[ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More

[imihal44]

hi,trying to mine vertcoin but it just close,on every rig....win 10,19.5.1 drivers,rx 470,rx 570..here bat..so if anyone had similar problem with lyra2rev3..saying NO ALGORITHM SPECIFIED ...help)
teamredminer.exe -a lyra2rev3 -o stratum+tcp://eu.gos.cx:4505 -u 3KF7FU5bCPV76dhg5VBLr8DDuFpaR1nUf3.rig1 -p m=party.badnjara

The command line you provided works just fine for me on the later versions. What version are you running? Can you provide the full output when you run the miner?

that happen on both 0.5.6 and 0.5.7,cryptonight algo working just great...but this cant start it...it just say that i write
Auto-detected AMD OpenCL platform 0
No algorithm specified. Use option --help for usage.
successful clean shutdown

That is odd. The most probably cause is still some error in the command line, hmm. Are you _absolutely_ sure you are running that exact command line? Can you open a clean command prompt, copy the text that you entered here yourself and paste it, then dump all the output from that window here if it still doesn't work?

UPDATE: with run_autotune_quick everything going ok,i put inside my data,shares accepted,46-47mh per card..hmmmm...

[1715177195]

1715177195

[1715177195]

1715177195

[1715177195]

1715177195

[kerney666]

hi,trying to mine vertcoin but it just close,on every rig....win 10,19.5.1 drivers,rx 470,rx 570..here bat..so if anyone had similar problem with lyra2rev3..saying NO ALGORITHM SPECIFIED ...help)
teamredminer.exe -a lyra2rev3 -o stratum+tcp://eu.gos.cx:4505 -u 3KF7FU5bCPV76dhg5VBLr8DDuFpaR1nUf3.rig1 -p m=party.badnjara

The command line you provided works just fine for me on the later versions. What version are you running? Can you provide the full output when you run the miner?

that happen on both 0.5.6 and 0.5.7,cryptonight algo working just great...but this cant start it...it just say that i write
Auto-detected AMD OpenCL platform 0
No algorithm specified. Use option --help for usage.
successful clean shutdown

That is odd. The most probably cause is still some error in the command line, hmm. Are you _absolutely_ sure you are running that exact command line? Can you open a clean command prompt, copy the text that you entered here yourself and paste it, then dump all the output from that window here if it still doesn't work?

UPDATE: with run_autotune_quick everything going ok,i put inside my data,shares accepted,46-47mh per card..hmmmm...

Ah, auto-tune stuff is only for CN variants. Sounds like we have a bug in the argument parsing code if you add auto tuning arguments for compute algos? If you remove the auto-tune stuff, I'm guessing it works fine as well?

[imihal44]

hi,trying to mine vertcoin but it just close,on every rig....win 10,19.5.1 drivers,rx 470,rx 570..here bat..so if anyone had similar problem with lyra2rev3..saying NO ALGORITHM SPECIFIED ...help)
teamredminer.exe -a lyra2rev3 -o stratum+tcp://eu.gos.cx:4505 -u 3KF7FU5bCPV76dhg5VBLr8DDuFpaR1nUf3.rig1 -p m=party.badnjara

The command line you provided works just fine for me on the later versions. What version are you running? Can you provide the full output when you run the miner?

that happen on both 0.5.6 and 0.5.7,cryptonight algo working just great...but this cant start it...it just say that i write
Auto-detected AMD OpenCL platform 0
No algorithm specified. Use option --help for usage.
successful clean shutdown

That is odd. The most probably cause is still some error in the command line, hmm. Are you _absolutely_ sure you are running that exact command line? Can you open a clean command prompt, copy the text that you entered here yourself and paste it, then dump all the output from that window here if it still doesn't work?

UPDATE: with run_autotune_quick everything going ok,i put inside my data,shares accepted,46-47mh per card..hmmmm...

