It looks like MasterCard is interested in Bitcoin. If MasterCard has started implementing blockchain technology then it will make it easier for us to credit and pay it with bitcoin. And this could motivate some countries that ban bitcoin by looking at news like this.

In my opinion at the end of this year the price will rise and the decrease will end. The price indeed cannot be stable or controlled by anyone, but there are a lot of whales who manipulate the price where they often play and make some people panic.

this is only an indirect consequence that occurs, it can even be said that cryptocurrency is the victim of the alleged nonsense opinion against him. if the knife is used to kill people then makes the knife the antagonist of the murder case story? really a very illogical thought, blaming something for people's mistakes. even since the first time fiat has been used as a tool, a tool for committing crimes. in my opinion this is an old issue that people use to bring into conflict to the community.

You can do scalping, buy fast and sell fast. if you have good analysis and experience in the market, because in here prices on the market are very volatile. if you make a wrong decision from your fast analysis, then your scalping strategy will end in loss. so it all depends on the ability of yourself if you want to do scalping.

all of that we must see, read, and analyze carefully. somehow until whenever the news about negative and positive things will surely emerge continuously, because in this world there must be people who are pros and cons of cryptocurrency or even blockchain technology. so we don't have to constantly blame and prevent false (negative) news, we ourselves must be smart in analyzing a news so that we can become wise. one day there will definitely be a project that will help our lives improve and the blockchain also Bitcoin are one of them.

I hope your message will not only stop in this thread or even just in this forum, i hope it spread like a wildfire. what I'm afraid of is something like this, they are like pointing a gun from the front while behind us is a chasm, so we can't help but have to follow where they will take us. it is not impossible that they will popularize cryptocurrency in the community but they will force people to use their platform.

I think what wrong here is your mindset about Bitcoin and the spirit also philosophy that is brought with it, for the circulation itself it can be set in code while for circulation using it on the transaction back to the user and community itself, here the government should fill its role as a regulator so there's no unwanted things happened, especially crimes.

I think cryptocurrency is an alternative to conventional payments, crypto use blockchain technology that speeds up the transactions process so there is no need to hesitate about the long queues and making pending transactions, especially if lightning network is evenly applied. meanwhile fiat money is national money that will still be used in every country, but maybe in the future fiat and crypto money will have their respective roles in each country to help process transactions that are so fast for digital payments.

well even though I didn't feel it but the demonetization experienced by the Indian yesterday really was hit their government so hard and also to the world of banking throughout the world and again it is not a secret that the government will back up bankrupt banks because it will have a big impact on their economy, this is the work of business people who have received permission and through rigorous selection but in the end they are destroyed from the inside.

make a software that can predicts crypto trade movement (especially Bitcoin) is not a simple thing. If you talk about forex bot or atleast technical analysis on forex, you should understood what factors that move the market and in crypto we can't use technical analysis for some reason, and one of them is FUD that contain a lot of people's emotions, or atleast for now. even it can be created, it's really a complex software with AI that can understand the FUD and the price is worth the development effort.

Even though the government refused but it’s strange if they did not learn what they rejected, this means they fooled the people who supporting it. They should understand this and because of that they deliberately reject the crypto, in other words they reject with clear intentions, also not necessarily for the public interest.

I don't think there is anything wrong with that, Satoshi-sama have thought that the value growth can be used as an investment tool, but in the practice it occurs that the movements are wilder than they usually do. Like the USD, when the price rise, the holders of the USD will go straight to exchange it into local currency even though the initial purpose of creating USD wasn’t for this but it was a common thing for us to do.

Common people will definitely use blockchain and cryptocurrency later but only a few of them are aware of it because there is no benefit they will get from knowing this, what they want is every of their business can run according to their will whatever happens in the back.

I have bad experience with MLM and bad stereotypes are inherent in the community, so it seems that‘s not good for Bitcoin. Indeed not all MLMs are bad, but this can open a gap for scammers to carry out their actions which will hurt the reputation or financial loss.

It‘s undeniable that a lot of shitcoins make the image of crypto in the public eyes become bad even worse but doesn’t necessarily generalized. The fear of the bubble is understandable but if it’s properly observed it will make him understand that the current condition of crypto cannot be equated with tulip mania.

Bitcoin will certainly achieve it, but we don't have to rush to reach that point, slowly but surely people will accept Bitcoin especially if we advise them to accept transactions using Bitcoin. University is the right place to be a pioneer for this, I mean not just accepting donations, it can be used in campus like paying tuition fees for example.

The thread will be even better if it has a reference link related to the discussion, not because lazy but it will be easier to point in the thread.
There’s actually no threat to cryptocurrency even the state issues a 'digital money', that’s a digital form of the currency of the country using. Because if you make a new currency, the agenda they’re working on won’t be realized but instead add new problems in their socio-economy.

I think that’s how a capitalist should be, where the big one will win and become bigger then the smaller one will be eliminated from competition, a capitalist will enjoy the hard work of people below its class. It seems you must relearn the basic economy, this is very important especially you are currently in a field that needs it.

The bank might add additional bitcoin services in the future if the country has accepted bitcoin. And that will be easier for us to deposit our bitcoin quickly. But bitcoin cannot replace the country's fiat because fiat and bitcoin have their own functions that cannot be replaced.

Agree or not, it’s certain that Fiat won’t be able to be replaced by Crypto, both have their own functions which can never be replaced.
Both fiat and crypto cannot collaborate, maybe in some countries there have been successful fiat collaboration systems with crypto, but there are some who reject crypto because they considered it as a threat that could disturb the stability of fiat money of the country.