*** More than 300 GB traded on BinaryBalls ***Global trading stats since launch date of 2017-11-13 :| | - Contracts made: 10816
- MBytes traded: 301060
- Winning contracts: 6060
- Global payout rate: 97%
|
And the top 3 best rush traders :| | - Rank 1: O5GADL (1790 MBytes 24h net profit with 12 contracts)
- Rank 2: EY3XXZ (1401 MBytes 24h net profit with 7 contracts)
- Rank 3: 4GYTFH (819 MBytes 24h net profit with 8 contracts)
|
Will you manage to be on the best rush traders list ? BinaryBalls.com1st Binary Options Trading Platform with Byteball Bytes Please explain how come the fact that your payout return is a steady 97% |
|
|
|
I'd have a hard time finding another audience willing to actually pay for porn online ;-)
Nowadays people pay for interactivity, we need a sextoy that vibrates when bytes are received  But not before transaction has been confirmed. |
|
|
|
I read constantly from various actions to distribute the remaining balance. Is there somewhere an overview of how much balance is remaining to distribute in total? Otherwise this is somehow very opaque.
The first address here https://byteball.fr/Top100ByteballRichest.php |
|
|
|
You are really full of surprises! Even implementing the missing fiat bridge for bytes. I wonder how long do we have to wait for the selling side to be 100% able to use byteball wallet as an excellent gateway in and out the crypto world. Excellent job! What is the point of "partially subsidize" the fee from the distribution fund? Why not fully compensate, or adjust to the average exchange fee (bittrex fee is 0.25%), if the goal is to facilitate FIAT-->GByte conversion. |
|
|
|
Does not solve the problem
I'll have a try at setting a node up and see how I go. wow ! [thumb] |
|
|
|
The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?
Thank you for your answer. I have done: /sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
But it is the same  That sucks. Last option would be to check your ip6tables for rules and to also tcpdump the packets to see where they're goin. Good idea ip6tables ! but does not work either. :-( Fun that nobody seems running a node on Ubuntu with a firewall  I have the feeling (but not enough skills to solve) it due to the way the ports are handled with UDP (it reminds me the trouble you may have will firewall and ftp). /sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
Does not solve the problem |
|
|
|
The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?
Thank you for your answer. I have done: /sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
But it is the same |
|
|
|
Hi there,
Newby question, please. I have installed a headless node on an Ubuntu 16.04
At node start I have 4 errors strings:
"sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted"
I have opened UDP port for peering in the firewall with no result:
#nano In/Out
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
What am I missing? Thank you.
Are you directing packets to a table called filter? Any other rules you have got in place? Maybe try this instead: /sbin/iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
Yes, it is part of a larger firewall script where I close "everything" then re-open one by one each port I need (I have others software running on this server). Here is the beginning of the script: #!/bin/sh
# Empty rules
/sbin/iptables -t filter -F
# Empty personnal rule
/sbin/iptables -t filter -X
# Forbid everything
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P INPUT DROP
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P FORWARD DROP
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P OUTPUT DROP
# Preserve established connexion
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
# Allow loopback
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
Then I open the ports I need according to https://github.com/nanocurrency/raiblocks/wiki/Network-usage#nano In/Out
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
The -t filter comes from the way the script starts and does works well will all other programs, I have been using this script for years. I suspect this is related to the UDP nature of the protocol but I have no idea. Anyone out there has an iptable working script on Ubuntu ? I also have in my logs: [2018-04-04 12:14:39.686591]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:138.68.183.123]:1964: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687108]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:51.255.200.174]:6063: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687115]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:5.189.128.113]:12000: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687160]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:186.155.30.146]:52921: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687176]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:167.99.254.89]:1024: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687257]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:186.155.30.146]:62212: Operation not permitted
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Newby question, please. I have installed a headless node on an Ubuntu 16.04
At node start I have 4 errors strings:
"sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted"
I have opened UDP port for peering in the firewall with no result:
#nano In/Out
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
What am I missing? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I need and invite to slack to get some Neighboring Nodes.
Can someone send me an invite please ?
Thank you
No more Slack. Now the community is on discord: https://discord.gg/7Gu2mG5Got it. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I need and invite to slack to get some Neighboring Nodes.
Can someone send me an invite please ?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
Probably this one... https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08850233Looks like there were multiple corporations set up for him and a few of them have since been dissolved. Not unusual at all. I have multiple companies (many just holding companies) and some now file nil returns and others have been dissolved because they no longer fit into the corporate structure that suits my needs. So IMO nothing to see here. Certainly not enough evidence to FUD. "We are super excited that we have signed a contract with our first PR agency, Tom Cridland Public Relations." One must know what he has signed with who. Anyway, better anything than no PR. I agree, better anything than no PR. I would note that your quote doesn't say "Tom Cridland Public Relations Limited", which is the dissolved company. Brands and business lines live on even after original corporations are dissolved. Which is why people often submit the term "operating as" or "o/a" when filing with tax authorities. We are entering into subtility :-) After a few searchs on the net it shows that Tom Cridland main business is "The World's Number 1 Sustainable Fashion Brand" (a clothing company) https://www.tomcridland.com/This is the non disolved company you pointed to (by the way has a very good press coverage with regard to his main business). And he founded its own PR agency because "When PR Failed This Designer, He Launched His Own Agency" (end 2015) https://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2015/12/12/when-pr-failed-uk-designer-tom-cridland-he-launched-his-own-agency/#67f2aea55308 (we are talking about ""TOM CRIDLAND PUBLIC RELATIONS LIMITED"). This company has been disolved in june 2017. I am not spreading the FUD. It looks that this guy is a talentous guy that successfuly launched his own business (clothing) with a very good press coverage (good PR). Then he decided to diversify into PR and founded an other dedicated company. For some reason it looks that he decided to stop PR at some point then today he is back in the PR business through promoting Byteball. OK Tom, feel welcome. Just wishing success. |
|
|
|
Probably this one... https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08850233Looks like there were multiple corporations set up for him and a few of them have since been dissolved. Not unusual at all. I have multiple companies (many just holding companies) and some now file nil returns and others have been dissolved because they no longer fit into the corporate structure that suits my needs. So IMO nothing to see here. Certainly not enough evidence to FUD. "We are super excited that we have signed a contract with our first PR agency, Tom Cridland Public Relations." One must know what he has signed with who. Anyway, better anything than no PR. |
|
|
|
Does Airdrop has been completely stopped from byteball team?
and how to sell blackbytes
You can sell your blackbytes on http://beeb-bot.com |
|
|
|
I didn't receive my bb from beeb bot. Tried the resend id procedure, but it says "No such batch can be resent."
Batch number is 4437.
What should i do?
We are still investigating with Tony why Blackbytes delivery is so delayed. I see you have received your Blackbytes in the meantime. Thank you for using BEEB! The problem has been fully identified by Tony. It is OK now. Back to normal. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
?