Ah, auto-tune stuff is only for CN variants. Sounds like we have a bug in the argument parsing code if you add auto tuning arguments for compute algos? If you remove the auto-tune stuff, I'm guessing it works fine as well?

i just add it in inside and it worked,i scared to shut it down hahahaha...will try that for sure...i mean i can mining with that..it wont close or exit ..or something?))..it is working also without that staff at  end - autotune.....

[goran89]

XMR mining

is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix.
tried also 7x7
cards are 8gb
running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000


I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.

any recommendations?
thanks.

I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up.
I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s
and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250
999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16

[kerney666]

XMR mining

is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix.
tried also 7x7
cards are 8gb
running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000


I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.

any recommendations?
thanks.

I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up.
I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s
and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250
999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16

Nice, thanks for sharing, we were discussing this a little in the discord after the post here!

[Apprentice]

XMR mining

is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix.
tried also 7x7
cards are 8gb
running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000


I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.

any recommendations?
thanks.

I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up.
I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s
and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250
999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16

Nice, thanks for sharing, we were discussing this a little in the discord after the post here!

great, thx. Will try it. as of now I was ablt to get to 890 max

[Apprentice]

XMR mining

is anyone mining with Saphire Nitro+ RX580? can't get those cards to mine higher the 870Hs. Tried one click polaris modding and SRB modding pimp my straps but the hashrate never went above 870. Memory is hynix.
tried also 7x7
cards are 8gb
running at clock core 1411 and mem 2000


I have MSI and Gigabyte, they are doing 1050 on average.

any recommendations?
thanks.

I have 2 Special Edition variants also with hynix and they are really pain in the a** to set up.
I am running them with config 8+8:BAB,8+8:CAB and 1250/925 core and 2145/940 memory and hashrate is ~ 1015H/s
and this is memory strap that I use on them for 1750, 2000 and 2250
999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16

Nice, thanks for sharing, we were discussing this a little in the discord after the post here!

great, thx. Will try it. as of now I was ablt to get to 890 max

well it worked. now hashing at 955. Guess I will stop here

thanks

[RuMiner]

That is rather odd and should definitely not be happening.

I've read log files in detail and found relation:
after one or more GPUs stops giving shares, "total table" stops appearing further. In below example GPU3 and GPU4 are lost, so the blue table is not shown anymore, but rig continues hashing without two GPUs until manual restart. I'm sure you can catch totals disappearing in code and react as GPU watchdog shoud. I could write external tool for log monitoring, but it's a hack.

