That really depends on who's standards you are judging by. I chose not to use red trust, Nutilduuuuuh did. This is independent of other trust system abuses perpetrated by all of the loudest parrots in this thread. Yes, I AM the one twisting everything into some kind of misconduct, such behavior you, Nutilduuuh, and Bozoza are all above doing amirite?
Lets try different approach here. Do you think nutildah abused trust when he tagged StonerStanley? If you do, why didn't you call it abuse back then? If you don't think it was abuse, why don't you tag account yourself? You mean like when you included account BitcoinSupremo because you don't like some users and those users ended up DT negative because of your actions?
Or your abusive DT manipulation with reciprocal inclusions for your own personal goals? You are not really the one who should lecture others about trust system and scream "abuse".
Speaking of trust system abuse... Fixed that link for ya, shill.
|
|
|
Npr. Ako hoćete nastaviti rad, prodajte nam software ili...
Nikad ne znaš, vladine organizacije ako hoće mogu blokirati sve i pročešljati svakog mogućeg i nemogućeg korisnika te im skroz uništiti biznis pa lako moguće da je bilo "ili...". Mislim da se ovdje najviše radi o borbi protiv terorizma, trgovini ljudima, pranju novca i sličnim aktivnostima, opet gledam s druge strane, ne vidim zašto bi netko tko je uključen u ovakve "poslove" držao bitcoin na coinbase-u, nema mi to baš neke logike. Isto mi tako nema logike da muričke agencije nemaju već svoj software za nadzor...
|
|
|
Stop ignoring questions if you want others to answer, troll. You accuse marlboroza in this thread; he is allowed to defend himself.
No response from TECSHARE about this so I will bump this topic and I ask tecshare again to elaborate his accusations or apologize.
@Vod, did you know that TECSHARE trusts sockpuppets people who threatened forum member that they will report them to government agencies because they said something against them/they don't like? Start reading from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg54568039#msg54568039, you'll figure out who am I talking about (just in case something disappear http://archive.is/FZzEp)
|
|
|
Nutilduuuh uses the trust system as a toy to suit their own personal goals at the cost of the overall community
You mean like when you included account BitcoinSupremo because you don't like some users and those users ended up DT negative because of your actions? Or your abusive DT manipulation with reciprocal inclusions for your own personal goals? You are not really the one who should lecture others about trust system and scream "abuse".
|
|
|
Čini se da Coinbase nije više sigurno mjesto za pohranu bitcoina jer će dozvoliti američkoj poreznoj službi da koriste svoj softver za nadzor blockchaina.
Piše u članku da će oni moći plijeniti sredstva sa Coinbase-a. Matt Odell je pisao na twitteru nešto u vezi toga, izgleda je na taj dan povučeno preko 22000 bitcoina: Većini ljudi privatnost ipak nije bitna, i nastaviće da koriste Coinbase.
Većina ljudi kad čuje da netko dijeli 20$ daje podatke " no matter what".
|
|
|
Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.
Techy no likey Stoney. Techy like nutildah red trust. Techy say no word. Nutildah remove red trust. Techy no like nutilda remove red trust. Techy upset now.
|
|
|
Lauda said : Monkey monkey cave Turkish monkeys. Not having More than 90 IQ and civil behaviour idiots Being retard. Nobody from your gang is employed tagging the member who got employed.
Vispilio said : fake and corrupt DT cult desperately toxic terrorist lauda
mathematically provable corruption and foul interference going on in signature campaign selections.
