2
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: GMiner v2.13 Equihash/CuckooCycle/Ethash/ProgPoW/KAWPOW
|
on: July 05, 2020, 03:13:11 PM
|
I have few GTX 690 cards, been sugegsted by some to mine ravencoin. loaded gminer however it is giving error at startup
Failed to initialize miner on GPU1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 2GB
any suggestion please? thanks.
CUDA version 9.2 Gminer 2.13
Algorithm: KAWPOW DevFee: 2% Stratum server: host: rvn.2miners.com:6060 user: walletaddress password: x Power calculator: on Color output: on Watchdog: on API: off Log to file: off Selected devices: GPU1 GPU2 Intensity: 100 100 Temperature limits: 90C 90C ------------------------------------------------------------------ 18:12:12 Failed to initialize miner on GPU1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 2GB: 18:12:12 Failed to initialize miner on GPU2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 2GB: 18:12:12 No devices for mining
|
|
|
8
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.9 - Cryptonight/Chukwa Thread - High hashrate, Low Power
|
on: November 22, 2019, 07:08:07 AM
|
please include the pool fail-over in the next release. This is a very important option. Thanks.
Just to note that I do use this mine for all of my AMD GPUs
Hi Apprentice, Apologies that we didn't get this done in this release. We recognize that pool failover is an important feature, and we will be adding it in the next release. To help us get it right, could you describe the failover and/or load balancing features you would like to see added? That would be great. Simple failover, pool 1, pool 2, pool 3..with # of retries for each pool before switching to the next pool. Keep checking pool 1 status and go back when it is available.
|
|
|
10
|
Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: M20S Overclock
|
on: October 23, 2019, 06:39:09 AM
|
measuring in A here, the highest is 14.2A for units that are hashing at 68.4 on average. Units hashing at 67.8 on average are sucking 13.9A.
|
|
|
13
|
Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: M20S Overclock
|
on: September 30, 2019, 03:54:56 PM
|
they have changed the PSU and replaced it with a 3600 W model. I think it can be overclocked.. umm.. not really overclocked but more fine tuned since on some machines there is a difference in frequency between boards. SM0 638 SM2 682
the miner is totaling of 67.3T
probably it is possible to get better hashrate if setting by board frequency since the auto tuning on startup is not "fixed" by board, but the total average seems to be the same.
tried logging in with putty SSH like the S9, but it's not connecting.
|
|
|
14
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power
|
on: August 26, 2019, 08:46:42 PM
|
XMR mining
is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix. tried also 7x7 cards are 8gb running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000
I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.
any recommendations? thanks.
I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up. I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250 999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16 Nice, thanks for sharing, we were discussing this a little in the discord after the post here! great, thx. Will try it. as of now I was ablt to get to 890 max well it worked. now hashing at 955. Guess I will stop here thanks
|
|
|
15
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - Cryptonight Thread - High hashrate, Low Power
|
on: August 26, 2019, 08:17:22 PM
|
XMR mining
is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix. tried also 7x7 cards are 8gb running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000
I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.
any recommendations? thanks.
I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up. I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250 999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16 Nice, thanks for sharing, we were discussing this a little in the discord after the post here! great, thx. Will try it. as of now I was ablt to get to 890 max
|
|
|
16
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - AMD GPU Miner for Grin, MTP, x16r/rt/s and more
|
on: August 26, 2019, 06:58:11 PM
|
ouch! where did this come from?! I've already have 6 rigs using this miner.....! and since I mine to a proxy, I need fail over pool Will monitor the hashrate and compare hashrate with the fees and manage my profitability.
also to let you know that it does work on other AMD GPUs. I have tried WX 4100/7100 and fire pro, think cause they have polaris too.
Hi, sent you a PM. Nice with the other GPUs, there are a few that we haven't tested on ourselves. It's all about what device string the driver is presenting the GPU with, if we recognize it we present our kernels for that architecture, if we don't recognize it we crap out. Hey Kerney, no need to even respond to such comments, like "Hurr durr, dev fee too high". You did a great job with the CN kernels, and you keep on delivering the goodies for other algos. Keep up the good work! Chill man! was an honest opinion, no one was complaining. take it easy
|
|
|
18
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.5.7 - AMD GPU Miner for Grin, MTP, x16r/rt/s and more
|
on: August 26, 2019, 01:52:32 PM
|
how to define multiple pools?
i really like this miner?
thanks.
Hehe, this is probably the 10th time I apologize that we still have pool failover support on our TODO list, it has been there from v0.3, we have continued to prioritize adding more algos rather than host-side work though. We should really add basic pool failover though, our bad. I'll discuss with todxx and see if/when we can slot it in. well in my honest humble opinion, the miner is good but in comparison to other miners and provided options (especially the fail over pool) your dev fees are really high. Some other miners are below 1%. But a 1% is good number that you should consider. Honestly, if you don't clearly earn more with TRM and/or have a hard time accepting the dev fee, then you should use another miner. For the dev fee, it won't change. If you don't want to pay for the kind of work we do, which means grinding instructions in GCN ASM and many times probably spending 5-10x more time (at least!) on our kernels than the other miners you refer to, then it's a no brainer, just use one of the other miners instead. For the specific issue of failover pool support, it's the last TODO item in that category, and no one has asked about it for 2-3 months. My sincerest apologies for getting you in the line of fire now since you were quite gracious with your suggestion, but since you aren't the first one to imply that we'd be better off slashing our current income with -60% so they can increase their mining profits +1.5%, please allow me one last public rant about this. This project is about putting your heart and soul into getting AMD GPUs to perform. Either we can make enough money from it to support two highly qualified devs spending a significant part of their available time on this, or we exit the market. And trust me, we're not getting rich from this, we're rather right at the level of it being worthwhile. So yeah, 1% dev fee means 0% for both you and for us, because we will be back to doing more lucrative work in other industries instead, or just doing private work in this space where you deal with business entities that do simple bottom line math and pay a premium for exclusivity. But no, we wanted to try to take our work public, benefitting all and making it much more difficult for private gpu miners to have a significant edge. Many times people seem to think our +20-40% advantages in the compute algos (except for MTP, which is a different beast) is something that comes for free. "Oh, they just use GCN ASM, maybe I'll look into it later and I'll be just as good". Right. Good luck with that. It's not the toolset that matters, it's your skill and experience using it. We've spent _months_ in total on c29/c31, all as a service for Vega users to have something to do when XMR forks in October, drawing from 2 yrs of experience trying to squeeze perf out of AMD GPUs, which isn't trivial to begin with. Same thing investing time in MTP, which didn't have a proper Vega miner at all. Last, don't even get me _started_ on the work we've done with the x16 family of algos. Months and months of grinding away finding small opts in each of the 16 algos. So, for everyone that feels the 2.5% TRM dev fee is unacceptable, please shop around for other AMD miner devs that right now are working proactively and are producing options that can at least compete with Team Green when XMR is out of the picture, and that has spent the same obscene amount of time as we have doing R&D just to be able to come close to Team Green. Then please use those miners instead. ouch! where did this come from?! I've already have 6 rigs using this miner.....! and since I mine to a proxy, I need fail over pool Will monitor the hashrate and compare hashrate with the fees and manage my profitability. also to let you know that it does work on other AMD GPUs. I have tried WX 4100/7100 and fire pro, think cause they have polaris too.
|
|
|
|