[2019-08-27 23:10:00] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU4) (a:47526 r:853) (139 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:03] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47527 r:853) (133 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:09] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47528 r:853) (151 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] Stats Uptime: 4 days, 05:59:51
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 0 [59C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.940kh/s a:5937 r:116 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 1 [60C, fan 15%] cnr: 2.038kh/s, avg 2.036kh/s, pool 1.949kh/s a:5964 r:98 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 2 [59C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.040kh/s, avg 2.039kh/s, pool 1.945kh/s a:5950 r:95 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 3 [59C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.022kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.940kh/s a:5937 r:123 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 4 [58C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.039kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.954kh/s a:5980 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 5 [60C, fan 16%] cnr: 2.019kh/s, avg 2.033kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5975 r:114 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 6 [58C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.016kh/s, avg 2.035kh/s, pool 1.899kh/s a:5810 r:109 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] GPU 7 [59C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5975 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:10] Total                cnr: 16.25kh/s, avg 16.29kh/s, pool 15.53kh/s a:47528 r:853 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:14] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47529 r:853) (265 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:19] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47530 r:853) (201 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:26] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU3) (a:47531 r:853) (219 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:26] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU3) (a:47532 r:853) (127 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:29] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47533 r:853) (131 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] Stats Uptime: 4 days, 06:00:21
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 0 [59C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.940kh/s a:5938 r:116 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 1 [60C, fan 15%] cnr: 2.039kh/s, avg 2.036kh/s, pool 1.949kh/s a:5964 r:98 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 2 [60C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.040kh/s, avg 2.039kh/s, pool 1.945kh/s a:5951 r:95 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 3 [59C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.026kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.941kh/s a:5939 r:123 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 4 [60C, fan 12%] cnr: 2.039kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.954kh/s a:5980 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 5 [59C, fan 16%] cnr: 2.020kh/s, avg 2.033kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5975 r:114 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 6 [61C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.015kh/s, avg 2.035kh/s, pool 1.899kh/s a:5810 r:109 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] GPU 7 [59C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5976 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:40] Total                cnr: 16.25kh/s, avg 16.29kh/s, pool 15.53kh/s a:47533 r:853 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:10:52] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU5) (a:47534 r:853) (134 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:10:57] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9111)
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] Stats Uptime: 4 days, 06:00:51
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 0 [59C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.940kh/s a:5938 r:116 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 1 [57C, fan 15%] cnr: 2.038kh/s, avg 2.036kh/s, pool 1.949kh/s a:5964 r:98 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 2 [59C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.040kh/s, avg 2.039kh/s, pool 1.945kh/s a:5951 r:95 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 3 [59C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.024kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.941kh/s a:5939 r:123 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 4 [60C, fan 13%] cnr: 2.039kh/s, avg 2.037kh/s, pool 1.954kh/s a:5980 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 5 [59C, fan 16%] cnr: 2.021kh/s, avg 2.033kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5976 r:114 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 6 [61C, fan 14%] cnr: 2.016kh/s, avg 2.035kh/s, pool 1.899kh/s a:5810 r:109 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] GPU 7 [59C, fan 15%] cnr: 2.036kh/s, avg 2.034kh/s, pool 1.953kh/s a:5976 r:99 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:10] Total                cnr: 16.25kh/s, avg 16.29kh/s, pool 15.53kh/s a:47534 r:853 hw:0
[2019-08-27 23:11:13] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU5) (a:47535 r:853) (178 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:14] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47536 r:853) (194 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:16] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47537 r:853) (139 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:19] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU5) (a:47538 r:853) (127 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:40] Stats Uptime: 4 days, 06:01:21
[2019-08-27 23:11:41] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47539 r:853) (132 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:44] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47540 r:853) (214 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:44] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47541 r:853) (174 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:49] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47542 r:853) (155 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:11:57] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9112)
[2019-08-27 23:12:03] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47543 r:853) (168 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:11] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47544 r:853) (203 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:19] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47545 r:853) (150 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:25] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47546 r:853) (179 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:25] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47547 r:853) (222 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:56] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47548 r:853) (167 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:12:57] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9113)
[2019-08-27 23:13:26] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47549 r:853) (149 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:13:38] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47550 r:853) (180 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:13:45] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47551 r:853) (136 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:13:57] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9114)
[2019-08-27 23:14:01] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47552 r:853) (169 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:02] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47553 r:853) (129 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:06] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU7) (a:47554 r:853) (127 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:12] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47555 r:853) (180 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:19] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47556 r:853) (128 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:20] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47557 r:853) (168 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:25] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47558 r:853) (146 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:29] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU5) (a:47559 r:853) (151 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:32] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47560 r:853) (155 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:49] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47561 r:853) (128 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:53] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47562 r:853) (188 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:56] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47563 r:853) (142 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:58] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9115)
[2019-08-27 23:15:11] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47564 r:853) (158 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:15:23] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9116)
[2019-08-27 23:15:46] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47565 r:853) (135 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:15:47] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47566 r:853) (159 ms)

[livada]

That is rather odd and should definitely not be happening.

I've read log files in detail and found relation:
after one or more GPUs stops giving shares, "total table" stops appearing further. In below example GPU3 and GPU4 are lost, so the blue table is not shown anymore, but rig continues hashing without two GPUs until manual restart. I'm sure you can catch totals disappearing in code and react as GPU watchdog shoud. I could write external tool for log monitoring, but it's a hack.