DT corruption
mafia mathematically proven corruption in Signature campaign selections. coordinated attacks fake character assassination jobs
criminal scum certain bad nepotist actors it's reasonable to assume someone or an organization with decisive authority on Bitcointalk is employing these useful trolls for their own dark agendas
diversionary tactics nepotist DT clique definitively proven cases of corruption
band of criminals nepotism little mafia games...
corruption nepotism nepotist or perhaps, a company who has authority over even theymos is instructing them to keep the trolls and bad actors on the payroll
terrorist lauda some DT1 mafioso terrorist lauda and her mafioso DT1 friends
DT nepotism manipulating revenue streams
corruption of DT1 by your disgusting gang activity nepotist manipulation of DT1. nepotism gang colluding freeloaders their con game
DT system has become totally corrupt manipulate income streams nepotism cult criminal cartel of Bitcointalk a petty criminal network black nepotist propaganda proven criminals criminal friends
Check whats the difference between insult and serious accusation. Please leave the forum alone you dirty piece of double standards and agendic defamator. FTFY, Bump. Insult: monkey/idiots/retard/etc Serious accusation: proven criminal/criminal cartel/terrorist/mafia/etc ~
You missed this one(not related to topic but it is another accusation): ps. thanks peloso, I had the impression suchmoon was an obese immigrant woman living in the USA , if s/he is Croatian that would make a lot more sense given her cover up operations and brazen favoritism of some very well known blacklisted criminals of Bitcointalk in the past... Maybe "criminal" doesn't mean what I think it means? It is probably person who walks in the park.
|
|
|
Thanks for pointing that out, I just assumed it was PM due to how stupid that would be to say publicly Free speech, buddy. Vispilio says lauda is terrorist and lauda says Vispilio is baboon, but you didn't comment terrorist part. Latter is insult while former is serious accusation... Please, bring some objectivity here.
|
|
|
~
A što se ti ne bi prijavio? Pišeš jako dobre postove, dobro šalješ merite, imaš dobru reputaciju i jako si puno merita skupio u relativno kratkom vremenu a i mislim da bi te mnogi sa global boarda podržali. Vjerujem da bi postao source na sljedećim "izborima" bez pol beda. Da li taj topic može biti self-moderated ili ne?
Ako je u meti ne može, ali čini mi se da ima jedna caka. Otvoriš self-moderated u nekom drugom dijelu i prebaciš temu u metu, i kad hoćeš nešto obrisati prebaciš u neki drugi board gdje tema opet postane self-moderated, obrišeš i vratiš u metu, bar sam tako čuo...
|
|
|
Ili da otvorimo novu temu... Pa da svi vide koji su postovi već prijavljeni da ne duplamo.
Otvorio sam temu. ~
Negdje sam ovo čitao, da li u meti ili reputaciji, ne sjećam se više. Nisu mi jasni ovi što kupuju merite po 15-20$, pa bogte jednostavnije je napisati konstruktivan post i dobiti merit nego kupovati. Kad neko napravi prijavu da bude merit source, onda mora proći skeniranje svih na forumu. Svako slovo se onda meri, i ako slučajno nadju nešto šte im se ne svidja... Mislim da je to mogući razlog, ali možda nisam u pravu. Neznam, bar do sad nisam naletio da se netko prijavio za sourca i da su ga onda samo zbog toga počeli istraživati (ili možda nitko nije ništa našao, ko zna). Ovaj wannabe merit source je recimo sasvim slučajno uhvaćen, išao sam istražiti ovog kad ono on sam za sebe shillao i slao si merite, ne bi čovjek vjerovao koliko glupavih ljudi ima. Mislim da općenito ljudi žele više merit sourca, pa možda i ne istražuju, ko će ga znati.
|
|
|
Vise mi je tuzno vidjeti kako nas Nizozemci prezavidju sa svim vezanom sa merite a nemaju ni 10% postova koliko ih ovdje imamo... Valjda bude admin uslišio molitve i podigao opet merite sourcima, kod mene to otprilike ovako izgleda (vidim nešto i s obzirom da nemam merita bookmarkam post ili temu): [img] Recimo da sam sve merite već "podijelio" i za ovaj i za idući mjesec a nisam ih još ni dobio. Mozemo mi (kao clanovi ove zajednice) tu nesto pomoci...? Budem ja za koji dan prošao kroz naš board i složio nekakvu listu postova/tema koji nisu dobili merite ili su ih dobili premalo pa ću updejtat svoju merit temu, jedino bi bilo dobro kad bi mi svi linkali svoje i/ili tuđe dobre postove (iz naše zajednice) i poslali u PM (da mi olakšate "posao") pa bih otišao s tim u metu (ako nije problem) A, možda bolje ovdje nego na PM? Ili da otvorimo novu temu... Pa da svi vide koji su postovi već prijavljeni da ne duplamo. Kratak uvid u situaciju, znači, nestašica merita i kako je FatFork predložio, tema, a poslije "shilling hard for merits"
|
|
|
Mozemo mi (kao clanovi ove zajednice) tu nesto pomoci...?
