ve is good use of trust system, but yet again, I am trust abuser so what do I know  |
|
|
|
marlboroza ask yourself - are these imbeciles really worth engaging with until they reform their character? I currently do not have either of them on IGNORE but just might have to do it if they keep going the way they are.
I have this fake newbie account on ignore (I can only guess that they probably wrote text wall asking for evidence and probably some crap about objective standards), but I can't put this tard tecschare on ignore when he accuses me of doing something I didn't do over and over again! I am done with placing neutural on tecs's wall, however, I might link everything in thread I started, remove all neutrals and leave one negative. I am under a coordinated attack by trust system abusers?
Lunatic, tries to create some kind of club and lists some users which he doesn't like then he creates conspiracy theory that this imaginary group is conspiring against him. If you think they will just quit when they are done with me, you are a moron.
Done with you? Quit what exactly? What the fuck are you talking about I strongly suggest you to visit DOCTOR, you maybe have brain tumor and I just saved your life. "Some one doesn't like humorous critical observations being made about them so they abuse the reporting system to have them removed" - Tecshare (archived http://archive.is/07bbz#selection-9817.24-9843.9) This topic is about "my trust abuse", and that post was just under my post, TECSHARE certainly accused me of "abusing reporting system", not it is only off topic reply, tecshare is directly trying to hurt me by posting false information. It is defamation, a one big LIE.  I did not report this post either, stop harassing me @tecshare!
reporting off topic lie btw, I don't want to tag you for defamation but I will strongly suggest you to restrain yourself of posting lies and off topic replies. |
|
|
|
Wahabi wallet
You might want to edit this. |
|
|
|
|
Hacker, did you buy this account?
Asking this third time already but I don't think you have answer it or at least I missed it. I need this info to update topic and I just don't want to update it with wrong information.
You said something like "you don't control other accounts" in January so logically, you control other account for a month or two.
|
|
|
|
Is this what you mean? Just copied it from the quote you send since as Ive mentioned the account is suspended already and I dont have access to it now. I dont know why youre asking this. I mean, your post which you posted on forum. You posted it, right? There must be some kind of record. Hm, are you suggesting that they copy/pasted your twitter report directly from twitter? It really doesn't look like something which someone would have copy/pasted:  Or they messed up with reports. How the hell I know? I don't. Hm...you seems to be on The Shitlist, kicked out of facebook campaign because you have been recognized as facebook-spammer, your twitter account is banned... |
|
|
|
^ Q: Can you post from where did they copy/paste your twitter status?A: It is not so hard to copy/paste twitter status Anyway I think its not hard to copy paste any post on Twitter as url link can be copied easily even other's post.
I know it is not hard, that is why I asked. Can you please copy/paste this status here: ...and link it from where did you copy/paste it? |
|
|
|
~
Can you please post from where did they copy/paste your twitter status?
That twitter account, probably cat walked over keyboard and copy/pasted it. People who sent you tokens are your friends (logically) and it is just coincidence that you signed up to the same campaign "back-to-back" and it is just coincidence that you are in the same signature campaign. Of course, why it wouldn't be coincidence that you are trying to defend OP spamming topic repeating tecshare's nonsense, just as it is coincidence that OP registered account somewhat at the same time when other banned account was logged in. Of course, it is coincidence that accounts have interesting nicks RapTarX & CoinMenX. This is just another coincidence:   It is all coincidence, it is coincidence that Little Mouse copy/pasted OP's application and said: Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet. Because people usually do copy/paste someone's application to re-apply for higher rank than they are. Lolz!
Well, why would that be all? Another "busted account" topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.0, Little Mouse is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53901171#msg53901171, then account who merited cryptoaddictchie's post claim they https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53901626#msg53901626 got account from fwiend (of course), of course, fwiend who gave account said he given account away https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53902039#msg53902039 (now why the hell wouldn't they? they are accused, logically they are fwiends), then Mr. A jumps into thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53903387#msg53903387, just under it, another best-exchange sig account (who is tagged by the way, multiaccount cheating something...) posted something https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53903813#msg53903813... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
)