[2019-08-27 23:14:49] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU1) (a:47561 r:853) (128 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:53] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47562 r:853) (188 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:56] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU2) (a:47563 r:853) (142 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:14:58] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9115)
[2019-08-27 23:15:11] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47564 r:853) (158 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:15:23] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org received new job. (job_id: 9116)
[2019-08-27 23:15:46] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU6) (a:47565 r:853) (135 ms)
[2019-08-27 23:15:47] Pool xmr-eu1.nanopool.org share accepted. (GPU0) (a:47566 r:853) (159 ms)

[/quote]

the same problem occurs on saber(TUBE) algo ...  

[vmozara]

How is TRM now for heavy, tube or haven algo? I was thinking to stop mining cryptonight R and maybe give some relax to the sytem with heavy algos. I did back out my system a bit for efficiency, and now I average about 2000h/s per vega, i think i use 1100/1000 core and mem (to be honest, since i run MMPOS i don't even know, i didn't touch any machine for 2 months already). What could i expect from heavy algos?

[heavyarms1912]

How is TRM now for heavy, tube or haven algo? I was thinking to stop mining cryptonight R and maybe give some relax to the sytem with heavy algos. I did back out my system a bit for efficiency, and now I average about 2000h/s per vega, i think i use 1100/1000 core and mem (to be honest, since i run MMPOS i don't even know, i didn't touch any machine for 2 months already). What could i expect from heavy algos?

1800+ iirc.

[reaper7881]

 amd drivers  19.9.1 have sorted Navi mining issues
54mhs on Eth at 105w

[lncm]

amd drivers  19.9.1 have sorted Navi mining issues
54mhs on Eth at 105w

And how about XMR hashrate?

[valjean]

And how about RVN hashrate ?

[pepe000]

I get error when starting TRM on cnr algo
- Failed to initialize device idx 5 (-31)

[reaper7881]

Dunno not got one yet

[kerney666]

I get error when starting TRM on cnr algo
- Failed to initialize device idx 5 (-31)

Well, I can't say you overdid it providing details about your setup  .

The error is a buffer allocation error, so I'm guessing you're running win10 and have too little swap available to support >= 6 cards? If so, is it possible to increase it to at least >= 48GB?

Another wild guess is that your 6th is a smaller gpu, but you have specified a cn_config that tries to allocate more scratchpads than the gpu can support.

[pepe000]

I get error when starting TRM on cnr algo
- Failed to initialize device idx 5 (-31)

Well, I can't say you overdid it providing details about your setup  .

The error is a buffer allocation error, so I'm guessing you're running win10 and have too little swap available to support >= 6 cards? If so, is it possible to increase it to at least >= 48GB?

Another wild guess is that your 6th is a smaller gpu, but you have specified a cn_config that tries to allocate more scratchpads than the gpu can support.

48GB did the job, but i am getting around 800 h/s on each rx 570 x 6 (1250/2100mhz)

[ku4eto]

I get error when starting TRM on cnr algo
- Failed to initialize device idx 5 (-31)

Well, I can't say you overdid it providing details about your setup  .

The error is a buffer allocation error, so I'm guessing you're running win10 and have too little swap available to support >= 6 cards? If so, is it possible to increase it to at least >= 48GB?

Another wild guess is that your 6th is a smaller gpu, but you have specified a cn_config that tries to allocate more scratchpads than the gpu can support.

48GB did the job, but i am getting around 800 h/s on each rx 570 x 6 (1250/2100mhz)

You know, Ethash timings are not the same as CN timings.

[pepe000]

I get error when starting TRM on cnr algo
- Failed to initialize device idx 5 (-31)

Well, I can't say you overdid it providing details about your setup  .

The error is a buffer allocation error, so I'm guessing you're running win10 and have too little swap available to support >= 6 cards? If so, is it possible to increase it to at least >= 48GB?

Another wild guess is that your 6th is a smaller gpu, but you have specified a cn_config that tries to allocate more scratchpads than the gpu can support.

48GB did the job, but i am getting around 800 h/s on each rx 570 x 6 (1250/2100mhz)

You know, Ethash timings are not the same as CN timings.

I know, i have timings as recommended from TRM for rx570 8gb