Budem ja za koji dan prošao kroz naš board i složio nekakvu listu postova/tema koji nisu dobili merite ili su ih dobili premalo pa ću updejtat svoju merit temu, jedino bi bilo dobro kad bi mi svi linkali svoje i/ili tuđe dobre postove (iz naše zajednice) i poslali u PM (da mi olakšate "posao") pa bih otišao s tim u metu (ako nije problem) Moze se netko od nasih starijih i etabliranijih clanova prijaviti da bude merit source.
Pa predloženo je prije par dana a nitko ne trza.
|
|
|
Vise mi je tuzno vidjeti kako nas Nizozemci prezavidju sa svim vezanom sa merite a nemaju ni 10% postova koliko ih ovdje imamo... Valjda bude admin uslišio molitve i podigao opet merite sourcima, kod mene to otprilike ovako izgleda (vidim nešto i s obzirom da nemam merita bookmarkam post ili temu za kasnije): Recimo da sam sve merite već "podijelio" i za ovaj i za idući mjesec a nisam ih još ni dobio.
Sad vidim da sam si napisao "for merit" umjesto "za merite", ko da sam englez
|
|
|
Not these or themselves. He has never been on my trust list.
Never ever?
Correct me if I am wrong, but that was the week of Vispilio's defamation campaign. What do you mean?
I am terrible sorry, now I see you are talking about wolwoo
|
|
|
for future reference for all genuine readers, all the meaningful questions about these issues are addressed in the original threadGenuine reader here. Can you help me to find where is connection between authorities/trust leaders/merit leaders/cheerleaders/staff members and criminals addressed? Link posts, please. Sadly we're gonna have to stop feeding him otherwise he'll reproduce to unsustainable levels.
But you will miss Vispilio's explanation how provably corrupted signature system works then.
|
|
|
This is much better, seems bitcointalk is compromised: This forum needs new authorities, Trust leaders, sMerit leaders, and staff members, unaffiliated with proven criminals and acting in a reasonably independent capacity, so they won't compromise their responsibilities to the crypto space in order to provide income for their old timer criminal friends.
I'll just make collection of keywords/accusations he posted in that topic: fake and corrupt DT cult desperately toxic terrorist lauda
mathematically provable corruption and foul interference going on in signature campaign selections.
DT corruption
mafia mathematically proven corruption in Signature campaign selections. coordinated attacks fake character assassination jobs
criminal scum certain bad nepotist actors it's reasonable to assume someone or an organization with decisive authority on Bitcointalk is employing these useful trolls for their own dark agendas
diversionary tactics nepotist DT clique definitively proven cases of corruption
band of criminals nepotism little mafia games...
corruption nepotism nepotist or perhaps, a company who has authority over even theymos is instructing them to keep the trolls and bad actors on the payroll
terrorist lauda some DT1 mafioso terrorist lauda and her mafioso DT1 friends
DT nepotism manipulating revenue streams
corruption of DT1 by your disgusting gang activity nepotist manipulation of DT1. nepotism gang colluding freeloaders their con game
DT system has become totally corrupt manipulate income streams nepotism cult criminal cartel of Bitcointalk a petty criminal network black nepotist propaganda proven criminals criminal friends
~
You have some not answered questions in that topic of yours, if you don't mind please address them.
|
|
|
Can someone translate and provide more context for posts linked in OP?
He is pretty much saying that blacknavy is (or "was" so blacknavy himself claims) a multi accounter, bounty abuser and a ban evader that needs to get banned but have no idea how he became a merit source. Actually, I am curious about this part:
|
|
|
|