There were other topics opened, discussing the same problem.
This is your post:
We, a team of Litecoin supporters and developers, are not satisfied with the current development of LTC.
You are a liar. You are A team of (?) .
Team of Litecoin developers and supporters already gave us their point of view on ASICs and hardfork, well thought through and well argumented. Anyone can and should read it here:
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=18166.0 This way we like to keep it decentralized, so no large ASIC manufacturers like KnCMiner, Gridseed or Alpha-T can takeover the network when Scrypt ASICS come widely available.
To lower the footprint of LTC and retain GPU mineability, the algorithm of our choice is X11.
We would like to hear from the Litecoin community if other changes, like to the difficulty algorithm, are preferred too.
And this are your "arguments".
Noone knows who you are, what is your background, your true intentions, your programming knowledge, basicly nothing. How you, a team of supporters and developers, intend to support LTC in the future and are u up to the task (we know current DEV team is as they proved themselfs )? You may as well be random guy who never vrote one line of code in his life.
And funny thing is, there are still idiots out there willing to support you, despite all of that. I would say good reflections of what kind of people stand behind you.And do votes really reflect LTC (and by LTC i dont mean GPU) community opinion?
I think for majority of community its no brainer (those that are not braindead) who to support, you or current dev team.
I smell retard.